Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2005 Accord Advice

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
DCDev - 18 Apr 2005 14:37 GMT
Greetings,
    I am looking to buy a 2005 Accord, but would like some advice on a
few questions?  First, 4 or 6 cylinder?  I currently own a '94 6
cylinder maxima (160 hp).  I live in the lower hudson valley region of
new york.  I do a great deal of driving, both highway and local roads.
I commute 35 miles each way to work, and I frequently drive to long
island.  This means that I drive in every condition -- flat ground,
large hills, high speed, stop-and go traffic, snow, etc.  Which engine
would you recommend?  I know this is a recent model, but what is the
difference in maintenance and reliability?  Handling?  DIY maintenance?
Money is an issue because I am a recent college grad without much of
it.  However, I am willing to finance and spend the extra if there is a
big gain in the v6.
    In addition to the cylinders, does the accord have a timing belt
or a timing chain?
    As for pricing, does anyone have an idea of what the wholesale
price for the accord would be in new york?  If anyone else has bought a
car in this region, would you mind telling me how much I can expect to
knock off the sticker?
    Are there any common problems that have arisen with this model?
Are there any alternative cars you would recommend looking at?  Thank
you for any advice you can offer...
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 18 Apr 2005 16:29 GMT
>      I am looking to buy a 2005 Accord, but would like some advice on a
> few questions?  First, 4 or 6 cylinder?  I currently own a '94 6
> cylinder maxima (160 hp).

The 4 cylinder Accord gives 160hp.

I loved my 4 cyl 2000 Accord.  This is the sweet spot of Honda's
engineering.

Never had *any* problem with it in any of the terrain or conditions you
described.

> Money is an issue because I am a recent college grad without much of
> it.  However, I am willing to finance and spend the extra if there is a
> big gain in the v6.

No, there's not a big gain in the V6.  Trust me.
Charles Lasitter - 18 Apr 2005 16:43 GMT
> I am looking to buy a 2005 Accord, but would like some advice on a
> few questions?

More questions first.  Is your Maxima the GXE or the SE?  Both are
sedans, while Honda also offers the Accord as a Coupe/Hatchback.  
Nissan also made your life simpler from the standpoint of just picking
one of two trim lines and then adding the specific options you wanted.

1994 Nissan Maxima 4 Dr GXE Sedan (options)

AM/FM/CD Audio System
Antilock Brakes
Automatic Climate Control
Bose Audio System
Leather Seats
Leather Steering Wheel
Power Driver Seat
Power Moonroof
Power Passenger Seat
Special Factory Paint

- or the -

1994 Nissan Maxima 4 Dr SE Sedan (options)

AM/FM/CD Audio System
Antilock Brakes
Automatic 4-Speed Transmission
Leather Seats
Power Driver Seat
Power Moonroof
Power Passenger Seat
Special Factory Paint

From what I gather, Honda doesn't install options from the factory.  
You just get a mind numbing number of styles to choose from, and each
style has a preset bunch of options / features:  (from www.edmunds.com)

2005 Honda Accord Styles:  Midsize Coupe/Hatchback

EX Styles                               (MSRP: $22,815 - $27,215)
2dr Coupe                               Manual  2.4L    4cyl
2dr Coupe                               Auto.   2.4L    4cyl
2dr Coupe       w/Leather               Manual  2.4L    4cyl
2dr Coupe       w/Leather               Auto.   2.4L    4cyl
2dr Coupe       w/Leather and Nav       Manual  2.4L    4cyl
2dr Coupe       w/Leather and Nav       Auto.   2.4L    4cyl

EX PZEV Styles                          (MSRP: $23,765 - $27,365)
2dr Coupe                               Auto.   2.4L    4cyl
2dr Coupe w/Leather                     Auto.   2.4L    4cyl
2dr Coupe w/Leather and Nav             Auto.   2.4L    4cyl

EX V-6 Styles                           (MSRP: $27,465 - $29,465)
2dr Coupe                               Auto.   3.0L    6cyl
2dr Coupe                               Manual  3.0L    6cyl
2dr Coupe w/Nav                         Auto.   3.0L    6cyl
2dr Coupe w/Nav                         Manual  3.0L    6cyl

LX Styles                               (MSRP: $20,390 - $21,190)
2dr Coupe                               Manual  2.4L    4cyl
2dr Coupe                               Auto.   2.4L    4cyl

