Car Forum / Hyundai Cars / June 2005
How many miles will a Hyundai
|
|
Thread rating:  |
twfsa - 30 May 2005 22:13 GMT How many miles will the newer Hyundai's run before there ready for the bone yard, altho the quaility is up from the first generations, there's never going to be any re-sale value, as in a Honda or a Toyota.It would be nice if they would run 200K with maintance.
So if I were to buy a Hyundai I would have to run it in the ground, or trade it on another Hyundai.
Tom
Dances With Crows - 30 May 2005 22:37 GMT > How many miles will the newer Hyundai's run 's is not a plural marker. You mean "Hyundais" here.
> before there ready for the bone yard, altho the quaility This is a run-on sentence. You want a "?" after "bone yard". Use a speling checker, and remember that "there" != "they're" != "their", eh?
> is up from the first generations, there's never going to be any > re-sale value, as in a Honda or a Toyota. 1975: "Japanese cars suck! Honda cars/motorcycles are *never* going to have the resale value of Ford/Chevy cars!"
Stuff changes. I'd say Hyundai (now) = Honda (1985) . ICBW.
> It would be nice if they [Hyundai cars] would run 200K [miles] with > [regular maintenance.] Since recent Hyundai cars sold in the USA have a 60,000 mile bumper-to-bumper warranty and a 100,000 mile powertrain warranty, I don't think 200,000 miles is out of the question. I can't speak for this, though, as my Tiburon is only 2.2 years old and only has 22,000 miles on it. I *can* say that it's had zero mechanical problems except for the time I ran over a raccoon, which caused $80 worth of trim damage.
> So if I were to buy a Hyundai I would have to run it in the ground, or > trade it on another Hyundai. Can you provide supporting evidence for this statement? Or did you mean "If I were to buy a Hyundai, would I have to run it into the ground?" ?
Cars depreciate faster than anything except computer equipment. Given that, the smart thing to do from a pure financial standpoint is this: Buy a car that has a good repair record and is 1 or 2 years old, then drive that car until it falls apart. This means you can't show off a new car every 3 years, but it also means you will spend much less money on cars. YMMV, naturally.
If you want specific advice, you need to say what model you're interested in, what your plans are, and what's important to you. HTH,
 Signature Matt G|There is no Darkness in eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see Yesterday upon the stair, I met a man who wasn't there. He wasn't there again today -- I think he's from the CIA.
Jozef - 30 May 2005 22:52 GMT FWIW. My 1996 Hyundai Accent is at 193,050 miles and going strong. My wife says that she intends to prevent me from catching up to her machine a 1993 Subaru Impreza with 213,200 miles. The Accent owes me nothing considering I paid $7.5K for it when brand new in 1996. At a consistent 40 - 43 mpg on the highway the machine long ago delivered its value.
Jozef Vermont
>> How many miles will the newer Hyundai's run > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > If you want specific advice, you need to say what model you're > interested in, what your plans are, and what's important to you. HTH, Harry Smith - 01 Jun 2005 06:32 GMT The Sonatas did *not* have quality or reliability problems in the '89-91 era. Maybe it helped that they were built in Canada? At any rate, we have an '89 Sonata with 308,500 miles on it that I am driving daily. Rebuilt cylinder head at about 260,000, and some rust repair a couple of times (we're in the upper midwest -- lots of road salt), but I'm planning to drive it 2500 miles to Canada -- pulling our enclosed trailer. Now *that's* quality, for my money!
Harry ==============
> FWIW. My 1996 Hyundai Accent is at 193,050 miles and going strong. My wife > says that she intends to prevent me from catching up to her machine a 1993 [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] >>If you want specific advice, you need to say what model you're >>interested in, what your plans are, and what's important to you. HTH, eastwardbound2003@yahoo.com - 04 Jun 2005 01:34 GMT Manuel transmission or automatic? 3 or 4 speed automatic? 4 or 5 speed manuel?
eastwardbound2003@yahoo.com - 04 Jun 2005 01:57 GMT Is the transmission automatic or manuel? I ask because this makes all the difference in longevity.
