Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Hyundai Cars / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

XM-Satellite Is Coming Soon To A High-Priced Luxury Car Not For You

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Robert Cohen - 06 Jan 2006 01:42 GMT
One thing about Hyundai: They ain't gonna make XM-satellite standard in
the Elantra etal later this year.

Thank goodness, because that would be spoiling the customers, plus the
Delphic Parts Oracle frowns upon non-austerity, plus I'd rather listen
to local radio commercials interrupted by inane chatter and occasional
music, plus why give people the option, plus ...I'm kidding:

HYUNDAI IN LATER 2006 IS REPORTEDLY MAKING XM-SATELLITE COMPONENTS
STANDARD; and I presume one will have to pay that $13 a month
subscription or whatever  if one wants his satellite radio components
activated.
nothermark - 06 Jan 2006 03:27 GMT
>One thing about Hyundai: They ain't gonna make XM-satellite standard in
>the Elantra etal later this year.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>subscription or whatever  if one wants his satellite radio components
>activated.

why pay for radio??????????
Brian Nystrom - 06 Jan 2006 13:56 GMT
>>One thing about Hyundai: They ain't gonna make XM-satellite standard in
>>the Elantra etal later this year.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> why pay for radio??????????

I agree. Personally I'd like to see the concept fall flat on it's face.
If nothing else, it would be nice to see Howard Stern out of a job. ;-)
Matthew Rebbert - 06 Jan 2006 15:10 GMT
If you ever move to a small town (Think Mid West) where there may only be 2
or 3 radio stations, paying 13 a month seems like a small price.  Plus if
you are a trucker that does not want to retune your radio every 2 or so
hours this is a small price.

Am I saying XM or Sirrus(Howard Sterns keeper) is good for everyone?  Nope,
I live in Baltimore/DC area and have at least 20 stations to choose from.
But there are plenty who do want it.  My Brother in law likes XM, he drives
35 minutes to work each way and he likes the fact that for 35 minutes all he
hears is music.  I can't say the same, I drive 60 minutes to work and if I
hear 35 minutes of music I have done well.  Traditional radio makes money
from commercials, this means less music more crap.  XM is paid for
Mostly(some have commercials) by subscriptions so commercials are not an
issue.

I have had XM, and I did not prefer their formats but that's me.  My brother
in law loves it and has yet to use his FM or AM in his car.

To each their own...

>>>One thing about Hyundai: They ain't gonna make XM-satellite standard in
>>>the Elantra etal later this year.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> I agree. Personally I'd like to see the concept fall flat on it's face. If
> nothing else, it would be nice to see Howard Stern out of a job. ;-)
Dances With Crows - 06 Jan 2006 15:57 GMT
Please don't top-post.  Message rearranged and trimmed for easier
reading.

>>>>One thing about Hyundai: They ain't gonna make XM-satellite standard
>>>>in the Elantra et al later this year.  Thank goodness, because that
>>>>would be spoiling the customers, plus the Delphic Parts Oracle
>>>>frowns upon non-austerity, plus I'd rather listen to local radio
>>>>commercials interrupted by inane chatter and occasional music, plus
>>> why pay for radio?

I asked this in this froup a while back, and someone said, "How are you
going to get local traffic info and weather without a radio of some
sort?"  Now, you don't need pay services for local traffic and weather,
but if you want traffic, weather, and music, it gets more complex.  (I
don't care too much about traffic and weather, because here in southern
Michigan 1.5 hours from Detroit, traffic is not a problem, and blizzards
are too wimpy for weather to be very relevant.)

>> I agree. Personally I'd like to see the concept fall flat on its
>> face.
> If you ever move to a small town (Think Mid West) where there may only
> be 2 or 3 radio stations, paying 13 a month seems like a small price.

0. 1 reasonable CD-RW drive: $50
1. Spindle of CD-Rs:         $18
2. Ripping+encoding music you already have: time
3. Songs from iTunes or whatever: roughly $1/song
4. Songs from your local friendly P2P network: time
5. Burning mix CDs from songs obtained in steps 2-4: time

...so for a minimal investment + time, you don't need monthly
subscription fees in order to listen to nothing but music you like.
Heck, most consumer-level x86s and Macs have CD-RWs now, so the
investment is even more minimal than I outlined above.

> My Brother in law likes XM, he drives 35 minutes to work each way and
> he likes the fact that for 35 minutes all he hears is music.  I can't
> say the same, I drive 60 minutes to work and if I hear 35 minutes of
> music I have done well.

The first (and last) time I used my car radio was during the huge
blackout several years ago.  CD-Rs, tapes, and iPod + cassette adapter
mean it's all music, all the time in my car.

> XM is paid for mostly (some have commercials) by subscriptions so
> commercials are not an issue.

In the early days of cable TV, commercials on cable TV were pretty
infrequent "because subscribers pay fees, we don't need commercials."
Things are different now.  Look for more XM stations to add commercials,
as they try to maximize revenue.  If one of XM or Sirius goes belly-up,
all stations on the surviving satellite radio provider will have
commercials in a very short time.  That's just the way it goes, I think.

Signature

This .sig removed because Richard Steinfeld hates .sigs.