LX PZEV Styles                          (MSRP: $21,340)
2dr Coupe                               Auto.   2.4L    4cyl

LX V-6 Styles                           (MSRP: $24,565)
2dr Coupe                               Auto.   3.0L    6cyl

Special Edition Styles                  (MSRP: $20,640 - $21,440)
2dr Coupe                               Manual  2.4L    4cyl
2dr Coupe                               Auto.   2.4L    4cyl

MIDSIZE SEDAN

DX Styles                               (MSRP: $16,810 - $17,610)
4dr Sedan                               Manual  2.4L    4cyl    
4dr Sedan                               Auto.   2.4L    4cyl    

EX Styles                               (MSRP: $22,715 - $27,115)

4dr Sedan                               Manual  2.4L    4cyl    
4dr Sedan                               Auto.   2.4L    4cyl    
4dr Sedan w/Leather                     Manual  2.4L    4cyl    
4dr Sedan w/Leather                     Auto.   2.4L    4cyl    
4dr Sedan w/Leather and Nav             Manual  2.4L    4cyl    
4dr Sedan w/Leather and Nav             Auto.   2.4L    4cyl    

EX PZEV Styles                          (MSRP: $23,665 - $27,265)
4dr Sedan                               Auto.   2.4L    4cyl    
4dr Sedan w/Leather                     Auto.   2.4L    4cyl    
4dr Sedan w/Leather and Nav             Auto.   2.4L    4cyl    

EX V-6 Styles                           (MSRP: $27,365 - $29,365)
4dr Sedan                               Auto.   3.0L    6cyl    
4dr Sedan w/Nav                         Auto.   3.0L    6cyl    

Hybrid Styles                           (MSRP: $30,655 - $32,655)
4dr Sedan                                       Auto.   3.0L    6cyl    
4dr Sedan w/Nav                               Auto.   3.0L    6cyl    

LX Styles                               (MSRP: $20,290 - $21,090)
4dr Sedan                               Manual  2.4L    4cyl    
4dr Sedan                               Auto.   2.4L    4cyl    

LX PZEV Styles                          (MSRP: $21,240)
4dr Sedan                               Auto.   2.4L    4cyl    

LX V-6 Styles                           (MSRP: $24,465)
4dr Sedan                               Auto.   3.0L    6cyl    

Value Package Styles                    (MSRP: $18,510)
4dr Sedan                               Auto.   2.4L    4cyl    

> First, 4 or 6 cylinder?  I currently own a '94 6 cylinder maxima
> (160 hp).  

OK -- That means you have the GXE sedan.  Looks like your have an
automatic, and compared to the LX value package auto your vehicle may
be about 20 pounds havier.  This means that you could keep the same
power to weight ratio with the i-VTEC 4cyl (i4).  With more cylinders
and displacement, however, you now have an extra 21 ft-lbs of torque,
which you will feel more or less depending on your driving style and
and conditions.

> I live in the lower hudson valley region of new york.  I do a
> great deal of driving, both highway and local roads. I commute 35
> miles each way to work, and I frequently drive to long island.  

Since saving money is important to you, fuel economy and acquisition
cost (even insurance!) could be a big factor in determining whether you
go with the i4 or V6.  The LX's EPA estimate is 24/34 with the i4,
falling to 21/30 with V6.  But there is also the fun factor:  With the
extra 80 horses, you may find it difficult to stay off the fun pedal
... YMMV.

> This means that I drive in every condition -- flat ground, large
> hills, high speed, stop-and go traffic, snow, etc.  

> Which engine would you recommend?  

How happy are you with the responsiveness of your current setup?  If
160 horses are enough, you might like the i4 a lot.  I know I do.

How important is handling?  The i4 gives the car a better weight
distribution, and a lot of Honda owners like that.

> Money is an issue because I am a recent college grad without much of
> it.  

With the V6, you pay more to buy it and more to run it.  Consumer
Reports says that the predicted reliability of the i4 and V6 are
excellent.  

> I know this is a recent model, but what is the difference in
> maintenance and reliability? Handling?  DIY maintenance?  

I would have to guess that the average repair on the larger engine
might be higher, depending on the nature of the repair, of course.  You
don't have to change the spark plugs 'till 110 miles (i4 at least), but
when you do, there are six of them for the V6, vs four.  I wouldn't let
that deter me if I really wanted / needed the extra horses and had the
money though.

