Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Manual Tranny Fluid Observations

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Elle - 18 Sep 2006 16:23 GMT
1991 Civic Sedan owner here, 182k miles, original and only
owner. The owner's manual for this Honda prescribes either
ordinary 10W-30 or 10W-40 (depending on expected ambient
temperatures) for the manual transmission fluid (MTF), with
a change interval of 2 years/60k miles, whichever comes
first. Discussion here suggests that use of ordinary engine
oil is no longer appropriate, due to changes in engine oil
technology over the years. In addition, using instead OEM
Honda MTF has been said, anecdotally and by one
authoritative written source IIRC, to yield smoother
shifting. Smoother shifting of course implies less wear as
well.

Last week I made the switch to OEM Honda MTF. I do think the
shifting is smoother. Not by a lot, but I think what I
perceive when shifting gears is more than a placebo effect.

As a "BTW" when buying my MTF at the dealer's, I asked the
dealer parts folks and one of the service writers whether I
could increase the change interval. They said yes,
suggesting I go to at least three years.

Interest piqued, I figured more recent Honda Civic owner's
manuals might add more insight. The 2004 and 2005 manuals
give a change interval of 6 years/120k miles(!) for normal
conditions; half these numbers for "severe driving
conditions." Go back to 1998, and the interval listed is 6
years/90k miles for normal; 2 years/30k  miles for  severe.

The OEM Honda MTF cost me about $12 total for two quarts,
which completely changes out my Civic's MTF. Ordinary 10W-30
or 40, for good or bad, costs around $4 for two quarts right
now.

Per year cost ("normal conditions") of using OEM Honda MTF
and the more recently recommended intervals: Just about
exactly the same.

Manual tranny design has not changed much, if at all, from
1991 to the present. A manual tranny is still mostly a
collection of steel etc. gears and synchronizers etc.
mounted on a mainshaft etc. that rotate in the MTF. Barring
further evidence, ISTM the OEM Honda MTF is now for many
older Civic owners the preferred route to go, both from a
wear-and-tear standpoint and a cost per year standpoint,
assuming the limiting factor is years and not miles for
one's driving.
Earle Horton - 18 Sep 2006 16:52 GMT
Thanks for the observations.  Contamination of manual transmission fluid
comes from two sources, wear of synchros, gears and bearings, and
environmental water.  There isn't much you can do about wear (except change
the fluid!) but if you live in a wet, humid, cold or damp area then you
should think about modifying maintenance intervals appropriately.  If you
ford a lot of streams, for example...

Cheers.

Earle

> 1991 Civic Sedan owner here, 182k miles, original and only
> owner. The owner's manual for this Honda prescribes either
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> assuming the limiting factor is years and not miles for
> one's driving.
Grumpy AuContraire - 18 Sep 2006 18:31 GMT
My personal opinion for manual tranny lubricant is to use synthetic
since it is not exposed to combustion contaminents and take advantage of
extended component as well as a significant difference with shifting
especially during cold weather.

Take a look at the RedLine site where synchronizer issues are discussed
under transmission fluids.

JT

> 1991 Civic Sedan owner here, 182k miles, original and only
> owner. The owner's manual for this Honda prescribes either
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> assuming the limiting factor is years and not miles for
> one's driving.
Elle - 19 Sep 2006 01:50 GMT
JT, good point. The OEM Honda MTF container unfortunately
does not say whether it's synthetic or not. All it says is
that it's so superior that one can increase the time between
MTF changes.

Earle, unfortunately and unintentionally, right now each
year I end up driving through a few of what are in effect
serious creekbeds. Having also recently replaced that flimsy
little boot at the end of the shift rod linkage (just as it
enters the tranny casing), I can believe water ingress at
that point, for one, could occur on these "high rain" days
where the roads flood where I am. I should probably keep
count.

> My personal opinion for manual tranny lubricant is to use
> synthetic
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> are discussed
> under transmission fluids.
Earle Horton - 19 Sep 2006 02:21 GMT
Water in the tranny will show up as "milky" fluid.  I have a Jeep.  I know.
;^)

Earle

> JT, good point. The OEM Honda MTF container unfortunately
> does not say whether it's synthetic or not. All it says is
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> > are discussed
> > under transmission fluids.
TeGGeR® - 19 Sep 2006 12:23 GMT
> Water in the tranny will show up as "milky" fluid.  I have a Jeep.  I
> know. ;^)

Water in ANY oil that is churned in operation will result in a milky
emulsion.

Signature

TeGGeR®

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.