She may have thought you have a 2001 civic, with a timing
chain.  In that case, yes the interval changed from 100000km
to 160000km.

Where in Canada are you located?  I am in Winnipeg, and
with the more than -20oC here, it puts alot more wear on the timing belt,
I wouldn't go too much over the recommended
interval.

t

The site below says your Canadian car's timing belt is due at 84 months or
168,000 km, whichever comes first.

http://www.honda.ca/HondaEng/YouAndYourCar/HondaService/MaintenanceCalculator.ht
m

I thought maybe you were thinking of "severe duty" TB replacement intervals. As
poster "disallow" suggested, Canada driving is generally considered "severe
duty."

So does the site above give the "severe duty" specs?

I have a Chilton's manual for American Honda Civics, 1984-1995. I checked the
1992 specs in this manual and at the Canadian site above. The non-severe duty
spec in the Chilton's is 145k km/6 years. At the Canadian site, it gives a spec.
of  96k km, period.

So the Canada site above seems to give the "severe duty" specs, period.

Barring further commentary from others, I'd believe the young lady.

I don't know how to convert 100,000 Kms to miles. However, if you believe
that your timing belt needs to be changed, you could tell them to do it or
hire a local mechanic that you trust to do the work for you. It's my guess
that the local mechanic will charge you less than the Honda dealership.
For example, I change the oil in my Honda every 3000 miles regardless of
what is stated in the owner's manual.