I will gladly defer to others here having more experience actually
working on these engines, however.

> However, I am willing to finance and spend the extra if there
> is a big gain in the v6.  

As noted, the horsepower gain is huge.  The V6 automatically gets you
traction control, 16" wheels w/rear disks and Electronic Brakeforce,
Distribution, but you don't get alloys until you go to the EX, at which
point you also get alloys vs steelies.  There's other stuff, like 6xCD
changer, fancier seat and Throttle by Wire.  You pay an extra $4k or
so, but with the V6 and all the other goodies, it looks like a heck of
a value to me.

I got the LX because it was a value and I could get the five speed
manual transmission.  It doesn't look like the manual was available
with the V6 in a sedan.  Wish I knew why.  You could pay a fortune and
get a six-speed in the coupe.  I can only wonder how much different the
insurance would be for the i4 sedan!

> In addition to the cylinders, does the accord have a timing belt
> or a timing chain?

> As for pricing, does anyone have an idea of what the wholesale
> price for the accord would be in new york?  

Check edmunds.  It's a fantastic resource, and it's free, and that
beats the hell out of paying Consumer Reports a rediculous $11 per car
for info that Edmunds gives away.

-- CL.

+-----------------------------------------+
| Charles Lasitter   | Mailing / Shipping |
| 401/728-1987       | 14 Cooke St        |
| cl+at+ncdm+dot+com | Pawtucket RI 02860 |
+-----------------------------------------+
Jason - 18 Apr 2005 17:32 GMT
> Greetings,
>      I am looking to buy a 2005 Accord, but would like some advice on a
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Are there any alternative cars you would recommend looking at?  Thank
> you for any advice you can offer...

I advise you to visit the nearest Honda shop and pick up free booklets on
the 4 cyld. and 6 cyld. Accords. The various specifications of the various
models will be in the back of the booklets. I advise you to buy the 4
cyld. EX since Honda has been making 4 cyld. engines many years longer
than 6 cyld. engines. They seem to have less problems than the 6 cyld.
engines but do have less power which is the only draw back. Take some test
drives--remember-just because you take a test drive does NOT mean that you
have to buy the vehicle.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Kenneth J. Harris - 18 Apr 2005 22:17 GMT
The V6 has noticeably more power, also comes with traction control.  It
has a timing belt, not a chain like the 4 cyl.  Downstate New York (Long
 Island)-- generally get 10% off msrp from dealers here on the V6, not
sure about the 4 cyl.

Ken
L Alpert - 19 Apr 2005 03:02 GMT
> Greetings,
>     I am looking to buy a 2005 Accord, but would like some advice on a
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Are there any alternative cars you would recommend looking at?  Thank
> you for any advice you can offer...

I have a 2004 V6, and my daughter has the 4 cyl.  About 7-8 MPG better with
the 4, pretty peppy for a four. Have to downshift up large incline grades at
high elevations (we drive some mountain roads going out to Tahoe), but other
then that, you may want to go with the better mileage.....
Jason - 19 Apr 2005 21:47 GMT
> > Greetings,
> >     I am looking to buy a 2005 Accord, but would like some advice on a
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> high elevations (we drive some mountain roads going out to Tahoe), but other
> then that, you may want to go with the better mileage.....

Get the 4 cyld--it's much cheaper than the 6 cyld. Hybrid and gets as good
or better gas mileage than the Hybrid. I agree with the poster that said
that the cost of gas will be a problem in the next several years. The 4
cyld. gets much better gas mileage than the 6 cyld. Accord--it also has
lots of power. Also, get the EX model since it has the most features.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

hondaman - 19 Apr 2005 05:03 GMT
i'd sacrifice the power to save money on gas. gas prices are supposed to get
even higher by mid summer i heard. the 4cyl. accords are awesome. they're
honda's best in overall value and reliability.

                                     jeff
> Greetings,
>     I am looking to buy a 2005 Accord, but would like some advice on a
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Are there any alternative cars you would recommend looking at?  Thank
> you for any advice you can offer...
DCDev - 19 Apr 2005 13:28 GMT
Thank you for the advice everyone.  I'll be going to test drive both
the 4 and 6 later this evening.

