Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Odometer Class Action Suit?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bill Radio - 28 Dec 2006 06:47 GMT
I just received paperwork from the feds concerning a suit that will acheive
Class Action status on Accord odometers.  Of all cars, our '05 Accord is the
most accurate!  I do, however, have a different car that has a similar 3-4%
error on the speedometer & odometer.  So, now I'm wondering how common a
problem is this?  If I switch tire sizes, it all goes out the window,
anyway.

Anyone else question their odometer?

Bill Radio
Eric - 28 Dec 2006 08:00 GMT
> I just received paperwork from the feds concerning a suit that will
> acheive Class Action status on Accord odometers.  Of all cars, our '05
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Anyone else question their odometer?

Sure.  The odometer on my '88 Civic is about 2-3% off.  For what it's worth,
slight errors can be adjusted for by switching to different tires.  Try
experimenting with a tire size calculator such as
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html.

Eric
stilllost@comcast.net - 28 Dec 2006 10:34 GMT
I've noticed when I pass through the school or police van radars my
2000 Ody shows about 2-3 mph below what my speedometer is showing. As
an aside, this is a replacement unit, because my first one blew (quit)
during the warranty period.

>I just received paperwork from the feds concerning a suit that will acheive
>Class Action status on Accord odometers.  Of all cars, our '05 Accord is the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Bill Radio
Michael Pardee - 28 Dec 2006 12:20 GMT
> I've noticed when I pass through the school or police van radars my
> 2000 Ody shows about 2-3 mph below what my speedometer is showing. As
> an aside, this is a replacement unit, because my first one blew (quit)
> during the warranty period.

Interestingly, that's what I've seen in all the modern cars and trucks I've
driven the last few years. 2 mph conservative at low speeds, 3 (sometimes 4)
mph at highway speeds.

Mike
Flatlander47 - 28 Dec 2006 16:11 GMT
>><stilllost@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>news:c877p2phbsus97itu4suej4jd26rb8f42i@4ax.com...
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
>>Mike

Comparing my 2001 Accord to GPS, the speedometer is dead on.  Reads about 1
mph fast at all speeds.
JXStern - 28 Dec 2006 16:27 GMT
>Comparing my 2001 Accord to GPS, the speedometer is dead on.  Reads about 1
>mph fast at all speeds.

I've questioned the speedometer on my 2004 Accord as being a little
optimistic, reading 65mph when others are passing me in the presence
of Highway Patrol car!  And, um, I forget what else triggered
suspicion, but I estimated at least 2-3mph discrepancy.

However, if anything, I suspected the odometer of being a tad
pessimistic, reading shorter than actual distances, maybe a couple of
percent in the other direction.

So the combination means I look at the speedometer, estimate my time
of arrival, and can't understand why I'm late.

J.
MLD - 28 Dec 2006 18:38 GMT
> >Comparing my 2001 Accord to GPS, the speedometer is dead on.  Reads about 1
> >mph fast at all speeds.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> J.

On several long trips I have had a go at calibrating my speedometer.  The
accuracy of my calculation is 100% dependent on the assumption that the
odometer is reading correctly.  I set the cruise control to hold several
speeds, usually 60, 65, 70 and 80 mph and then record the miles traveled
over a 3 minute time period.  The results were relatively consistent--the
speedometer reading was always higher than the calculated number and it was
a combination of a percentage of the speed plus a fixed value. The error was
4% of the speedometer reading plus 2.  So when set to 80, calculated was 75;
70 vs 65, 65 vs 60, 60 vs 61 .  Not too sure just how accurate this is but I
do know that when I was moving at the 70 mph (65 speed limit)  I always
seemed to be the slowest one on the road.
MLD
Gordon McGrew - 28 Dec 2006 22:55 GMT
>> >Comparing my 2001 Accord to GPS, the speedometer is dead on.  Reads about
>1
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>seemed to be the slowest one on the road.
>MLD

The best way to check is to use the mile markers on the interstate
highways.
Michael Pardee - 28 Dec 2006 23:02 GMT
> The best way to check is to use the mile markers on the interstate
> highways.

I'm so used to the markers here in Arizona I forget not all states have
them. I know California doesn't.

