Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Hyundai Cars / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Hyundai Resale value!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
taters2 - 07 Oct 2006 02:50 GMT
Paid close to $18000 in 5 years value down to about 1/3.
Dave in Lake Villa - 07 Oct 2006 13:41 GMT
That seems like a steep drop ;  why do u suppose Hyundais  dont hold
their value too well ?  

____________________________________________
Featured Best Seller Book : "I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist"
(a fair appraisal of what Atheists DO believe in for their worldview).
Address:http://www.impactapologetics.com/product.asp?numRecordPosition=1&P
____________________________________________
Matt Whiting - 07 Oct 2006 14:06 GMT
> That seems like a steep drop ;  why do u suppose Hyundais  dont hold
> their value too well ?  

Reputation for poor quality, hopefully, from the past.  I've heard the
early Hyundai's were really pretty bad.  I have an 06 Sonata and it has
been very reliable thus far.  Quality is pretty good, but the interior
plastics on the dash are pretty chintzy and scratch very easily.
Otherwise, quality seems decent, particularly for the price of the vehicle.

Matt
Edwin Pawlowski - 07 Oct 2006 14:14 GMT
> That seems like a steep drop ;  why do u suppose Hyundais  dont hold
> their value too well ?

IMO, that is not all that bad.  Take a look at other 5 year old cars and
compare selling price to sticker price.  My 2001 Buick LeSabre is showing a
retail sale value of about 1/3 of the sticker price.  Trade in value about
60% of that according to KBB, but even less  in reality since mine is high
miles. .

Getting back to Hyundai, they had a poor reputation for many years.  Ask
anyone that owned on from the 1980's and see what condition it was in after
a few years.  So it may have been many years ago, but reputations take a
long time to change. If you asked me even a few months ago, I laughed at the
idea of buying a Hyundai.  Like the ads say "rethink everything" so I did
and found the car to be stylish, seemingly well made, a good value for the
money.

What changed my mind about the car?  The owners of my company were on a trip
and had a Sonata as a rental.  They were impressed with everything about it
and thought it was much better than the typical Impala or Taurus they would
usually rent.  Given their high marks (they normally drive Lexus, Audi,
Corvette, Avalon) I thought it deserved a check out.  I did so and was
impressed.

Also, I never liked the styling of the older Sonata.  Just my opinion, but
it was nothing I would consider.  IMO, all the new Chrysler cars should be
trashed also.  I'd not buy a new Camry because the new front end is ugly
too.  Obviously, others like and buy them but people even buy maple walnut
ice cream so there is no accounting for taste.

Did I consider resale value in my purchase?  Since I keep cars for a long
time, no.  My '91 Regal was worth the $1 they gave me for a trade and it was
easy to dispose of that way.
Signature

Ed
http://pages.cthome.net/edhome/

Matt Whiting - 07 Oct 2006 16:28 GMT
> Also, I never liked the styling of the older Sonata.  Just my opinion, but
> it was nothing I would consider.  IMO, all the new Chrysler cars should be
> trashed also.  I'd not buy a new Camry because the new front end is ugly
> too.  Obviously, others like and buy them but people even buy maple walnut
> ice cream so there is no accounting for taste.

Likewise.  The older Sonata's (and Hyundai's in general) had terrible
styling.  They looked like a poor copy of a Jag in the front and I'm not
sure what in the back, maybe a candy bar that was in the sun too long.
I didn't like the "melted" look at all.  It reminded me a little of the
original Ford Taurus ... butt ugly.

Yes, why would anyone eat maple walnut ice cream when you can have good
natural vanilla bean or strawberry?  :-)

> Did I consider resale value in my purchase?  Since I keep cars for a long
> time, no.  My '91 Regal was worth the $1 they gave me for a trade and it was
> easy to dispose of that way.

Same here.  I tend to keep vehicles until the wheels fall off.  I hope
the Sonata holds up as well as my Chevy and Chrysler vehicles have held
up.  So far, so good, but 13,000 miles isn't enough to make a judgement.

