Car Forum / Hyundai Cars / June 2009
Dealer bites the dust
|
|
Thread rating:  |
631grant - 09 Jun 2009 03:41 GMT Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of business and our nearest dealer is now about 80 miles away. Wonderful.......................
Paradox - 10 Jun 2009 06:46 GMT > Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of business > and our nearest dealer is now about 80 miles away. > Wonderful....................... Welcome to the Obama Economy(?)
631grant - 10 Jun 2009 22:32 GMT Amen to that!!! We are doomed!
>> Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of > business >> and our nearest dealer is now about 80 miles away. >> Wonderful....................... > > Welcome to the Obama Economy(?) Bill - 10 Jun 2009 22:51 GMT >> Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of >business >> and our nearest dealer is now about 80 miles away. >> Wonderful....................... > >Welcome to the Obama Economy(?) Yeah, the one he inherited from Bush. The only thing that makes me thinks bad about Obama is that he wasn't smart enough to say "no thanks" to the job.
Voyager - 10 Jun 2009 23:04 GMT >>> Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of >> business [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > thinks bad about Obama is that he wasn't smart enough to say "no > thanks" to the job. The "it isn't my fault, I inherited it" excuse is wearing thin. Obama has spent more money in this first few months than Bush spent in years. That is simply a fact.
Matt
Miles Monroe - 11 Jun 2009 02:32 GMT >>>> Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of >>> business [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Matt It's Bush and the Republicans' fault. End of story. Spinning it won't alter reality. Deregulation failed.
631grant - 11 Jun 2009 02:53 GMT Same comment to you Miles!!! Wake up and watch something besides your left wing TV stations and maybe, just maybe, you'll recognize the truth.............
>>>>> Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of >>>> business [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > alter > reality. Deregulation failed. jp103 - 11 Jun 2009 13:02 GMT > Same comment to you Miles!!! Wake up and watch something besides your left > wing TV stations and maybe, just maybe, you'll recognize the > truth............. Something fair and balanced like Fox with Beck, Hannity and O'Really!?!?
>>>>>> Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of >>>>> business [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >> alter >> reality. Deregulation failed. 631grant - 11 Jun 2009 22:07 GMT I didn't say 'fair and balanced' but I said the other SIDE OF THE STORY. How can you make an intelligent (oops, I forgot this is a newsgroup and intelligence is not a prerequisite) decision if you just listen to one side of the story. AND what makes you think listening to CNBC is 'fair and balanced???' Tune in and learn what is REALLY happening unless you can't get your head out of the sand or some other dark place.
>> Same comment to you Miles!!! Wake up and watch something besides your >> left wing TV stations and maybe, just maybe, you'll recognize the [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] >>> alter >>> reality. Deregulation failed. jp103 - 11 Jun 2009 23:50 GMT Thanks 631 - I think I missed where you said "the other SIDE OF THE STORY." Could you please tell me where that quote is? What you did say was that if you "watch something besides your left wing TV stations...you'll recognize the truth." I think that this infers that the truth will be found on some other station and, having listened to enough of FOX to know that all stations other than FOX are "left wing" I just assumed that you meant FOX. Was there another station you were referring to? AND although FOX declares itself to be fair and balanced I'm unaware that CNBC (where/who brought that up?) also claims that. I always thought CNBC was a business channel. Oh wait, I'll bet you meant MSNBC, didn't you?
When my daughter was six and she would run out of logic she would say "shut up stupid". Is that the equivalent of "get your head out of the sand or some other dark place"? You really do know how to elevate a discussion.
> I didn't say 'fair and balanced' but I said the other SIDE OF THE STORY. > How can you make an intelligent (oops, I forgot this is a newsgroup and [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] >>>> alter >>>> reality. Deregulation failed. 631grant - 12 Jun 2009 00:59 GMT Actually, JP, I WAS referring to CNBC because they were interviewing the new Pay Czar, who refused 12 invitations from Fox to appear on their show. NBC is NBC no matter what letter appears before it. You should know that from your Ebonics classes. If you are so up to date and know both sides, can you tell me the down side of the Farm/Environmental Bill that your girlfriend, the great Nancy Pelosi is DEMANDING be passed by the end of next week? Why does everything have to be rushed through Congress before it can even be read and digested? This one is 1000 pages NOW. Have your TV stations told you what it will do to the American economy and how much it will affect the price of operating the farms, which of course translates to food prices?
Do yourself a favor and watch some Fox News so that, in the future, you won't look quite as stupid when someone asks you who in the hell you voted for. As for me, I voted for the American. Maybe I'm mistaken but you appear learned and therefore probably aren't looking for a free ride like most Obama voters are looking for. That probably means you are either from the New England area or are a young, idealist who hasn't learned anything yet. If you are neither of those, than I truly feel sorry for you and your offspring (God forbid).
