Car Forum / Hyundai Cars / April 2008
Help! Does anyone know anything about smogging their car?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Pamela G. - 15 Apr 2008 10:17 GMT Crud. I feel like I'm about to be pouring money down an endless pit.
I went to get a smog check for my 1991 Hyundai Excel. It flunked. The guy showed me the printout and pointed to where it says the car can only have a maximum of 847 polluting points, and my car showed 2,559 points, making it a Gross Polluter. He said I need a new catalytic converter and then it would pass.
I drove two blocks away and had the muffler guy install a new one for $95.......I drive right back and have it tested again, and would you believe it went from 2,559 points, to 3,428 Gross Polluting points!!!! It actually tested WORSE with a new converter!!!
So now I'm asking him what happened?? How can this be? He tells me that I should drive the car around and put about 50 miles on it and then he will retest it and maybe it will pass?? I said what if it doesn't? He said maybe you need and new ECR, or PCV, or some other 3 initial type valve.......I'm so ticked off.
Does anyone have any advise for me? And how can my test results WORSEN after I just put a new converter on??
hyundaitech - 15 Apr 2008 16:43 GMT The reason is for the worse results is that your original converter wa probably fine and that new converters that can be installed for $95 don' cost enough to cover the cost of the precious metals necessary to do good job. Can you have the original one put back on? You don't want t hear the price of a new factory converter. It'll probably be close t $1000.
To help you find out what may be wrong with the car, I'll need to know wh it failed. "Polluting points" don't give me much information, and in fact I've never even heard the term "polluting point." I'm interested in th HC, CO, NOx, and any other specific readings that were taken, and th maximum/minimum reading in each category. Also let me know what sort o test was done (e.g. dynamometer, idling tailpipe)
- Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/alt.autos.hyundai More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.htm
Pamela G. - 16 Apr 2008 10:27 GMT After I read your post I jumped in the car and flew back to the muffler shop to retrieve my old catalytic converter. I was shocked to find that the muffler shop owner WOULD NOT let me have it!!...He said that the state collects those from him and he has to have an old one for each new one he sells ....Sounds like a bunch of BS to me.....but I wasn't going to argue as it wouldn't of helped.
Yes, I don't think they're called polluting points either...lol! I tried to scan the printout so I could post the numbers but my darn scanner just went on the fritz. I'm thinking that posting a photo using my camera would probably be too small to read. Would you happen to have a fax number that I could zap you the page to?
Edwin Pawlowski - 16 Apr 2008 10:54 GMT > After I read your post I jumped in the car and flew back to the muffler > shop to retrieve my old catalytic converter. I was shocked to find that > the muffler shop owner WOULD NOT let me have it!!...He said that the > state collects those from him and he has to have an old one for each new > one he sells ....Sounds like a bunch of BS to me.....but I wasn't going > to argue as it wouldn't of helped. They have high scrap value. I'm not sure of the number but we are talking over $50, not pennies that steel alone would bring.
Pamela G. - 17 Apr 2008 09:39 GMT Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
>>They have high scrap value. I'm not sure of >>the number but we are talking over $50, not >>pennies that steel alone would bring. A-ha! That explains why he wouldn't remove his grubby little paws off the converter! That's a nice chunk of change. I'm surprised that crooks haven't resorted to stealing those for scrap. ( I guess technically that just happened to me..Ha!)
Heck, it's pretty bad here in California as they are digging through parks and school yards ripping out the copper wire to sell for scrap.
Edwin Pawlowski - 17 Apr 2008 10:51 GMT Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
>>They have high scrap value. I'm not sure of >>the number but we are talking over $50, not >>pennies that steel alone would bring. A-ha! That explains why he wouldn't remove his grubby little paws off the converter! That's a nice chunk of change. I'm surprised that crooks haven't resorted to stealing those for scrap. ( I guess technically that just happened to me..Ha!)
Heck, it's pretty bad here in California as they are digging through parks and school yards ripping out the copper wire to sell for scrap.
*********************************
I've not heard of it locally, but I understand they are being stolen in some places, rigt from under your parked car. As for copper, a nearby church had copper roof flashing stolen during Good Friday services.
Pamela G. - 18 Apr 2008 09:35 GMT Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
>>I've not heard of it locally, but I understand >>they are being stolen in some places, rigt >>from under your parked car. As for copper, >>a nearby church had copper roof flashing >>stolen during Good Friday services. That's really pathetic! And as this economy continues to slide into the toilet, these incidences are on the rise. If gas goes up too much higher we all might have to put locking gas caps on our cars!!
Mike Marlow - 17 Apr 2008 12:38 GMT Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
>>They have high scrap value. I'm not sure of >>the number but we are talking over $50, not >>pennies that steel alone would bring.