Matt
Edwin Pawlowski - 08 Oct 2006 05:45 GMT
"Matt Whiting" <whiting@epix.net> wrote in message

> Same here.  I tend to keep vehicles until the wheels fall off.  I hope the
> Sonata holds up as well as my Chevy and Chrysler vehicles have held up.
> So far, so good, but 13,000 miles isn't enough to make a judgement.
>
> Matt

I guess we won't know for sure for a long time.  I was unhappy with my last
GM car and decided to go this way instead.  But it will be a couple of years
to know for sure if it was a good decision.  I'll probably hit 2000 miles
tomorrow.

I remember my father buying cars in the 50's and 60's and going back to the
dealer a week or two later with a list of 10 or 15 items to be fixed.  Then
again in another few months with something else.  So far, I have zero.
PMDR - 08 Oct 2006 08:46 GMT
Resale value only actually matters if you intend to sell it.  I plan to
keep mine for at least 10 years at which point it won't have any value
anyway.   But that's OK. I don't look at my car expecting it to hold
value.  I expect it to start when I want it to and not break down, and
perhaps be fun to drive.

It's transportation, not an investment.

My last car -a Toyota Corolla- was almost 12 years old when I bought my
06 Sonata.  The Hyundai dealer wanted to give me 600 bucks for it.
Ended up selling it myself for more a little money but it was a 12 year
old car with a lot of miles.  What IS that worth?  Not a lot.  Not even
a Toyota holds value.

In 2016, I bet my Sonata ends up being worth the same 600 bucks.
Matt Whiting - 08 Oct 2006 14:27 GMT
> Resale value only actually matters if you intend to sell it.  I plan to
> keep mine for at least 10 years at which point it won't have any value
> anyway.   But that's OK. I don't look at my car expecting it to hold
> value.  I expect it to start when I want it to and not break down, and
> perhaps be fun to drive.

Actually, it also matters if your car gets totaled in a wreck as my
minivan did last December.  The insurance payout is based on the market
value of the vehicle in most cases (I guess some policies can be had now
with replacement cost coverage, but I've never had one).  So,
depreciation could hurt a lot in that case as well as the trade-in case.

Matt
PMDR - 09 Oct 2006 08:43 GMT
Yes, of course you are totally correct.   I never think about totaling
the car.  Hope it never happens.

> Actually, it also matters if your car gets totaled in a wreck as my
> minivan did last December.  The insurance payout is based on the market
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Matt
Matt Whiting - 08 Oct 2006 14:25 GMT
> "Matt Whiting" <whiting@epix.net> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> to know for sure if it was a good decision.  I'll probably hit 2000 miles
> tomorrow.

The last GM car I owned was a 1979 Chevette.  :-)  However, my 94 K1500
really has been, as the commercials said, "Like a rock."  It is 12 years
old and has been used pretty hard hauling firewood and plowing a 1700'
long driveway.  It only has 95,000 miles as much of its work has been
"off road" where the miles don't rack up that fast.  Other than a
pushrod that failed early during warranty (5200 miles) and a u-joint I
had to replace in the front driveshaft a couple of years ago (dur to
snow plowing most likely), it has been rock solid.

It hardly even shows any rust yet after driving in PA nad NY road salt
all these years.  I see Nissans and Toyota's of this vintage and the
fenders are falling off of them.

I'll almost certainly buy another Chevy truck, but I expect to get 20
years out of this one at the rate it is going so my next truck will be
well into the next decade.

> I remember my father buying cars in the 50's and 60's and going back to the
> dealer a week or two later with a list of 10 or 15 items to be fixed.  Then
> again in another few months with something else.  So far, I have zero.

Yes, I've also had zero defects of this nature (assembly issues) with my
Sonata.  I have several issues with many aspects of its design, but
these aren't things the dealer can fix.

Matt
Bob Adkins - 13 Oct 2006 15:24 GMT
>  But it will be a couple of years
>to know for sure if it was a good decision.  I'll probably hit 2000 miles
>tomorrow.

