I'm embarking on a valve adjustment for my '95 civic DX. I'm not
noticing anything that would lead me to believe a valve problem, it's
just way overdue for a valve check. I've never done this before,
however, and I just wanted to make sure I'm doing this right. I've
memorized the Chilton and Haynes manuals, and now I wanted to see what
y'all thought.
Should I replace the cylinder head gasket no matter what? or only if
it looks bad. Do I need to clean the mating surfaces if I'm reusing
the same gasket? The Haynes manual tells me to use RTV sealant on the
points where the rocker arm assembly touches the cover-- why? what is
this stuff? do I need to if I'm not replacing the gasket? does the
gasket itself need any sealant? any other things i should be aware
of?
thanks for any help!
-mr. speck
Sean Dinh - 22 Oct 2003 10:56 GMT
Valve cover gasket is reusable. It need to be replaced when it dried up
and let oil seep through. RTV is like silicon caulk. I don't use it. You
may need to use it if your valve cover is no good. I don't ever use it.
> I'm embarking on a valve adjustment for my '95 civic DX. I'm not
> noticing anything that would lead me to believe a valve problem, it's
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> thanks for any help!
> -mr. speck
'Curly Q. Links' - 23 Oct 2003 02:24 GMT
> Valve cover gasket is reusable. It need to be replaced when it dried up
> and let oil seep through. RTV is like silicon caulk. I don't use it. You
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> > thanks for any help!
> > -mr. speck
-------------------------
Sean,
Valve adjustment (or at LEAST inspection) is vital to your engines
long-term survival. Tip: The engine will let you turn it over by hand,
easier, if you leave the plugs out while doing the adjustments.
If in doubt, go with the looser clearance, since this is your first try.
If it's too noisy, you can do it again later when you feel bolder.
'Curly'
------------------------
E. Meyer - 22 Oct 2003 21:50 GMT
On 10/22/03 3:10 AM, in article
dbafbce1.0310220010.3cf1981c@posting.google.com, "Mr. Speck"
<garbage@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> I'm embarking on a valve adjustment for my '95 civic DX. I'm not
> noticing anything that would lead me to believe a valve problem, it's
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Should I replace the cylinder head gasket no matter what? or only if
> it looks bad.
You mean valve cover gasket? You don't go anywhere near the head gasket
when you adjust the valves.
If it is still round and reasonably supple you can re-use it. If it is
flattened and/or hard, replace it. If your engine is one of the ones where
the spark plug holes go though the valve cover, don't forget the rubber
rings around the holes or it will pour oil into the spark plug holes.
> Do I need to clean the mating surfaces if I'm reusing
> the same gasket?
Yes. Always clean all mating surfaces. There will be old RTV in the
corners that has to be cleaned off and replaced.
> The Haynes manual tells me to use RTV sealant on the
> points where the rocker arm assembly touches the cover-- why? what is
> this stuff? do I need to if I'm not replacing the gasket?
Those sharp corners can leak otherwise. You should do it whether new gasket
or not.
> does the
> gasket itself need any sealant?
No.
> any other things i should be aware
> of?
Be careful to torque the bolts correctly that hold the valve cover on. Too
loose and it leaks. To tight and it distorts (and then leaks).
You always adjust Honda valves first thing in the morning when the engine is
cold or they will be wrong.
> thanks for any help!
> -mr. speck
Jeff Tamblyn - 23 Oct 2003 00:57 GMT
If the car is running good and fuel economy is good, why bother the valves?
Tegger? - 23 Oct 2003 02:58 GMT
> If the car is running good and fuel economy is good, why bother the
> valves?
To prevent burning.

Signature
TeGGeR?
Spudston - 25 Oct 2003 05:24 GMT
<> Should I replace the cylinder head gasket no matter what? or only if
> it looks bad.
I always use a new valve cover gasket because I don't like oil leaking all
over my engine. If you're overdue for the valve adjustment your old one is
probably hardened and shouldn't be reused. They're cheap enough it's not
worth the hassle of replacing it later when it fails.
Spudston
Tony Lance - 10 Oct 2006 13:38 GMT
Big Bertha Thing sumation
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/sumation.html
Access Page for 78K Zip File
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including alt.politics
Count the number of polka-dots on an equilatteral triangle.
Ready to run Fortran 77 program software, using double
precision and extended precision versions. Complete
with source code in listing format and the original
extended precision subroutine source code.
Sumation N = N*N + N all over 2, where N=1,2,3,..N
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 2000
To comply with my copyright, please distribute
complete and free of charge.
Big Bertha Thing postings
Depleted uranium shells were once used at great cost,
in terms of Gulf War Syndrome.