> Thanks 631 - I think I missed where you said "the other SIDE OF THE > STORY." Could you please tell me where that quote is? What you did say [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] >>>>> alter >>>>> reality. Deregulation failed. Miles Monroe - 12 Jun 2009 03:19 GMT > Do yourself a favor and watch some Fox News so that, in the future, you > won't look quite as stupid when someone asks you who in the hell you voted > for. As for me, I voted for the American. LOL There is nothing funnier and scarier than someone who doesn't know how stupid they are.
jp103 - 12 Jun 2009 03:38 GMT Sorry 631 where was it you said "the other side of the story" again? After reading about all your other extraneous stuff the answer escaped me.
I'm afraid I don't know about the Farm/Environmental Bill that you refer to. I googled farm bill and didn't come up with anything that seemed relevant and then I went to the govtrack/congress/search bill and didn't find anything there either. Do you have an HR #? You certainly will get no argument from me that Congress is not doing there job and that goes across party lines. The business of Congress seems to be to get reelected and anything else is a bonus.
If I watch Fox News then I will know who I voted for? There's so much I don't understand. Perhaps I should watch them.
It sounds like you think there was only one American running in the last election but I can assure you that with a Supreme Court, who has a majority of it's members appointed by a Republican, I think it's highly unlikely that a non-American could be nominated, no less be elected, as President of the U.S. (At least as a Democrat). I now that sometimes certain constitutional issues are kind of winked at but ....
I kind of have trouble following the logic in your last part. You say I appear to be learned and not looking for a free hand out (thank you I would like to think you are right on both counts), but then you go on to say I am either from NE or a young idealist who hasn't learned anything yet. Being neither of these, and since you are from the Athens, GA area and also not a young idealist it sounds like we are in the same boat. I appreciate your empathy and wish to extend my sympathies to you and your offspring. I know how hard it is to accept someone so antithetical to be your President but look on the bright side. At least you aren't a heartbeat away from having Sarah as your president.
> Actually, JP, I WAS referring to CNBC because they were interviewing the new > Pay Czar, who refused 12 invitations from Fox to appear on their show. NBC [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] >>>>>> alter >>>>>> reality. Deregulation failed. jp103 - 12 Jun 2009 03:43 GMT Sorry - second from last sentence/second paragraph should be their not there. Stupid spell check!
> Sorry 631 where was it you said "the other side of the story" again? > After reading about all your other extraneous stuff the answer escaped me. [quoted text clipped - 104 lines] >>>>>>> won't alter >>>>>>> reality. Deregulation failed. 631grant - 12 Jun 2009 13:24 GMT You sure as hell substantiated my point if you don't know about the bill that is now being vigorously debated in Congress!!! See what I mean about the networks you watch? Ever watch the Senate or House proceedings? My guess is NO. Once again, you Dems with your head in the sand won't find out what is going on until it is too late and then you'll spend your time trying to blame it on Bush even though it's being done right now by YOUR Congress. Your type is the reason this country is going to hell! I guess you also can't see the maneuvering that is and has been going on to position the country to grant amnesty to 20 million illegal aliens. Once again, when it's over, you'll say 'How did that happen?'.
> Sorry 631 where was it you said "the other side of the story" again? After > reading about all your other extraneous stuff the answer escaped me. [quoted text clipped - 103 lines] >>>>>>> won't alter >>>>>>> reality. Deregulation failed. jp103 - 12 Jun 2009 13:43 GMT Grant, Grant, Grant, There you go again. I try to educate myself by asking WHAT THE HR (this stands for House Resolution)# IS and you just want to rant. How can I educate myself by reading and familiarizing myself if you won't even tell me what you are talking about? So I will assume that this is a Rush Rant that piqued your interest and aside from maybe retaining some of his "facts" you don't really know jack about it. I have tried to address your points but you seem to only want to hear yourself talk and not reply to any of my questions. If this is incorrect then please tell me where you said:
1 Where did you say "the other side of the story"? 2 Do you have an HR #? 3 If I watch Fox news I will know who I voted for?
If you need some help with the answers - 1 As regards this thread I didn't. 2 Hmmm no 3 How the hell would Fox news know who you voted for?
Perhaps you could get your news from Colbert and Stewart because it seems that you just aren't enjoying life right now.
I do appreciate some of your posts about Hyundais so keep up the good work.
> You sure as hell substantiated my point if you don't know about the bill > that is now being vigorously debated in Congress!!! See what I mean about [quoted text clipped - 114 lines] >>>>>>>> won't alter >>>>>>>> reality. Deregulation failed. 631grant - 12 Jun 2009 16:24 GMT Jp, Jp, Jp
I'm not helping you anymore to avoid watching Fox to get the other side of the story. When you find out what I'm talking about, you can cry on my shoulder. I'm not making anything up. It's for you to find out.
