Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jason - 09 Apr 2006 21:53 GMT
I have a copy of the May 2006 issue of Car and Driver (magazine). The
magazine has an excellent article beginning on page 58 related 6 foreign
made cars that cost about $15,000 per car. They are really small cars (aka
economobiles).
These are the companies that make the economobiles:
Honda Fit Sport
Hyundai Accent GLS
Kia Rio5 SX
Nissan Versa 1.8L
Suzuki Reno
Toyota Yaris S

The car that came in first place in the comparison test was the Honda Fit
Sport. It actully "sailed through the lane change test 6 mph faster than a
Corvette Z06." The Honda Fit is now sold in 70 countries and is known in
Europe as the Jazz.

One of the reasons that Americans buy GM cars and Ford cars is because of
their low prices compared to cars made by Honda and Toyota. Now that Honda
and Toyota will be selling the Honda Fit and the Toyota Yaris at a cost of
about $15,000 per car, it means those people that plan to buy a low priced
new car in 2006 or 2007 will probably be buying a Honda Fit or Toyota
Yaris instead of a low priced Ford or Chevy. Do you agree? Do you agree
that this could be the final nail in the coffin for GM and perhaps Ford?
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Michael Pardee - 09 Apr 2006 22:48 GMT
> I have a copy of the May 2006 issue of Car and Driver (magazine). The
> magazine has an excellent article beginning on page 58 related 6 foreign
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> that this could be the final nail in the coffin for GM and perhaps Ford?
> Jason

I think Car and Driver wants to sell magazines.

I don't know the shape of things to come in the consumer automotive market,
but I doubt anything will cause a huge shift of buyers from any major brand
to another. It seems to me most people have already made up their minds
which brands of car they would buy and which they will not.

I do recall that in the mid-70's one of the magazines (Road and Track, IIRC)
track tested various cars and the Ford Pinto beat the Porsche 911's time
through the slalom! Outraged readers wanted to know how the obvious error
got through, so the editors explained: understeering cars have an edge over
oversteering cars in the slalom, allowing the Pinto (shudder!) to beat the
Porsche. I just don't think that is why more Pintos were sold than were 911s
each year.

Mike
Grumpy AuContraire - 10 Apr 2006 03:51 GMT
> > I have a copy of the May 2006 issue of Car and Driver (magazine). The
> > magazine has an excellent article beginning on page 58 related 6 foreign
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Mike

A major factor is brand loyalty regardless of that particular brand's
performance over the years.  There are simply folks that will NEVER buy
a foreign car and then those on the other side of the fence that will
never buy domestic tin.

As far as "nails in the coffin" for any domestic manufacturer, one must
consider the costs (high labor), government mandates (far too intrusive)
and the public's response to sales campaigns.

I for one am not caught up in the "gotta get a new car" syndrome.  One
of my daily drivers is over fifty years old while the other is almost
twenty-five years of age and that is way modern 'nuff for this ol' fossil...

JT
Jason - 10 Apr 2006 20:14 GMT
> > I have a copy of the May 2006 issue of Car and Driver (magazine). The
> > magazine has an excellent article beginning on page 58 related 6 foreign
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Mike

MIke,
You must be much younger than me. I remember the 1970's when there were
lines of cars at every gasoline station. They even had to ration gasoline.
It was the main reason the Jimmy Carter lost the election for a second
term. The best selling cars (in the !970's) became the really small cars
such as the Honda Civic and the Volkswagen Bug. If the cost of gasoline
rises to $4.00 per gallon, it will cause a shift to cars such as the Honda
Fit and the Toyota Yaris. I doubt that GM and Ford will sell very many
monster sized SUVs and Pickups if the gasoline rises to $4.00 per gallon.
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Grumpy AuContraire - 11 Apr 2006 05:49 GMT
> > > I have a copy of the May 2006 issue of Car and Driver (magazine). The
> > > magazine has an excellent article beginning on page 58 related 6 foreign
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
> monster sized SUVs and Pickups if the gasoline rises to $4.00 per gallon.
> Jason

I can come up with several reasons Carter lost the election, all of
which are based on his total incompetence.

1.  Foreign Policy blunder #1: Returning the Panama Canal to Panama

2.  Foreign Policy blunder #2: Inability to deal with the Iranian
hostage crisis

3.  Foreign Policy blunder #3: Failure to deal with the Lebanese civil war

4.  Gutting the military (as evidence by the failure of the Iranian
hostage rescue attempt)

5.  Presiding over double digit inflation

6.  The pardoning of Vietnam War deserters

Worse, his incompetence carried forth in later years such as being the
main architect of the North Korean nuclear issue (along with Richardson
of New Mexico).

Jimmy Carter, the Millard Fillmore of the 20th century...