<<<<The Sonatas did *not* have quality or reliability problems in the '89-91 era. Maybe it helped that they were built in Canada? At any rate, we have an '89 Sonata with 308,500 miles on it that I am driving daily. Rebuilt cylinder head at about 260,000, and some rust repair a couple of times (we're in the upper midwest -- lots of road salt), but I'm planning to drive it 2500 miles to Canada -- pulling our enclosed trailer. Now *that's* quality, for my money!
Harry >>>>
twfsa - 04 Jun 2005 14:25 GMT Automatic.
> Is the transmission automatic or manuel? I ask because this makes all > the difference in longevity. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Harry >>>> eastwardbound2003@yahoo.com - 04 Jun 2005 16:56 GMT Sorry twifsa I was not asking you. I was asking Harry Smith about his car.
An automatic will not last as long as a manual because of the additional engine load that autos put on the engine. Also Autos are more sensitive to mechanical irregularities and would cause the engine to stop running before a manual would. Once again it's because of the added load. Also an automatic will not get as good gas mileage as the manual counterpart.
<<<< twfsa Jun 4, 9:25 am show options Newsgroups: alt.autos.hyundai From: "twfsa" <uks...@qwest.net> - Find messages by this author Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 08:25:10 -0500 Local: Sat,Jun 4 2005 9:25 am Subject: Re: How many miles will a Hyundai Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
Automatic.>>>>
Richard Steinfeld - 05 Jun 2005 10:45 GMT > Sorry twifsa I was not asking you. I was asking Harry Smith about his > car. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > added load. Also an automatic will not get as good gas mileage as the > manual counterpart. However, in San Francisco, the reverse is true. Think about the stresses throughout when at a stop sign sloping backward; you attempt to start up without rolling back into the Buick that's right on your bumper. You get going by slipping the clutch while your engine screams.
My hunch is that as far as real-world mechanical longevity goes, the two systems are a draw. One "X-factor" is the driver; and I'll bet that most standard shift drivers are a bit rougher on the mechanicals than the automatic drivers. The automatic tends to prevent the driver from doing stupid things with the machine.
And I could be equally wrong; in other words, I think that there are too many variables here to be sure one way or the other. But the automatics don't, in general, get the efficiency of the manuals.
Richard
RSCamaro - 05 Jun 2005 15:14 GMT >> Sorry twifsa I was not asking you. I was asking Harry Smith about his >> car. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >without rolling back into the Buick that's right on your bumper. You get >going by slipping the clutch while your engine screams. Don't believe that for a minute. Those same stresses that are affecting the clutch slippage are working even harder on the automatic transmission. More power needed move the vehicle = more heat created through the pump and clutch packs/bands = more wear and needed preventive maintainance.
I might be a little harder on transmissions than the average person, none of the cars that I've had with auto transmissions made it past 100,000 miles without some major work needed to the transmission. Manual transmissions usually last me the the time I own the car. I usually replace the clutch when I buy a car so I don't get stranded and so I know what I have under my clutch pedal.
...Ron
>My hunch is that as far as real-world mechanical longevity goes, the two >systems are a draw. One "X-factor" is the driver; and I'll bet that most [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Richard -- 68' Camaro RS 88' Firebird Formula 00' Mustang GT Vert
Jody - 05 Jun 2005 16:11 GMT jesus if your letting the engine scream as your foots still on the clutch half way no wonder its not going to last thats when you make use of your e brake if your scared of rolling back on a steep hill...
>>> Sorry twifsa I was not asking you. I was asking Harry Smith about his >>> car. [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > 88' Firebird Formula > 00' Mustang GT Vert eastwardbound2003@yahoo.com - 05 Jun 2005 16:38 GMT Now that you mentioned this. Has anybody here ever seen a manual transmission/transaxle auto/truck that had the e-brake actuated by the left foot on the floorboard with a release lever for the left hand? (assuming the car is a north american left hand drive set up)
I ask because it would only make sense to have it between the two front seats as the more familiar pull lever for the right hand. It can be used at different degrees of effectiveness for one thing, plus it keeps your foot free for the clutch. And for all other reasons not mentioned.