> Grant, Grant, Grant, > There you go again. [quoted text clipped - 146 lines] >>>>>>>>> won't alter >>>>>>>>> reality. Deregulation failed. 631grant - 12 Jun 2009 13:25 GMT No, I'm only two sniper rounds away from having Nancy Pelosi as my President!!!! NOW THAT REALLY SCARES THE sh.t OUT OF ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> Sorry 631 where was it you said "the other side of the story" again? After > reading about all your other extraneous stuff the answer escaped me. [quoted text clipped - 103 lines] >>>>>>> won't alter >>>>>>> reality. Deregulation failed. Bill - 13 Jun 2009 15:10 GMT >No, I'm only two sniper rounds away from having Nancy Pelosi as my >President!!!! NOW THAT REALLY SCARES THE sh.t OUT OF ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yeah, scares me too. ALMOST as much as being one heart attack away from Palin being president.
Bill
Voyager - 16 Jun 2009 00:36 GMT >> No, I'm only two sniper rounds away from having Nancy Pelosi as my >> President!!!! NOW THAT REALLY SCARES THE sh.t OUT OF ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > Yeah, scares me too. ALMOST as much as being one heart attack away > from Palin being president. The difference is that the first scenario is possible and the second is not.
Bill - 17 Jun 2009 21:51 GMT >>> No, I'm only two sniper rounds away from having Nancy Pelosi as my >>> President!!!! NOW THAT REALLY SCARES THE sh.t OUT OF ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >The difference is that the first scenario is possible and the second is not. Yeah, thanks to the diety of your choice for that!
Indrek Aavisto - 19 Jun 2009 01:00 GMT B> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:36:51 -0400, Voyager <m.whiting@computer.org> B> wrote:
>>>> No, I'm only two sniper rounds away from having Nancy Pelosi as my >>>> President!!!! NOW THAT REALLY SCARES THE sh.t OUT OF >>>> ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>> Yeah, scares me too. ALMOST as much as being one heart attack away >>> from Palin being president.
>>The difference is that the first scenario is possible and the second is >>not. B> Yeah, thanks to the diety of your choice for that!
Is that a low cal god?
Cheers,
Indrek Aavisto
 Signature Criticism is easy; achievement is difficult. W.S. Churchill
Bill - 19 Jun 2009 13:27 GMT > B> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:36:51 -0400, Voyager <m.whiting@computer.org> >B> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >Indrek Aavisto No, that's a politically correct god, and I can't believe I said that. I must be mellowing in my old age.
Bill
Voyager - 11 Jun 2009 03:03 GMT >>>>> Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of >>>> business [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > It's Bush and the Republicans' fault. End of story. Spinning it won't alter > reality. Deregulation failed. I hate to burst your bubble, but the banking deregulation began under Clinton in 1999. He has admitted that himself. No spin required.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/nov1999/bank-n01.shtml
631grant - 11 Jun 2009 04:07 GMT Good one, Voyager. I missed that. These left wing idiots just don't get it. They can't see the 'Change' happening right before their eyes. We're getting CHANGE, alright! From Democracy to Socialism to Anarchy to Rebellion to chaos.
>>>>>> Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of >>>>> business [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/nov1999/bank-n01.shtml Voyager - 11 Jun 2009 23:55 GMT > Good one, Voyager. I missed that. These left wing idiots just don't get > it. They can't see the 'Change' happening right before their eyes. We're > getting CHANGE, alright! From Democracy to Socialism to Anarchy to > Rebellion to chaos. Even though I am still registered Republican, I don't think either party gets it nor has for some time now. I'm very close to voting for a 3rd or 4th party next time around. I wasn't happy with ANY of the candidates fielded this last election.
Matt
631grant - 12 Jun 2009 01:01 GMT I too would gladly vote for a third choice if they had a chance of beating the Democratic Fascist party.
>> Good one, Voyager. I missed that. These left wing idiots just don't get >> it. They can't see the 'Change' happening right before their eyes. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Matt Ed Pawlowski - 12 Jun 2009 02:21 GMT >> Good one, Voyager. I missed that. These left wing idiots just don't get >> it. They can't see the 'Change' happening right before their eyes. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Matt I've voted for the third parties often. If enough people did, the other two would really take notice and perhaps get their stuff together.
Mike Marlow - 12 Jun 2009 03:44 GMT >> Good one, Voyager. I missed that. These left wing idiots just don't get >> it. They can't see the 'Change' happening right before their eyes. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Matt This is like looking in a mirror...
 Signature -Mike- mmarlowREMOVE@windstream.net
Miles Monroe - 11 Jun 2009 08:30 GMT >> It's Bush and the Republicans' fault. End of story. Spinning it won't >> alter [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/nov1999/bank-n01.shtml Funny you'd provide that link which mentions the congressional Republicans' hand in banking deregulation.
But I was talking about business deregulation in general, because it isn't just banks that are failing. You've heard about the auto industry, yes?
I hate to burst your bubble but deregulation began in earnest under Reagan. It was a Milton Freedman nutjob fantasy and it doesn't work. Freedman believed the market place is a natural force like wind, air, and fire and Reagan and you Republicans are too stupid to realize how stupid that sounds.