A Hyundai Owner - 07 Jan 2006 01:25 GMT
> Please don't top-post.  Message rearranged and trimmed for easier
> reading.

I'm pretty sure that most of the people on which you've imposed YOUR opinion
of  how to post on Usenet did not appreciate it. Looking at your posting
history, you've provided more information on how to post according to your
standards than useful information in your responses. Case in point here. A
buck a tune or around $10-$13 a disk adds up to $13 (the monthly fee) pretty
quickly. Unless of course, they heed your suggestion and pirate the music.
There's good things, not so good things, and bad things about both - Sirius
and XM. The issues are well known. You on the other hand just decided to pop
up out of the woodwork and start issuing posting instructions to a regular
poster in a newsgroup that you haven't contributed to in over a year.

00000000    Some people post top.
00000001    Some people post bottom.
00000010    Some people delete (usually, like this guy does) the older
stuff.
00000011    Some people interleave - sometimes.
00000100    Some people should just be told to 11110000.  ; )
Eric G. - 07 Jan 2006 01:31 GMT
> I asked this in this froup a while back,

Please don't make typographical errors.  They are very annoying to read.
Pete & Cindy - 06 Jan 2006 17:03 GMT
all I hear is music too.. its called a CD player which all Hyundais come
with and most play MP3's or WMA files. thats about 180 songs per CD..   have
10 CDs in my Santa Fe.. thats approx 1800 songs.. no brainer there. WHO
needs radio..;-)

Pete...

> If you ever move to a small town (Think Mid West) where there may only be
> 2 or 3 radio stations, paying 13 a month seems like a small price.  Plus
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>> I agree. Personally I'd like to see the concept fall flat on it's face.
>> If nothing else, it would be nice to see Howard Stern out of a job. ;-)
Raoul - 07 Jan 2006 03:42 GMT
>all I hear is music too.. its called a CD player which all Hyundais come
>with and most play MP3's or WMA files. thats about 180 songs per CD..   have
>10 CDs in my Santa Fe.. thats approx 1800 songs.. no brainer there. WHO
>needs radio..;-)
>
>Pete...

I guess it comes down to what works for you. Freedom of choice and all
that. My CD collection isn't that large and I really don't like
deciding whether I want to download a particular song. With XM I'm
continually hearing songs I haven't heard in years. I'm prepaid for
next next couple of years, so my daily cost is about 30 cents. Well
worth it for me.

IMHO the XM traffic channel is almost useless. I live near Boston and
it's clear that the traffic reporters don't understand how the
highways they are reporting on are related. Opie & Anthony can be
funny, but their schtick gets old quickly.
Robert Cohen - 07 Jan 2006 15:21 GMT
re: radio & other audio phenomena

Y'all are too young for the Golden age of Radio.

I am now ...uh..can't recall.. uh...61.

A grandpa who had luved late 1940s and 1950s radio programs, which I
can recite commercials and so forth.

And I've been thru the talk, rock,  folk-sing, hillbilly, jazz and
classical formats: So, I'm not anti-music, except for rap, which is
....uh...semi-terrific political doggerel/bad poetry.

I now hardly listen to radio, except NPR sometimes, but when they do
the annoying pledge drives....buh-byuh.

So, we listen-to  audio book cassettes and c.d. book cassettes now.

Too dumb to download 'em from internet chiseling/gray area sites, so
just borrow 'em from public libraries.

Mostly detective fiction, Grisham, John Sandford, James Patterson, and
many other who-dunnits.

So, when travelling now, it's no more singing along with 30 year old
Eagles etal albums.

Well, an ole Carly Simon we might listen to.

And to heck with XM & Sirius: They'll please combine 'em if they want
my subscription.

Because I've had it with 8-track, Sony Betamax, and other such
obsoletes.

Sirius and/or XM won't survive: They should please merge, and perhaps
sell Class B stock to their listeners/loyal "owners" if ya get my
self-interest drift.

People will simply not gladly pay that $13 a month--plus for
components, and so we gotta be persuaded that sat radio is
truly/inherently in our self-interests, which it is, including

old radio programs, college stations, CSPAN, NPR, local & network tv
news, Pacifica, comedy, HOWARD's awful shite, etal.

But if ya really like the current local schlocky/garbagey radio, then
save the $13 for gas, cholesterol burgers, house payments, lotto
tickets et cetera.
Dan - 07 Jan 2006 21:58 GMT
> re: radio & other audio phenomena
>
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> save the $13 for gas, cholesterol burgers, house payments, lotto
> tickets et cetera.

Amen to your definition of rap. I see the ONLY difference between rap
and crap is the "c".
Oleg Lego - 08 Jan 2006 03:56 GMT
The Dan entity posted thusly:

>> And I've been thru the talk, rock,  folk-sing, hillbilly, jazz and
>> classical formats: So, I'm not anti-music, except for rap, which is
>> .....uh...semi-terrific political doggerel/bad poetry.
>>
>Amen to your definition of rap. I see the ONLY difference between rap
>and crap is the "c".

I like the music OK, it's just the annoying guys talking over top of
it that ruin it.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.