Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

No early first oil change

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Eye In The Sky - 15 May 2007 12:23 GMT
I've got a  new Accord and my custom when buying a new car has always been
to change the oil at about 1000 miles. No doubt that's a hold over from the
bad old days when you had to get the metal chips and debris deposited during
the sloppy engine manufacturing process out of there. Unnecessary today I'm
sure with improved manufacturing-- but I was going to do it nonetheless.

But the owner's manual specifically says not to change the oil early the
first time. Why is that? Is there some kind of special "break in" oil in
there?
Joe LaVigne - 15 May 2007 12:45 GMT
> I've got a  new Accord and my custom when buying a new car has always been
> to change the oil at about 1000 miles. No doubt that's a hold over from
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> first time. Why is that? Is there some kind of special "break in" oil in
> there?

You got it!

AAMOF, you only need to change the oil when the car tells you it is time.
When the Maintenance Monitor light comes on, get the oil changed, and reset
the light.
Tegger - 15 May 2007 23:43 GMT
> I've got a  new Accord and my custom when buying a new car has always
> been to change the oil at about 1000 miles. No doubt that's a hold
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> the first time. Why is that? Is there some kind of special "break in"
> oil in there?

There certainly is. Honda explicitly says so in the Aug'06 issue of Honda
Service News.

An excerpt:
"What’s really important to remember here is this:
Don’t change the factory-fill engine oil because it
looks dark; just make sure it’s at the right fluid
level. To ensure proper engine break-in, the
factory-fill engine oil needs to remain in the
engine until the first scheduled maintenance
interval."

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

ecarecar - 16 May 2007 00:41 GMT
>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
>  

Is this the Magic Mystery Break-In oil thing again?

Just what is in this magic oil?
Tegger - 16 May 2007 01:51 GMT
>>>But the owner's manual specifically says not to change the oil early
>>>the first time. Why is that? Is there some kind of special "break in"
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Just what is in this magic oil?

I do not know. However, I did read once that break-in oil is low in
dispersants.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

ACAR - 16 May 2007 11:55 GMT
> >>>But the owner's manual specifically says not to change the oil early
> >>>the first time. Why is that? Is there some kind of special "break in"
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQwww.tegger.com/hondafaq/

www.bobistheoilguy.com has some oil analysis from Honda factory fills.

the magic is apparently molybdenum

Honda dealers typically push "early" oil changes so its doubtful that
any harm will be done unless synthetic oil is used prior to the engine
fully wearing-in. Then there's the whole "severe" vs "normal" interval
thing, a first oil change at 3500 miles is apparently OK under the
severe schedule for the V6 but 10K is OK under the normal schedule for
the I4. I'm not buying this.

So far, I've yet to hear any solid reason to substantiate Honda's
factory fill instructions other than to prevent owners from switching
to synthetic too soon. The "normal" service interval for my I4 is 10K
miles; I wasn't about to follow that bad advice (see "Bob" for some
10K oil analysis data). I changed the oil at 3500 mile intervals for
the first 4 oil changes then switched to synthetic. So far (about 70K
miles) so good.

YMMV
Charlie Allnut - 16 May 2007 13:04 GMT
> `

<snip>

> So far, I've yet to hear any solid reason to substantiate Honda's
> factory fill instructions other than to prevent owners from switching
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the first 4 oil changes then switched to synthetic. So far (about 70K
> miles) so good.

What's the problem with using synthetics in low mileage vehicles?

Charlie
Tegger - 16 May 2007 13:20 GMT
>> `
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> What's the problem with using synthetics in low mileage vehicles?

Not a thing. After the initial oil change.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Tegger - 16 May 2007 13:20 GMT
>> >>>But the owner's manual specifically says not to change the oil
>> >>>early the first time. Why is that? Is there some kind of special
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> the magic is apparently molybdenum

According to Honda, the molybdenum that they see comes from the assembly
lube used when the engine is made. The oil does not originally come with
it.