Does anyone have any experience or opinions regarding the new hybrids?
I know they're more expensive, but they have both the v6 and good gas
mileage.  What about maintenance / reliability of these?  I know
they're brand new, but I wonder.  Based on what i've read, it sounds
like the gas engine is constantly shutting off and turning on, and
constantly shutting down and restarting cylinders.  Do  you think this
changes the reliability of the car, or greatly increase maintenance
costs?
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 19 Apr 2005 18:08 GMT
> Does anyone have any experience or opinions regarding the new hybrids?
> I know they're more expensive, but they have both the v6 and good gas
> mileage.

Not GREAT gas mileage.

You'll get much better out of a 4 cyl Accord.  Honda's philosophy on
their hybrid Accord is that you'll get great 6 cyl power with better
than typical 6 cyl gas mileage.
Guy - 20 Apr 2005 18:26 GMT
Toyota is doing the same thing. Their make you believe that a hybrid vehicle
is cleaner than a 4 cylinder. However, if you check the smog index of both
cars, either Accord or Camry, the smog index of 4 cylinders (PZEV) is about
the same as Insight and Prius. Consumer Report also indicates that Accord
Hybrid will not save you too much gas, either.

> > Does anyone have any experience or opinions regarding the new hybrids?
> > I know they're more expensive, but they have both the v6 and good gas
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> their hybrid Accord is that you'll get great 6 cyl power with better
> than typical 6 cyl gas mileage.
Steve - 20 Apr 2005 03:20 GMT
> Greetings,
>     I am looking to buy a 2005 Accord, but would like some advice on a
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Are there any alternative cars you would recommend looking at?  Thank
> you for any advice you can offer...

Go for the four cylinder, except if you will be routinely carrying a heavier
load (as in say two adults two teenagers) in which case you will appreciate
the added power of the 6.

Just my opinion, from a 4 cyl owner moving up to the 6.
DCDev - 20 Apr 2005 16:02 GMT
Again, thank you for your opinions.

I test drove both the i4 and v6 models yesterday.  I have to say, I
found the i4 power disappointing.  Like I said, there are many hills
where I live, and in order to climb the hill, even at only 30 mph, the
engine had to drop gears and rev to over 3Krpm.  I wasn't in an area
where I could test hill climbing at 55 or 60, which I routinely do
while commuting.  It seemed like the engine had to do an awful lot of
work, even revving at 2Krpm just to cruise at 40mph on relatively flat
ground.

Then, I drove the v6, and there was a major difference.  The v6 climbed
the hills with no problem at all.  The gas efficiency is a downfall,
but my current vehicle has only been getting about 20 mpg, and I've
been surviving on that.

Several people have mentioned that the i4 may be more reliable, but is
there really a big difference in reliability?  It would seem that, for
my location at least, the work the engine must perform to constantly
climb hills and travel at high speeds would put more wear on the i4
than the v6.  Let me know if you think this presumption is incorrect.

As for the LX vs EX, I will probably go with the LX because I am tall
(6' 6") and the headroom in the EX is a bit tight due to the moonroof.
hippo - 20 Apr 2005 17:27 GMT
I have an 05 Accord EX-V6 sedan and my friend has an 03 Accord EXL (I4)
sedan. We compare gas mileage and there's not that much difference, less
than 10% which can account for difference in driving habits.

I did test drive both and although the I4 had adequate power, the V6
definitely had more power and responded effortlessly. I had similar
concerns (i.e. gas mileage, maintenance, etc.) when deciding between the
V6 and I4. In the end, hearing my friend say "we should have got the V6"
made my decision.
Jack - 20 Apr 2005 17:36 GMT
Go with the V-6 you won't be disappointed.  I love it. It's as smooth as
silk and it's get the best gas mileage of anything in it's class.
> Again, thank you for your opinions.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> As for the LX vs EX, I will probably go with the LX because I am tall
> (6' 6") and the headroom in the EX is a bit tight due to the moonroof.
Jason - 20 Apr 2005 17:54 GMT
> Again, thank you for your opinions.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> As for the LX vs EX, I will probably go with the LX because I am tall
> (6' 6") and the headroom in the EX is a bit tight due to the moonroof.

If you prefer the V6--get it. It appears you made the right decision
related to headroom. You may want to make sure you head does not hit the
roof in the LX. There was a post several months ago from a man that was
upset with his Honda that he had already owned for several months. He
complained that his head would hit the roof when he moved various ways. We
told him that he should have figured it out when he did the test drive--he
said, "But my head did not hit the roof during the test drive." If your
head does hit the roof--consider the mini-van or the SUV.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Charles Lasitter - 20 Apr 2005 20:01 GMT
> Then, I drove the v6, and there was a major difference.  The v6
> climbed the hills with no problem at all.  The gas efficiency is a
> downfall, but my current vehicle has only been getting about 20
> mpg, and I've been surviving on that.