<<<<jesus if your letting the engine scream as your foots still on the clutch half way no wonder its not going to last thats when you make use of your e brake if your scared of rolling back on a steep hill... >>>>
Richard Steinfeld - 31 May 2005 01:03 GMT >>How many miles will the newer Hyundai's run
> 's is not a plural marker. You mean "Hyundais" here. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >>is up from the first generations, there's never going to be any >>re-sale value, as in a Honda or a Toyota. OK. Look. Yeah: it's a real pain to have to read peoples' bad use of English on the Internet and try to figure out what they mean. Misuse of apostrophes is galling to me too, since I attempt to write clearly and have acquired a reputation for effective writing.
I feel that before a person posts, that person should learn how to write English. It's not that hard. However, I'll allow that for some folks, it's harder than for others.
However, and note this well: it's _also_ a pain to have to read excessive verbiage auto-tagged onto the beginnings and ends of posts, as, "...-0500, twfsa staggered into the Black Sun and said:" Out of kindness, I'll refrain from calling this blather what it is... This is worse, you know, than "Do you Yahoo?" since, after all, this is essentially a joke between you and yourself: you have control over it. It's just excessive blather to others. I really don't give a flying f--- about your private in-jokes.
Give me a break: please put yourself into the shoes of others and stop this, especially before you pick at other posters' scabs for their bad netequette.
Your points about cars, however, are well-taken.
> 1975: "Japanese cars suck! Honda cars/motorcycles are *never* going to > have the resale value of Ford/Chevy cars!" [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Can you provide supporting evidence for this statement? Or did you mean > "If I were to buy a Hyundai, would I have to run it into the ground?" ? "Supporting evidence?" Is the OP on trial?
> Cars depreciate faster than anything except computer equipment. Given > that, the smart thing to do from a pure financial standpoint is this: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > If you want specific advice, you need to say what model you're > interested in, what your plans are, and what's important to you. HTH, Valid (I can pass judgment, too).
I'll add: I bought a 2000 Sonata with 107k on the clock. It's in excellent shape for its age; obviously driven mostly on the freeway. The underside steel looks like new. However, contrast this with a car driven 100,000 miles through New York City potholes and slush. Cars will, of course, wear very differently in different climates, different terrain, and different driving conditions. It's complicated.
Back in Connecticut during the 60s, I saw people having their Borgwards and Peugeots rebuilt at 200,000 miles. Undoubtedly Volvos, too (the first two were built like German and French Volvos, respectively). Some cars are really built to last. I'm not sure that the jury's in about Hyundai yet -- from reading over the Consumer Reports charts, I get the sense that Hyundai hasn't fallen into a groove yet. Those charts are, in my opinion, built on rickety information. Nonetheless, with a grain of salt, one can spot trends with them.
Richard
Andy - 31 May 2005 11:41 GMT well... i can say only best thigs about endurance and quality, my hyundai accent (2001 1,3 liter 75hp) had 62000 km in less then 3 years - (now it is RIP, a truck hit it with 70km/h speed in the back end, 4 girls wore in there without injury, the car was stoped at red light) - (at begining of second it had 47000 km then my wife got her car) ... we had no trouble only oilchanges and thats it... i know of one security company in croatia that uses hyundai accents for it cars ... they run 24hour a day, only time they are not working is when they are changing oil or geting fuel ... they make 100.000 km or more a year...
and one of colegues that i know over internet had 600.000 km on its accent (1996/97 i think and i checked that fackt at servise center and they did confirm it...) and then it changed only some rubber on engine and likes and it runs even today wizhout complete overhoul... only regular service...