You guys are so pathetic in your desperate attempts to pin this crisis on liberals. It's a relief nobody takes you boneheads seriously anymore.
nothermark - 11 Jun 2009 12:31 GMT >>> It's Bush and the Republicans' fault. End of story. Spinning it won't >>> alter [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >You guys are so pathetic in your desperate attempts to pin this crisis on >liberals. It's a relief nobody takes you boneheads seriously anymore. It is a natureal force. In a weather sense this is just an example of why we build houses instead of living in a tent. In a financial sense the other shoe has to fall and all the smug folks who want cheap imports and no stinking factory jobs are going to find out where the money ultimately comes from to pay their salaries. That part of the cycle is what is hitting now. I'm waiting for either California or New York to go bankrup next.
BTW, if you want to point a finger use the mirror. Both sides of the aisle are complicit in the mess.
631grant - 11 Jun 2009 22:18 GMT When did they deregulate the auto industry???? Chrysler and GM failed because they had Union labor getting paid way too much for what they did, they had cars that no one wanted at $4 a gallon for gas, their executives only cared about their bonuses, which is common today. They had no clue as to what the public really wanted in this economy. Rick Wagoneer (sp??) of GM gets on the podium and says the "new" GM would give the people World Class cars like the Cadillac CTS, the Escalade, SUV's, and pickup trucks. In an era of no credit, no money, rising gas prices, this idiot puts the future on gas guzzling cars that no one can afford to buy or run. He is just as stupid as you, Miles, since you are calling 'us' stupid.
>>> It's Bush and the Republicans' fault. End of story. Spinning it won't >>> alter [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > You guys are so pathetic in your desperate attempts to pin this crisis on > liberals. It's a relief nobody takes you boneheads seriously anymore. Mike Marlow - 12 Jun 2009 03:42 GMT > When did they deregulate the auto industry???? Chrysler and GM failed > because they had Union labor getting paid way too much for what they did, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > future on gas guzzling cars that no one can afford to buy or run. He is > just as stupid as you, Miles, since you are calling 'us' stupid. You might have had a good start there, but when you dove down to the gutter with the "gas guzzler" crap, you completely lost any credibility with your points. It would benefit you to examine the numbe of GM vehicles that got over 30 mpg for the past several years, and how that number compares to the competition. For all that GM has screwed up, gas mileage is not among the list of bad moves. But then again - it does feel good to type "gas guzzlers", dosen't it?
 Signature -Mike- mmarlowREMOVE@windstream.net
631grant - 12 Jun 2009 13:29 GMT I was wondering when you would jump in, Mike. I know about GM with their claims of all their 30 mpg cars but 30 mpg really doesn't cut it in the land of $4 a gallon gas, which is where we will end up again. The HHR is a great little car and we have one in our family but it SHOULD be getting 40 mpg. I just don't believe 30 is the magic number we'll be looking for. Personal opinion.
>> When did they deregulate the auto industry???? Chrysler and GM failed >> because they had Union labor getting paid way too much for what they did, [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > mileage is not among the list of bad moves. But then again - it does feel > good to type "gas guzzlers", dosen't it? 631grant - 12 Jun 2009 13:49 GMT As I've said on previous posts (and arguments with you) that when 40-50 mpg is the norm in Europe, to say 30 mpg is good here is calling us a third world country. Please don't bring up the emissions copout since Europe is more Green than we are. Hell, my Sedona, just like yours, gets 30+ mpg. For a little car like the HHR or Cobalt to get the same mileage is sick.
>I was wondering when you would jump in, Mike. I know about GM with their >claims of all their 30 mpg cars but 30 mpg really doesn't cut it in the [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >> mileage is not among the list of bad moves. But then again - it does >> feel good to type "gas guzzlers", dosen't it? Mike Marlow - 14 Jun 2009 12:28 GMT > As I've said on previous posts (and arguments with you) that when 40-50 > mpg is the norm in Europe, to say 30 mpg is good here is calling us a > third world country. Please don't bring up the emissions copout since > Europe is more Green than we are. Hell, my Sedona, just like yours, gets > 30+ mpg. For a little car like the HHR or Cobalt to get the same mileage > is sick. 40-50 isn't really the norm in Europe, is it? I too believe that a car like the Cobalt should be getting better mileage. It does not seem unreasonable to me to expect to see upper 30's out of that size car these days - without going to steps like putting a diesel in it.
That said, my daughter recently replaced an 00 Sunfire with an 05 or 06 Mazda 3. Granted, you don't mention Japanese cars above, but they are generally touted as being superior to GM in every respect, and certainly in the mileage department. (Not so, but that's what you hear). Her in city mileage dropped significantly (an impact to her because she lives in the city and does a large amount of city driving), and her highway mileage dropped some. Not as noticeable a drop as the city mileage, but still a drop.
The HHR is a design nightmare for mileage figures. I can see where that would struggle to attain the mileage that a more aerodynamic design should achieve, but its city mileage could be better, I believe.