> So far, I've yet to hear any solid reason to substantiate Honda's
> factory fill instructions

And you're an engineer? Neither am I.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Earle Horton - 16 May 2007 16:04 GMT
> >> >>>But the owner's manual specifically says not to change the oil
> >> >>>early the first time. Why is that? Is there some kind of special
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> And you're an engineer? Neither am I.

I'm a software design engineer, retired.  You can safely come to me for
advice on all engineering related topics.

Saludos,

Earle
Elle - 16 May 2007 17:43 GMT
> "Tegger" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote
>> And you're an engineer? Neither am I.
>>
> I'm a software design engineer, retired.  You can safely
> come to me for
> advice on all engineering related topics.

Do you really feel that software design "engineer" denotes
education, training, and experience equivalent to
mechanical, electrical, chemical, and civil engineers?

Just curious. I do not think one need be a bona fide
engineer to have intelligent discussions on technical topics
here or elsewhere. Though one best have some serious
experience on whatever tech topic is at hand or be studying
on it.
jmattis@attglobal.net - 16 May 2007 20:32 GMT
On May 16, 11:43 am, "Elle" <honda.lion...@nospam.earthlink.net>
wrote:

> >> And you're an engineer? Neither am I.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> experience on whatever tech topic is at hand or be studying
> on it.

i think Earle was making a funny.  Or baiting you.  Not sure which.
Earle Horton - 17 May 2007 02:19 GMT
> On May 16, 11:43 am, "Elle" <honda.lion...@nospam.earthlink.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> i think Earle was making a funny.  Or baiting you.  Not sure which.

I think Elle was reverse baiting me.  Things can get real subtle in here.
Elle has a good point, but the engineers who designed whatever, and the
technical documentation people who wrung the information out of them,
probably know a little more than the mechanic on the corner, or the odd
Usenet poster.

Saludos,

Earle
Private Private - 17 May 2007 04:09 GMT
Here's an interesting link . http://www.nordicgroup.us/oil.htm
Elle - 17 May 2007 07:46 GMT
> <jmattis@attglobal.net> wrote
>> On May 16, 11:43 am, "Elle"
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>>
> I think Elle was reverse baiting me.

Some software "engineers" (maybe not you) really do fancy
themselves on a par with degreed and experienced mechanical
etc. engineers.

Each group (software technicians and mechanical etc.
engineers) make their contribution, and they cannot do each
others' jobs, AFAIC. But lumping them together is
misleading.

Not that this will stop software developers from calling
themselves "engineers."

> Things can get real subtle in here.
> Elle has a good point, but the engineers who designed
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> corner, or the odd
> Usenet poster.

I did not know we were talking about the engineers who
actually designed Honda systems. (They overwhelmingly
modify, by the way. That's design but it's rare that an
automotive engineer actually innovates anything one would
call altogether new.)

I would put my money on many experienced technicians'
(including many amateurs') understanding of a Honda system
before betting on a picked-at-random mechanical engineer.

The really good, bona fide engineers admit what they do not
know and that of course a technician often will have more
expertise in certain areas than s/he. Same for the really
good technicians.

IMO.
Tegger - 17 May 2007 11:30 GMT
"Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in news:5xG2i.7248
$296.6183@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net:

>> "Tegger" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote
>>> And you're an engineer? Neither am I.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> engineer to have intelligent discussions on technical topics
> here or elsewhere.

True, but my point (obiquely stated) was that Honda mechanical and chemical
engineers came up with the directive to not perform the initial oil change
too soon. For us non-engineers to disregard that edict is foolish, since we
cannot possibly know more than Honda does.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

TomP - 19 May 2007 15:56 GMT
> "Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in news:5xG2i.7248
> $296.6183@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net:
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
> www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Tegger knows this but for the othere here:

   Earle and earle-like customers are the bane of the dealer service
departments.  They always have a strong opinion, and are often misinformed, and
are typically SoB's to deal with.

   What they don't realize is Techincians have their own version of "spitting
in the food"; so Earle and earle-like agitators, make trouble for the dealer,
then try to guess where the "spit" ;-) is....