> A-ha! That explains why he wouldn't remove his grubby little paws off > the converter! That's a nice chunk of change. I'm surprised that crooks > haven't resorted to stealing those for scrap. ( I guess technically that > just happened to me..Ha!) I guess not. Didn't you say it was a day or two later that you went back to him? How long should he hold the part, just in case you might decide you want it back? What about core parts? It is common to require the old part to be turned in as part of the price of the new part.
That said - converter theft is actually on the rise. Thieves have taken to cutting them right off cars parked during the night.
 Signature -Mike- mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net
hyundaitech - 16 Apr 2008 16:39 GMT Sounds like BS to me, too. Not sure what state you're in, or what thei regulations are, but that sounds rather odd. The scrap value is indee high, as Edwin states. Check your local regulations about return of ol parts. Most jurisdictions have laws that require shops to return parts t customers at their request. Since you left without requesting the parts you may no longer have standing, but by the same token, they still had i and refused to give it to you. The local BBB or consumer assistanc office may be able to help you on this.
As far as the numbers go, just type them in. I suspect there are abou four readings. Just tell me the heading, the reading, and the max/mi allowable entry
- Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/alt.autos.hyundai More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.htm
hyundaitech - 16 Apr 2008 16:41 GMT Also, is your check engine lamp on
- Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/alt.autos.hyundai More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.htm
Pamela G. - 17 Apr 2008 10:51 GMT Hyundaitech, I'm in California, and the engine light isn't coming on....not yet anyway...Ha!!
I took photos of the numbers. The yellow highlighter marks are from the smog tech guy.
http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL836/446301/527393/313605467.jpg http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL836/446301/527393/313605234.jpg
http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL836/446301/527393/313605063.jpg
http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL836/446301/527393/313604916.jpg
http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL836/446301/527393/313604631.jpg
Partner - 17 Apr 2008 15:58 GMT From the California Department of Consumer Affairs web site :
NO (PPM): Oxides of nitrogen (more commonly called NOx) are odorless gases that help form smog, and give smog its characteristic brown color. NO is produced when temperatures in the combustion chambers exceed 2500 degrees Fahrenheit. Excessive engine temperatures could be caused by a lean fuel mixture, by retarded timing, by carbon buildup inside the combustion chamber, or by a malfunctioning engine cooling system. The function of the EGR System is to reduce NO. Unhealthy levels of NO emissions result in a vehicle failing its Smog Check. NO is measured in parts per million (PPM).
> Hyundaitech, I'm in California, and the engine light isn't coming > on....not yet anyway...Ha!! [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL836/446301/527393/313604631.jpg Pamela G. - 18 Apr 2008 09:44 GMT
>>From the California Department of Consumer >>Affairs web site : [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >>failing its Smog Check. NO is measured in >>parts per million (PPM). Thanks Partner....wow, it doesn't say that a worn out catalytic converter could be the culprit.......Dang, I just wasted $95
hyundaitech - 17 Apr 2008 17:04 GMT Okay. The only category in which you've failed is NOx (oxides o nitrogen). This occurs when combustion chamber temperatures get too hig and the nitrogen in the air begins to react with the oxygen in the air. So you'll need to check things that would make the combustion chambe temperature too high.
1. Check the (coolant) thermostat. Make sure it's opening at the correc temperature. If it opens at too high a temperature, your combustio chamber temperatures can be excessive.
2. Check the ignition timing. Over-advanced ignition timing can caus the fuel to burn prematurely and increase combustion chambe temperatures.
3. Check the function of the entire EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation system. The purpose of EGR is to introduce exhaust gases back into th combustion chamber for the purpose of cooling. If any part of it doesn' function properly, your combustion chamber temperatures will go up. You'll need to make sure that the EGR solenoid is working, that the EG valve is working, and the EGR passages are clear. You'll also need t verify that the ECM commands the EGR valve to open at the proper time.
Of course, I don't expect that you'll be able to do any of this yourself. Any good emissions diagnostic technician should already know what high NO readings mean and should know to run the tests I've mentioned above. also don't advocate just going out and replacing some of the parts. There's no guarantee that will fix anything. If you want to take a chea shot at passing, try running your tank to empty and refueling wit premium. There's a possibility that'll compensate for over-advance ignition timing, but by the same token, resetting the ignition timing i fairly simple and cheap
- Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/alt.autos.hyundai More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.htm
Pamela G. - 18 Apr 2008 10:18 GMT hyundaitech wrote:
>>Of course, I don't expect that you'll be able to >>do any of this yourself. Any good emissions [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >>timing, but by the same token, resetting the >>ignition timing is fairly simple and cheap. Thank you so much for the info and advise! You've given me a 1,000 times more information than that nitwit who is supposedly a smog technician!!!!!!