Mike
Randy - 29 Dec 2006 00:22 GMT
Yes California does!  Take a look at those little white rectangular
paddles along to side of the road.  The Large numbers on them are
post-miles.  Also at certain markers that end in ##.00 there will be a
large white mark in the middle of the sideline stripe.  These may be 5
miles apart or less.  This is so that the CHP can clock your speed from
the air.

Randy

>> The best way to check is to use the mile markers on the interstate
>> highways.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Mike
Michael Pardee - 29 Dec 2006 04:03 GMT
> Yes California does!  Take a look at those little white rectangular
> paddles along to side of the road.  The Large numbers on them are
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Randy

Thanks for the info!

Mike
Howard Lester - 28 Dec 2006 18:57 GMT
"JXStern"

> I've questioned the speedometer on my 2004 Accord as being a little
> optimistic, reading 65mph when others are passing me in the presence
> of Highway Patrol car!  And, um, I forget what else triggered
> suspicion, but I estimated at least 2-3mph discrepancy.

My 2004 Accord is dead on. I've tested it several times and at various
speeds using a handheld GPS. I've also tested it against the traffic
signboards that tell you your speed as you approach it. Under all
curcumstances, the readings match up. I can't say the same for the three
Civics I owned previously.
Joe LaVigne - 29 Dec 2006 01:15 GMT
>> I've noticed when I pass through the school or police van radars my
>> 2000 Ody shows about 2-3 mph below what my speedometer is showing. As
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Mike

I was surprised at the accuracy on the speedo on my 06 Civic Si.  When I
pass through the police radar truck areas, I have never been more than 1
MPH off, at any speed range.

In all of my past vehicles, they would be off by 1-2 at 30, and 3-4 at 60.
Gordon McGrew - 28 Dec 2006 16:59 GMT
>I just received paperwork from the feds concerning a suit that will acheive
>Class Action status on Accord odometers.  Of all cars, our '05 Accord is the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Bill Radio

For decades, manufacturers have intentionally aimed for calibration
which was as much as 10% above reality.  There are a number of
advantages to this - the owner thinks he is getting better gas
mileage, the car is lasting longer, maintenance intervals come sooner
and replacement of the vehicle will come earlier if the decision is
based on the odometer.  That said, it seems like the odometers have
become more accurate over the last 10 - 15 years.

As you point out, tire size can throw off the odometer no matter how
well it was calibrated.  Even tire wear and inflation will have minor
effects.  Also, different brands/models of tires can vary slightly in
size, even if they have the same size designation.  Add in a
reasonable production tolerance and a desire to error on the high side
and you can have perhaps a +4% error even though the manufacturer made
a good faith effort to deliver an accurate instrument.

That said, if the manufacturer can be shown to have intentionally
delivered a significantly miscalibrated odometer, it might be cause
for legal action to recover loses associated with excess vehicle
depreciation.  To win this, I think they should have to show that the
manufacturer in question was significantly worse than comparable cars
in this regard since the value of a used vehicle is compared to others
on the market.  The manufacturer could argue that the odometer
measures "odometer miles" which are comparable with other used
vehicles within the make if not between makes.  He could even argue
that, if his make is worse than other in this regard, that the
over-optimistic odometer reading has given his brand a reputation for
quality that compensates for the excess mileage.

Do the papers provided by the court mention any specific level of
inaccuracy?  If they can't show that the cars average at least +4%
with original tires, the case is bogus IMO.
clodhoppers18@gmail.com - 19 Jan 2007 04:29 GMT
I am a Honda owner and am furious.  I received a copy of the
"settlement" in the mail yesterday.  The only ones benefiting from the
suit are the attorneys that filed the case.  The only benefit I can get
is "any out of pocket expenses occurring between "Mile 36,000" and
"Mile 37,800".  If the mileage on the odometer is incorrect, then 1)
the MPG is not as good as was promoted and the advertising that
factored into my decision to buy a Honda was false; 2) both of the trip
meters also incorrectly state miles traveled; 3) Honda owners can not
sell their used Hondas for their  actual value since the odometer
reading, which is a factor in the sales price, will overstate the
actual miles driven; 4) vehicle usage taxes owed will be erroneously
high, due to the overstated odometer.