--
Tp,

-------- __o
-----   -\<.    --------  __o
---  (  )/ (  )    ----  -\<.
--------------------  (  )/ (  )
-----------------------------------------

No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron...
Elle - 19 May 2007 21:39 GMT
>    Earle and earle-like customers are the bane of the
> dealer service
> departments.  They always have a strong opinion, and are
> often misinformed, and
> are typically SoB's to deal with.

And service departments never have strong opinions and are
never wrong?

Let's start with something simple, like the bullshit line
from the typical dealer that the engine oil has to be
changed every 3k miles.

Earle and I may not always agree, but Earle is one of many
contributors whose posts here I think are worth reading.
jim beam - 19 May 2007 22:25 GMT
>> "Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in news:5xG2i.7248
>> $296.6183@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net:
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> in the food"; so Earle and earle-like agitators, make trouble for the dealer,
> then try to guess where the "spit" ;-) is....

it cuts both ways dude.  misinformation in the motor service industry is
the rule, not the exception.  you may have been told something, and you
may even believe it, but it doesn't mean it's right.  every now and
then, you /will/ get a customer that knows more than you.  or who knows
someone else that knows.  when the monkeylube service manager is
bullshitting my grandmother about how her transmission fluid needs
changing urgently, she simply calls me on her cellphone and hands it to
him.  /i/ then politely tell him that i personally changed it last week
and that his inspection tech must have made a mistake and that i'll come
on over if there's any problem.  unsurprisingly, there is no problem and
she leaves without being ripped off, but will never return.  now, whose
food are you trying to spit in?  from where i sit, it looks like your own.

bottom line, you need to try being a little bit smart about figuring out
the customer.  if they know more than you, and you're not smart enough
to recognize that, and you go ahead and bullshit them anyway, you're
screwed.  did i ever tell you that i used to date a lawyer whose first
degree was in engineering?  there's a number of vehicle service centers
in san francisco that very much regret the day they tried messing with
her.  grow up and get smart, before you get sore.
Earle Horton - 20 May 2007 15:12 GMT
> >> "Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in news:5xG2i.7248
> >> $296.6183@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net:
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> > departments.  They always have a strong opinion, and are often
> > misinformed, and are typically SoB's to deal with.

It is real easy to become "misinformed" reading the service recommendations
in the owner's manual, eh?

> >     What they don't realize is Techincians have their own version of
> > "spitting
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> it cuts both ways dude.  misinformation in the motor service industry is
> the rule, not the exception.  you may have been told something, and you

I don't want to get personal here but I have been an auto service technician
and many, not all, only do that job because they don't have the ambition or
the ability to become something more profitable like a nurse's aide or
hairdresser.  Heh, or like Tom says, a lawyer.

Saludos,

Earle

> may even believe it, but it doesn't mean it's right.  every now and
> then, you /will/ get a customer that knows more than you.  or who knows
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> in san francisco that very much regret the day they tried messing with
> her.  grow up and get smart, before you get sore.
jim beam - 16 May 2007 13:54 GMT
>>>>> But the owner's manual specifically says not to change the oil early
>>>>> the first time. Why is that? Is there some kind of special "break in"
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> YMMV

bitog only has the results of spark spectroscopy - that tells you
/nothing/ about the organic content of the oil whatsoever.  it's
therefore has very limited usefulness and there's no way most of their
conclusions can be drawn.
TomP - 19 May 2007 15:56 GMT
> > Is this the Magic Mystery Break-In oil thing again?
> >
> > Just what is in this magic oil?
>
> I do not know. However, I did read once that break-in oil is low in
> dispersants.

   Honda factory fill oil is special only in that it is rich with
Molybdenum disulfide ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molybdenum_disulphide )
assembly lubricants.  Moly, as it's know to mechanics, help the rotating,
reciprocating engine components marry into their mating parts completely.

   Yes, Honda factory fill oil should be left in until the oil life
indicator gets 10% or one year, which ever comes first.

   Engine manufacturers go to great lengths to remove ALL machining debris,
before assembling an engine.

