Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / June 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

timing belt change

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
newman - 12 May 2007 20:51 GMT
It looks like I may need a timing belt soon.  My 1999 4 cyl now has 105000,
which is what manual recommends for belt change.

I have been quoted about $760 for complete job; belt, water pump, seals.
This quote by non-Honda dealer.

Is this a reasonable quote for this job?  I live in Northern Texas.

Thanks
Paul - 13 May 2007 03:23 GMT
> It looks like I may need a timing belt soon.  My 1999 4 cyl now has
> 105000,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Thanks

In the past week I have been quoted $578 and $702 for this job on my 2000
Accord SE (4 cyl.). These quotes are from two independent shops in Houston,
so I would say you're at least in the ballpark.

Paul
AnotherSquid - 15 May 2007 17:23 GMT
> I have been quoted about $760 for complete job; belt, water pump, seals.
> This quote by non-Honda dealer.

Hmm... $440 at HonToyCare, Boulder, Colorado. I just had mine replaced
on my '98 Civic EX. The price includes water pump, seals, etc. A
complete job.

Andy
swllz - 15 May 2007 19:30 GMT
Civic might be cheaper, because Civic does not have balance shaft.

>>I have been quoted about $760 for complete job; belt, water pump, seals.
>>This quote by non-Honda dealer.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Andy
Earle Horton - 15 May 2007 20:15 GMT
Imho, seals, tensioner and water pump are unnecessary the first time.  They
tell you to replace the water pump at the parts counter, because it is a
bear to get to unless the timing belt is off.  But if you're not paying for
labor it isn't so hard on the wallet.  If you've always used Honda Genuine
Coolant and been somewhat conscientious about replacing it, your water pump
is likely good as new.

Earle

> Civic might be cheaper, because Civic does not have balance shaft.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> >
> > Andy
Joe LaVigne - 15 May 2007 20:24 GMT
> Imho, seals, tensioner and water pump are unnecessary the first time.
> They tell you to replace the water pump at the parts counter, because it
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Coolant and been somewhat conscientious about replacing it, your water
> pump is likely good as new.

Sure, but for the price of a water pump, it is worth the peace of mind, IMO.

A water pump is not very expensive...
Earle Horton - 15 May 2007 21:09 GMT
> > Imho, seals, tensioner and water pump are unnecessary the first time.
> > They tell you to replace the water pump at the parts counter, because it
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> A water pump is not very expensive...

True, but lots of people who work on their own cars do so for financial
reasons, and I really don't like throwing a water pump, that looks and feels
just like a new one, in the trash.

Earle
Private Private - 18 May 2007 06:46 GMT
105000!!!!!! Holy crap I wouldve changed the belt at 60-70k .
Joe LaVigne - 18 May 2007 14:08 GMT
> 105000!!!!!! Holy crap I wouldve changed the belt at 60-70k .

And you'd have been wasting your money.  They are good to at least 105k.
Honda under-estimates it to make sure their reputation stays stellar.

Of course, driving a shitty Dodge, you'd be wise to change it early...
alfred - 30 May 2007 03:01 GMT
I had my 2005 Accord Serpentine belt changed at 30k miles, but a timing belt
should go alot longer than 60k i would hope!

>> 105000!!!!!! Holy crap I wouldve changed the belt at 60-70k .
>
> And you'd have been wasting your money.  They are good to at least 105k.
> Honda under-estimates it to make sure their reputation stays stellar.
>
> Of course, driving a shitty Dodge, you'd be wise to change it early...
High Tech Misfit - 30 May 2007 03:13 GMT
> I had my 2005 Accord Serpentine belt changed at 30k miles, but a timing belt
> should go alot longer than 60k i would hope!

If your Accord is a 4-cylinder, it uses a timing chain that typically has no
replacement interval.  If you have a V6, that uses a belt and the interval
is likely somewhere in the vicinity of 7 years or 100,000 miles, whichever
comes first.
Private Private - 02 Jun 2007 07:40 GMT
My car is a 1993 del sol and i changed the timing belt 6 months ago. I
thought timing belts have an age limit too?? Am I wrong?  I mean would
you trust a 14 year old timing belt?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.