I installed a drop in K&N on my 98 civic at about 80000kms. I'm now at
229000kms with the same filter. I noticed the following differences:
1. My car sounded different, i like the sound but whatever
2. better throttle reponse
3. marginal power improvement
4. marginal but noticeable fuel economy gain
I have put a factory filter in since, just to see if i was delusional. the
differences above are actual changes. Now whether the extra dirt that gets
in the motor (according to the reports tegger showed us) is worth all this,
is questionable.
So far, my car has lasted and performed above my expectations. There may be
more wear, but I can't tell. In my mind, I like the idea of not having to
throw out the air filter. Instead I clean and oil it about every 50000kms.
I may switch back to OEM yet if I see more reports like that.
t
> 1. My car sounded different, i like the sound but whatever
I notice a difference in sound too, but only when the windows and roof are
closed, radio off and inside air vents closed which is not very often.
> 2. better throttle reponse
Agree
> 3. marginal power improvement
Agree, but only when engine is warm. When engine is cold, power is reduced.
> 4. marginal but noticeable fuel economy gain
I noticed a big gain. Perhaps my feul gauge is bad.
>I installed a drop in K&N on my 98 civic at about 80000kms. I'm now at
> 229000kms with the same filter. I noticed the following differences:
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>>
>>Show me your raw numbers.
T L - 31 Aug 2005 20:58 GMT
Fuel economy needs to be tracked over several tanks of gas. Also, different
gas pumps at the station will fill to different levels. Sometimes they leave
alot of room at the top of the tank, others fill it til it gushes out of the
filler neck. best way to measure is to drive a certain number of kms, and
fill up til the first click or so. And use the same pump at the same gas
station.
t
>> 1. My car sounded different, i like the sound but whatever
>I notice a difference in sound too, but only when the windows and roof are
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>>
>>>Show me your raw numbers.
T L - 31 Aug 2005 20:59 GMT
My car makes a cool whistling noise at about 4800 rpms with the K&N. It
makes it sound like I have a turbo. hee hee.
>> 1. My car sounded different, i like the sound but whatever
>I notice a difference in sound too, but only when the windows and roof are
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>>
>>>Show me your raw numbers.
Michael Pardee - 01 Sep 2005 00:28 GMT
<snip>
>> 4. marginal but noticeable fuel economy gain
> I noticed a big gain. Perhaps my feul gauge is bad.
I think it goes without saying that if you experienced a significant gain
the filter you took out was in pretty bad shape - one way or another.
(That's a common way of troubleshooting problems - by substituting a known
good part.) Intake filters can't improve performance or economy or throttle
response at all, only reduce those by restricting air flow. The idea is to
restrict flow of air as little as possible while preventing dirt from
getting into the engine.
Mike
Jim Yanik - 01 Sep 2005 00:53 GMT
><snip>
>>> 4. marginal but noticeable fuel economy gain
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Mike
But a cold air intake DOES reduce intake restriction,and also gives a
cooler,denser air charge.
Honda Tuning Magazine did dyno and flow bench tests,and both CAIs tested
gave a 20HP increase on an RSX,and increased torque.
IIRC,the OP installed a CAI,not just a K&N filter.

Signature
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
Michael Pardee - 01 Sep 2005 01:15 GMT
>><snip>
>>>> 4. marginal but noticeable fuel economy gain
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> IIRC,the OP installed a CAI,not just a K&N filter.
Oops - missed those crucial words. Never mind!
Mike
T L - 01 Sep 2005 04:27 GMT
No sir, the filter I replaced was pretty much new. As I mentioned, I have
also changed back over to OEM (from Honda) and there was a difference. If
the filter is the only thing different, then please tell me what the
difference is?
As I mentioned, the differences are marginal, but NOTICEABLE.
t
><snip>
>>> 4. marginal but noticeable fuel economy gain
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Mike