 Signature -Mike- mmarlowREMOVE@windstream.net
631grant - 14 Jun 2009 17:37 GMT Oh, 50 mpg in Europe is quite normal now, BUT remember that 1/2 of the cars are diesels! I'm retired now for 3 years but before that I spent TOO much time in Europe on business and routinely rented MB, Fords, and Peugeots that always gave me well over 50 mpg with as many as 4 people in them. Most of the mileage was what I would term suburban driving in town or on the Autobahn at 100 mph. The cars had surprising acceleration and passing ability too.
>> As I've said on previous posts (and arguments with you) that when 40-50 >> mpg is the norm in Europe, to say 30 mpg is good here is calling us a [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > would struggle to attain the mileage that a more aerodynamic design should > achieve, but its city mileage could be better, I believe. Voyager - 16 Jun 2009 00:39 GMT > As I've said on previous posts (and arguments with you) that when 40-50 mpg > is the norm in Europe, to say 30 mpg is good here is calling us a third > world country. Please don't bring up the emissions copout since Europe is > more Green than we are. Hell, my Sedona, just like yours, gets 30+ mpg. > For a little car like the HHR or Cobalt to get the same mileage is sick. What Sedona are you talking about? Certainly not the Kia. I had one for a rental and it couldn't get 18 MPG.
http://www.mpgfacts.com/?did=806&year=2009
631grant - 17 Jun 2009 01:07 GMT Ooops. Senility strikes again! I have a Kia Sedona AND a Hyundai Sonata and continually get the two names confused. Of course, I meant the Sonata getting 30+. Just got 32 on a 1900 mile trip. Incidentally, someone posted that they had a European Sedona (Kia) with a diesel and were getting over 30 mpg! Why can't that be us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>> As I've said on previous posts (and arguments with you) that when 40-50 >> mpg is the norm in Europe, to say 30 mpg is good here is calling us a [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > http://www.mpgfacts.com/?did=806&year=2009 Voyager - 17 Jun 2009 11:45 GMT > Ooops. Senility strikes again! I have a Kia Sedona AND a Hyundai Sonata > and continually get the two names confused. Of course, I meant the Sonata > getting 30+. Just got 32 on a 1900 mile trip. Incidentally, someone posted > that they had a European Sedona (Kia) with a diesel and were getting over 30 > mpg! Why can't that be us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ah, that makes much more sense!
Matt
631grant - 17 Jun 2009 20:03 GMT Once in a great while, I actually Do make sense.................... :o) Of course, my wife will never agree to that!
>> Ooops. Senility strikes again! I have a Kia Sedona AND a Hyundai >> Sonata and continually get the two names confused. Of course, I meant [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Matt Mike Marlow - 14 Jun 2009 12:17 GMT >I was wondering when you would jump in, Mike. I know about GM with their >claims of all their 30 mpg cars but 30 mpg really doesn't cut it in the >land of $4 a gallon gas, which is where we will end up again. The HHR is a >great little car and we have one in our family but it SHOULD be getting 40 >mpg. I just don't believe 30 is the magic number we'll be looking for. >Personal opinion. Yeah - I supposed I might be a bit predictable at times. I'm just so tired of that phrase "gas guzzlers", and it always seems to get thrown out there for the effect, rather than a valid argument point. I do agree that it seems we well ought to be able to expect mileage numbers in the 40's now, without any radical designs. 30's was great for a generation of cars, and I applaud GM for having lead the pack in producing as many cars as they did, for as long as they did, that achieved that kind of mileage. But, like you, I believe it's time to advance on that front. I really like both of the Sonatas we own (04 and 06), and I have almost nothing but good to say about them, but the one thing that struck me with each one of them was that the mileage compared to my GM cars was actually somewhat off. Not so bad as to make owning either one a bad experience, but it is hard at first to accept a new car getting a couple/few less miles per gallon that what you owned before it.
 Signature -Mike- mmarlowREMOVE@windstream.net
631grant - 12 Jun 2009 13:57 GMT Hey, I just visited the new Chevy website and the Cobalt is being claimed to get 37 mpg!! Now that is quite an improvement and I stand corrected. I think Fiat and the Ford Fiesta will both force even more advances in fuel mileage in the coming years. They might even put enough pressure on Congress to adopt regulations to allow European diesel technology into the US and THEN we will truly have oil independence.
>> When did they deregulate the auto industry???? Chrysler and GM failed >> because they had Union labor getting paid way too much for what they did, [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > mileage is not among the list of bad moves. But then again - it does feel > good to type "gas guzzlers", dosen't it? 631grant - 12 Jun 2009 16:27 GMT Curiously enough, the Cobalt with Auto transmission gets 4 MPG less than the stick! That is very unusual in today's advanced automatic technology. Usually the auto trans' are getting the same or maybe one mpg less than stick, but 4?????
