Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Pilot Transmission Problems

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ringopilot - 08 Dec 2006 18:39 GMT
New to the sight ... and wish I had seen it sooner.

Just replaced the trans on my 03 pilot ... @ 125,000 miles. It was
shifting sporatically from 2nd to 3rd. I had the recall inspection done
at 45,000 but to no long term avail. All of the miles are highway ...
pretty easy miles.

Also, spoke to another 03 owner that had to replace his trans @ about
the same miles ...

Honda customer service just didn't seem to think this was there problem
because of the miles ... they have engineering problems (now they are
mine)
Jack Tseng - 10 Dec 2006 05:40 GMT
well.. I had my 2002 Accord V6 transmission problem too @ 60K miles. We got
approved from American Honda Motor Company. The company paid $3800 for the
repairing. I paid nothing. ;-)  I think Honda engineers have a mistake.

> New to the sight ... and wish I had seen it sooner.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> because of the miles ... they have engineering problems (now they are
> mine)
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 10 Dec 2006 15:53 GMT
> well.. I had my 2002 Accord V6 transmission problem too @ 60K miles. We got
> approved from American Honda Motor Company. The company paid $3800 for the
> repairing. I paid nothing. ;-)  I think Honda engineers have a mistake.

Honda engineers didn't make a mistake.  Honda in Japan made a
mistake--by removing the engineers from key decisions, replacing them
with beancounters.

The results were dramatically bad:  horrible designs over about a 10
year period as well as transmission problems that make Chrysler's
reliability look like Toyota's.  Honda cheapened out on the transmission
supplier, and got what they paid for.

They fell into the trap that they'd rather do it completely wrong and
pay for it twice than do it right up front.  In the end they dumped
YEARS of customer loyalty and satisfaction, despite their efforts to fix
things.

I will never pay for a transmission in my 02 Odyssey.  Period.  If it
fails and Honda tells me to go blow, that van will sit at the side of
the road with a huge sign on it, explaining that to anyone who drives by.
Art - 10 Dec 2006 20:26 GMT
Toyota and Honda expect things to last 100k miles.  GM goes for just the
warranty period.  That is why Toyota and Hondas are more reliable.  It
lasted over 125k miles.  You have nothing to complain about.

> New to the sight ... and wish I had seen it sooner.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> because of the miles ... they have engineering problems (now they are
> mine)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.