JT
Gordon McGrew - 10 Apr 2006 01:07 GMT
>The car that came in first place in the comparison test was the Honda Fit
>Sport. It actully "sailed through the lane change test 6 mph faster than a
>Corvette Z06."

Actually it was 6 mph faster than the next fastest car in the
comparison and faster than the Corvette but we don't know by how much.
Still a very impressive showing.

As for being the kiss of death for GM and Ford, Gm and Ford never made
any money off economy cars anyway.  The kiss of death for GM and Ford
is $3 gas which is killing their monster SUV sales.  
Jason - 10 Apr 2006 20:05 GMT
> >The car that came in first place in the comparison test was the Honda Fit
> >Sport. It actully "sailed through the lane change test 6 mph faster than a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> any money off economy cars anyway.  The kiss of death for GM and Ford
> is $3 gas which is killing their monster SUV sales.  

You are correct. I just re-read the sentence that you mentioned and it's
clear that I left out some of the words from that sentence in my
post--sorry.
You made a great point related to gas prices in regard to monster SUV
sales. It's my guess that GM and Ford will have a hard time selling the
monster sized pickup trucks if the gas prices keep going higher.
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

tww - 10 Apr 2006 03:05 GMT
> I have a copy of the May 2006 issue of Car and Driver (magazine). The
> magazine has an excellent article beginning on page 58 related 6 foreign
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> that this could be the final nail in the coffin for GM and perhaps Ford?
> Jason

Perhaps more telling was the Consumer Reports 2006 cars edition where CRs
data indicates that an 8 yr old Toyota/Honda has the same number of problems
as does a 3 year old Ford or GM product -- and a 2 yr old VW.
Art - 10 Apr 2006 03:57 GMT
The only thing that can help GM is a 6 year bumper to bumper warranty.  That
would get them a lot of sales.  And probably bankrupt them paying for
repairs.
John Horner - 10 Apr 2006 07:23 GMT
> The only thing that can help GM is a 6 year bumper to bumper warranty.  That
> would get them a lot of sales.  And probably bankrupt them paying for
> repairs.

I have been saying the GM should put up or shut up about it's much
bragged about "quality improvements" with a much better warranty for a
long time now.  Reasonable people see the logic, Mike Hunter does not :).

John
Grumpy AuContraire - 11 Apr 2006 05:51 GMT
> The only thing that can help GM is a 6 year bumper to bumper warranty.  That
> would get them a lot of sales.  And probably bankrupt them paying for
> repairs.

You bet!  I really chuckled over that one...

JT
twothousandtwoto2007@yahoo.com - 10 Apr 2006 07:43 GMT
I don't see much of a market for the Honda Fit.  Most people would buy
the civic instead which offers so much more for less money.  Same thing
with the Suzuki Reno vs the Suzuki Forenza.  The Forenza is the better
choice.

America isn't built like prehistoric Europe where there is barely
enough room for foot traffic.  People will buy the larger car for the
same price or for a slightly higher price than the smaller version.

It would appear that for every Toyota Echo that was sold there were 10
more Corollas that were sold.  Can you see the pattern?
Air-
High Tech Misfit - 10 Apr 2006 12:57 GMT
> I don't see much of a market for the Honda Fit.  Most people would buy
> the civic instead which offers so much more for less money.  Same thing
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> more Corollas that were sold.  Can you see the pattern?
> Air-

Sorry, but the Fit costs less than a comparably equipped Civic.  I don't
know about the U.S., but there is definitely a market for the Fit here in
Canada, where gas costs much more than in the U.S. even after you do the
necessary conversions (metric to U.S., currency).  The Toyota Echo actually
sold quite well here, and the Yaris looks like it will be equally
successful.  So I have no doubt that the Fit will also do well here.
Jason - 10 Apr 2006 20:00 GMT
> > I don't see much of a market for the Honda Fit.  Most people would buy
> > the civic instead which offers so much more for less money.  Same thing
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> sold quite well here, and the Yaris looks like it will be equally
> successful.  So I have no doubt that the Fit will also do well here.

If the cost of gasoline rises to $4.00 per gallon, it's my guess that the
Honda Fit Sport, Toyota Yaris S and Suzuki Reno will be very successful.
That's the main reason those types of cars are so popular in Europe--since
gas prices are much higher in Europe than in America.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

twothousandtwoto2007@yahoo.com - 11 Apr 2006 01:05 GMT
OK so the Fit is a little less.  You still missed the point.  Americans
in general do not gravitate towards mini-compact cars.  The situation
is different in Canada.  Yet In Canada people still buy big SUVs.  Ever
watched the TV show "Help you sell" based in Quebec Canada?  They are
driving an Explorer or a Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Air-

> > I don't see much of a market for the Honda Fit.  Most people would buy
> > the civic instead which offers so much more for less money.  Same thing
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> sold quite well here, and the Yaris looks like it will be equally
> successful.  So I have no doubt that the Fit will also do well here.
High Tech Misfit - 11 Apr 2006 02:01 GMT
> OK so the Fit is a little less.  You still missed the point.  

