Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Coolant Vanishing: '95 Civic EX 1.6 - Attn Tegger and Techs

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 18 Feb 2008 21:20 GMT
When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add
"quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from NM,
with a spotty service record, I had hoped that it was simply not topped
off ever. Now, three months later, with only moderate driving, I see the
reservoir is virtually empty again. I don't see excessive white smoke in
the exhaust, or smell antifreeze in it - although I haven't sniffed it
specifically for that, yet. The oil looks fine. I don't smell coolant
inside the car, either. It would be hard to spot a slow drip in this wet
Winter weather. How common are internal head gasket leaks in this
engine, as opposed to slow leaks in the reservoirs?
Tony Hwang - 18 Feb 2008 21:30 GMT
>    When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add
> "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from NM,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Winter weather. How common are internal head gasket leaks in this
> engine, as opposed to slow leaks in the reservoirs?
Hi,
First I'd replace the rad. cap and see.
loewent - 19 Feb 2008 02:43 GMT
had the same problem on my 98 civic.  Ended up that vibration over time had
rubbed a small hole in the bottom of the plastic resevoir.  It only dripped
slowly, and right onto the ground so no telltales that there was a leak.

Used some epoxy to seal the hole, its been good ever since.

That being said, make sure you give the entire system a once over, and don't
overlook anything.

t

>>    When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add
>> "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from NM,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Hi,
>First I'd replace the rad. cap and see.
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 19 Feb 2008 10:07 GMT
>>    When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add
>> "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from NM,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Hi,
> First I'd replace the rad. cap and see.

   Good idea. I didn't realize that pressure leaks were such a common
problem. I may have the system pressure-tested if replacing the cap
doesn't work. Thanks.
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 19 Feb 2008 21:48 GMT
>>>    When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add
>>> "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> problem. I may have the system pressure-tested if replacing the cap
> doesn't work. Thanks.

   I took the car to a local shop today. They do free pressure tests (I
gave them $20 anyway). No leaks, including the cap. Unless I'm missing
something, it has to be the #@!@# head gasket, right? Assuming it's
going straight to the exhaust and not burning much, how safe is it to
leave it alone? Any suggestions?
jim beam - 19 Feb 2008 22:15 GMT
>>>>    When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to
>>>> add "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> going straight to the exhaust and not burning much, how safe is it to
> leave it alone? Any suggestions?

go for at least a 20 minute run, then look at the coolant reservoir
while the engine's still running.  [make sure you can see in, but don't
lift the hose above the coolant surface!!!]  any bubbles?  if so, it's
gasket.  also, check under the car and look at the bottom of the timing
belt cover.  any coolant?  if so, it's the pump.
Tegger - 20 Feb 2008 11:39 GMT
>>>>    When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to
>>>>    add
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> going straight to the exhaust and not burning much, how safe is it to
> leave it alone? Any suggestions?

The pressure test needs to be performed in two places.
1) the cooling system, and
2) the combusion chambers.

the first is done in conjuction with the introduction of UV dye to the
coolant, this being detected on the outside with a black light. The
second consists of shop air being blown into each combustion chamber,
then the rad filler neck being then inspected for bubbles.

There is a third test that uses special paper test strips dipped into
the rad filler neck. These change color in the presence of combustion
gases in the coolant.

Your problem is NOT the rad cap. If it were, the reservoir would be
FULL.

There is also the possibility of a worn water pump. In that case the
coolant would drip down the block under the timing belt cover and may
not be obvious. Findinig that leak means carefully inspecting the crank
pulley area.

Do not put this off. You WILL damage your engine, possibly badly. You're
supposed to check your coolant level every time you open the hood, or at
least once a week.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 20 Feb 2008 12:20 GMT
>>>>>   When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to
>>>>>   add
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> the rad filler neck. These change color in the presence of combustion
> gases in the coolant.

    The procedure in the Honda manual online in the UK is to just use a
hand pump-operated pressurizer with guage, and see if the pressure drops
in the cooling system or cap. I don't know which they used at the shop...

> Your problem is NOT the rad cap. If it were, the reservoir would be
> FULL.

   Good point.

> There is also the possibility of a worn water pump. In that case the
> coolant would drip down the block under the timing belt cover and may
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> supposed to check your coolant level every time you open the hood, or at
> least once a week.

