>These would be the venerable 1984 Civic CRX 1.3 liter, which did an EPA
>rated 51/67 MPG city/Hwy, or the 1984 Civic CRX 1.5 liter, which did
>52/57. (I think both were 5-speed manuals). Sad to see Honda touting
>~50 mpg Civic Hybrids more than 2 decades later........
Exactly. Its ridiculous. Why pay $25000 for a new hybrid when you could buy a
used CRX for 2500 or less. And of course they should be way farther ahead than
they are now.
>> I am trying to find out which year and exactly the gas mileage of the CRX that
>> got the great 60? mpg mileage in the middle 80s. Also a place to get mileage
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> --
>> To reply, remove _
Grumpy AuContraire - 22 Jan 2007 01:02 GMT
>>These would be the venerable 1984 Civic CRX 1.3 liter, which did an EPA
>>rated 51/67 MPG city/Hwy, or the 1984 Civic CRX 1.5 liter, which did
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> used CRX for 2500 or less. And of course they should be way farther ahead than
> they are now.
...and before that there was the Honda Civic FE in 1982 and '83. I have
an '83 that averages 45 mpg in mixed driving.
JT
Doug B - 22 Jan 2007 17:25 GMT
How about Honda's first attempt at building a car for the US market:
the 1972 600 Sedan and Coupe? They claimed 54mpg highway, as I recall.
I owned one briefly in 1977. Zero to 60 in about five minutes. :))
xxx@xxx.xxx - 24 Jan 2007 09:19 GMT
>How about Honda's first attempt at building a car for the US market:
>the 1972 600 Sedan and Coupe? They claimed 54mpg highway, as I recall.
> I owned one briefly in 1977. Zero to 60 in about five minutes. :))
I have one of those. It gets about 35-40 mpg. You would think it would do
better than that. Also it has plenty of power for its size.