Andy
illusion123a - 01 Jun 2005 01:23 GMT That good to know, i have a 2002 accent, my transmission dosent seem to shift as well as it used to, i hope this isnt a signs of things to come, but for now I am happy that i bought the 100k bumper to bumper warrenty. But I do see my self getting a new car and keeping my accent as a second car (I got the accent in college and have a little more $$ now)
twfsa - 31 May 2005 15:08 GMT Matt G Do you have any friends that you can carry on a conversation with, without correcting there use of the English ????.
My guess is no....... Maybe you and Richard Steinfeld can get together, and instance message each other and correct each others grammar.
In the future if you see a post of mine ignore it please.
Tom
>> How many miles will the newer Hyundai's run > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > If you want specific advice, you need to say what model you're > interested in, what your plans are, and what's important to you. HTH, Richard Steinfeld - 31 May 2005 18:28 GMT Dances with whatever wrote:
> Matt G > Do you have any friends that you can carry on a conversation with, without > correcting there use of the English ????. > > My guess is no....... Maybe you and Richard Steinfeld can get together, and > instance message each other and correct each others grammar. Missed my point, whoever you are. I called you on your high-handed putdown of another poster -- his grammer was bad. But you were hypercritical -- he's wasting peoples' time with his awful English. You, who, after all, by criticizing him, should know better, are wasting others' time with your textual masturbation, as:
"There is no Darkness in eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see Yesterday upon the stair, I met a man who wasn't there. He wasn't there again today -- I think he's from the CIA."
Now, why on earth does anyone else want to read this waste of bandwidth? The purpose of writing is to communicate -- and there are actually people, real people, at the other end of that process. I am not a figment of your imagination. I'm saying don't waste the time and patience of other people with drivel.
> In the future if you see a post of mine ignore it please. > > Tom > "Dances With Crows" Done.
Richard
Dances With Crows - 31 May 2005 19:16 GMT > Dances with whatever wrote: Er, I didn't. "twfsa" or uksatw@qwest.net wrote the paragraphs with >> in front of them. This is why people are supposed to pay attention to the attribution lines at the top of messages, you know.
>> Matt G Do you have any friends that you can carry on a conversation >> with, without correcting there use of the English ????. My guess is >> no....... Maybe you and Richard Steinfeld can get together, and "twfsa" / uksatw@qwest.net, work on your composition skills. Lots of people write badly because nobody ever calls them on it when they write badly. Or you can continue writing badly--makes little difference to me.
> You, who, after all, by criticizing him, should know better, are > wasting others' time with your textual masturbation, as: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Now, why on earth does anyone else want to read this waste of > bandwidth? That was in my .signature, which is properly delimited and McQuary convention compliant. .signatures have been used in mail and news since the mid-1980s to provide contact info, funny quotes, silly quotes, or ASCII art to readers. The general rule for Usenet AFAICT is that you can put *anything* in a .signature as long as it's properly delimited and <= 4 lines with each line <= 80 characters.
Thunderbird should have at least a few useful syntax-highlighting features. It should display properly delimited signature text in a different color from regular message text, for example. In fact, Richard, you should be able to set up Thunderbird to show or hide people's signatures, whichever you want. Or you can continue complaining. Whatever works for you.
> The purpose of writing is to communicate -- and there are actually > people, real people, at the other end of that process. I am not a > figment of your imagination. I'm saying don't waste the time and > patience of other people with drivel. Complaining about a person's .signature, if that .signature is properly delimited and follows length guidelines, is a bit like complaining about a bumper sticker that's on a person's car. If .signatures offend you, turn 'em off. If people offend you, killfile them.
>> In the future if you see a post of mine ignore it please. > Done. Shouldn't you be killfiling *me*, not *him*? Whatever you want.
 Signature [This .signature removed because Richard Steinfeld hates .signatures]
twfsa - 01 Jun 2005 00:16 GMT Dances with whatever
I could care less if my writing skills are not up to your standards, or people like you, and I will continue to write badly,not intentionally of course and, people such as yourself that take it upon themselves, to try and correct and criticize people like me can go Fist f.ck themselves,... and that's referring to you a.shole... incase I am confusing you!
