Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Any more ideas about the 2008 Accord?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
alfred - 03 Aug 2007 04:27 GMT
I am seeing the 2008 Accord in concept version only. From what I read, the
2008 accord will have a slightly longer body and may have considerable hp
improvement. I am reading 175-205 for the 4 cyl and 270-280 for the 6 cyl.
Maybe more luxury?? I'd like to get more viable information about the 2008
Accord and the release date if anyone has that information.

Thanks,
Al
jim beam - 03 Aug 2007 04:40 GMT
> I am seeing the 2008 Accord in concept version only. From what I read, the
> 2008 accord will have a slightly longer body and may have considerable hp
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Thanks,
> Al

what about weight increase?  increasing power means nothing if weight is
also increasing.  and if weight is increasing, you'd also better worry
about improved brakes too.
tww1491 - 04 Aug 2007 01:12 GMT
>> I am seeing the 2008 Accord in concept version only. From what I read,
>> the 2008 accord will have a slightly longer body and may have
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> also increasing.  and if weight is increasing, you'd also better worry
> about improved brakes too.

Increasing the current I4 to 200 hp probably means a switch to premium gas.
Have to wonder about the weight if it is bigger.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 04 Aug 2007 01:16 GMT
> Increasing the current I4 to 200 hp probably means a switch to premium gas.

Doubt it.  That's not Honda's style.
tww1491 - 04 Aug 2007 13:27 GMT
>> Increasing the current I4 to 200 hp probably means a switch to premium
>> gas.
>
> Doubt it.  That's not Honda's style.

I certainly hope not.  In my long association with the big H since my first
CL77 in 1967 to the many cars I have owned, their byword has been
efficiency.  Their I4 Accord (particularly with a manual) represents what
they stand for in my opinion.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 04 Aug 2007 14:09 GMT
> >> Increasing the current I4 to 200 hp probably means a switch to premium
> >> gas.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> efficiency.  Their I4 Accord (particularly with a manual) represents what
> they stand for in my opinion.

Oh, absolutely!  A Honda I4 with manual transmission is an absolute
jewel of a system, rock solid and bulletproof.
Bob Jones - 07 Aug 2007 04:25 GMT
>>> I am seeing the 2008 Accord in concept version only. From what I read,
>>> the 2008 accord will have a slightly longer body and may have
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Increasing the current I4 to 200 hp probably means a switch to premium
> gas. Have to wonder about the weight if it is bigger.

Not likely. I think they would rather be competing with Korean mobiles like
Hyundai than it's own Acura.
KmanScam - 03 Aug 2007 06:03 GMT
alfred Wrote:
> I am seeing the 2008 Accord in concept version only. From what I read,
> the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Thanks,
> Al
I found a gallery and a forum for the new accord
http://gallery.8thaccord.org/main.php

It definitely looks bigger than the current accord.  I don't know about
more luxury.  The date of release according to 8thaccord.org is in
September of 2007.

and someone obviously leaked all the trim options and stuff for the 08
accord
http://tinyurl.com/2tsu58

even the 2008 accord colors are out
http://tinyurl.com/2fo22p

I personally can't wait to see the coupe.
[image:
http://gallery.8thaccord.org/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=110&g2
_serialNumber=2
]

Signature

KmanScam

http://www.automotiveforums.com

alfred - 03 Aug 2007 23:54 GMT
Well the photos are pretty close to what I've seen. The options didnt look
as if anything new was added. I'd like to see a few things like more power,
better brakes, and maybe a sequential sport shifter etc.

> alfred Wrote:
>> I am seeing the 2008 Accord in concept version only. From what I read,
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> [image:
> http://gallery.8thaccord.org/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=110&g2
_serialNumber=2
]
Pszemol - 05 Sep 2007 03:15 GMT
Here is more photos of 2008 accord directly from honda.com:
http://automobiles.honda.com/2008-accord/

Enjoy! :-)

> Well the photos are pretty close to what I've seen. The options didnt look
> as if anything new was added. I'd like to see a few things like more power,
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>> [image:
>> http://gallery.8thaccord.org/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=110&g2
_serialNumber=2
]
Gene S. Berkowitz - 05 Aug 2007 05:14 GMT
> I am seeing the 2008 Accord in concept version only. From what I read, the
> 2008 accord will have a slightly longer body and may have considerable hp
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Thanks,
> Al

Well, since they've spiked the V6 Hybrid, how about a 4-cylinder
version?