    What I'm going to do, assuming I can even afford the cost of a new
gasket done by the dealer, is to tell them to look for leaks, especially
at the water pump. If they find none, I'll have them replace the head
gasket. Shouldn't they install the new timing belt and water pump for no
extra labor charge (they will be providing the parts, not me) when they
do the gasket? I'm also having the front oil seals replaced as a
preventive measure. Thanks for your response. If you could answer this
post before this evening, when I drop it off, I'd appreciate it greatly.
E Meyer - 20 Feb 2008 16:18 GMT
On 2/20/08 6:20 AM, in article gWUuj.16648$FK2.1405@trndny08,

>>>>>>   When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to
>>>>>>   add
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> preventive measure. Thanks for your response. If you could answer this
> post before this evening, when I drop it off, I'd appreciate it greatly.

Seems like you're jumping the gun a little bit here.  How low was it in the
reservoir?  When you say reservoir do you just mean the overflow tank, or
the radiator?  

In normal use, the system will settle out to where the overflow tank sits at
the "min" mark when the engine has cooled & the level will rise to around
the "max" mark when the engine is hot & has been running for a while.

I certainly would not spend money replacing a head gasket that has not even
been diagnosed.  There is not enough info here to even say for sure that
there is a problem.
motsco_ - 20 Feb 2008 17:00 GMT
> Seems like you're jumping the gun a little bit here.  How low was it in the
> reservoir?  When you say reservoir do you just mean the overflow tank, or
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the "min" mark when the engine has cooled & the level will rise to around
> the "max" mark when the engine is hot & has been running for a while.

----------------------------

Where did you get this bit of misinformation? I've owned six Hondas and
the level in the reservoir never changes more than about 1", hot or
cold, summer or winter.

If yours changes that much, there's something radically wrong from what
the Honda engineers designed.

'Curly'
E Meyer - 20 Feb 2008 17:24 GMT
On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com,

>> Seems like you're jumping the gun a little bit here.  How low was it in the
>> reservoir?  When you say reservoir do you just mean the overflow tank, or
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> 'Curly'

I get my bit of "misinformation" from the behavior of 27 different cars over
a period 38 years.  Where do you get yours?
motsco_ - 20 Feb 2008 22:34 GMT
> On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> I get my bit of "misinformation" from the behavior of 27 different cars over
> a period 38 years.  Where do you get yours?

---------------------

Sorry, misinformation is a strong word.

Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs. The
coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the HONDA
isn't supposed to, since it's reservoir isn't under pressure at all.
Boiling hot coolant isn't supposed to take up much more room than cold
coolant, as long as the rad cap is keeping the pressure up.

Since about '92 most Hondas will self-bleed any trapped air because the
rad cap is the highest point in the system. When any trapped air is
forced out, the air is supposed to bubble through the reservoir and when
the system next cools, the level in the reservoir drops as coolant it
drawn back in. That's when the owner is supposed to add coolant up to
the MAX mark on bottle. The owner's manuals and the Helms service manual
all tell the same story.

However, none of this theory applies if there's a hole in a hose, the
head, the heater core, the water pump seal, or if the rad cap is shot.

'Curly'
jim beam - 20 Feb 2008 22:47 GMT
>> On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> Boiling hot coolant isn't supposed to take up much more room than cold
> coolant, as long as the rad cap is keeping the pressure up.

sorry, that's fundamentally incorrect.  coolant liquid most definitely
expands as it heats - for both systems.  pressure doesn't stop coolant
expanding, it simply raises the boiling point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_thermal_expansion

> Since about '92 most Hondas will self-bleed any trapped air because the
> rad cap is the highest point in the system. When any trapped air is
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> 'Curly'
Jim Yanik - 21 Feb 2008 00:06 GMT
>>> On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>>
>> 'Curly'

I think we all agree that this motor should not be losing so much coolant
so quickly.
IMO,a coolant DYE test is in order. see if and where there's a coolant
leak.

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

jim beam - 21 Feb 2008 01:31 GMT
>>>> On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com,
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> IMO,a coolant DYE test is in order. see if and where there's a coolant
> leak.

but most antifreeze already has dye in it already.  and dye does nothing
to diagnose a head gasket.

as said by someone else, the o.p. needs to take this vehicle to a shop
that /wants/ to fix it - clearly the current one doesn't.  time to hit
the phones.
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 21 Feb 2008 05:15 GMT
>>>>On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com,
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> IMO,a coolant DYE test is in order. see if and where there's a coolant
> leak.

