Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Decision Time

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Beri - 22 Nov 2005 06:20 GMT
thanks to Bill G in my earlier question regarding tires for my 2000
Honda accord.

I think I have narrowed down to either Michelin HYDROEDGE or BFG
Traction T/A. (size 205/60R15). What have been your experience and
recomendations.

I read one place that for snow it might be better to go with BFG but
some sites have favored Michelin hydroedge. I also read some where that
Hydroedge might have more road noise.

My preference is traction first followed by road noise.

thanks,

-B
jim beam - 22 Nov 2005 15:09 GMT
> thanks to Bill G in my earlier question regarding tires for my 2000
> Honda accord.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> -B

michelin & continental use a silica reinforced rubber vs. most others
that still use carbon.  the advantage of the silica reinforced compound
is that it allows optimum rolling resistance to coincide with optimum
wet grip, something not possible with carbon compounds where you can
have wet grip /or/ low rolling resistance, but not both.  it might not
make a huge difference at the gas pedal, but if it a wet-safe tire saves
$100 in gas over its life through lower rolling resistance, it pays for
itself, right?
rocketj55@gmail.com - 22 Nov 2005 18:25 GMT
did you try www.tirerack.com? they have survey comparisons....
if you did...then I'd go with Traction T/A. if you're driving in a lot
of snow, then get a snow tire. but i drive BFG in 6in-1feet snow and
i'm fine. in a 2001 Accord.....
Tractions have more road noise than Michelin Energy MXV4 and are
stiffer. Even at 30psi.
Bill G - 23 Nov 2005 03:49 GMT
> thanks to Bill G in my earlier question regarding tires for my 2000
> Honda accord.
>
> I think I have narrowed down to either Michelin HYDROEDGE or BFG
> Traction T/A. (size 205/60R15). What have been your experience and
> recomendations.

I have the Traction T/A's on my car.  They work fine in snow, but once it
gets really heavy (I live in northern Michigan), no all-season is going to
work well.  I've been very happy with the tires.  I have stayed away from
Michelin's.  They are great tires, but seem to wear out much faster than
they should (and I don't really drive all that aggressively).

Make sure you keep the T/A's inflated properly.  My 225/60-15's need around
34-35 psi.

Bill G

> I read one place that for snow it might be better to go with BFG but
> some sites have favored Michelin hydroedge. I also read some where that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> -B
Beri - 24 Nov 2005 16:09 GMT
Hi,

Just check with Costco for Hydroedge and they won't install the tires
on my honda accord as honda recomends min H rated for 2000 accord and
hydroedge are T rated... Now i am not sure if I should just forget
Hydroedge tires?

Thanks,

-B
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.