>>> Hi.
>>> Just completed a regular ATF change. It gave up 3 qt and I put the
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> the screen/filter is akin to putting onn the same dirty socks after a
> bath. IOW, the pan should be pulled...
> On 7/8/04 1:32 AM, in article 40ECEB1C.2FE328BE@doofis.FAKEcom, "Grumpy au
> Contraire" <Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Honda automatics generally do not have a removable bottom pan and there is
> no accessible screen/filter to clean or replace.
I will not profess real knowledge of Honda auto trannies but could this
lack contribute to the relatively high rate of Honda tranny failures?

Signature
JT
Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4
E. Meyer - 09 Jul 2004 02:10 GMT
On 7/8/04 6:03 PM, in article 40EDD347.5BAC498C@doofis.FAKEcom, "Grumpy au
Contraire" <Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote:
>> On 7/8/04 1:32 AM, in article 40ECEB1C.2FE328BE@doofis.FAKEcom, "Grumpy au
>> Contraire" <Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> I will not profess real knowledge of Honda auto trannies but could this
> lack contribute to the relatively high rate of Honda tranny failures?
Possibly. One of the failure modes that has caused warranty
extensions/recalls involves clutches disintegrating and clogging the little
(inaccessible) screens they have in the fluid passages. This then causing
exciting behavior like slamming into 2nd gear without warning at 80 mph. I
suspect there would be less chance of that happening if there was a filter
in the pan (if it had a pan...). It would still disintegrate, but the
failure mode probably wouldn't be as exciting.
It does make for easy fluid changes though.
Grumpy au Contraire - 09 Jul 2004 03:15 GMT
> On 7/8/04 6:03 PM, in article 40EDD347.5BAC498C@doofis.FAKEcom, "Grumpy au
> Contraire" <Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> It does make for easy fluid changes though.
I guess, religious changing of the fluid is in order...
<G>

Signature
JT
Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4
jim beam - 09 Jul 2004 14:46 GMT
>>On 7/8/04 1:32 AM, in article 40ECEB1C.2FE328BE@doofis.FAKEcom, "Grumpy au
>>Contraire" <Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> I will not profess real knowledge of Honda auto trannies but could this
> lack contribute to the relatively high rate of Honda tranny failures?
"high rate" of failure??? my friends have over 360k on an 88 accord
automatic. original transmission. i had a civic with 180k before i
sold it. i wouldn't call those unreliable transmissions.
E. Meyer - 09 Jul 2004 14:57 GMT
On 7/9/04 8:46 AM, in article oM-dndDiNItSPHPdRVn-jg@comcast.com, "jim beam"
<nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>> On 7/8/04 1:32 AM, in article 40ECEB1C.2FE328BE@doofis.FAKEcom, "Grumpy au
>>> Contraire" <Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> automatic. original transmission. i had a civic with 180k before i
> sold it. i wouldn't call those unreliable transmissions.
Before the failures started showing up on the '02 Acura TL-S and the newer
Odysseys, I think Honda automatics were pretty much bullet-proof. They seem
to have problems beefing them up to handle the bigger V6 engines.