 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Car Forum / Honda Cars / January 2007Honda Pilot's VTM-4 4WD System on Ice
On Sunday, my sister-in-law was driving her 4WD Pilot up an icy road in Yosemite. The vehicle skidded on ice, did a 360 degree, and she ended up stuck slightly off the side of the road, but with no damage. Three wheels had no traction, and the 4WD system dutifully delivered all the power to the wheels that had no traction, while the wheel with traction got no power. She didn't know how to manually engage the 4WD, since it doesn't work in (D)rive. Some people came and pushed her out and everything was okay, but it seems like the 4WD system should be delivering power to the wheels that have traction, like a limited slip differential on a normal 4WD truck would do, rather than spinning the wheels that have no traction. Meanwhile, I went up the same road in my Toyota 4Runner, and had the traction control system engage when I began to slip on the ice, but I didn't skid. I was thinking of getting a Pilot as the 4Runner is too truck-like for me, and is uncomfortable for rear seat passengers. But if the 4WD system is not up to par then I may pass. You should do a little research on things like: 4WD compared to AWD, full time AWD vs part time AWD, AWD vehicles that have a locking center differential(or clutch pack) and those that don't, AWD vehicles whose AWD shuts off over 25 mph, etc. There are quite a few variations between car brands and sometimes between model lines within the same brand. Unless you are going to look at expensive brands like Audi or BMW you may not be happy with the AWD found on "lesser" brands. Ken > On Sunday, my sister-in-law was driving her 4WD Pilot up an icy road in > Yosemite. The vehicle skidded on ice, did a 360 degree, and she ended up [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > truck-like for me, and is uncomfortable for rear seat passengers. But if > the 4WD system is not up to par then I may pass. > You should do a little research on things like: 4WD compared to AWD, According to the literature on the Honda 4WD system, it should be delivering power to the wheels with traction when it detects slippage. It works fine as long as you never encounter the situation where both wheels on either side lose traction, because it only appears to shift power between front and rear, but not between sides. It will engage both rear wheels simultaneously, but if one rear wheel has no traction, all the power goes to the wheel without traction. Similarly, the front wheel drive does not have any sort of LSD, so all the power goes to the wheel with no traction as well. On some traction control systems, the wheel with no traction will have the brake automatically applied by the ABS system, so the wheel with traction will be driven. This is cheaper than an LSD or locker. It seems as if this would be an inexpensive way to correct the VTM-4 limitations. Yes--all correct info. I believe the Honda system shuts off above about 25 mph, which is fine for low speed traction in snow etc. More sophisticated systems operate at higher speeds, and as you seem to understand, will transfer from side to side as well as front to back. My take on this is that the Honda system is probably OK for many low speed low traction situations, but if you need(or want) more, you need to look at other vehicles. I'm going to be thinking about a new (probably crossover) SUV at the end of 2007 if I can find what I like. Besides our Accord(which we will keep) I would like something with at least the capability of my Mercury Mountaneer, which while not a great vehicle by any means has a considerably more capable drive system than the Pilot, in my opinion. >> You should do a little research on things like: 4WD compared to AWD, > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > traction will be driven. This is cheaper than an LSD or locker. It seems > as if this would be an inexpensive way to correct the VTM-4 limitations. > Yes--all correct info. I believe the Honda system shuts off above about > 25 mph, which is fine for low speed traction in snow etc. More [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > any means has a considerably more capable drive system than the Pilot, > in my opinion. It's too bad, because the Pilot is a great vehicle in most respects. I've driven my sister-in-laws, and it's a much better on-road vehicle than my Toyota 4-Runner. But it's very common, at least in the Sierra's, to have icy roads where the ice is in patches on one side of the lane but not the other. They don't use salt, so ice is a constant problem in the winter. The plows try to scrape it, but they don't do a great job. The road where the Pilot did the 360 is in Yosemite, and it's one of the only two roads where I've ever seen chains required for all vehicles, though the chain control wasn't in effect for 4WD vehicles at the time. They often have a ranger at the bottom of the hill turning away vehicles that aren't carrying chains, including 4WD/AWD vehicles. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.