Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / April 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Honda's hydrogen-fuel-cell FCX Clarity

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nomen Nescio - 01 Dec 2007 20:50 GMT
"...this is a true zero-emission vehicle, yet it looks, operates and
drives like anything else on the road. There is simply no more
realistic a peek into the possibly green future of the automobile, not
the theoretical Chevrolet Volt from General Motors, nor the electric
Tesla billionaire-toy, and not even the Holy Green Grail of the plug-in
Prius..."

Wall Street Journal: http://301url.com/f43
Matt Ion - 02 Dec 2007 01:18 GMT
> "...this is a true zero-emission vehicle, yet it looks, operates and
> drives like anything else on the road. There is simply no more
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Wall Street Journal: http://301url.com/f43

The downside, of course, is that PRODUCING hydrogen in quantity is not
generally a zero-emission process (unless you have substantial hydro- or
nuclear-generated electricity available).
JXStern - 02 Dec 2007 02:03 GMT
>The downside, of course, is that PRODUCING hydrogen in quantity is not
>generally a zero-emission process (unless you have substantial hydro- or
>nuclear-generated electricity available).

If you mean someone is burning coal upstream, I suppose so, but the
idea is that big centralized power generation is both cleaner and more
efficient than most vehicles, so if the resulting consumption is
clean, it's a net winner.

Y'know, I don't get it, if you asked anybody five years ago what would
make sense for vehicles when oil reached $100/barrel, they'd have said
all sorts of alternatives could come online at those prices.  Maybe
even hydrogen.

J.
Matt Ion - 02 Dec 2007 07:05 GMT
>> The downside, of course, is that PRODUCING hydrogen in quantity is not
>> generally a zero-emission process (unless you have substantial hydro- or
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> efficient than most vehicles, so if the resulting consumption is
> clean, it's a net winner.

NET winner, perhaps (IN THEORY)... still, the point is, it's not a
"ZERO-emissions" solutions; it's a shifted-emissions setup.

> Y'know, I don't get it, if you asked anybody five years ago what would
> make sense for vehicles when oil reached $100/barrel, they'd have said
> all sorts of alternatives could come online at those prices.  Maybe
> even hydrogen.

Don't get me wrong, I think it would be great to see some VIABLE
alternatives to this petroleum-fueled society... it just, I dunno,
amuses me, I guess, to see people tripping over themselves to jump on
various "clean energy" pie-in-the-sky bandwagons, only to ask a dozen
years later, "What ever happened to that idea" because they didn't stop
to think about ALL the implications, requirements, disadvantages, etc.
JXStern - 02 Dec 2007 20:20 GMT
>NET winner, perhaps (IN THEORY)... still, the point is, it's not a
>"ZERO-emissions" solutions; it's a shifted-emissions setup.

Nobody rides for free.

>> Y'know, I don't get it, if you asked anybody five years ago what would
>> make sense for vehicles when oil reached $100/barrel, they'd have said
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>years later, "What ever happened to that idea" because they didn't stop
>to think about ALL the implications, requirements, disadvantages, etc.

How about horses?  Or do you think a careful scientific study would
find that they have emissions, too?

/hah
Matt Ion - 03 Dec 2007 01:51 GMT
>> NET winner, perhaps (IN THEORY)... still, the point is, it's not a
>> "ZERO-emissions" solutions; it's a shifted-emissions setup.
>
> Nobody rides for free.

That's my point. The original post *opened* with, "...this is a true
zero-emission vehicle".

TANSTAAFL.

> How about horses?  Or do you think a careful scientific study would
> find that they have emissions, too?

Well if you could collect and distill the methane, you could use that
for powering your car...
John Cocktoastin - 24 Apr 2008 09:36 GMT
> "...this is a true zero-emission vehicle, yet it looks, operates and
> drives like anything else on the road. There is simply no more
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Wall Street Journal: http://301url.com/f43

Last I heard, a fuel cell car costs like $1 million.  Is this more a public
R&D phase (aka "beta test") more than anything else?  After the lease is
up, will they be crushed and buried with the EV1's?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.