> Hey, I just visited the new Chevy website and the Cobalt is being claimed > to get 37 mpg!! Now that is quite an improvement and I stand corrected. [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >> mileage is not among the list of bad moves. But then again - it does >> feel good to type "gas guzzlers", dosen't it? Voyager - 16 Jun 2009 00:45 GMT > Curiously enough, the Cobalt with Auto transmission gets 4 MPG less than the > stick! That is very unusual in today's advanced automatic technology. > Usually the auto trans' are getting the same or maybe one mpg less than > stick, but 4????? I believe the XFE has changes other than the transmission. I believe the engine has been tweaked for fuel economy, it has low rolling resistance tires (I wonder what those cost to replace?), etc., that I don't believe are on the auto tranny version.
Matt
Mike Marlow - 14 Jun 2009 12:34 GMT > Hey, I just visited the new Chevy website and the Cobalt is being claimed > to get 37 mpg!! Now that is quite an improvement and I stand corrected. > I think Fiat and the Ford Fiesta will both force even more advances in > fuel mileage in the coming years. They might even put enough pressure on > Congress to adopt regulations to allow European diesel technology into the > US and THEN we will truly have oil independence. I'm anxious to see more advances in electric, but in self-generating electric. Diesel generator locomotives have advanced great strides in the tonnage they can move on a gallon of diesel fuel, and it sure seems that the technology they employ could be migrated to cars. I'm not at all interested in seeing any more introductions that require the own to plug the car into the wall to charge it up.
 Signature -Mike- mmarlowREMOVE@windstream.net
631grant - 14 Jun 2009 17:46 GMT I agree, Mike. any care that has to be plugged in is doomed to failure until an infrastructure is well in place (which, I believe, will never happen given our present form of government self interests). One thing that makes the railroads so efficient is the fact that there is almost no contact area between the wheels and the track reducing friction. Once the energy is expended to get the mass up to speed, very little is needed to maintain it. I guess also the NASCAR drafting syndrome plays a part in moving a long train. Try that on the interstate!!! When I was young and foolish, I did that on my motorcycle behind trucks. You could almost close the throttle and be sucked along (while you prayed he didn't hit the brakes!). Tire technology could take a giant step forward to reduce rolling resistance too. I saw an ad for a new 'gas saving' tire but when you do the math, it is more hype than actual help.
>> Hey, I just visited the new Chevy website and the Cobalt is being claimed >> to get 37 mpg!! Now that is quite an improvement and I stand corrected. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > interested in seeing any more introductions that require the own to plug > the car into the wall to charge it up. Voyager - 16 Jun 2009 00:48 GMT >> Hey, I just visited the new Chevy website and the Cobalt is being claimed >> to get 37 mpg!! Now that is quite an improvement and I stand corrected. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > in seeing any more introductions that require the own to plug the car into > the wall to charge it up. The main reason trains use this approach is to avoid the need for a clutch system capable of starting out heavy loads. This is basically the same as the hybrids currently in use. Yes, I think a diesel hybrid would have significant advantages over a gas hybrid, even with the greater weight of the diesel engine.
Matt
631grant - 17 Jun 2009 01:09 GMT I never did understand why the hybrid people didn't use a small diesel for the ultimate efficiency since the 'overall' emissions would be quite low even with the diesel.
>>> Hey, I just visited the new Chevy website and the Cobalt is being >>> claimed to get 37 mpg!! Now that is quite an improvement and I stand [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Matt Ed Pawlowski - 17 Jun 2009 02:35 GMT >I never did understand why the hybrid people didn't use a small diesel for >the ultimate efficiency since the 'overall' emissions would be quite low >even with the diesel. Getting the diesel past emission requirements is probably one reason. It may not be a smooth starting too, when the power is required, compared to gas, especially in cold climates. I have to think that they have considered it at some point.
631grant - 17 Jun 2009 20:06 GMT If they looked at emissions per mile where the electric motor was doing the work part of the time, I would think emissions would be quite low. If you've ever driven a small turbo diesel in Europe, you would see how smooth and quick they are. Starting in the cold is no longer a problem. In fact, I believe they don't' even use glow plugs anymore. I had a diesel in Chicago for years and it started even at sub zero temps. Diesels are NOT your 'grandmother's diesels'. It's a whole new breed.
>>I never did understand why the hybrid people didn't use a small diesel for >>the ultimate efficiency since the 'overall' emissions would be quite low [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > gas, especially in cold climates. I have to think that they have > considered it at some point. Slim - 15 Jun 2009 01:59 GMT Dear Lazy Assed Top- Poster:
The UAW didn't make the decisons to design and manufacture sh.t cars.
The UAW didn't piss billions away on bad advertsing.
The UAW didn't buy private jets to fly to Congressional Hearings.
The UAW is not in bed with Saudis like the Bush family is.
> When did they deregulate the auto industry???? Chrysler and GM failed > because they had Union labor getting paid way too much for what they [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] >> You guys are so pathetic in your desperate attempts to pin this crisis >> on liberals. It's a relief nobody takes you boneheads seriously anymore.
 Signature "Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY." --Goering at the Nuremberg Trials
Voyager - 11 Jun 2009 23:57 GMT >>> It's Bush and the Republicans' fault. End of story. Spinning it won't >>> alter [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Funny you'd provide that link which mentions the congressional Republicans' > hand in banking deregulation. I never said that the Republicans didn't play a role. I simply was point out the error in your statement.