--Gene
alfred - 05 Aug 2007 15:14 GMT
The V6 Hybrid is a joke, it costs 31K and gets the same mpg as the regular
Accord I4 from what I've seen. You'd have to keep it 10 years to get your
moneys worth in gas vs the cost of the car costing alot more.

I'm still debating about the Civic Si and the Accord EX sedan for my next
one. I am not so sure the Civic Si would be practical for a New England
region with the snow and ice plus it needs premium. I like the car alot but
thats a problem I'm thinking especially with the super low pro tires.

Maybe the Accord I4 EX with a manual as a change to what I have.

> Well, since they've spiked the V6 Hybrid, how about a 4-cylinder
> version?
>
> --Gene
High Tech Misfit - 05 Aug 2007 15:30 GMT
> I'm still debating about the Civic Si and the Accord EX sedan for my next
> one. I am not so sure the Civic Si would be practical for a New England
> region with the snow and ice plus it needs premium. I like the car alot but
> thats a problem I'm thinking especially with the super low pro tires.

Then get a separate set of winter tires.
alfred - 06 Aug 2007 00:50 GMT
That may be an idea but then I would have to store them someplace and I am
limited on room in my place and it could end up costing alot of money for
the tires if I had to get comparable ones.

> Then get a separate set of winter tires.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 06 Aug 2007 11:08 GMT
> > Then get a separate set of winter tires.
>
> That may be an idea but then I would have to store them someplace and I am
> limited on room in my place and it could end up costing alot of money for
> the tires if I had to get comparable ones.

All you need is the Nokian WR tire.
See signature for email address - 06 Aug 2007 14:55 GMT
> The V6 Hybrid is a joke, it costs 31K and gets the same mpg as the regular
> Accord I4 from what I've seen. You'd have to keep it 10 years to get your
> moneys worth in gas vs the cost of the car costing alot more.

It all depends upon your point of view:) From my point of view, with V6
Hybrid you get the fuel efficiency of a civic (my recent road trip of
2000+ miles in my V6 hybrid got me 36 mpg over the entire trip which
included lots of slow or stop-and-go driving through crowded national parks)
with the power of V6, roominess of a midsize car, and safety features
like stability control, and don't forget all the extra features you get
on a V6 accord versus I4 accord. I really couldn't be happier with my
choice. BTW, I paid $23,800 for my V6 hybrid (after colorado state tax
deduction) which was $200 less than what I paid for my EX-V6 6MT, both 2006.

It is ironic most people do not understand what a V6 hybrid gets them.
Hopefully Honda will announce new accord hybrid a little later. There
are other manufacturers entering the same performance hybrid market -
Saturn Aura greenline and Lexes GS450h come to mind.

====================================================================
Khalid

khalid gonehiking org
Pszemol - 07 Aug 2007 05:03 GMT
> The V6 Hybrid is a joke, it costs 31K and gets the same mpg as the regular
> Accord I4 from what I've seen. You'd have to keep it 10 years to get your
> moneys worth in gas vs the cost of the car costing alot more.

Could you please tell me what gas price per gallon you have plugged
in for years 2010-2017 of you owning hybrid for 10 years??
What if in 2010 a gallon of unleaded will run you $10.009 ?
alfred - 10 Aug 2007 03:29 GMT
Well I look at it like this...

The accord ex I4 gets an average of 26-32 mpg and so does the accord V6
hybrid, although the hybrid costs about $7,000.00 more that the accord ex
I4. Based on inflation gas will cost $3.90 in 2017, instead of an average of
$3.00 now. So technically according to this it is not worth getting other
than for comfort, but if you compare the Hybrid accord to the regular exv6
there is a difference of about 10 mpg. So without getting too technical it
would be safe to say that you'd maybe get anywhere from getting the same
deal in savings over 10 years or maybe come out 2000.00 ahead if you buy the
hybrid.