chand

> >I just received paperwork from the feds concerning a suit that will acheive
> >Class Action status on Accord odometers.  Of all cars, our '05 Accord is the
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> inaccuracy?  If they can't show that the cars average at least +4%
> with original tires, the case is bogus IMO.
Gordon McGrew - 20 Jan 2007 00:28 GMT
>I am a Honda owner and am furious.  I received a copy of the
>"settlement" in the mail yesterday.  The only ones benefiting from the
>suit are the attorneys that filed the case.  The only benefit I can get
>is "any out of pocket expenses occurring between "Mile 36,000" and
>"Mile 37,800".  

This implies that the odometers are reading 5% high.  Therefore you
get a 5% extension in your warranty.  That seems fair.

>If the mileage on the odometer is incorrect,

Have you checked it?

> then 1)
>the MPG is not as good as was promoted and the advertising that
>factored into my decision to buy a Honda was false;

The odometer does not affect your actual mileage of course.  If you
mean that you are measuring your MPG and the number is 5% higher than
reality, then you need to factor that into your calculation.  If you
are referring to the EPA estimate, then rest assured that the estimate
is in no way dependent on the accuracy of the odometer.

>2) both of the trip
>meters also incorrectly state miles traveled;

You need to factor this in, but I don't see how you have been harmed
by this.

>3) Honda owners can not
>sell their used Hondas for their  actual value since the odometer
>reading, which is a factor in the sales price, will overstate the
>actual miles driven;

This may or may not be a valid point.  But consider that, to the
extent that used Odysseys compete with each other for buyers, they are
all at an equal disadvantage.  To the extent that they compete with
other cars, we don't know how accurate those cars' odometers are.  I
can tell you that +5% is pretty typical for odometer accuracy.

> 4) vehicle usage taxes owed will be erroneously
>high, due to the overstated odometer.

If you pay taxes on this basis, then you are overpaying.  Where are
you that calculates taxes this way?  I have never heard of this and it
seems ripe for cheating by periodically disconnecting the odometer.

I would have a hard time working up much anger about this.

>> >I just received paperwork from the feds concerning a suit that will acheive
>> >Class Action status on Accord odometers.  Of all cars, our '05 Accord is the
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>> inaccuracy?  If they can't show that the cars average at least +4%
>> with original tires, the case is bogus IMO.
jim beam - 30 Dec 2006 01:39 GMT
> I just received paperwork from the feds concerning a suit that will acheive
> Class Action status on Accord odometers.  Of all cars, our '05 Accord is the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Bill Radio

i can't understand why anyone would launch a lawsuit on this in the
first place, let alone one that complains about where cars are
/accurate/.  i say this is an anti-import troll.
DodgeDriver - 30 Dec 2006 11:43 GMT
> > I just received paperwork from the feds concerning a suit that will acheive
> > Class Action status on Accord odometers.  Of all cars, our '05 Accord is the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> first place, let alone one that complains about where cars are
> /accurate/.  i say this is an anti-import troll.

An inaccurate reading odometer can affect your mileage warranty by reporting
higher mileage than is accurately on the car.
jim beam - 30 Dec 2006 15:00 GMT
>>> I just received paperwork from the feds concerning a suit that will
> acheive
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> An inaccurate reading odometer can affect your mileage warranty by reporting
> higher mileage than is accurately on the car.

1. there are legal limits on inaccuracy.
2. this car is allegedly /too/ accurate.

makes no sense.
al.romig@gmail.com - 13 Jan 2007 21:14 GMT
They filed the suit so the lawyers could collect $9.8 million in legal
fees from Honda!

I'm sure that if Honda odometers consistently read LOW, the same four
lawyers would file in behalf of purchasers of used Hondas.

Texas' tort reform has chased these small fry lawyers into federal
court.

Al
> > I just received paperwork from the feds concerning a suit that will acheive
> > Class Action status on Accord odometers.  Of all cars, our '05 Accord is the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> first place, let alone one that complains about where cars are
> /accurate/.  i say this is an anti-import troll.
Nobody - 31 Dec 2006 08:52 GMT
> I just received paperwork from the feds concerning a suit that will
> acheive Class Action status on Accord odometers.  Of all cars, our '05
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Bill Radio

Well, enjoy the 5% warranty boost.
Elmo P. Shagnasty - 01 Jan 2007 02:32 GMT
> I do, however, have a different car that has a similar 3-4%
> error on the speedometer & odometer.  So, now I'm wondering how common a
> problem is this?

