Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Honda Cars / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Major Service Intervals for '94 Civic EX

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 23 May 2007 11:03 GMT
I'm interested in buying a '94 Civic EX sedan. I assume this is the
125hp motor. What is Honda's schedule for replacing the timing belt and
water pump? Do dealers ever do just the belt? It was supposedly serviced
and the belt replaced at 94k, now has 140k on it, and I'm not sure the
water pump was ever changed. What would a Honda dealer have done at 60k
and 90k miles?
Tegger - 23 May 2007 12:20 GMT
>     I'm interested in buying a '94 Civic EX sedan. I assume this is the
> 125hp motor. What is Honda's schedule for replacing the timing belt and
> water pump? Do dealers ever do just the belt? It was supposedly serviced
> and the belt replaced at 94k, now has 140k on it, and I'm not sure the
> water pump was ever changed. What would a Honda dealer have done at 60k
> and 90k miles?

Go here:
https://techinfo.honda.com/rjanisis/logon.asp
Choose "Owner's Manuals" from the menu at left, then navigate to your car.
No login required.

This will bring up the Owner's Manual for the '94 Civic. This manual will
contain the maintenance schedule.

The water pump should be replaced at the same time as the belt. If this is
the car's second change, the tensioner should be replaced as well.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 23 May 2007 20:45 GMT
>>    I'm interested in buying a '94 Civic EX sedan. I assume this is the
>>125hp motor. What is Honda's schedule for replacing the timing belt and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> The water pump should be replaced at the same time as the belt. If this is
> the car's second change, the tensioner should be replaced as well.

    Thanks for the link and info.
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 23 May 2007 20:49 GMT
>>    I'm interested in buying a '94 Civic EX sedan. I assume this is the
>>125hp motor. What is Honda's schedule for replacing the timing belt and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> The water pump should be replaced at the same time as the belt. If this is
> the car's second change, the tensioner should be replaced as well.

   I just checked that online manual, and unless the dealer was
proactive, the water pump was only "inspected," Great...
motsco_ - 23 May 2007 21:38 GMT
>    I just checked that online manual, and unless the dealer was
> proactive, the water pump was only "inspected," Great...

-------------------------

In Canada the dealers will tell you just about anything you need to
know. You walk in and tell the service writer that 'Joe' is selling /
has sold you his car and you know THEY serviced it, (you provide the
VIN) and eventually you walk out with reprints of the work orders that
they have. You can find the exact date it was sold and the dealership's
number too.

Done it about 6 times.

'Curly'
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 23 May 2007 22:15 GMT
>>    I just checked that online manual, and unless the dealer was
>> proactive, the water pump was only "inspected," Great...
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> 'Curly'

   As I wrote earlier, I'll be looking at a fax of a service order
tomorrow. The car was bought and serviced on the other side of the
country from where it is (and I am) now, so it's not as easy. Basically
I wanted to know how likely it was that the water pump was ever
replaced, and I'm disappointed to learn that Honda didn't give a
specific mileage for doing it, like every 90k miles. This gives
cheapskate owners a reason to skimp on service, and then act aggrieved
when I deduct the $600 for that service they never had done, from my
offer...
Tegger - 23 May 2007 23:59 GMT
>>>    I'm interested in buying a '94 Civic EX sedan. I assume this is
>>>    the
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>     I just checked that online manual, and unless the dealer was
> proactive, the water pump was only "inspected," Great...

"Inspected" would mean the mechanic spun the pulley by hand to see how
it felt. You can tell if the pump's going bad just by doing that.

Truth be told, the pump will last two belt changes if the coolant is
changed according to the severe schedule, and with OEM fluid. IF...

The reason you change it every belt change is because you have to pull
the timing belt off to get at it in the first place, so the labor is
mostly the same. But, with a $60 part charge, $20 for coolant, and maybe
an additional hour's labor ($180 total for the pump), there's
considerable incentive for customers to skimp on the pump.

Dealers will change just the pump if that's what you want, but it's been
my experience that they will try to talk you into doing the pump too,
which is a great idea, regardless of the perceived "ripoff" factor.

I guess Honda assumes everybody will use Honda coolant and change it
when they're supposed to.

If you have no documented proof that the pump was changed, just keep an
ear/eye on your engine, especially at startup. If there are no strange
squealing noises, no coolant leaks on the ground at the timing belt end,
your pump is still OK.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 24 May 2007 00:44 GMT
>>>>   I'm interested in buying a '94 Civic EX sedan. I assume this is
>>>>   the
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> squealing noises, no coolant leaks on the ground at the timing belt end,
> your pump is still OK.