Now heres where the fun starts...The hybrid batteries last about 8 years and
the cost of replacing them is in the 1000's. Maybe 3-4 thousand from what I
understand. So are you really coming out ahead now?? Who knows about what
else could go wrong that is not that well known.

I live in RI and we do NOT get a government tax exemption for buying a
hybrid. I'd rather get an all gas car personally.

> Could you please tell me what gas price per gallon you have plugged
> in for years 2010-2017 of you owning hybrid for 10 years??
> What if in 2010 a gallon of unleaded will run you $10.009 ?
Pszemol - 15 Aug 2007 05:20 GMT
Gas prices are moving up much faster than inflation...
Demand for gas grows faster than it can be dug/produced.

> Well I look at it like this...
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>> in for years 2010-2017 of you owning hybrid for 10 years??
>> What if in 2010 a gallon of unleaded will run you $10.009 ?
mc_dfisch - 16 Aug 2007 23:54 GMT
alfred schrieb:
> I am seeing the 2008 Accord in concept version only. From what I read, the
> 2008 accord will have a slightly longer body and may have considerable hp
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Thanks,
> Al

Are there any news about the new european Accord?
higgledy - 21 Aug 2007 17:17 GMT
I am excited by the prospect of an Accord with a Diesel engine, that
would be better than a hybrid. Rumor is that Honda is bringing Diesels
to the states in 2009/2010.

Honda has posted pics of the 2008 Accord Sedan on it's website. I am
not a huge fan of this generation's styling, not that I liked the
outgoing styling much more. But I am waiting to see the new Accord "in
the steel" before judging.
higgledy - 21 Aug 2007 17:19 GMT
Here is the link

http://automobiles.honda.com/2008-accord/
johngdole@hotmail.com - 22 Aug 2007 03:31 GMT
The mileage is probably using the new EPA numbers? The I4 got 31
(manual) instead of the current 34 miles per gallon highway. The 3.5L
V6 much worse even 17/25 (manual) though it has 3, 4, and 6 cylinder
modes. What gives? I'm not so sure about the new styling though.

See also:
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070821/BUSINESS02/708210302/10
15/BUSINESS01


> Here is the link
>
> http://automobiles.honda.com/2008-accord/
Howard Lester - 22 Aug 2007 17:28 GMT
> The mileage is probably using the new EPA numbers? The I4 got 31
> (manual) instead of the current 34 miles per gallon highway. The 3.5L
> V6 much worse even 17/25 (manual) though it has 3, 4, and 6 cylinder
> modes. What gives? I'm not so sure about the new styling though.

The lowering of the mileage figures is something I don't understand, because
my '04 4-cyl auto Accord does get the mileage as specified.

I do like the new styling better than the previous ones.
higgledy - 23 Aug 2007 21:15 GMT
> I do like the new styling better than the previous ones.

I miss the really low hoods of 80's Accords/Preludes.
ACAR - 24 Aug 2007 11:34 GMT
> > I do like the new styling better than the previous ones.
>
> I miss the really low hoods of 80's Accords/Preludes.

Thank Euro safety standards. New front ends are designed to lessen
injury to pedestrians.
higgledy - 24 Aug 2007 19:04 GMT
> > > I do like the new styling better than the previous ones.
>
> > I miss the really low hoods of 80's Accords/Preludes.
>
> Thank Euro safety standards. New front ends are designed to lessen
> injury to pedestrians.

Interesting how Honda USA makes themselves ultra safety conscience
when they are simply meeting a European requirement.
Tony Harding - 28 Aug 2007 12:20 GMT
>>>> I do like the new styling better than the previous ones.
>>> I miss the really low hoods of 80's Accords/Preludes.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Interesting how Honda USA makes themselves ultra safety conscience
> when they are simply meeting a European requirement.

Yup, it's called "making the system work for you".  :)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.