> But I was talking about business deregulation in general, because it isn't > just banks that are failing. You've heard about the auto industry, yes? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > believed the market place is a natural force like wind, air, and fire and > Reagan and you Republicans are too stupid to realize how stupid that sounds. So now it is Reagan rather than Bush. When will you find a lie that you like and will stick with?
> You guys are so pathetic in your desperate attempts to pin this crisis on > liberals. It's a relief nobody takes you boneheads seriously anymore. I made no such attempt.
Matt
Miles Monroe - 12 Jun 2009 03:24 GMT >>>> It's Bush and the Republicans' fault. End of story. Spinning it won't >>>> alter [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > I never said that the Republicans didn't play a role. I simply was point > out the error in your statement. I didn't make an error. Educate yourself. You are only entitled to an informed opinion, not regurgitating right-wing talking points.
> So now it is Reagan rather than Bush. When will you find a lie that you > like and will stick with? No, stupid, it was all three of them. (That's Reagan and both Bushes.) The Republican agenda of deregulation and greed is good, and f.ck you I got mine.
Voyager - 12 Jun 2009 10:43 GMT >>>>> It's Bush and the Republicans' fault. End of story. Spinning it won't >>>>> alter [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I didn't make an error. Educate yourself. You are only entitled to an > informed opinion, not regurgitating right-wing talking points. Your statement that it was the fault of Bush and the Republicans is completely false. Any thinking person knows that and the data supports that the Democrats played a huge role staring back with the "New Deal." Read some history. It is very interesting.
>> So now it is Reagan rather than Bush. When will you find a lie that you >> like and will stick with? > > No, stupid, it was all three of them. (That's Reagan and both Bushes.) The > Republican agenda of deregulation and greed is good, and f.ck you I got > mine. First, it was Bush, then it was Reagan, now it is both. Do you have a 4th lie to share?
Matt
Slim - 15 Jun 2009 01:55 GMT >>> It's Bush and the Republicans' fault. End of story. Spinning it won't alter >>> reality. Deregulation failed. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Funny you'd provide that link which mentions the congressional > Republicans' hand in banking deregulation. Yes, them Republickans are always shooting themselves in the foot, when they are aren't pretending to be Cheney. LOL.
> But I was talking about business deregulation in general, because it > isn't just banks that are failing. You've heard about the auto [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > and fire and Reagan and you Republicans are too stupid to realize how > stupid that sounds. But....Nancy's Astrologer said everthing would be OK!
> You guys are so pathetic in your desperate attempts to pin this crisis > on liberals. It's a relief nobody takes you boneheads seriously anymore. AMEN! ;-)
 Signature "Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY." --Goering at the Nuremberg Trials
Slim - 15 Jun 2009 01:53 GMT >>>>> Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of >>>> business [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > It's Bush and the Republicans' fault. End of story. Spinning it won't alter > reality. Deregulation failed. Throw in a war to scam a pipline, complete with no-bid contracts and no end strategy.
 Signature "Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY." --Goering at the Nuremberg Trials
Slim - 15 Jun 2009 01:52 GMT >>>> Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of >>> business [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > has spent more money in this first few months than Bush spent in years. > That is simply a fact. The banks are paying back thier loans.
We all know how people like you just hate that.
 Signature "Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY." --Goering at the Nuremberg Trials
631grant - 11 Jun 2009 02:52 GMT Bill, once and for all, Obama didn't inherit anything from Bush!!! He inherited it from the Democratic Congress that was in control for the last two years of Bush's administration! The House approves appropriations and taxes, NOT the President. He inherited it from Nancy Pelosi!!! Get over it. Now they want us to read Miranda rights to terrorists captured in Iraq and Afghanistan! Would McCain have allowed that????? What has happened to all the Americans?????
>>> Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of >>business [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > thinks bad about Obama is that he wasn't smart enough to say "no > thanks" to the job. Irwell - 11 Jun 2009 16:24 GMT > Bill, once and for all, Obama didn't inherit anything from Bush!!! He > inherited it from the Democratic Congress that was in control for the last [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Now they want us to read Miranda rights to terrorists captured in Iraq and > Afghanistan! Would McCain have allowed that????? After asking Sara Palin? 'In a minute John dear, I'm busy choosing another outfit to wear'.
631grant - 11 Jun 2009 22:12 GMT One more moron Democrat who can't see what's happening. I hope Obama crowns a Moron Czar to get them all off the street. I just can't believe you Dems can't see what's happening! Instead, you keep looking back and trying to find someone to blame rather than opening your eyes and seeing where we hare headed. Stupid stupid stupid.
>> Bill, once and for all, Obama didn't inherit anything from Bush!!! He >> inherited it from the Democratic Congress that was in control for the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > After asking Sara Palin? > 'In a minute John dear, I'm busy choosing another outfit to wear'. Miles Monroe - 12 Jun 2009 03:16 GMT > than opening your eyes and seeing where we hare headed. Stupid stupid > stupid. Where hare headed? Tortoise wants to know.