You're right, but I feel smarter and smarter with every day and mile
that rolls by.  ;)
-

Bob
Dave in Lake Villa - 08 Oct 2006 02:07 GMT
'Ask anyone that owned on from the 1980's and see what condition it was
in after a few years. So it may have been many years ago, but
reputations take a long time to change. If you asked me even a few
months ago, I laughed at the idea of buying a Hyundai. Like the ads say
"rethink everything" so I did and found the car to be stylish, seemingly
well made, a good value for the money.'

REPLY:  I had a feeling it was about the earlier Hyundais ;  yes, ive
heard aweful stories on that era Hyundai.  Before i bought my 2002
SantaFe and a 2004 SantaFe for my elderly mom, i looked intently into
Toyotas RAV4 as it seems to have a much lower depreciation rate . But, I
just could not see spending the additional money for the RAV4  which had
less of a motor, less equipment, and less of a warranty .  I didnt think
it was as stylish as the SantaFe either.   I made good decisions as both
SantaFe's have been very reliable, practical,  and fun to drive.

____________________________________________
Featured Best Seller Book : "I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist"
(a fair appraisal of what Atheists DO believe in for their worldview).
Address:http://www.impactapologetics.com/product.asp?numRecordPosition=1&P
____________________________________________
Tom - 09 Oct 2006 22:16 GMT
I also like my 06 Sonota very much.  I tried buying a Toyota but the two
dealerships I visited were so nasty and arrogant that I would never consider
them again.  You can't even get to the cars without going through the
showroom and being assigned a salesperson.  They have it fenced off to
funnel customers into the showroom.  I had to show my salesman how to open
the hood!!!  The sales manager called me 'cheap' because I didn't want to
pay the extra $500 that just showed up on the paperwork.  Not even the
friggin dealer documentation fee, which was $700!!!!!  Never will I set foot
in Togoa land again.......
In contrast, I was in and made a deal with Hyundai in 5 minutes.  Took the
moon roof cost off without  me even saying a word, gave me $1500 more off,
got the rebate, and I had so little to pay between the new car and the old
one that I couldn't make the $10,000 limit to get another $1000 rebate from
Hyundai Finance that they wrote ME a check for $6000!!!!!  to make the
difference.  Then I paid it off in 3 months with no penalty.  Now THAT'S
what I like.  I've been buying new cars every 2 years for the last 40 years
and never had that experience.

Tom

>> That seems like a steep drop ;  why do u suppose Hyundais  dont hold
>> their value too well ?
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> time, no.  My '91 Regal was worth the $1 they gave me for a trade and it
> was easy to dispose of that way.
Matt Whiting - 09 Oct 2006 22:50 GMT
> I also like my 06 Sonota very much.  I tried buying a Toyota but the two
> dealerships I visited were so nasty and arrogant that I would never consider
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> what I like.  I've been buying new cars every 2 years for the last 40 years
> and never had that experience.

I had a pretty positive sales experience as well.  Unfortunately, I got
a card in the mail that my salesman has since left the dealership and
somebody else took his place.  Haven't been back so no idea how the new
guy will be.

A new car every two years!  Either you are a traveling salesman or you
have more money than brains!  :-)

Matt
Tom - 10 Oct 2006 02:36 GMT
No, Matt, my brains are still in place.  :o)

We had two cars for quite some time and both my wife and I worked so, we
alternated.  We traded cars after they were four years old and we spaced
them so it was every two years.  Four years and 50,000 miles was at the end
of warrantees and, since they were American cars, they were worn out by
then.  Sad, but true.  Someday our auto industry will wake up and make cars
that aren't ugly as crap and built the same way with Union labor that
doesn't give a damn about anything except their paycheck and benefits.

>> I also like my 06 Sonota very much.  I tried buying a Toyota but the two
>> dealerships I visited were so nasty and arrogant that I would never
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Matt
Matt Whiting - 10 Oct 2006 02:48 GMT
> No, Matt, my brains are still in place.  :o)

:-)

> We had two cars for quite some time and both my wife and I worked so, we
> alternated.  We traded cars after they were four years old and we spaced
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> that aren't ugly as crap and built the same way with Union labor that
> doesn't give a damn about anything except their paycheck and benefits.

