> stick with oem sensors. aftermarket like bosch will get you through
> emissions, but their reaction times are very poor compared to oem, and
> performance consequently sucks. i did some experimentation with
> different sensors i'd got from a junkyard. no doubt about it, oem is
> the way to go.
>>stick with oem sensors. aftermarket like bosch will get you through
>>emissions, but their reaction times are very poor compared to oem, and
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> equal on an analog voltmeter. I might record their response time on a
> dual digital scope in the near future.
that would be excellent!
> A $225 Genuine O2 sensor could
> beat out the $49 Bosch, but by how much is the question.
indeed. my test was limited to "drivability" which meant two things on
my automatic: hesitation and smoothness of gear shifts. the first, i
kinda hoped for, the second i was not expecting at all. when i first
got this 89, it had been filled with non-honda atf and had the old
"shift like a door slamming" feeling. i'd changed the atf back to honda
three times and the shift was a lot better, but still a little harsh and
i figured it was probably due to permanent contamination of the
clutches. when i changed the sensor however, suddenly, the harsh
shifting improved dramatically!!!
> As long as the fuel/air supply are clean and no or little oil or radiator fluid
> consumption, the Bosch can last more than 200K.
can't say i have the patience for the longevity test. my sensors are
single wire unheated - that may have some influence on results.
Michael Pardee - 11 Oct 2005 23:11 GMT
> indeed. my test was limited to "drivability" which meant two things on my
> automatic: hesitation and smoothness of gear shifts. the first, i kinda
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> probably due to permanent contamination of the clutches. when i changed
> the sensor however, suddenly, the harsh shifting improved dramatically!!!
Interesting! I hadn't considered the effect of O2 sensor response time on
changes like throttle changes or shifting. It makes sense, though. That also
means that old O2 sensors are likely to affect shift smoothness and throttle
response, since slowness is a common "failure" mode.
Mike
TeGGeR® - 12 Oct 2005 13:33 GMT
>> indeed. my test was limited to "drivability" which meant two things
>> on my automatic: hesitation and smoothness of gear shifts. the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> smoothness and throttle response, since slowness is a common "failure"
> mode.
Could this be "Jez's" RPM oscillating problem?

Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
Burt Squareman - 14 Oct 2005 06:55 GMT
> >> indeed. my test was limited to "drivability" which meant two things
> >> on my automatic: hesitation and smoothness of gear shifts. the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> >> contamination of the clutches. when i changed the sensor however,
> >> suddenly, the harsh shifting improved dramatically!!!
> > Interesting! I hadn't considered the effect of O2 sensor response time
> > on changes like throttle changes or shifting. It makes sense, though.
> > That also means that old O2 sensors are likely to affect shift
> > smoothness and throttle response, since slowness is a common "failure"
> > mode.
> Could this be "Jez's" RPM oscillating problem?
Or could be that the O2 sensors are making the car run a little lean (instead
of slowness in response.) Second generation Hondas tend to not shift
well under lower horsepower. You could try advancing your timing and
you can feel the slamming door shift. My original O2 sensors at 270K
miles does a good job with accelerations and shift smoothness.