No, I didn't miss the point.  I was only pointing out that there is a market
for those small cars in other places around the world.

> Americans
> in general do not gravitate towards mini-compact cars.  The situation
> is different in Canada.  Yet In Canada people still buy big SUVs.  Ever
> watched the TV show "Help you sell" based in Quebec Canada?  They are
> driving an Explorer or a Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Yes, people are still buying big SUV's here, but not in the large numbers
of, say, 10 years ago.
Jason - 11 Apr 2006 18:33 GMT
> OK so the Fit is a little less.  You still missed the point.  Americans
> in general do not gravitate towards mini-compact cars.  The situation
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Air-

Hello,
If the cost of gasoline rises to $4.00 per gallon, the Honda Fit Sport,
Toyota Yaris S. and the Suzuki Reno will become the best selling vehicles
in America.
Of course, lots of people that can afford it will continue to buy full
sized pickups and SUVs. There are lots of people in America that can't
afford to spend $50.00 or more per week for gasoline. I know several
people that drive over 50 miles per day to and from work.
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

twothousandtwoto2007@yahoo.com - 11 Apr 2006 23:07 GMT
If Gas rises to $4 a gallon the best selling cars in america would be
the Prius and the Civic Hybrid.  Including the cars that run off of
compressed natural gas.  Motorcycles would start picking up in sales in
a way that the states would have never seen before.

Sure the Fit and Nissan version would be top sellers too but the Prius
would be one of the most desirable.  Honda Insights would start selling
for a lot of money used.

O3-

> > OK so the Fit is a little less.  You still missed the point.  Americans
> > in general do not gravitate towards mini-compact cars.  The situation
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
> We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
Jason - 12 Apr 2006 02:59 GMT
> If Gas rises to $4 a gallon the best selling cars in america would be
> the Prius and the Civic Hybrid.  Including the cars that run off of
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> > >
> > > Air-

Air-
You are probably correct. Only time will tell.
The smallest cars and hybrids made by all of the car companies will become
their best selling cars if the cost of gasoline rises to $4.00 per gallon.
I would keep my Accord since I rarely drive it long distances.
jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

twothousandtwoto2007@yahoo.com - 12 Apr 2006 04:10 GMT
<<<<Air-
You are probably correct. Only time will tell.
The smallest cars and hybrids made by all of the car companies will
become
their best selling cars if the cost of gasoline rises to $4.00 per
gallon.
I would keep my Accord since I rarely drive it long distances.
jason >>>>

And don't forget the Turbo Diesels offered by Volkwagen.

50mpg Highway is not bad at all for a diesel VW Jetta or Golf.  The new
Jeep Liberty Diesel is selling so fast that none of the dealerships can
keep one on the show floor.

I wouldn't be surprised if the 5 states that banned the new turbo
diesels would lift the emmisions requirments in order to make the
diesel alternative available to the public in California, New York,
Massachusets, Vermont, and Maine.

The advantage to the diesels is that they get better MPG on the Highway
while the gas/electric hybrids get their best MPG in the stop and go.
Now market a car that is a diesel/electric hybrid and now your talking!
It's been on the drawing boards for  years, just never actually done.

Or who knows, like you said only time will tell.  I've got a feeling
those nuclear batteries are going to save us.

O3-
Jason - 12 Apr 2006 05:37 GMT
> <<<<Air-
> You are probably correct. Only time will tell.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> O3-

I have not read yet read about those nuclear batteries but will do so if
an article appears about them in Car and Driver magazine or Popular
Mechanics magazine--I subscribe to both of them. I have read a lot about
the hydrogen fuel cells and it's obvious that it's a stupid idea. They are
not cost effective. It takes huge amounts of energy to produce a fuel
cell. I'm sure that someone will disagree with me.
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

twothousandtwoto2007@yahoo.com - 12 Apr 2006 14:40 GMT
> I have not read yet read about those nuclear batteries but will do so if
> an article appears about them in Car and Driver magazine or Popular
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> --

Jason, For your information the Nuclear Batteries are only a concept
that I was introduced by world renouned psychic "Sylvia Brown".  She
regularly appears on the Montel Williams show.