I've had the opposite experience.  My American cars (mostly Chryslers -
Acclaim, and two minivans) and trucks (Jeep Comanche and now Chevy
K1500) have been much more durable than my foreign cars (VW Beetles and
Honda Accord).  All have went well over 100,000 miles (well, my Chevy
truck is just shy of 100,000), with the Acclaim going to 143,000 before
being totaled by a deer and my 96 minivan had 178,000 when totaled by a
drunk driver.

My Accord suffered catastrophic engine failure at 72,000 miles when the
cam and rocker arms self-destructed.  The two Beetles went over 100K,
but needed valve work, oil leaks addressed, etc.

The Accord had fewer teething pains when new than many of the American
cars (except the Acclaim which was nearly flawless from the start), but
began to systematically self-destruct at 60,000 miles.  It needed
struts, new rotors, new drums, new exhaust system, etc., all at 5 years
and 60,000.  My Acclaim had the original exhaust when it was totaled
ager 9 years and 143K.  I'd just replaced the exhaust on my minivan at
10 years and 178,000 right before it was totaled.

I'm hoping the Sonata holds up more like the Acclaim than the Accord!

Matt
Mike Marlow - 10 Oct 2006 03:56 GMT
> No, Matt, my brains are still in place.  :o)
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> that aren't ugly as crap and built the same way with Union labor that
> doesn't give a damn about anything except their paycheck and benefits.

I understand the alternating car purchase thing - we do the same, but
getting 4 years and/or 50,000 miles out of a car is crazy.  I've driven GM
products for over 30 years and have consistently gotten 200,000 out of them
with no real problems.  If you're only getting 50K out of a car, you're
either buying some real low end junk, or you're way too hard on a car.

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

Old_Timer - 10 Oct 2006 04:55 GMT
>> No, Matt, my brains are still in place.  :o)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>with no real problems.  If you're only getting 50K out of a car, you're
>either buying some real low end junk, or you're way too hard on a car.

Not necessarily true.
A car dealer's lot is filled with low mileage, good condition, late
model  used cars that were traded in by the  previous owners simply
because they were afflicted with "New Car Fever"

Old_Timer
Mike Marlow - 10 Oct 2006 12:10 GMT
> >> No, Matt, my brains are still in place.  :o)
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> model  used cars that were traded in by the  previous owners simply
> because they were afflicted with "New Car Fever"

True, but not relevant to my point.  I was responding to your comment that
your American cars were worn out by 50,000 miles.  That's just no consistent
with reality.

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

Old_Timer - 10 Oct 2006 16:30 GMT
>> >> No, Matt, my brains are still in place.  :o)
>> >>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>your American cars were worn out by 50,000 miles.  That's just no consistent
>with reality.

I have made no such comment.  In fact, I will say  my 1996 Dodge
Dakota has over 100,000 miles  and is still in "cherry" condition.

Old_Timer
Mike Marlow - 11 Oct 2006 13:03 GMT
> I have made no such comment.  In fact, I will say  my 1996 Dodge
> Dakota has over 100,000 miles  and is still in "cherry" condition.

Sorry - I got lost in the attributes.  My bad.

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

Tom - 10 Oct 2006 15:28 GMT
OH, I'm not saying they were worn out at 50,000 miles!!!  I'm just saying
that we wanted to avoid any more reduction in resale value and the
inevitable things that go wrong after the warrantee period expires.  (Murphy
lives with us)  In all the cars I've had (Knock on wood), I've never had a
lemon.  When I traded them in, there were no major problems with any of
them.  It's just a habit we had gotten into of trading.  Now, with a Kia and
a Hyundai, our perspective has changed.  Also, with me retiring the miles
don't accumulate as fast and we have broken that visous tradein cycle.

