Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

K&N on 01 Civic experience

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
t - 31 Aug 2005 14:53 GMT
Friends,

I've recently installed a K&N cold air intake system on my 01 Civic EX (with
5 spd) and can't believe the increase in feul economy. My mpg has increased
about 25 to 33%. Previously, I was getting about 36mpg, now is about 40mpg.
The only thing I don't like is that the kit is way overpriced.

Has anyone else experience this?
TeGGeR® - 31 Aug 2005 14:54 GMT
> Friends,
>
> I've recently installed a K&N cold air intake system on my 01 Civic EX
> (with 5 spd) and can't believe the increase in feul economy. My mpg
> has increased about 25 to 33%.

Yeah, right.

Show me your raw numbers.

Signature

TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

t - 31 Aug 2005 15:34 GMT
I look to see the total number of miles driven since the last fill up
divided by the number of gallons I put in to fill the tank up again.

>> Friends,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Show me your raw numbers.
DopplerD - 10 Sep 2005 22:25 GMT
My calculations show you are getting ~11% increase. I think you may need to
fill up again and check your numbers!!!

>I look to see the total number of miles driven since the last fill up
>divided by the number of gallons I put in to fill the tank up again.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
>> Show me your raw numbers.
T L - 31 Aug 2005 17:05 GMT
I installed a drop in K&N on my 98 civic at about 80000kms.  I'm now at
229000kms with the same filter.  I noticed the following differences:

1. My car sounded different, i like the sound but whatever
2. better throttle reponse
3. marginal power improvement
4. marginal but noticeable fuel economy gain

I have put a factory filter in since, just to see if i was delusional.  the
differences above are actual changes.  Now whether the extra dirt that gets
in the motor (according to the reports tegger showed us) is worth all this,
is questionable.

So far, my car has lasted and performed above my expectations.  There may be
more wear, but I can't tell.  In my mind, I like the idea of not having to
throw out the air filter.  Instead I clean and oil it about every 50000kms.

I may switch back to OEM yet if I see more reports like that.
t

>> Friends,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Show me your raw numbers.
t - 31 Aug 2005 20:31 GMT
> 1. My car sounded different, i like the sound but whatever
I notice a difference in sound too, but only when the windows and roof are
closed, radio off and inside air vents closed which is not very often.

> 2. better throttle reponse
Agree

> 3. marginal power improvement
Agree, but only when engine is warm. When engine is cold, power is reduced.

> 4. marginal but noticeable fuel economy gain
I noticed a big gain. Perhaps my feul gauge is bad.

>I installed a drop in K&N on my 98 civic at about 80000kms.  I'm now at
> 229000kms with the same filter.  I noticed the following differences:
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>>
>>Show me your raw numbers.
T L - 31 Aug 2005 20:58 GMT
Fuel economy needs to be tracked over several tanks of gas.  Also, different
gas pumps at the station will fill to different levels.  Sometimes they leave
alot of room at the top of the tank, others fill it til it gushes out of the
filler neck.  best way to measure is to drive a certain number of kms, and
fill up til the first click or so.  And use the same pump at the same gas
station.

t

>> 1. My car sounded different, i like the sound but whatever
>I notice a difference in sound too, but only when the windows and roof are
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>>
>>>Show me your raw numbers.
T L - 31 Aug 2005 20:59 GMT
My car makes a cool whistling noise at about 4800 rpms with the K&N.  It
makes it sound like I have a turbo.  hee hee.

>> 1. My car sounded different, i like the sound but whatever
>I notice a difference in sound too, but only when the windows and roof are
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>>
>>>Show me your raw numbers.
Michael Pardee - 01 Sep 2005 00:28 GMT
<snip>
>> 4. marginal but noticeable fuel economy gain
> I noticed a big gain. Perhaps my feul gauge is bad.

I think it goes without saying that if you experienced a significant gain
the filter you took out was in pretty bad shape - one way or another.
(That's a common way of troubleshooting problems - by substituting a known
good part.)  Intake filters can't improve performance or economy or throttle
response at all, only reduce those by restricting air flow. The idea is to
restrict flow of air as little as possible while preventing dirt from
getting into the engine.