--
Tp,

-------- __o
-----   -\<.    --------  __o
---  (  )/ (  )    ----  -\<.
--------------------  (  )/ (  )
-----------------------------------------

No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron...
Tegger - 19 May 2007 18:37 GMT
>> > Is this the Magic Mystery Break-In oil thing again?
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>     Honda factory fill oil is special only in that it is rich with
> Molybdenum disulfide

Apparently not. Honda has stated that the molybdenum evident in the factory
fill comes from engine assembly lube. That stuff IS heavy on moly.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

TomP - 26 May 2007 14:50 GMT
You snipped the last part of the sentence..."assembly lubricants."

I could have said that better...  like "from assembly lubricants."

> >> > Is this the Magic Mystery Break-In oil thing again?
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
> www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

--
Tp,

-------- __o
-----   -\<.    --------  __o
---  (  )/ (  )    ----  -\<.
--------------------  (  )/ (  )
-----------------------------------------

No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron...
jim beam - 20 May 2007 15:47 GMT
>>> Is this the Magic Mystery Break-In oil thing again?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> assembly lubricants.  Moly, as it's know to mechanics, help the rotating,
> reciprocating engine components marry into their mating parts completely.

i think that statement needs some qualification: many would consider
"marrying" to be a process like grinding in a valve with abrasive so it
seats properly.  that's something MoS2 /doesn't/ do.  how it works is
that, when used in assembly, it provides solid state lubrication until
oil is flowing properly.  with a newly assembled engine, that's critical
since there are surface anomalies [call them microscopic "high points"]
in all the newly machined parts and metal-to-metal contact between them
would cause localized welding, galling, and rapid wear.  MoS2 simply
allows these parts to slide and deform their way into conformity, or to
a more substantial degree anyway.  after it's allowed the first few
non-damaging revolutions of the engine, its job is done.

>     Yes, Honda factory fill oil should be left in until the oil life
> indicator gets 10% or one year, which ever comes first.
>
>     Engine manufacturers go to great lengths to remove ALL machining debris,
> before assembling an engine.

indeed - this is absolutely /critical/ to engine longevity.  it's
typically the major differentiator in wear life between new and
remanufactured engines.  there's no real reason why a remanufactured
engine can't last just as long as the original build, but they rarely
last 30% as long.  reason is hygiene after machining.  microscopic grit
particles left in things like cylinder bores after re-honing get lodged
and then abrade.  a wipe with an oily rag so "that looks clean enough"
just doesn't work.
Art - 20 May 2007 10:58 GMT
Suppose the new car was sitting on the lot for 6 months before being sold.
During such time it picked up a couple hundred miles for test drives.  How
long to wait for an oil change in that case?

>> I've got a  new Accord and my custom when buying a new car has always
>> been to change the oil at about 1000 miles. No doubt that's a hold
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> engine until the first scheduled maintenance
> interval."
Charlie Allnut - 20 May 2007 12:26 GMT
> Suppose the new car was sitting on the lot for 6 months before being sold.
> During such time it picked up a couple hundred miles for test drives.  How
> long to wait for an oil change in that case?

I would avoid buying that particular car. It's had too much abuse. Test
drivers do hard acceleration, stops-- etc., etc.

The ones I buy have 5 miles or less on them. My a.s is the first non-Honda
or dealer to sit in that seat.
Tegger - 20 May 2007 13:09 GMT
> Suppose the new car was sitting on the lot for 6 months before being
> sold. During such time it picked up a couple hundred miles for test
> drives.  How long to wait for an oil change in that case?

Whatever it says in the time/mileage chart. Or whatever the Mileage Minder
says.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

TomP - 26 May 2007 15:02 GMT
> Suppose the new car was sitting on the lot for 6 months before being sold.
> During such time it picked up a couple hundred miles for test drives.  How
> long to wait for an oil change in that case?

I would still adhere to the manufacturer's recommendation of one year or <10%
oil life.
The point of having a "time limit" takes into consideration short trip driving
and lot rot.

However, you do raise a good point, 200 miles accumulated 2 or 3 miles at a
time is not good for any car at any time in its life.

--
Tp,

-------- __o
-----   -\<.    --------  __o
---  (  )/ (  )    ----  -\<.
--------------------  (  )/ (  )
-----------------------------------------

No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.