Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tire Questions (Bridgestone Potenza RE92)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
CDMA - 05 Jul 2006 01:06 GMT
I have owned my 2000 Prelude since it was new and have driven it very
responsibly, mostly highway mileage. The car came with Bridgestone Potenza
RE92 (205/50R16) tires, since I also have an older (second gen.) 1987
prelude, I don't drive the 2000 that often and have only put 53K miles in
it, today I noticed the front passenger side tire has cracks all around the
sidewall, I can only see the cracking on this tire, the others seem ok. I
check tire pressure every 2 to 3 months and don't recall going over anything
or hitting a curb that could cause such damage and there are no signs of any
wear or tear on the wheels and the tires still have excellent tread.

The questions I have:

1) is this normal wear or could it be possible I damaged the tire some how?

2) Has anyone else had any similar experience with these types of tires?

Thanks, CDMA
Body Roll - 05 Jul 2006 05:32 GMT
> The questions I have:
>
> 1) is this normal wear or could it be possible I damaged the tire some how?

I do not think this normal. Yes, it's possible you trashed it. Good
riddance.

> 2) Has anyone else had any similar experience with these types of tires?

No, but now you have an excellent excuse to replace that junk with
decent
tires. RE92 does not belong on prelude or any other semi decent car.
CDMA - 05 Jul 2006 07:05 GMT
Thanks for the comments Body Roll, Btw, any recommendations on some decent
tires without having to break the bank?, I do plan on replacing them soon.

> > The questions I have:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> decent
> tires. RE92 does not belong on prelude or any other semi decent car.
Rob - 05 Jul 2006 15:37 GMT
Is it possible this one tire has more direct sun hitting it day to day?

> Thanks for the comments Body Roll, Btw, any recommendations on some decent
> tires without having to break the bank?, I do plan on replacing them soon.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>> decent
>> tires. RE92 does not belong on prelude or any other semi decent car.
CDMA - 06 Jul 2006 04:34 GMT
Rob, not really, when the car is not in use it is in a garage, it seems to
me it may be a tire defect, there are not wear marks on the side walls other
than these cracks, I really take care of this car and cant recall where or
how I could have done something like that.. I check it on a regular basis,
but I wondering if low tire pressure could cause something like that.

> Is it possible this one tire has more direct sun hitting it day to day?
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>> decent
>>> tires. RE92 does not belong on prelude or any other semi decent car.
Body Roll - 06 Jul 2006 00:03 GMT
> Thanks for the comments Body Roll, Btw, any recommendations on some decent
> tires without having to break the bank?, I do plan on replacing them soon.

Kumho Ecsta ASX is cheap, 712 is marginally better.
Ecsta MX is a whole lot better and a tiny bit more expensive.
Look on tirerack.com
Lots of tests and you can get an idea about prices even if you want to
buy tires
from a local ripoff joint.
Stephen H - 06 Jul 2006 06:24 GMT
The tires are old. 6 years old. This is normal for tires that are old or
don't get moved enough. It is important for the tires to roll and let the
oils in the tires move around. Eventually they loose this oil and dry out.
It varies from tire manufacture to manufacture; but generally 5 to 6 years
is the life of a tire. On my travel trailer; I change the tires every 5
years regardless of what they look like.

Steve

>I have owned my 2000 Prelude since it was new and have driven it very
>responsibly, mostly highway mileage. The car came with Bridgestone Potenza
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks, CDMA
CDMA - 06 Jul 2006 07:12 GMT
Hi Steve,  Thanks for the feedback and I tend to agree with you on the tires
being old. I will be changing them this week.
CDMA

> The tires are old. 6 years old. This is normal for tires that are old or
> don't get moved enough. It is important for the tires to roll and let the
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>> Thanks, CDMA
glenf - 10 Jul 2006 04:12 GMT
I agree with Stephen.  When tires on my motorhome are 6 years old and still
have significant tread depth, they get replaced.  And that costs almost
$2K!!

I had Kumhos on my Miata and was very pleased with them
> The tires are old. 6 years old. This is normal for tires that are old or
> don't get moved enough. It is important for the tires to roll and let the
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> >
> > Thanks, CDMA
tww - 07 Jul 2006 00:47 GMT
> I have owned my 2000 Prelude since it was new and have driven it very
> responsibly, mostly highway mileage. The car came with Bridgestone Potenza
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Thanks, CDMA

I previously owned a 01 Prelude.  In my opinion the OEM RE92s were a lousy
tire.  Replaced them with Bridgestone RE 750s and was quite pleased.  You
might check into http://www.absoluteprelude.com/ for info from other Prelude
owners on tires and a variety of other info on your Prelude.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.