Mike
Jim Yanik - 01 Sep 2005 00:53 GMT
><snip>
>>> 4. marginal but noticeable fuel economy gain
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Mike

But a cold air intake DOES reduce intake restriction,and also gives a
cooler,denser air charge.
Honda Tuning Magazine did dyno and flow bench tests,and both CAIs tested
gave a 20HP increase on an RSX,and increased torque.

IIRC,the OP installed a CAI,not just a K&N filter.

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

Michael Pardee - 01 Sep 2005 01:15 GMT
>><snip>
>>>> 4. marginal but noticeable fuel economy gain
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> IIRC,the OP installed a CAI,not just a K&N filter.

Oops - missed those crucial words. Never mind!

Mike
T L - 01 Sep 2005 04:27 GMT
No sir, the filter I replaced was pretty much new.  As I mentioned, I have
also changed back over to OEM (from Honda) and there was a difference.  If
the filter is the only thing different, then please tell me what the
difference is?

As I mentioned, the differences are marginal, but NOTICEABLE.

t

><snip>
>>> 4. marginal but noticeable fuel economy gain
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Mike
zonie - 31 Aug 2005 15:30 GMT
I dont buy it. You have fallen for aftermarket air filter propaganda. Read
the air filter test results and see how much more dirt they allow into the
engine. You must like the noise it makes.
I'm Right - 31 Aug 2005 15:39 GMT
why do you k&n people publish such lies?
the stock heated air filtration system provides more than adequate air flow
and the warmed air aids in fuel vaporation.

> Friends,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Has anyone else experience this?
t - 31 Aug 2005 20:33 GMT
> why do you k&n people publish such lies?
Is it a lie, when one discusses their own observation? Isn't this a
discussion board where we contribute our ideas and experiences. You're a
prude.

> why do you k&n people publish such lies?
> the stock heated air filtration system provides more than adequate air
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>
>> Has anyone else experience this?
Steve Bigelow - 31 Aug 2005 23:26 GMT
> Friends,
>
> I've recently installed a K&N cold air intake system on my 01 Civic EX
> (with 5 spd) and can't believe the increase in feul economy. My mpg has
> increased about 25 to 33%. Previously, I was getting about 36mpg, now is
> about 40mpg.

That is an 11% increase.
TeGGeR® - 31 Aug 2005 23:41 GMT
>> Friends,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> That is an 11% increase.

And we've seen no raw numbers yet.

I can supply raw numbers on my mileage, why can't he?

Signature

TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

TWW - 01 Sep 2005 00:11 GMT
> Friends,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Has anyone else experience this?

Tried a K&N air filter on my 01 Prelude.  No improvement in mileage.  If
there was a performance gain it was virtually unoticeable.  But, I did get a
driveability problem which went away when I returned to the stock Honda
filter.
Jim Yanik - 01 Sep 2005 03:49 GMT
>> Friends,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> did get a driveability problem which went away when I returned to the
> stock Honda filter.

You probably needed to reset the ECU. You pull the ECU fuse in the engine
compartment for 30 minutes,then put it back in. Then the ECU relearns it's
parameters when you drive it.

You also won't get much of any performance gain with only the air filter
change;you need to go to a cold air intake(CAI). I got a very noticeable
increase on my 94 Integra GSR.Also a big increase in noise,though.

Honda Tuning Magazine dyno-tested CAIs,short rams,and the K&N filter on an
RSX,and the K&N filter had NO power or torque gains.The CAIs both got 20HP
gains,and the short rams were around 5 HP gains.

The short rams are the easiest to install.

Signature

Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

TWW - 03 Sep 2005 01:53 GMT
> >> Friends,
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> compartment for 30 minutes,then put it back in. Then the ECU relearns it's
> parameters when you drive it.

Thanks -- useful info.  Seemed on the lean side.

> You also won't get much of any performance gain with only the air filter
> change;you need to go to a cold air intake(CAI). I got a very noticeable
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> The short rams are the easiest to install.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.