The Nuclear Batteries are mearly an idea that was brought forth through
"Metaphysics".  Sylvia believes that at this very moment there are
Aliens out there that have been observing us.  Since the very begining.
At some time in the future they will step in and introduce Nuclear
Batteries for our motorized transportation as a replacement for the
Internal Combustion engine.  Since burning fossil fuels to survive
becomes too problematic so much to say the least.

Go check out the "Metaphisics" section at your local Barnes and Nobels
or Borders book store.  Sylvia Brown has a host of books that she's
already sold hundreds of thousands of copies.

Research it and take it for what it's worth.  I personaly take most of
her preaching as truth/prophecy.  It only makes so much sense what she
writes about.  And deep down inside I know that what she brings forward
to the public is the truth.

O3-
Jason - 12 Apr 2006 18:26 GMT
> > I have not read yet read about those nuclear batteries but will do so if
> > an article appears about them in Car and Driver magazine or Popular
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> writes about.  And deep down inside I know that what she brings forward
> to the public is the truth.

Hello,
Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any articles
about the Nuclear Batteries in "Car and Driver" and "Popular Mechanics".
I was shocked that there were no posts indicating that hydrogen fuel cells
are the solution to all of the world's problems. Many liberals that hate
oil and gas seem to believe that hydrogen fuel cells will take the place
of gasoline in the years to come. Those people don't realize that lots
of energy (such as from coal fueled power plants) needs to be used to
produce hydrogen fuel cells.
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Gordon McGrew - 13 Apr 2006 06:08 GMT
>Hello,
>Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any articles
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>of energy (such as from coal fueled power plants) needs to be used to
>produce hydrogen fuel cells.

Most liberals I know think conservation is the most effective
solution.  After that, renewable sources such as solar and wind.  They
are pretty skeptical about hydrogen - even more so after Bush gave it
a big endorsement.  I don't think they are going to go for nuclear
batteries ;-]
Jason - 13 Apr 2006 15:52 GMT
> >Hello,
> >Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any articles
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> a big endorsement.  I don't think they are going to go for nuclear
> batteries ;-]

I agree. The liberals in both houses of Congress would NEVER allow
nuclear batteries to be produced. Perhaps they should use a different
name for them such as "green battery" or "Enviromental Battery". That's
why they use terms like "No Child Left Behind" on the bills. They knew
that no one would vote against a bill entitled, "No Child Left Behind"
even if it was a stupid bill.
Jason

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Gordon McGrew - 14 Apr 2006 15:41 GMT
>> >Hello,
>> >Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>even if it was a stupid bill.
>Jason

I assume you mean politicians not liberals use terms like "No Child
Left Behind" on the bills.  That term is a Bush initiative.

Some other gems from Bush/GOP:

The Clear Skies Initiative allows coal plants to delay installation of
emissions control equipment.

The Patriot Act allows government to spy on you.

The Healthy Forest Initiative allows more logging.
Jason - 14 Apr 2006 17:17 GMT
> >> >Hello,
> >> >Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> The Healthy Forest Initiative allows more logging.

The Republicans and Democrats--liberal or conservative--use that trick.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Paul Elliot - 12 Apr 2006 18:26 GMT
U R 2 Funny  :-)

>>I have not read yet read about those nuclear batteries but will do so if
>>an article appears about them in Car and Driver magazine or Popular
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> O3-

Signature

PC Paul
89 PC800
77 R100RS

Trip pics at: http://photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart

"To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to
society" - Theodore Roosevelt

twothousandtwoto2007@yahoo.com - 11 Apr 2006 01:09 GMT
OK so the Fit is a little less.  You still missed the point.  Americans
in general do not gravitate towards mini-compact cars.  The situation
is different in Canada.  Yet In Canada people still buy big SUVs.  Ever
watched the TV show "Help you sell" based in Quebec Canada?  They are
driving an Explorer or a Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Air-

> > I don't see much of a market for the Honda Fit.  Most people would buy
> > the civic instead which offers so much more for less money.  Same thing
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> sold quite well here, and the Yaris looks like it will be equally
> successful.  So I have no doubt that the Fit will also do well here.
twfsa - 10 Apr 2006 12:15 GMT
I would buy a GM or Ford car if they had any kind of reliability, I don't
mind spending the extra on the domestic brands, what I do mind is sticking a
bunch of money in it, just  after the warranty expires.I think the bidy
styles are better looking than the foreign cars.

Tom

> I have a copy of the May 2006 issue of Car and Driver (magazine). The
> magazine has an excellent article beginning on page 58 related 6 foreign
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> that this could be the final nail in the coffin for GM and perhaps Ford?
> Jason
JXStern - 12 Apr 2006 13:13 GMT
>The car that came in first place in the comparison test was the Honda Fit
>Sport. It actully "sailed through the lane change test 6 mph faster than a
>Corvette Z06."

Must have been the speed bumps.

J.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.