
Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
On 7/25/2006 2:28 AM TeGGeR® spake these words of knowledge:
>> Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> See my reply to this identical message in rec.autos.makers.honda.
Tegger, many people don't read rec.auto.makers.honda. I see that
putting this message here serves to direct those people to finishing the
thread, but why not put the reply in all of the newsgroups? If everyone
read all the newsgroups out there, we'd only need one.
This is something I've never understood, and I've been on usenet since
the early 80's. Heck, I'm one of those suckers who was paying $4 a
month to keep dialup Fidonet going.
If I were asking a question in several Honda groups, it would be because
I would expect to contact different people; of course, there are many
who subscribe to multiple newsgroups on a subject - and there are many
who don't. I have actually seen grown people (who should know better)
suggest that it's OK to ask a question in more than one newsgroup, as
long as you don't do it by sending the same question at once, but rather
by typing it (or at least) sending it as a separate transmission. I
have never found anyone who could suggest a reasonable basis for this
notion.
Anyway, I think of you as a pretty reasonable person, so perhaps you can
help an old computer guy out.
RFT!!!
Dave Kelsen

Signature
I looked for evidence of collusion between the tobacco industry and
firearms manufacturers, but alas, I could find no "smoking gun."
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 25 Jul 2006 14:07 GMT
> If I were asking a question in several Honda groups, it would be because
> I would expect to contact different people;
Which is why cross-posting exists.
Dave Kelsen - 26 Jul 2006 02:50 GMT
On 7/25/2006 8:07 AM Elmo P. Shagnasty spake these words of knowledge:
>> If I were asking a question in several Honda groups, it would be because
>> I would expect to contact different people;
>
> Which is why cross-posting exists.
Yes. Thank you.
That is the gist of my question; why not simply reply to the post? What
is the purpose of reducing one's reply to a single group rather than
posting the reply in all of the groups the question was posted to?
Understand that this is a genuine question; I am aware of the trolls and
a.sholes who post to groups which could have no possible interest in the
material; posting a question about Honda suspension to
alt.jehovahs.witness, and that sort of thing. That is not what I am
referring to.
Wait. I have just looked at the original headers, and I see that the OP
did not cross-post.
This makes Tegger's response eminently sensible to me *although I would
simply have put both newsgroups in my response) but begs the question,
"Why did dolodiaz post the way he/she did?" Note that I don't expect
anyone to know...
Interesting.
RFT!!!
Dave Kelsen

Signature
"The individual activity of one man with backbone will do more than a
thousand men with a mere wishbone." -- William J.H. Boetcker
TeGGeR® - 26 Jul 2006 03:17 GMT
> Wait. I have just looked at the original headers, and I see that the
> OP did not cross-post.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> question, "Why did dolodiaz post the way he/she did?" Note that I
> don't expect anyone to know...
Because like a lot of people, he is unaware of correct Usenet etiquette. He
has MULTIposted instead of crossposting.
Multiposting is poor form because you may end up making fools of those who
engage in a debate in one group, unaware that someone in another group may
have given the best and most informative answer yet.
I refuse to condone multi-posting. I will put my answer in one place, then
point to that.

Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
dolo.diaz@gmail.com - 27 Jul 2006 06:57 GMT
Dave,
I did not cross-post out of ignorance, I did not know this option was
available since this is my first time using Usenet. Sorry about all
the confusion and please forgive my sloppy posting etiquette :)
> On 7/25/2006 8:07 AM Elmo P. Shagnasty spake these words of knowledge:
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> "The individual activity of one man with backbone will do more than a
> thousand men with a mere wishbone." -- William J.H. Boetcker
TeGGeR® - 25 Jul 2006 16:54 GMT
> On 7/25/2006 2:28 AM TeGGeR® spake these words of knowledge:
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> thread, but why not put the reply in all of the newsgroups? If everyone
> read all the newsgroups out there, we'd only need one.
Crossposting is the tool used to put a reply in all groups. All newsreaders
are capable of it, but some make the process a bit arcane.
Even if you're only able to see one of the groups, you can at least see by
the headers that it has been posted to other groups as well, giving you a
chance to use Google Groups to fill in what your provider may not carry.
Google Groups can even fill in for those situations where some ignoramus
thought he was being clever by removing the crossposting in his reply.
That there exist two groups with identical subject matter is stupid.
(rec.autos.makers.honda; alt.autos.honda).
If I had any control over it, I'd consolidate them.
If our friend had crossposted correctly, or had indicated to people that
the message was posted to more than one group (and which groups those
were), then there wouldn't be a problem.
As it stood, any reply in one group would not be seen by the other, as
about half the audience would be unaware of any answers in one place or the
other. Hardly fair, so in these cases I put my reply in one place and just
point to it.

Signature
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/