Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

When to Change Timing Belt????

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
piperspost@webtv.net - 15 Jul 2005 02:59 GMT
I had my Timing Belt on my 1993 Civic changed along with the Water Pump
at 105,000 miles. I am now at 146,000, when should I have it changed
again before it snaps??
Rich - 15 Jul 2005 03:07 GMT
> I had my Timing Belt on my 1993 Civic changed along with the Water Pump
> at 105,000 miles. I am now at 146,000, when should I have it changed
> again before it snaps??

I have a 1993 Accord and the recommended interval is 90,000 miles. I
have 149,200 miles on the car now and changed the timing belt(& water
pump) at 102,000. I don't plan to change it again until 200,000 miles.
Rich
Garry - 16 Jul 2005 04:57 GMT
There should be inpection holes so you can see the belts condition.  Is
it a interfering engine or a "free wheeling " engine.  beter find that
out because if it is a interfering and the belt breaks...oh boy what an
expense. Valves hitting pistons and bending valves and possibly
puttting holes in the pistons.  I had a car towed to me once and the
people said it just died.  so i took at the inspection holes where the
belt is and it was ripped up.  I next turn the engine over manually and
i noticed it was acting funny.  Turns out it they negelcted to change
the belt.  It ended up being cheaper to replace the engine.  the cost
of new pistons and valves and labor expense was more than a rebulit
engine............
Garry - 16 Jul 2005 04:57 GMT
There should be inpection holes so you can see the belts condition.  Is
it a interfering engine or a "free wheeling " engine.  beter find that
out because if it is a interfering and the belt breaks...oh boy what an
expense. Valves hitting pistons and bending valves and possibly
puttting holes in the pistons.  I had a car towed to me once and the
people said it just died.  so i took at the inspection holes where the
belt is and it was ripped up.  I next turn the engine over manually and
i noticed it was acting funny.  Turns out it they negelcted to change
the belt.  It ended up being cheaper to replace the engine.  the cost
of new pistons and valves and labor expense was more than a rebulit
engine............
Garry - 16 Jul 2005 04:57 GMT
There should be inpection holes so you can see the belts condition.  Is
it a interfering engine or a "free wheeling " engine.  beter find that
out because if it is a interfering and the belt breaks...oh boy what an
expense. Valves hitting pistons and bending valves and possibly
puttting holes in the pistons.  I had a car towed to me once and the
people said it just died.  so i took at the inspection holes where the
belt is and it was ripped up.  I next turn the engine over manually and
i noticed it was acting funny.  Turns out it they negelcted to change
the belt.  It ended up being cheaper to replace the engine.  the cost
of new pistons and valves and labor expense was more than a rebulit
engine............
Garry - 16 Jul 2005 04:57 GMT
There should be inpection holes so you can see the belts condition.  Is
it a interfering engine or a "free wheeling " engine.  beter find that
out because if it is a interfering and the belt breaks...oh boy what an
expense. Valves hitting pistons and bending valves and possibly
puttting holes in the pistons.  I had a car towed to me once and the
people said it just died.  so i took at the inspection holes where the
belt is and it was ripped up.  I next turn the engine over manually and
i noticed it was acting funny.  Turns out it they negelcted to change
the belt.  It ended up being cheaper to replace the engine.  the cost
of new pistons and valves and labor expense was more than a rebulit
engine............
motsco_ _ - 16 Jul 2005 14:29 GMT
> I had my Timing Belt on my 1993 Civic changed along with the Water Pump
> at 105,000 miles. I am now at 146,000, when should I have it changed
> again before it snaps??

-------------------------

You've only told us ONE THIRD of the equation. We'd have to know WHEN
the belt was changed as well. Your LOCATION is important too, since you
could be in Alaska and not own a garage or a block heater. Your Owner's
Manual tells you how to figure it out.

Use the SEARCH function of your newsreader and look back a couple days
to see MANY posts on this exact question.

'Curly'
piperspost@webtv.net - 17 Jul 2005 20:51 GMT
I live in Florida & I beleive that it was changed back in 1998 or 1999
at 105,000 miles. I am noe at 146,500 miles and wonder if I should have
it changed yet
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.