At Agincourt the English long bow took a large toll,
due to the arrows being armour-piercing and re-useable.
The above shells were armour-piercing,
but can hardly be called re-useable
and should not have been used once.
Big Bertha Thing posting features;-
1. Ornate Engraving and Scrollwork.
2. Re-useable.
3. Armour-piercing.
4. Zero casualties.
5. Re-configurable.
6. Accurate.
7. Tactical.
8. Strategic.
9. Scientific.
10. Weighty.
11. Start of Thread.
12. Brand Name.
13. Banned on moderators conference.
14. Whole moderators thread deleted,
with the exception of tenure posting.
15. Tenure read only request withdrawn.
16. 2K Anecdote (Assault Rifle Bullet and detonator.) Day 23
17. 4K Preface (Anecdote and Attachment description.) Day 24
18. 50K Attachment
(Powder charge for shell with detonator.) Days 1 - 20
19. 600K Attachment
(powder charge for bomb with detonator.) Days 21, 22
20. 50K postings pair, with 12 on-topic and 6 off-topic.
Hydrogen bomb (2 shells with jacket of water; H2O) Days 25, 26
21. Odd configurations. (Landmine, boobytrap and armistice terms.)
22. Zip disc spanning.
(Manual operation encryption technique.) Day 21, 22
23. Potential CD-Rom triology.
24. Astrophysics web-ring web site.
25. PI web-ring web site with software.
26. Web publisher for unpublished scientific works,
including fringe.
27. Particle periodic table research project with results
and software.
28. First Aid Tent for Spam Attack Victim Support Group.
29. Sesame Street beat Darth Vader twice.
(1st and 2nd Battles of Cyberspace.)
30. To the victor the spoils; a web site built on them.
(level 2 HTML)
31. Politics makes poor science.
Tony Lance
tonylance@uku.co.uk
Big Bertha Thing Probe-B
In the Sunday Telegraph of 11th April 2004, the QED section, gave the story of
the Gravity Probe-B satellite launch. This is expected to prove the existence of
a new force of nature, proposed by Einstein.
Free Press Pack Download (11MB PDF)
http://www.gravityprobeb.com/gpb_presskit.pdf
There are one or two problems with this:-
1. Einstein never proposed this new force of nature. (Funding canard)
2. It is a magnetic force directly proportional to angular momentum. (Memomagnetism)
3. It is weak at Newtonian speeds and strong at near light speeds.
4. The big three in gyroscopes are Einstein, Professor Francis Everitt of
Stanford University and Harold Crabtree M.A.
5. One wrote the definitive book on the subject and the other two read it.
6. The relevant extract from the book is given below. (Spider published 4th March 1998)
7. They do not credit the costermonger, with the definitive experiment,
which proves the existence of the new force of nature.
8. They do not accept that the novelty item was a valid experiment.
9. They believe that the spider wheel was magnetized.
10. The costermonger did not magnetize the spider wheel, he exploited a force of nature.
11. The costermonger discovered, applied and sold the first working application.
12. There is an eye-witness account from 1850 by the author, which kindled his
life-long interest.
13. The description was published in 1909, in the same book.
14. The force of nature has been missing for 150 years, since its discovery.
15. The first modern publication on the subject is spider, on 4th March 1998. (Usenet)
16. Attribution and due credit are two of the failings of modern science.
Big Bertha Thing spider
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/spider.html
Access page JPG 11K Image
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including uk.rec.cycling
Drawing of a clockwork spider wheel and hairpin.
Extract from Introductory Chapter;-
The "Spider tops," which are frequently sold in the streets of London,
consist of a heavy little disc mounted on a spindle (Fig. XIV.).
When the disc has been set spinning a small curved piece of
metal is placed to touch the toe, and at once begins to slide round it,
first the side (a) in the figure, and then the side (b),
the motion continuing backwards and forwards till the top comes to rest.
The fact is that the toe is magnetic, and this being the case it is easy
to see that the rolling of the toe on the side of the metal produces
the motion.
From the book
An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of
Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion.
By Harold Crabtree M.A.
Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge
Assistant Master at Charterhouse
Longmans, Green and Co. 1923
First Edition 1909
Second Edition 1914
New Impression 1923
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.
Big Bertha Thing fact
Anything but a fact, changes the face of twentieth century science.
1. No iron moons and planetary cores.
2. No red shift measure of speed.
3. No Patrick Moore star at 95% the speed of light.
4. Muons arrive on earth.
5. Relativity is like an imaginary number; useful but not real.
6. Einstein-Haas gives a field strength 1/10000th the electric field.
7. Wave particle duality is a field effect.
8. Schroedinger is an approximation.
Who has the wit to check the fact?