>I think the "Fit" has taken the old role of the Civic
>as Honda's bottom offering. I think the jury is
>still out is if they have the "Civic reliability" being
>such a young model. I saw very few on the road
>until this summer, when I presume Honda
>finally started making them in bulk.
Well, given that the 2nd year of the Fit (08) is really the 5th year
(I think) of the Jazz, I think we can extrapolate some numbers for
reliability.
Honda appears to have actually been surprised by the response to the
2007 Fit. When I talked to one of the local dealers in mid 2006, she
was excited and promised to call me for a test drive when the first
one came in. Well, she did call. But I had to be there at a specific
time, as she was scheduling test drives on her two cars, but only for
three days.
The 2008s are/were more available, but still in lower supply than the
demand. By the time I bought, dealers weren't getting more than MSRP.
But they weren't getting less, that's for sure.
>Meanwhile the standard Civic grows each year,
>nearly an intermediate car size & price now.
>Engineering improvements have keep its mileage
>up there, but not as good as the older, lighter models.
I went from an 89 CRX to a 96 Civic EX. The Civic was "huge". Almost
as big as my wife's 89 Accord (which she traded for a 96 Accord EX at
the same time). Once I put some Tokicos on the Civic, it handled
"quite nicely". Even nicer with the R1s, but that's a different
story.