    I told them to look for signs of a leak. If they find none, they
will call me. How much should a dye test cost, and is it better or worse
than a cylinder pressure test? The car already had a system pressure
test, and passed.
jim beam - 21 Feb 2008 05:34 GMT
>>>>> On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com,
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> than a cylinder pressure test? The car already had a system pressure
> test, and passed.

you don't usually do a separate dye test for antifreeze since it's
already dyed.  dye is more commonly used for differentiating different
types of oil leak [engine oil and mtf are similarly colored and hard to
tell apart sometimes] or for a/c systems.

the best thing at this time is to take the vehicle to someone that has
an interest in fixing the problem, not trying to tell you the vehicle is
too old to be worth bothering with.  there are plenty of independent
honda specialists out there.  find one and check to see if they have a
good reputation.
Tegger - 21 Feb 2008 10:52 GMT
>      I told them to look for signs of a leak. If they find none, they
> will call me. How much should a dye test cost, and is it better or
> worse than a cylinder pressure test? The car already had a system
> pressure test, and passed.

The two tests are meant to check for different problems. They are NOT
equivalent.

I'm assuming the "system test" means they checked the cooling system by
pressurizing it. If that test did not use dye, then the test was
incomplete. A dye test also will not pick up leaks that come from the water
pump, since those leaks take lots of time fo be seen from under the timing
belt cover.

If there is suspicion on a head gasket leak, you must do the cylinder
pressure check.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

motsco_ - 21 Feb 2008 16:02 GMT
>> Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs. The
>> coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the HONDA
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_thermal_expansion

-----------------------------

I should have said "Coolant that is _boiling-hot_ isn't supposed to take
up much more room than cold coolant, as long as the rad cap is keeping
the pressure up".
The word 'boiling' was used as an adjective, not a verb the first time.
If you (disable the cooling fan so as to) boil it, you'll certainly fill
the reservoir to the top, but in a healthy Honda cooling system, the
level in the reservoir isn't supposed to go up and down 4 - 5 inches
every time you drive it.

'Curly'
jim beam - 21 Feb 2008 16:24 GMT
>>> Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs.
>>> The coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> up much more room than cold coolant, as long as the rad cap is keeping
> the pressure up".

but that's not true.  as the liquid warms up, it expands substantially.
 that's why the "max" mark on the bottle is only half way down, not
near the top.  and that's why old fashioned thermometers work - as the
volume of liquid in the bulb expands, it rises through the tube.

http://www.forestry-suppliers.com/product_pages/View_Catalog_Page.asp?mi=8225#

> The word 'boiling' was used as an adjective, not a verb the first time.
> If you (disable the cooling fan so as to) boil it, you'll certainly fill
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> 'Curly'
motsco_ - 21 Feb 2008 16:49 GMT
>>>> Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs.
>>>> The coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> http://www.forestry-suppliers.com/product_pages/View_Catalog_Page.asp?mi=8225#

----------------------------

Apples to oranges. The thermometer has a capillary tube that amplifies
the amount the mercury or spirit is expanding, and it's expanding toward
the air bubble at the top. That's exactly like the Volvo or Dodge system
with the pressure cap on top of a reservoir half-full of air.

The Honda coolant expands a bit and builds pressure, but it's the hoses
that probably absorb most of the expansion, not the reservoir. If you
were talking about gasoline expanding, that's very different. Water
doesn't compress, and until it boils it doesn't expand much at all.
That's why the water pipes in your house hammer when you shut off a tap
suddenly. For that reason I've installed an air trap in the water line
to my bathroom shower as a shock absorber. All is now quiet on the
Western Front.

:-)

'Curly'
Jeff - 21 Feb 2008 16:56 GMT
<...>

> Apples to oranges. The thermometer has a capillary tube that amplifies
> the amount the mercury or spirit is expanding, and it's expanding toward
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> to my bathroom shower as a shock absorber. All is now quiet on the
> Western Front.

Water will expand by about 4.3% from freezing to boiling:

http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/chem03/chem03335.htm

So if a cooling system contains 8 liters of water (about 2 gallons), it
will expand by about .3 liter, which is about 11 onces, or nearly the
volume in one can of soda.

The coolant will expand by a different amount, because it is not pure water.

Jeff
> :-)
>
> 'Curly'
jim beam - 21 Feb 2008 18:10 GMT
>>>>> Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs.
>>>>> The coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Apples to oranges.

apples to apples - it's exactly the same principle.