    Yeah, that's the plan, but I sure wish other people were more like
me. I have the oil seals done with the belt and pump, if the mileage is
over 100k. My '86 CIvic Si (bought new) is 22 years old and still runs
fine...
Tegger - 24 May 2007 01:49 GMT
>      Yeah, that's the plan, but I sure wish other people were more
>      like
> me. I have the oil seals done with the belt and pump, if the mileage
> is over 100k. My '86 CIvic Si (bought new) is 22 years old and still
> runs fine...

Then you've got five years on me. I bought my '91 Integra new as well.
It has almost 288,000 miles on it as of today.

I figure I'm sort of in competition with my long-dead Daddy. He got 140,000
miles out of his '58 Dodge, and I've doubled that. So far...

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 24 May 2007 02:47 GMT
>>     Yeah, that's the plan, but I sure wish other people were more
>>     like
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I figure I'm sort of in competition with my long-dead Daddy. He got 140,000
> miles out of his '58 Dodge, and I've doubled that. So far...

   I win on age, but you win on mileage. My Civic has only 146k on it.
I'm thinking of selling her now. Any interest out there?
Elle - 24 May 2007 07:52 GMT
> Truth be told, the pump will last two belt changes if the
> coolant is
> changed according to the severe schedule, and with OEM
> fluid. IF...

Where'd you hear this or see it specified?
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 24 May 2007 09:43 GMT
>>Truth be told, the pump will last two belt changes if the
>>coolant is
>>changed according to the severe schedule, and with OEM
>>fluid. IF...
>
> Where'd you hear this or see it specified?

   I think he's going by experience. That's a pretty common assumption
for more than one make. The only problem with it is that people who use
the specified coolant and change it regularly are the ones who usually
have the water pump changed with every timing belt. And, worse, vice versa.
jim beam - 24 May 2007 14:02 GMT
>> Truth be told, the pump will last two belt changes if the
>> coolant is
>> changed according to the severe schedule, and with OEM
>> fluid. IF...
>
> Where'd you hear this or see it specified?

honda don't specify a pump change, they specify inspection.  based on my
experience, a pump will last a good deal longer than a belt.  the urban
tradition of change is that of economics - for $45 extra bucks and
you're already in there, why not?

personally, i inspect if it's first change, but i have the tools and
experience to do the job myself.
Grumpy AuContraire - 24 May 2007 16:29 GMT
>>> Truth be told, the pump will last two belt changes if the coolant is
>>> changed according to the severe schedule, and with OEM fluid. IF...
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> personally, i inspect if it's first change, but i have the tools and
> experience to do the job myself.

My experience with older Honda Civics (Gen 1 & 2) is that a waterpump's
life span is about the same as a belt.  In fact, I have had to cheat to
get one to last as long as a belt by squirting the shaft with motor oil
in ever increasing frequency.  My record for water pump life extension
was about 7,000 miles and it was growling pretty good...

JT
Tegger - 24 May 2007 18:04 GMT
"Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in news:7Da5i.18526
$3P3.17332@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net:

>> Truth be told, the pump will last two belt changes if the
>> coolant is
>> changed according to the severe schedule, and with OEM
>> fluid. IF...
>
> Where'd you hear this or see it specified?

This is generally what my mechanic sees.

He does NOT recommend actually leaving it in for two changes though. Too
risky, since almost nobody's cooling system is maintained properly.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Tegger - 24 May 2007 18:48 GMT
Tegger <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in news:Xns993A8147BE528tegger@
207.14.116.130:

> "Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in news:7Da5i.18526
> $3P3.17332@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> He does NOT recommend actually leaving it in for two changes though. Too
> risky, since almost nobody's cooling system is maintained properly.

Sorry, this observation was based on a 60K-mile belt replacement interval,
not the max interval of 105K. My bad.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Elle - 24 May 2007 19:09 GMT
>>>> Truth be told, the pump will last two belt changes if
>>>> the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> replacement interval,
> not the max interval of 105K. My bad.

Pardon? So what's this mechanic's counsel for my 91 Civic
(interval of six years/90k miles on the timing belt)?
Tegger - 24 May 2007 19:57 GMT
"Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in news:qxk5i.14669
$j63.9339@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

>>>>> Truth be told, the pump will last two belt changes if
>>>>> the
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Pardon? So what's this mechanic's counsel for my 91 Civic
> (interval of six years/90k miles on the timing belt)?

Replace the pump every time you do the timing belt.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Elle - 24 May 2007 20:00 GMT
> "Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in
> news:qxk5i.14669
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Replace the pump every time you do the timing belt.

Even w/perfect maintenance of the cooling system? (Sorry;
that's the main point to me.)
Joe LaVigne - 24 May 2007 20:17 GMT
>> "Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in
>> news:qxk5i.14669
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Even w/perfect maintenance of the cooling system? (Sorry;
> that's the main point to me.)

The pump is a very inexpensive item.  $50 or so.  It isn't worth not doing,
IMO, since it takes minimal extra effort or money.
Elle - 24 May 2007 20:23 GMT
>>> "Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in
>>> news:qxk5i.14669
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> worth not doing,
> IMO, since it takes minimal extra effort or money.