631grant - 12 Jun 2009 14:01 GMT Well, I guess you have 'shot your wad' if you're down to citing typing mistakes and making fun of my Parkinson's causing me to hit extra keys. f.ck YOU IN THE HEART!!
>> than opening your eyes and seeing where we hare headed. Stupid stupid >> stupid. > > Where hare headed? Tortoise wants to know. Captain Rock - 13 Jun 2009 15:21 GMT > Well, I guess you have 'shot your wad' if you're down to citing typing > mistakes and making fun of my Parkinson's causing me to hit extra keys. > f.ck YOU IN THE HEART!! steady now, get a grip...
Irwell - 13 Jun 2009 16:12 GMT >> Well, I guess you have 'shot your wad' if you're down to citing typing >> mistakes and making fun of my Parkinson's causing me to hit extra keys. >> f.ck YOU IN THE HEART!! > > steady now, get a grip... On shaky ground here.
Slim - 15 Jun 2009 01:56 GMT >> Bill, once and for all, Obama didn't inherit anything from Bush!!! He >> inherited it from the Democratic Congress that was in control for the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > After asking Sara Palin? > 'In a minute John dear, I'm busy choosing another outfit to wear'. Is that kid knocked up AGAIN bu some jackoff loser a.shole?
 Signature "Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY." --Goering at the Nuremberg Trials
Slim - 15 Jun 2009 01:51 GMT >> Well, I just found out our Hyundai dealer in Athens, Ga went out of > business >> and our nearest dealer is now about 80 miles away. >> Wonderful....................... > > Welcome to the Obama Economy(?) Its the economy left by King Clusterfuck.
 Signature "Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY." --Goering at the Nuremberg Trials
CBX2@webtv.net - 14 Jun 2009 14:58 GMT THE DEMOCRATS & REPUBLICANS HAVE YOU RIGHT WHERE THEY WANT YOU! FIGHTING EACH OTHER SO YOU DON"T SEE THE REAL PROBLEM>THEY DON"T GIVE A f.ck ABOUT YOU THEY ARE RICH AND GETTING RICHER WHILE YOU FIGHT AMONG YOURELVES INSTEAD OF GETTING RID OF BOTH OF THEM>THIS COUNTRY IS DOOMED>THERE IS NO CONSTITUTION ANY MORE.WE JUST HAD A TOWN USE EMMINENT DOMAIN TO TAKE PROPERTY FROM ANOTHER TOWN??WATS NEXT>KEEP FIGHTING a.sholes<YOU"RE DOING THE WORK FOR THEM >
CBX2@webtv.net - 14 Jun 2009 15:17 GMT > THE DEMOCRATS & REPUBLICANS HAVE YOU RIGHT WHERE THEY WANT YOU! FIGHTING > EACH OTHER SO YOU DON"T SEE THE REAL PROBLEM>THEY DON"T GIVE A f.ck [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > DOMAIN TO TAKE PROPERTY FROM ANOTHER TOWN??WATS NEXT>KEEP FIGHTING > a.sholes<YOU"RE DOING THE WORK FOR THEM > whew... I FELT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO SHARE THAT BEFORE I DO MYSELF AND EVERYONE WHO KNOWS ME A FAVOR AND PULL THE TRIGGER. NOW LET'S SEE, WHICH END OF THE PISTOL GOES AGAINST MY EMPTY CRANIUM?
OH YEAH, I GOT IT NOW..
CBX2@webtv.net - 14 Jun 2009 16:31 GMT Second post was the a.shole ADDY HIJACKER>
Voyager - 16 Jun 2009 00:51 GMT > THE DEMOCRATS & REPUBLICANS HAVE YOU RIGHT WHERE THEY WANT YOU! FIGHTING > EACH OTHER SO YOU DON"T SEE THE REAL PROBLEM>THEY DON"T GIVE A f.ck [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > DOMAIN TO TAKE PROPERTY FROM ANOTHER TOWN??WATS NEXT>KEEP FIGHTING > a.sholes<YOU"RE DOING THE WORK FOR THEM > Oh no, now we're brought out the webtv bozos who can only type in all caps. Doesn't webtv give you a real keyboard yet?
---MIKE--- - 16 Jun 2009 01:32 GMT >Oh no, now we're brought out the webtv > bozos who can only type in all caps. > Doesn't webtv give you a real keyboard > yet? As you can see, we do have a real keyboard. The poster using all caps is his desire to shout his message. By the way, our keyboard is wireless.
---MIKE---
>>In the White Mountains of New Hampshire >> (44° 15' N - Elevation 1580') Voyager - 16 Jun 2009 03:11 GMT >> Oh no, now we're brought out the webtv >> bozos who can only type in all caps. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > is his desire to shout his message. By the way, our keyboard is > wireless. I don't think he is shouting. He is just smart enough to use a keyboard.
Only your keyboard is wireless? I'm sorry about that...
|
|
|