Most of the major maintenance items should have been done by 50,000 km.
It's also important to consider that your car is 6-7 years old. While I
don't believe that spark plug replacement, transmission fluid change, tire
rotation, etc. need to occur on a time basis, this is true of coolant and
belts (rubber ages).
With this in mind, I'd make sure your coolant is in good condition and
that you replace your timing belt if you haven't done so. If you haven't
replaced it yet, you're now entering the time period where it's *likely*
to break or strip.
For those watching from afar, please do not infer the likelihood of the
timing belt breaking on this engine is similar to the likelihood of the
timing belt breaking on your engine. Different engines have different
propensities for timing belt failure.
Guncho - 23 Nov 2005 01:01 GMT
> Most of the major maintenance items should have been done by 50,000 km.
> It's also important to consider that your car is 6-7 years old. While I
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> timing belt breaking on your engine. Different engines have different
> propensities for timing belt failure.
Hmm, we just bought this car at 57k so I don't know if it was changed
or not.
I'll call the dealership and see if they have a record of it.
How much would this cost otherwise?
Also, thanks for all your help.
Chris
hyundaitech - 23 Nov 2005 17:58 GMT
I'd recommend having a look at the drive belts. If the a/c belt is
significantly cracked, it's likely not been changed in at least 4 years or
40k miles. Typically, the a/c belt begins to crack around 3 years/30k
miles.
If you have other belts beginning to crack, then it's likely it's been
even longer.
If the drive belts haven't been changed recently, try to assess how long
they've been on the car and how long they would have been in poor
condition. Expect that if the drive belts were in poor condition, they
would likely have been replaced with the timing belt. And also know that,
in many cases, even if they look okay, the drive belts are replaced along
with the timing belt to avoid the labor cost at a later date.
But there's no way to know for sure without a record saying it's been
done, or having a person who actually knows give you the information.
Brian Nystrom - 23 Nov 2005 13:16 GMT
> For those watching from afar, please do not infer the likelihood of the
> timing belt breaking on this engine is similar to the likelihood of the
> timing belt breaking on your engine. Different engines have different
> propensities for timing belt failure.
What have you seen with the CVVT Elantra engines in this regard?
hyundaitech - 23 Nov 2005 17:53 GMT
I've not seen a breakage on the CVVT engine. I'm presuming that's because
it was not sold in my geographic area (that I know of) until 2004MY. I'd
presume it to be the same as the non-CVVT. Everything connected to the
timing belt is the same, and the CVVT shouldn't really add a significant
load, if any.
Beta engine Elantras (1996-present) have very few timing belt failures.
The ones I've seen have been in the neighborhood of 100k miles or 7 years
(as far as I can tell).
Brian Nystrom - 23 Nov 2005 23:25 GMT
> I've not seen a breakage on the CVVT engine. I'm presuming that's because
> it was not sold in my geographic area (that I know of) until 2004MY. I'd
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> The ones I've seen have been in the neighborhood of 100k miles or 7 years
> (as far as I can tell).
Thanks. That's not surprising, but it's definitely to have some feedback
from someone with direct experience.