> The thermometer has a capillary tube that amplifies
> the amount the mercury or spirit is expanding,

and how many liters of fluid are in the bulb?  it's /exactly/ the same
principle having a 3 liter coolant system and a 500cc expansion bottle.

> and it's expanding toward
> the air bubble at the top.

it's not an air bubble.

> That's exactly like the Volvo or Dodge system
> with the pressure cap on top of a reservoir half-full of air.

it really doesn't matter whether the expansion bottle is pressurized or
not - the expansion is the same because the volume of the liquid is not
affected by pressure.

> The Honda coolant expands a bit and builds pressure, but it's the hoses
> that probably absorb most of the expansion, not the reservoir.

untrue - the fiber reinforcing of the hoses is there to specifically
prevent that.  it would be impossible to maintain the 13psi pressure to
prevent boiling if the hoses could simply expand.

> If you
> were talking about gasoline expanding, that's very different. Water
> doesn't compress, and until it boils it doesn't expand much at all.

dude, did you read the wiki cite?  thermal expansion coefficient of
water is /huge/ compared to something like steel.

> That's why the water pipes in your house hammer when you shut off a tap
> suddenly. For that reason I've installed an air trap in the water line
> to my bathroom shower as a shock absorber. All is now quiet on the
> Western Front.

indeed, but it's got nothing to do with thermal expansion.
z - 25 Feb 2008 21:43 GMT
> The Honda coolant expands a bit and builds pressure, but it's the hoses
> that probably absorb most of the expansion, not the reservoir. If you
> were talking about gasoline expanding, that's very different. Water
> doesn't compress, and until it boils it doesn't expand much at all.

?? the average honda owner, meaning me, can see a rise of maybe an
inch or so in the reservoir after the engine is hot.
motsco_ - 26 Feb 2008 01:51 GMT
>> The Honda coolant expands a bit and builds pressure, but it's the hoses
>> that probably absorb most of the expansion, not the reservoir. If you
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> ?? the average honda owner, meaning me, can see a rise of maybe an
> inch or so in the reservoir after the engine is hot.

=======================

Yep. That's exactly what I said in the first place:

> I've owned six Hondas and the level in the reservoir never changes more than about 1", hot or cold, summer or winter.

'Curly'
jim beam - 26 Feb 2008 02:15 GMT
>> The Honda coolant expands a bit and builds pressure, but it's the hoses
>> that probably absorb most of the expansion, not the reservoir. If you
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> ?? the average honda owner, meaning me, can see a rise of maybe an
> inch or so in the reservoir after the engine is hot.

try driving up grapevine [california i5], in summer, at 95.  i guarantee
you'll see more than that.  unless there's something wrong, it won't
overheat, but fluid level will be right at the top of the bottle.
Grumpy AuContraire - 21 Feb 2008 17:20 GMT
>>>> Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs.
>>>> The coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>>
>> 'Curly'

I think the key here is; "Liquids cannot be compressed."

If a given liquid (at normal ambient temperatures) is heated, it will
expand but remain in a liquid state hence, it has to go somewhere to
accommodate the resultant expansion.

In modern cars, this is the coolant reservoir while in the older tin of
the past, it was simply the space at the top of the radiator.

JT
jim beam - 21 Feb 2008 16:43 GMT
>>> Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs.
>>> The coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> up much more room than cold coolant, as long as the rad cap is keeping
> the pressure up".

but that's not true.  as the liquid warms up, it expands substantially.
that's why the "max" mark on the bottle is only half way down, not
near the top.  and that's why old fashioned thermometers work - as the
volume of liquid in the bulb expands, it rises through the tube.

http://www.coolstuffcheap.com/verther.html

> The word 'boiling' was used as an adjective, not a verb the first time.
> If you (disable the cooling fan so as to) boil it, you'll certainly fill
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> 'Curly'
Tegger - 22 Feb 2008 01:36 GMT
> Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs. The
> coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the HONDA
> isn't supposed to, since it's reservoir isn't under pressure at all.
> Boiling hot coolant isn't supposed to take up much more room than cold
> coolant, [...]

But it does. ALL materials expand with heat.

The reservoir level naturally rises and falls as the coolant heats and
cools. This is the purpose of the various seals in the rad cap, and for the
very presence of the (unpressurized) reservoir in the first place.

You don't have to take my word for it. Check your own reservoir's level at
dead-cold. Drive the car to full-hot, then have another look at the level.
It will be at least a half-inch higher.

