Hi all,i hope someone can help with a couple of questions.I have the chance
of a XJS 4.2LTR with 58k on the clock,but don't know what to look out for in
the way of nasties.Also dont know anything about the engine.Would it be a
straight 6 or a V8? and what would the mgp be and hp output?
Any help would be helpfull as always wanted an xjs and this may be the car
for me.Thanks,Simon.
webserve - 19 Jan 2005 13:53 GMT
Simon,
You need to step back a bit and educate yourself on the XJS before you
buy one. The XJS was introduced in 1975 with a V-12 5.3 litre engine. It
carried this engine as it's only power plant until the introduction of the
AJ6 3.6 litre power plant in 1983 model year 1984. US introduction 1986.
It continued with this combination until the V-12 was upgraded to a 6.0
litre (not sure of the year) and the 3.6 was upgraded to a 4.0 in 1990. The
4.2 litre XK engine was never put into the XJS as part of Jaguar's
production line. If the XJS you are looking to buy has a 4.2 XK engine than
it is a replacement engine. The 4.2, by the way, is a great engine and a
straight 6 cylinder. The V-8 (other than the Daimler 250 of the 1960s) was
not introduced until 1998 by Jaguar -- long after the XJS was no longer
produced.
You might want to go to http://www.jag-lovers.org/brochures/index.html?ql
and read the original brochures on these cars so you know what you are
looking for.
Hope this helps.
Webserve
> Hi all,i hope someone can help with a couple of questions.I have the chance
> of a XJS 4.2LTR with 58k on the clock,but don't know what to look out for in
> the way of nasties.Also dont know anything about the engine.Would it be a
> straight 6 or a V8? and what would the mgp be and hp output?
> Any help would be helpfull as always wanted an xjs and this may be the car
> for me.Thanks,Simon.
Simon - 19 Jan 2005 21:04 GMT
Thanks for the indepth reply,I am going to see the car this weekend and now
know a little more about the XJS.Once again thanks for the detailed
advice,Simon.
> Simon,
> You need to step back a bit and educate yourself on the XJS before you
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> > Any help would be helpfull as always wanted an xjs and this may be the car
> > for me.Thanks,Simon.
Stuart Adair - 27 Jan 2005 08:01 GMT
Webserve is absolutely correct. The engine in your XJS would be non
original. Having said that apart from having 6 cylinders missing from the
proper engine - The 4.2 is a damn fine engine.
The big issue is going to be the bodywork. The first place to go is behind
the wheelarches where those big tyres throw up stones. The front is
protected by a cover but this usually just traps the mud. If you see any
sign of rust at the bottom of the front wings where it meets the sill then
you can guarantee that you will need to do some welding to the metalwork
behind - Not insurmountable but just be prepared.
Next open the bonnet and check where the shock absorbers come through the
body - Another common rust place.
Have a good look underneath and the jacking points. Again, any sign of rust
means that you will need your welder out.
Next, jack the car up and check the front suspension mountings by looking
for any play in the wheels or any fraying of the mounting rubbers. The top
ones are easy to change (although they are more expensive). To replace the
lower bushes means that you will need to drop the subframe which is really
fun !!!
Do the same with the rear suspension, but there are no real issues with cost
or difficulty to replace here. A good trick I learnt is to get an assistant
to sit with the engine running and their foot on the brake. Put the car in R
and see if the rear wheels twist. Then put in drive and see if the axle
twists again.
As far as MPG is concerned - If you need to ask then you cant afford !!!
Enjoy
Stu
> Hi all,i hope someone can help with a couple of questions.I have the
> chance
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Any help would be helpfull as always wanted an xjs and this may be the car
> for me.Thanks,Simon.
Ron - 27 Jan 2005 21:56 GMT
I cannot speak for the USA, but in the UK and AU, the last of the XJS had
an option of the XJ40 SIX. Far better than the V12 and VERY economical.
Ron
> Webserve is absolutely correct. The engine in your XJS would be non
> original. Having said that apart from having 6 cylinders missing from
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>> Any help would be helpfull as always wanted an xjs and this may be
>> the car for me.Thanks,Simon.
Alex - 30 Jan 2005 08:10 GMT
Can't help you on the 6 cylinder, but overall look for rust in the
fenderwells, under the floor pan, and along the trunk.
Look for fit and finish of the body panels to make sure no wrecks.
Personally, I'd run the VIN through one of the checking agencies like
Carfax. I just finished a month subscription and found a few good deals
weren't so good.
Just brought home my new 92 XJS (V12) with a smidge less than 55,000 miles
on the clock.
Good luck on the car, I love mine already!
-alex