On 11/18/07 2:03 PM, in article
g7GdnR-R7o4wB93anZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@giganews.com, "DJ NoMore"
<djnomore@somewhere.someplace.com> wrote:
> As some of you may know, I finally had my late wife's 1997 Civic EX
> Coupe titled over to me after it sat for about 10 months. My question
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> 1. Should I do the timing belt ASAP?
> 2. If so, should I just ask the dealer to change out the water pump too?
The fact that it sat for 10 months doesn't have any effect on the timing
belt, but you should have it changed. I believe for a '97 the prescribed
interval was 90,000 miles or 7 years. Check the book again for the calendar
interval. Its probably not critical to do it ASAP, but you should do it
soon.
As far as the water pump, its a lot cheaper to have it preemptively changed
while they already are in there than to come back later and do it if it
fails.
DJ NoMore - 19 Nov 2007 18:32 GMT
> On 11/18/07 2:03 PM, in article
> g7GdnR-R7o4wB93anZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@giganews.com, "DJ NoMore"
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> while they already are in there than to come back later and do it if it
> fails.
I was planning on getting the timing belt changed as soon as I could and
I believe I will just have them drop a water pump in there too while
they are at it.
I am really impressed with how good this little Civic runs for its age!
Even more impressive is the gas mileage I get out of it.