Coolant is constantly traveling in and out of the reservoir with every
heat-cool cycle. It's a normal and necessary feature of a modern sealed
cooling system's operation.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

z - 25 Feb 2008 21:50 GMT
> > Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs. The
> > coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the HONDA
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQwww.tegger.com/hondafaq/

my idle question is, how much negative pressure is required to suck
the coolant in. obviously, the spring keeps the in valve shut at zero
pressure, but when the coolant cools off, there's negative pressure in
the block which sucks the coolant from the reservoir. we assume the
pressure of the spring on the valve leading from the block to the
reservoir is what it's labeled as, but i just wonder how much residual
vacuum remains in the block when the spring shuts the input valve. for
no reason other than idle curiosity.
jim beam - 26 Feb 2008 02:17 GMT
>>> Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs. The
>>> coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the HONDA
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> vacuum remains in the block when the spring shuts the input valve. for
> no reason other than idle curiosity.

almost zero.  there are two springs - one for high pressure exit, the
other is practically zero return.  unscrew the radiator cap when cold
and see how much vacuum there is when you release.
Tegger - 26 Feb 2008 04:16 GMT
> my idle question is, how much negative pressure is required to suck
> the coolant in. obviously, the spring keeps the in valve shut at zero
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> vacuum remains in the block when the spring shuts the input valve. for
> no reason other than idle curiosity.

There are no springs on the inlet valve.

If you study the bottom of the rad cap, you'll discover either:
1) a round, thin rubber flap smaller than a dime, or
2) a wiggly post with a plastic disc on the end of it.

These are the inlet valves. It takes /next to/ zero negative pressure for
the rubber flap type to allow coolant back into the rad, and /definitely/
zero for the wiggly post type, which is always open until pressure shuts
it.

This assumes, of course, that both types are CLEAN. Goop and crud will plug
up the inlet and prevent free flow of coolant back to the rad.

This futher assumes you're using the correct OEM ND caps. If you've got
aftermarket crap, all bets are off as to how they work.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Elle - 20 Feb 2008 19:06 GMT
> In normal use, the system will settle out to where the
> overflow tank sits at
> the "min" mark when the engine has cooled & the level will
> rise to around
> the "max" mark when the engine is hot & has been running
> for a while.

On my 91 Civic, after years of observation, I'd say it's at
more like the mid mark on the reservoir when cool, then
right at max when warm. I am just following the manual: If
reservoir level is at low or a bit above, then warm up the
engine, and add coolant to the max mark.
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 20 Feb 2008 20:30 GMT
> On 2/20/08 6:20 AM, in article gWUuj.16648$FK2.1405@trndny08,
>
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
> been diagnosed.  There is not enough info here to even say for sure that
> there is a problem.

    I know. On the one hand it may be nothing. On the other it could be
engine-threatening. The dealer told us in essesnce, that we can't afford
a new gasket - didn't even quote a price. And we wonder why cars aren't
maintained like they used to be...

   The reservoir was empty, or virtually so, both times.
jim beam - 20 Feb 2008 20:41 GMT
>> On 2/20/08 6:20 AM, in article gWUuj.16648$FK2.1405@trndny08,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 88 lines]
>
>    The reservoir was empty, or virtually so, both times.

then you either have a leak [which should be obvious somewhere - you
need to inspect properly] or you have a blown gasket.  pressure tests
don't necessarily work for diagnosing gaskets unless the vehicle is at
full operating temperature.  and even then...  observing bubbles in the
coolant is the only sure-fire way of knowing.

bottom line, it's pointless spending money on the belt until you have a
correct diagnosis.

also, for repair economics, given the money that some repair shops
charge for head gasket work, it may be more economic to replace the
whole engine.  you can buy a jdm import for a few hundred bucks and
replacement time is way lower than the time necessary to strip, clean,
prep and reassemble a motor for a gasket.  and there's the problem of
repair shops using abrasives in preparation witch will in due course,
cause the car to burn oil.  and there's the problem of many places
insisting on skimming your head, even if it doesn't need it.
Jim Yanik - 21 Feb 2008 00:10 GMT

>      I know. On the one hand it may be nothing. On the other it could
>      be
> engine-threatening. The dealer told us in essesnce, that we can't
> afford a new gasket - didn't even quote a price.

then you need to go to a different service supplier.(but still use OEM
Honda parts)
It seems obvious this dealer just doesn't want to work on your car.