Matt, sounds like you better hang deer sirens all over that Sonota!!!  I
also have a 2002 Honda Civic, that I use occasionally.  I was saving it as a
trade in for a car for my son when he wears out his Jetta (145,000 miles).
At least the Honda retains its value quite well.

Tom

>> No, Matt, my brains are still in place.  :o)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> with no real problems.  If you're only getting 50K out of a car, you're
> either buying some real low end junk, or you're way too hard on a car.
Mike Marlow - 11 Oct 2006 12:56 GMT
> OH, I'm not saying they were worn out at 50,000 miles!!!

I responded to this very quote from your original post...

You said - "Four years and 50,000 miles was at the end of warrantees and,
since they were American cars, they were worn out by then.  Sad, but true."

It was hard to read something other than what you said into what you said...

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

Tom - 10 Oct 2006 15:32 GMT
I was too hasty in saying they were worn out.  I guess I was caught up in
the 'moment'.  Senioritis syndrome.......  I just seemed that, at 50,000
miles, you started hearing all kinds of expensive sounds that talked you
into trading before the perceived sounds became a reality.  Now, some of the
older 1960's and 1970's cars WERE worn out by then!  Reference any early
model Chrysler product pre-Ioccoa.

Tom

> No, Matt, my brains are still in place.  :o)
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>>
>> Matt
Old_Timer - 10 Oct 2006 16:39 GMT
>I was too hasty in saying they were worn out.  I guess I was caught up in
>the 'moment'.  Senioritis syndrome.......  I just seemed that, at 50,000
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Tom

If you really want to a "look back" I am old enough to recall when
cars of the 1930's era frequently required ring and valve jobs at
35,000 miles.  This was especially true for the early Ford V8's.
Also the rear differentials were howling on many cars with 50000
miles.  As for the bodies, it was not unusual for the fenders to be
"flapping" when the car was 8-10 years old.  There were no rust
preventatives built into the cars of that era.

The durability of the engines on all cars, domestic and imported,
have seen substantial improvement over the years.

Old_Timer

>> No, Matt, my brains are still in place.  :o)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>>>
>>> Matt
Tom - 11 Oct 2006 12:17 GMT
Amen, Old Timer!!
I think a lot of these young 'whipper snappers' have no idea what 50,000
miles on a 1950's era car really meant.  Hell, even the tires were good for
only 10,000 miles or so.  I had to have my 54 chevy rebuilt after 40,000
miles when I bought it for $395.  Had to finance it for a year.  :o)

>>I was too hasty in saying they were worn out.  I guess I was caught up in
>>the 'moment'.  Senioritis syndrome.......  I just seemed that, at 50,000
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
>>>>
>>>> Matt
Edwin Pawlowski - 11 Oct 2006 15:08 GMT
> Amen, Old Timer!!
> I think a lot of these young 'whipper snappers' have no idea what 50,000
> miles on a 1950's era car really meant.  Hell, even the tires were good
> for only 10,000 miles or so.  I had to have my 54 chevy rebuilt after
> 40,000 miles when I bought it for $395.  Had to finance it for a year.
> :o)

And a 150 mile trip was and adventure on the two lane roads compared to the
turnpikes and interstates we use today.  Not to mention the headlights at
night and lack of street lighting, poor road signs.

My first car was a '53 Mercury Monterey.  If it held fluid, it leaked.  I
carried oil, water/antifreeze mix, and trans fluid.  Getting 3 years from a
battery was excellent. Plugs were cleaned every 5k and replaced at 10k.
Points lasted maybe 10k but often needed a tweak between.  It did have an
automatic choke that had to be cleaned a couple of times a year to function.
IIRC the radio had tubes and being a technological oriented kind of guy, I
added a rear seat speaker.