Tom.
>> Dances with whatever wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > Shouldn't you be killfiling *me*, not *him*? Whatever you want. Richard Steinfeld - 02 Jun 2005 21:29 GMT > Dances with whatever > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Tom. Ha Ha! Tom, we have here a troll! (And, damn, but your writing has improved!)
His only appearance on this board that I can find was to attack you (and me). Fell for it myself, didn't I.
Richard
Jody - 30 May 2005 22:38 GMT no one can predict how long a car will last with out breaking down, but we have a 99 accent with 90 000 miles and doesnt use a drop of oil. were about to put new clutch in soon
> How many miles will the newer Hyundai's run before there ready for the > bone yard, altho the quaility is up from the first generations, there's [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Tom RSCamaro - 30 May 2005 23:11 GMT >How many miles will the newer Hyundai's run before there ready for the bone >yard, altho the quaility is up from the first generations, there's never [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Tom When I met my wife she was driving a 92' or 93' Excel which had about 150,000 on the clock when it was wrecked. We replaced it with a 97' Tiburon that now has over 180,000 on the ticker, granted it has nowhere near the power that it had when we bought it, but I think that it will make it to the 200,000 mark unless it too gets replaced.
The only mechanical problems to date have been 2 alternaters and some cooling issues (left the fluid in too long and had to replace the hoses). Just the recommended maintainance at their proper intervals, you know tires, brakes, timing belts, and the like. It still has the factory clutch. If someone can tell me how to do that on my Camaro, Firebird, and Mustang I'd be the happiest guy on the block.
...Ron -- 68' Camaro RS 88' Firebird Formula 00' Mustang GT Vert
Dan - 31 May 2005 18:38 GMT My 97 Tiburon has just passed the 250,000 mile mark and is still running strong. It uses about a quart of oil every 1000 miles, but I don't consider that excessive for a car with this many miles on it. I bought the car new so I know what has been repaired over the years. During its' in-warranty period, the throttle position sensor was out of spec which caused a couple visits to the dealer. Also, the clutch master cylinder went out at about 45,000 miles and was replaced by the dealer. The first "major" repair (that I had to pay for) was replacing the alternator at 170,000 miles. The only other major repair I had to contend with was a failed clutch throw-out bearing at 230,000 miles. As amazing as it sounds, when I dropped the transmission and removed the clutch there was virtually no wear to the disk or pressure plate, but I replaced it all anyway. I have never before owned a car that is as reliable as my Tiburon. I have a spare engine sitting in my garage (a 2000cc from a '99 Elantra with 43,000 miles on it) in anticipation of the day when this power plant finally does give up, but at this point, it doesn't seem like that will be any time soon.
twfsa - 31 May 2005 18:56 GMT My daughter bought a 04 Sonata she goes no where, but happens to put on 23k a year, I was concerned the car would be wore out before its paid for.
Thanks for your reply.
Tom
> My 97 Tiburon has just passed the 250,000 mile mark and is still running > strong. It uses about a quart of oil every 1000 miles, but I don't [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > give up, but at this point, it doesn't seem like that will be any time > soon. GP - 05 Jun 2005 00:47 GMT 1998 Elantra, manual 210,000 km regular maintenance, engine still going strong only repairs were two front wheel bearings and one power steering hose
I like the car.
> How many miles will the newer Hyundai's run before there ready for the bone > yard, altho the quaility is up from the first generations, there's never [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Tom vaestanfors - 06 Jun 2005 10:35 GMT > How many miles will the newer Hyundai's run before there ready > for the bone [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Tom Get this, my mate has done 350000 km in his 92 model excel..he only changed oil and filter and other normal wear items. even at this mileage it ran very well. kia which is owned by hyundai now has currently tested their engines for 300000 plus kms. their test car is still clocking up the miles, here in melbourne australia we have thousands of hyundais which keep running for years. hope this helps you.
|
|
|