How many people do you have to haul comfortably and how often?

The V6 coupe would give you 21/30 (EPA mpg), and you'd have a much
sportier package.

(If I ever went with the V6 coupe I'd have to have the six speed
stick.)

-- CL.

+-----------------------------------------+
| Charles Lasitter   | Mailing / Shipping |
| 401/728-1987       | 14 Cooke St        |
| cl+at+ncdm+dot+com | Pawtucket RI 02860 |
+-----------------------------------------+
G-Man - 22 Apr 2005 01:21 GMT
Drive both, it's the only thing that should make the decisoin.  I have a
2001 EX V6, I went to get a new Accord, and drove both.  I just couldn't go
back to the 4-cyl.  On the other hand, the 4 cyl gets better mileage, and no
longer requires a timing belt change.  I just got my son a 2005 LX Coupe.

G-Man

> Greetings,
>     I am looking to buy a 2005 Accord, but would like some advice on a
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Are there any alternative cars you would recommend looking at?  Thank
> you for any advice you can offer...
hondaman - 25 Apr 2005 04:33 GMT
i'd get the 4 cylinder but 1 with a vtec engine. they work hard use less gas
and are very reliable.

                                                    jeff

> Greetings,
>     I am looking to buy a 2005 Accord, but would like some advice on a
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Are there any alternative cars you would recommend looking at?  Thank
> you for any advice you can offer...
DCDev - 25 Apr 2005 18:45 GMT
Thank you everyone.  After reading all the advice and test driving them
both, the only difference seems to be power and fuel efficiency.  I
have decided to go with the v-6.  Although I'll pay more for gas, which
could really sky-rocket in the coming months, I would regret the
purchase of the 4 cyl everytime I try to climb a hill.  The four
cylinder would be great if I lived on Long Island, but up here in the
Hudson Valley, the 6 cylinder just seems better suited for the job.
Again, thank you to everyone for sharing your opinions.
halo2 guy - 25 Apr 2005 22:01 GMT
good luck to you...stay away from the paint sealant, leather protector,
cloth protector and undercoat BS!

Just buy the car with no frilly add ons.

> Thank you everyone.  After reading all the advice and test driving them
> both, the only difference seems to be power and fuel efficiency.  I
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Hudson Valley, the 6 cylinder just seems better suited for the job.
> Again, thank you to everyone for sharing your opinions.
Seth - 26 Apr 2005 01:41 GMT
> Thank you everyone.  After reading all the advice and test driving them
> both, the only difference seems to be power and fuel efficiency.  I
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Hudson Valley, the 6 cylinder just seems better suited for the job.
> Again, thank you to everyone for sharing your opinions.

Living here in the Hudson Valley, I have to agree.

Got mine at Friendly Honda.
hondaman - 26 Apr 2005 03:08 GMT
you would still be better off with the 4 cylinder but to each his own. it's
a dohc i-vtec engine while the 6 cyl. is only a sohc. honda makes probably
the best 4 cylinder engines on the market. you'll probably wish you had the
4 cylinder later. oh well.

                                               jeff

> Greetings,
>     I am looking to buy a 2005 Accord, but would like some advice on a
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Are there any alternative cars you would recommend looking at?  Thank
> you for any advice you can offer...
L Alpert - 26 Apr 2005 03:57 GMT
> you would still be better off with the 4 cylinder but to each his
> own. it's a dohc i-vtec engine while the 6 cyl. is only a sohc. honda
> makes probably the best 4 cylinder engines on the market. you'll
> probably wish you had the 4 cylinder later. oh well.
>
>                                                jeff

I depends.  I have the 6, but after 15 months, I still have < 10K miles on
the car.  I only fill up every 2-3 weeks.  Now that the weather is getting
nicer and we won't see rain for the next 6 months or so, I'll ride my bike
to work most of the time (only 5.5 miles).  Usually walk or ride my bike
most other places.....

>> Greetings,
>>     I am looking to buy a 2005 Accord, but would like some advice on
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>> Are there any alternative cars you would recommend looking at?  Thank
>> you for any advice you can offer...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.