Not really, just kinda surprised that the reading is as high as it is....
lotsa hard miles on that engine.
Is it possible that all the combustion chambers have carboned up and the
reading I got is artificially high?
Is my diagnosis on Cyl 4 correct? What would a carbon buildup be indicative
of? timing issue?
Just bought the tool, so its kinda cool. Gonna do a test on the fiancees 87
prelude today... should be interestin.... :)
Thanks
t
>> Hi there,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Mike
loewent - 26 Mar 2006 16:15 GMT
oh yeah, and to add some fuel to the fire on Air Filters, I have been running
a K&N stock replacement (drops into OEM airbox) since about 70000kms.
If it wasn't filtering properly, shouldn't the compression reading be a lot
lower?
I drive tonnes of gravel roads (lotsa dust) and live in winnipeg (tonnes of
salt and sand on the roads)
t
>Not really, just kinda surprised that the reading is as high as it is....
>lotsa hard miles on that engine.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>
>>Mike
Michael Pardee - 27 Mar 2006 00:02 GMT
> Not really, just kinda surprised that the reading is as high as it is....
> lotsa hard miles on that engine.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Thanks
> t
I'm not surprised bout the readings being good. I don't keep up with the
advances in engine technology, but modern engines do so much better than
those of my youth it really is amazing. It used to be that the engine life
determined the life of the car.
I don't really know about the higher reading on #4. Your guess is as good as
any I have. My son bought a used Subaru engine from a wrecking yard, and it
had one cylinder that was something like 20% higher than the others. I
assumed it had dirt in the combustion chamber, but we never took the head
off to see.
But I sure agree - compression guages are a nice thing to have, and it never
hurts to do a baseline check on a working engine.
Mike