Apparently very common.

Many years ago, when I first got a handheld GPS, I tested it against my
92 Civic--and found that the Civic's speedometer was showing 5mph fast,
no matter what.

Fast forward to today.  I'm driving my mother's 94 Civic home to sell
it; interestingly enough, I'm driving in exactly the same place I drove
years ago when I tested my 92...and the GPS shows that my mother's 94
behaves exactly the same way as my 92 did.
jim beam - 01 Jan 2007 03:24 GMT
>> I do, however, have a different car that has a similar 3-4%
>> error on the speedometer & odometer.  So, now I'm wondering how common a
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> years ago when I tested my 92...and the GPS shows that my mother's 94
> behaves exactly the same way as my 92 did.

it's the way of the world.  speedos are required to be within 10%.
almost everyone opts for the "fast" solution, some more so than others.
 [bmw and ford really push the bleeding edge, especially over 70 where
there is no legal accuracy requirement.]

the reasoning is quite simple.  customers want their car to be "fast".
[faster 0-60, bmw drivers bowling along at what they think is 85...]
cops want cars to be "slow".  everybody's happy.  it makes no difference
to fuel economy.  it stops you getting tickets.  i see no problem.
Gordon McGrew - 01 Jan 2007 05:33 GMT
>>> I do, however, have a different car that has a similar 3-4%
>>> error on the speedometer & odometer.  So, now I'm wondering how common a
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>cops want cars to be "slow".  everybody's happy.  it makes no difference
>to fuel economy.  it stops you getting tickets.  i see no problem.

The issue is really the odometer which does cost money by accelerating
depreciation, maintenance intervals, trade-in intervals and warranty
expiration.  The odometer and speedometer do not necessarily have the
same error.
jim beam - 01 Jan 2007 05:53 GMT
>>>> I do, however, have a different car that has a similar 3-4%
>>>> error on the speedometer & odometer.  So, now I'm wondering how common a
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> expiration.  The odometer and speedometer do not necessarily have the
> same error.

odometer/speedometer inconsistency is true, but even if the odometer is
off, what impact does it have?  what's the difference between a 30k mile
car and a 33k mile car in value?  it will affect you if you lease a car,
[which incidentally is a very high proportion of bmw "sales"] and you go
over your lease mileage limits, but again, the manufacturer wins - no
incentive for them to erode the 10% "slop" they're allowed.  and how are
you going to "prove" a problem?  "sorry sir, you can't have had your
tires inflated properly."
Michael Pardee - 01 Jan 2007 15:08 GMT
> the reasoning is quite simple.  customers want their car to be "fast".
> [faster 0-60, bmw drivers bowling along at what they think is 85...] cops
> want cars to be "slow".  everybody's happy.  it makes no difference to
> fuel economy.  it stops you getting tickets.  i see no problem.

I read a sci-fi short story many years ago called "The Marching Morons."
(IIRC) One of the major facets of the theme of a populace ignorant of the
stupidity of their lives was found in their cars. The protagonist came from
present day to find himself in that future, and when he was driven somewhere
in a "modern" car he noticed irregularities. The speedometer swiftly hit 300
mph and there were sparks blowing past the window, but the scenery moved
past at about 35 mph and the time it took to get to their destination was
more consistent with 35 mph than 300. But... everybody was happy!

Mike
Joe LaVigne - 01 Jan 2007 06:33 GMT
>> I do, however, have a different car that has a similar 3-4%
>> error on the speedometer & odometer.  So, now I'm wondering how common a
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> years ago when I tested my 92...and the GPS shows that my mother's 94
> behaves exactly the same way as my 92 did.

Got a Garmin c320 GPS for Christmas.  Checked my speedo on a long trip
yesterday, and much like the street-side police checks, the GPS shows my
speed as within 1MPH at all ranges.

They certainly have gotten better over the years!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.