Just got rid of my '91 Regal with the original exhaust system still in
place. Second set of plugs, only serious repair was a water pump at 80k so
at that time the radiator hoses and serpentine belt were replaced.  It was
on battery number 3 after 15 years.
Tom - 12 Oct 2006 00:58 GMT
I forgot about the points, Edwin.  Yep, I was good at that one.  I could
change them and adjust the dwell in just a few minutes.  I guess 'practice'
makes perfect.  That's a lost art in today's environment.
Ok on your reply, Mike.  :o)

Tom

>> Amen, Old Timer!!
>> I think a lot of these young 'whipper snappers' have no idea what 50,000
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> at that time the radiator hoses and serpentine belt were replaced.  It was
> on battery number 3 after 15 years.
Old_Timer - 14 Oct 2006 21:18 GMT
>I forgot about the points, Edwin.  Yep, I was good at that one.  I could
>change them and adjust the dwell in just a few minutes.  I guess 'practice'
>makes perfect.  That's a lost art in today's environment.
>Ok on your reply, Mike.  :o)
>
>Tom

But how many reading here do you thnik know how the points were set on
a Model A Ford?

Old_Timer

>>> Amen, Old Timer!!
>>> I think a lot of these young 'whipper snappers' have no idea what 50,000
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>> at that time the radiator hoses and serpentine belt were replaced.  It was
>> on battery number 3 after 15 years.
Mike Marlow - 11 Oct 2006 13:01 GMT
> I was too hasty in saying they were worn out.  I guess I was caught up in
> the 'moment'.  Senioritis syndrome.......

It's all right.  We all do that.  Ask me how I  know...

> I just seemed that, at 50,000
> miles, you started hearing all kinds of expensive sounds that talked you
> into trading before the perceived sounds became a reality.  Now, some of the
> older 1960's and 1970's cars WERE worn out by then!  Reference any early
> model Chrysler product pre-Ioccoa.

Agreed that back in the "good old days" we often faced some major repairs at
mileage levels that today go unnoticed.  The average car today will go well
over 100,000 with no major problems (although they may indeed present some
mind-boggling nusances), and today's engines can well be expected to run
200,000 with only the most fundamental level of care.  Keep the oil changed,
don't overheat it, etc.  If you  have to pay to get things repaired though,
even those mind-boggling nusances can get expensive.

Signature

-Mike-
mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net

Tom - 12 Oct 2006 13:06 GMT
I guess those expensive repairs for minor items is what makes us older folks
cry out for the simplicity of a carburated 283 Chevy with a stick shift.  We
would all love to be able to troubleshoot and fix our own cars again.  AND
my 54 Chevy with its straight six got 20 miles per gallon!  Boy, haven't we
come a long way?

I hate paying a garage $80 an hour to have the least senior guy in the shop
stumble about trying to fix my car.  My last visit to Kia to have the plugs
changed and antifreeze flushed resulted in two more visits for them to fix
things they screwed up getting the first job done.  (unplugged sensors and
cut wire)

>> I was too hasty in saying they were worn out.  I guess I was caught up in
>> the 'moment'.  Senioritis syndrome.......
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> though,
> even those mind-boggling nusances can get expensive.
Christopher Wong - 08 Oct 2006 19:07 GMT
> Paid close to $18000 in 5 years value down to about 1/3.

I bought a 3 yr old Hyundai for less than 1/2 it's original new value, from
a Hyundai *dealer*. Consider yourself lucky to only lose 1/3. Mine still had
a valid basic warranty when I bought it. Poor resale value equals great used
car value.

Still, I wonder if Hyundais depreciate that much worse compared to other
non-Japanese makes. In some ways, Toyota and Honda live in a parallel
universe.

Chris
Old_Timer - 08 Oct 2006 22:43 GMT
>Paid close to $18000 in 5 years value down to about 1/3.

It can be worse than Hyundai
See table

http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story.jsp?section=buy&story=loResidual&subject=bes
t_resale&referer=advice&aff=boston


Old_Timer
Edwin Pawlowski - 10 Oct 2006 03:48 GMT
>>Paid close to $18000 in 5 years value down to about 1/3.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Old_Timer

Interesting list, both the worst and the best. I did not expect to see Chevy
and Ford trucks on the worst, I would have though Lexus would have made the
top 1- best list.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.