*&^%$# This is repeated ad nauseam here. For the cheap
DIYers, I want Tegger's response.

:-)
Elle - 24 May 2007 20:26 GMT
"Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote
Others--
>>> Even w/perfect maintenance of the cooling system?
>>> (Sorry;
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> :-)

Plus I recall Jim Beam posting something about how certain
models' water pumps could go forever, in his estimation.

Do not lecture me about rolling the dice. My 91 Civic maint
repair experiences are less a pain and more an adventure.
JT, I know you know what I mean.

Still smiling.
jim beam - 25 May 2007 16:52 GMT
> "Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote
> Others--
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Plus I recall Jim Beam posting something about how certain
> models' water pumps could go forever, in his estimation.

did i say that?  honda pumps are very high quality, and the 305K crx i
had i got cheap because the pump which had never been changed finally
gave out, but that's not "forever".

i'm happy to just use inspection on my own vehicles, but i can get in
there and do my own work.  if you're paying someone else hundreds of
dollars to do the job, $45 for a pump is immaterial so you may as well
do it.

> Do not lecture me about rolling the dice. My 91 Civic maint
> repair experiences are less a pain and more an adventure.
> JT, I know you know what I mean.
>
> Still smiling.
Grumpy AuContraire - 25 May 2007 19:29 GMT
snip

 My 91 Civic maint
> repair experiences are less a pain and more an adventure.
> JT, I know you know what I mean.
>
> Still smiling.

I'll betcha that my maintenance tasks are simpler than yours!

How much work to change the alternator/AC compressor on your ride?

<GGG>

JT
Elle - 25 May 2007 22:37 GMT
> snip
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I'll betcha that my maintenance tasks are simpler than
> yours!

Yes, no doubt. :-)

> How much work to change the alternator/AC compressor on
> your ride?

I have not done the alternator myself yet. I bet I have to
place a jack strategically to get the necessary clearance,
per others' reports on Hondas c. 1991.

No AC on my 4-banger.
Tegger - 24 May 2007 22:53 GMT
"Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in news:oCl5i.9834
$296.699@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net:

>>>> Replace the pump every time you do the timing belt.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> *&^%$# This is repeated ad nauseam here. For the cheap
> DIYers, I want Tegger's response.

That's basically what my guy says too. It's not worth cheaping out on the
few extra bucks for the new water pump. I am also reminded that Honda water
pumps tend to be driven by the timing belt, so seizures can be very costly.

Some cars are different, such as our '99 Tercel (this is the one with the
60K belt interval). In that car the water pump is driven by a regular
accessory drive belt and is accessible without removing the timing belt. In
that case you can risk extending the pump change interval.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/

Grumpy AuContraire - 25 May 2007 00:30 GMT
>>"Elle" <honda.lioness@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in
>>news:qxk5i.14669
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> Even w/perfect maintenance of the cooling system? (Sorry;
> that's the main point to me.)

90K on the water pump on any vehicle is pushing the envelope to a
degree. On your (and others) car where the pump is driven by the timing
belt, this is even more important.

On the old tin that I drive, the water pump shares the same belt as the
alternator and is relatively easy to change but still is easier when the
timing belt is replaced.

JT
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 25 May 2007 05:02 GMT
> Tegger <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in news:Xns993A8147BE528tegger@
> 207.14.116.130:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Sorry, this observation was based on a 60K-mile belt replacement interval,
> not the max interval of 105K. My bad.

   Just thought I'd jump in here with an update: the faxed receipts,
which I sincerely hope were real, showed the water pump being replaced
as well. I left a deposit on the car. It's got some minor cosmetic
flaws, but zero rust and it's only $3k. Wish me luck.
jim beam - 23 May 2007 13:52 GMT
>    I'm interested in buying a '94 Civic EX sedan. I assume this is the
> 125hp motor. What is Honda's schedule for replacing the timing belt and
> water pump? Do dealers ever do just the belt? It was supposedly serviced
> and the belt replaced at 94k, now has 140k on it, and I'm not sure the
> water pump was ever changed. What would a Honda dealer have done at 60k
> and 90k miles?

unless you have a genuine service record, you cant assume /anything/ was
done on schedule.  there's no reason why this can't be a perfectly fine
vehicle but you must pay a price that reflects the need to spend money
taking care of what's not definitely been maintained.
mjc13<REMOVETHIS> - 23 May 2007 20:45 GMT
>>    I'm interested in buying a '94 Civic EX sedan. I assume this is the
>> 125hp motor. What is Honda's schedule for replacing the timing belt
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> vehicle but you must pay a price that reflects the need to spend money
> taking care of what's not definitely been maintained.

   I understand. I'll be looking at a fax of a dealer service stop, and
making an offer according to what it still needs.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.