Again, there is no mention of a bad catalytic converter being the possible problem. I blame both myself and that nitwit for this. When he said my car failed, I asked him what I needed to fix it. He said it needs a new catalytic converter. I drove a block away and had one installed, drove right back and had it retested and it had a WORSE test score. After I got home I looked at the inspection report and it said "Catalytic Converter---PASS"........Why did that nimrod tell me I need a new one when the report says it Passed!!! I'd like to kick him in the nuts!!!!!
My first plan is to try that premium gas thing next Monday or Tuesday....Unfortunately I just filled up my tank with el cheapo gas so I'll have to burn all of that off first.
Again, thank you so much for educating me on this subject. I really, really do appreciate it!
I will post my results next week. Got my fingers crossed :-)
hyundaitech - 18 Apr 2008 17:22 GMT A faulty catalytic converter can indeed be the cause of NOx pollution. I've seen it before (once), and it was very difficult to find and fix. The car's emissions were tested in another state and they had a differen procedure. We eventually called a dealer in the other state, and the were able to tell us that in their experience, if normal diagnostic turned up no problems, that the catalytic converter was the likel culprit.
Again, I'm going to put emphasis on the normal diagnostics. In your case there's no reason to go replacing a catalytic converter until it's bee verified that the other things I've mentioned are working properly. That's effectively just guessing a part to replace and retesting to see i it fixes the car. The computer in your car will report to a technicia with the proper tooling significant information that will allow him to d some of the diagnosis in a few minutes just by monitoring the data th computer will show him.
When the report says that your converter passed, that means nothing mor than it is present and doesn't appear to have been tampered with. I doesn't indicate that it's functioning normally
- Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/alt.autos.hyundai More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.htm
Vic Hyu Garcia - 17 Apr 2008 23:22 GMT > > Hyundaitech, I'm in California, and the engine light isn't coming [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL836/446301/527393/313604631.jpg > Did your car PASS the test last year, in CALIFORNIA ????
Your Excel is 17 years old, if it was not designed and maintained for the CA emission standards .... it will never make it.
Pamela G. - 18 Apr 2008 10:27 GMT Vic Hyu Garcia wrote:
>>Did your car PASS the test last year, in >>CALIFORNIA ???? >>Your Excel is 17 years old, if it was not >>designed and maintained for the CA >>emission standards .... it will never make it. Yes, it passed two years ago, and two years before and so on and so on.....It's a California car, not from some other state. I suppose it's just old now and going to be more problematic at these smog tests.
It really should be put to sleep :-)
hyundaitech - 18 Apr 2008 17:24 GMT I don't know that I agree about putting the car to sleep, but I don't kno the condition of your car, either. As long as the car doesn't have an serious mechanical issues and is otherwise in reasonable condition there's little reason to replace it. If the fuel management system i operating properly, it should still meet most if not all jursdictions emissions requirements
- Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/alt.autos.hyundai More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.htm
Old_Timer - 19 Apr 2008 04:37 GMT >Vic Hyu Garcia wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >It really should be put to sleep :-) Since you are in California the state has a couple of programs you may want to check out.
One will assist you up to $500 to repair the car to where it will pass smog.
The other may give you as much as $1000 to junk a gross polluter car.
Check out this web site
http://www.smogtips.com/consumer_assistance.cfm
Old_Timer
Old_Timer - 16 Apr 2008 18:30 GMT >The reason is for the worse results is that your original converter was >probably fine and that new converters that can be installed for $95 don't [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >maximum/minimum reading in each category. Also let me know what sort of >test was done (e.g. dynamometer, idling tailpipe). I learned a lesson about cheap cat convertors with my Dodge truck. A shop had the cats advertised for $119 installed. I had one put on and the truck passed smog, but the when the next smog test cycle after that came around it failed. I had to have another new cat put on. The next one I had installed cost $400 plus labor. It remains for me to find out how long this one will get me through the smog checks. Longer than the $119 one, I hope.
Old_Timer
Mike Marlow - 16 Apr 2008 21:26 GMT > I learned a lesson about cheap cat convertors with my Dodge truck. A > shop had the cats advertised for $119 installed. I had one put on and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > to find out how long this one will get me through the smog checks. > Longer than the $119 one, I hope. Your experience may well be reflective of cheap parts quality, but it may also be reflective of other things. Cats usually hold up - even cheap ones. That is, unless you have other problems. Engine misfires will eat up cats. Many people overlook engine misfire codes since they are somewhat transient. The ramifications of these transients can be expensive though.
 Signature -Mike- mmarlowREMOVE@alltel.net
|
|
|