Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

92 Civic Front Crank Seal

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jasper - 05 Feb 2006 22:30 GMT
I replaced the timing belt and water pump 23K ago.  The front crank seal
started to leak 10K ago. Should I wait until the timing belt has 50K on it
to go in and replace all three at the same time.
Michael Pardee - 06 Feb 2006 12:56 GMT
>I replaced the timing belt and water pump 23K ago.  The front crank seal
> started to leak 10K ago. Should I wait until the timing belt has 50K on it
> to go in and replace all three at the same time.

My concern is that the front seal is in a marvelous position to get oil on
the inside surface of the timing belt, which could deteriorate it
prematurely. Afraid the safe thing to do is to replace the seal and belt
soon... the pump should make it to the next belt change just fine.

Mike
Jasper - 07 Feb 2006 02:54 GMT
Is this something I should try or take it to a pro.
> >I replaced the timing belt and water pump 23K ago.  The front crank seal
> > started to leak 10K ago. Should I wait until the timing belt has 50K on it
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Mike
jim beam - 06 Feb 2006 14:27 GMT
> I replaced the timing belt and water pump 23K ago.  The front crank seal
> started to leak 10K ago. Should I wait until the timing belt has 50K on it
> to go in and replace all three at the same time.

what brand oil are you using?  some brands are awful for leaks, some
excellent.  if a change of brand fixes the problem as it did for me, you
won't need to change anything.
Jasper - 07 Feb 2006 02:52 GMT
I just change from penzoil 5w-30 to valvoline maxlife syn 5w-30.
> > I replaced the timing belt and water pump 23K ago.  The front crank seal
> > started to leak 10K ago. Should I wait until the timing belt has 50K on it
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> excellent.  if a change of brand fixes the problem as it did for me, you
> won't need to change anything.
Elle - 07 Feb 2006 02:59 GMT
You switched from conventional oil to synthetic, and the front seal starts
leaking? That sucks eggs.

From my reading synthetic is said to possibly be behind such leaks. Leak
incidence after switching to synthetic is rare. Though this could just be a
coincidence. Can't say, Still, it buttresses my decision not to switch my 91
Civic to synthetic oil.

If you can change the timing belt, you can change the seal. Though Jim's
suggestion sounds worth trying.

Post back if you want tips on the seal. A guy named Eric walked me through
dealing with this seal a couple or so years ago, and I know where this is in
the archive.

Are you certain the leak is at the seal, and not, say dripping down the
engine's sides from a failed valve cover gasket?

>I just change from penzoil 5w-30 to valvoline maxlife syn 5w-30.
Jasper - 07 Feb 2006 03:41 GMT
No...the leak began awhile ago...just changed to synthetic last week...the
drip is only coming off the front above the oil pan mating surface...the oil
pan and valve cover are leak free.
> You switched from conventional oil to synthetic, and the front seal starts
> leaking? That sucks eggs.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> >I just change from penzoil 5w-30 to valvoline maxlife syn 5w-30.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.