> when I buy a Car I do not buy it because of the nice face of the
> person that it selling it to me.
> I expect the distributor to give me good customer support and also
> Honda (the one that makes the car) shoul be responsable for it.
>
> My car was made in the US to be commercialized in Uruguay.
So the car was manufactured in the US. It might as well have been
manufactured in Toronto, or in Japan somewhere.
Where it was manufactured has nothing to do with who supports it. It is
manufactured by Honda, then sold to and distributed by the local Honda
organization.
For example, I owned a 92 Civic Si. Built in Toronto, Canada. Built
specifically for the US market, with a US VIN. Sold to me by a dealer,
who acquired it from American Honda Motor Manufacturing, Inc. American
Honda Motor Manufacturing is the manufacturer of record, and they hold
responsibility for warranting the car to be free from manufacturer
defects for 36 months/36,000 miles.
The Canadian distributing arm does NOT hold that responsibility, even
though the car was manufactured in Canada.
> If they accept Honda Uruguay to sell their cars they are asumming
> responsability for that.
no, Honda Uruguay is assuming all responsibility as the manufacturer of
record.
What if my 92 Civic Si were built in Uruguay specifically to be sold in
the US? Would I then go to Honda Uruguay and demand that they take care
of me? No. That would be silly. Honda Uruguay has nothing to do with
me. American Honda has total responsibility.
That's the structure Honda has set up. Accept it, deal with it, and
move on with your life.
> Honda Uruguay told me that they need acceptance from Honda America.
> And Honda America says that this is Honda Uruguay's problem.
Honda Uruguay is trying to blow you off. Take it up with them.
The parent corporation, Honda in Japan, set up the structure whereby
Honda Uruguay as the distributor of record takes all responsibility for
the car.