> And we wonder why
> cars aren't maintained like they used to be...
>
>     The reservoir was empty, or virtually so, both times.

It's a FACT you're losing coolant fast;you need to find out WHERE.
A dye test seems in order.

THEN worry about head gaskets,IF necessary.

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

E Meyer - 21 Feb 2008 16:17 GMT
On 2/20/08 2:30 PM, in article j50vj.11208$wG2.3708@trndny09,

>> On 2/20/08 6:20 AM, in article gWUuj.16648$FK2.1405@trndny08,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 83 lines]
>
>     The reservoir was empty, or virtually so, both times.

What did the dealer say he thought the problem was?

If the reservoir is empty, but the radiator is full (I'm still not clear if
that's what you are saying), have you checked that the reservoir itself, or
the hose to it is not damaged and is actually letting the coolant leak out?
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 21 Feb 2008 23:23 GMT
> On 2/20/08 2:30 PM, in article j50vj.11208$wG2.3708@trndny09,
>
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
> that's what you are saying), have you checked that the reservoir itself, or
> the hose to it is not damaged and is actually letting the coolant leak out?

   It turned out to be a leaking water pump. I believe the Grand Prize
goes to Tegger (or maybe Ray) for guessing that. I'm relieved. The pump
also had one frozen bolt, so I'm wondering if the pump really *was*
replaced 5.5 years ago and 50k miles ago, like th printout from the West
coast dealer said. It shouldn't have been in such bad shape - the
replacement interval is 6 years and soemthing like 80k miles...
Tegger - 21 Feb 2008 10:56 GMT
>      What I'm going to do, assuming I can even afford the cost of a
>      new
> gasket done by the dealer, is to tell them to look for leaks,
> especially at the water pump. If they find none, I'll have them
> replace the head gasket.

Only if they can confirm a leak into the cooling system from the
combustion chambers. And this is not difficult.

A head gasket is not something you just go and replace on a whim.

> Shouldn't they install the new timing belt
> and water pump for no extra labor charge (they will be providing the
> parts, not me) when they do the gasket?

No. They need to remove the crank pulley and lots of other parts when
replacing the timing belt.

> I'm also having the front oil
> seals replaced as a preventive measure.

That's a good idea, but does add to the labor cosrt.

> Thanks for your response. If
> you could answer this post before this evening, when I drop it off,
> I'd appreciate it greatly.

I'm not working from home for the time being (BIG adjustment after
working from home for 5 years) and putting in lots of hours at the
office. My replies will therefore not be as timely as they used to be.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 21 Feb 2008 11:46 GMT
>>     What I'm going to do, assuming I can even afford the cost of a
>>     new
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> working from home for 5 years) and putting in lots of hours at the
> office. My replies will therefore not be as timely as they used to be.

   I appreciate the replies. I'll have them do the pressure test if
there is no sign of a leak. If it's the kind of leak a dye test would
show, it should be visible by now anyway, I hope.
Ray - 20 Feb 2008 06:43 GMT
On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, "mjc13<REMOVETHIS>"
>     When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add
> "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from NM,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Winter weather. How common are internal head gasket leaks in this
> engine, as opposed to slow leaks in the reservoirs?

low odds but this happened to me

i used some type of radiator additive that was supposed to kep things
cooler instead it made my honda go through radiator fluid and make me
think that i had a blown head gasket.  I would try to flush the system
first and start fresh. Next feel the upper rediator hose with your
hand after warm up. Do you feel fluid and is the hose good. Low odds
but upper radiator hoses can collapse internally and are soo tough to
diagnose.  Possible that the thermostat is sticking if no fluid
passing you have a problem. Next burp the system get excess air out by
adding water and squeeze the upper hose till bubles come out of the
radiator top fill hole repeat over and over till no more bubbles.

if still no progress either radiator shot, head gasket, water pump

start low cost and confirm all low cost items are good
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 20 Feb 2008 07:56 GMT
> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, "mjc13<REMOVETHIS>"
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> start low cost and confirm all low cost items are good

    Here's the problem: I have an appointment *tomorrow* to drop the
car off to have the timing belt and water pump replaced, to take
advantage of a 2 week service sale. They will be replacing the coolant,
but I have to decide if I'm having them do the head gasket then,
obviously. BTW, the engine has always run perectly cool, even in very
hot weather, so I'm inclined to think the flow is ok...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.