(Re-ordered for ease of comprehension. Please don't top post)
>> The least desirable of the E-types. More of a cruiser and a poser than
>> a true sports car. Go for a series one 4.2, which has more comfortable
>> seats and an all-synchro box over the more sought-after - 3.8, but is
>> still the real thing.
> OK, what's a syncro-box?
I said an 'all-synchro' box. In other words, a gearbox which has
syncromesh on all four gears. The old Moss box fitted to the original
3.8s had no synchromesh on first and relatively weak synchromesh on
the other gears. Characterful, but best to double-declutch all the
time unless you were prepared to put up with very slow gearchanges.
Pretty basic question for someone who is considering the purchase of a
classic car. You maybe need to do more background reading. You might
be getting in over your head at this stage.
David Betts (davidb@motorsport.org.uk)
The Classic Car Gallery: http://www.ofoto.com/I.jsp?m=17830847103&n=398038677
Ron - 31 Jan 2005 21:05 GMT
> (Re-ordered for ease of comprehension. Please don't top post)
Why not?
Beats scrolling....
>>> The least desirable of the E-types. More of a cruiser and a poser
>>> than a true sports car. Go for a series one 4.2, which has more
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> The Classic Car Gallery:
> http://www.ofoto.com/I.jsp?m=17830847103&n=398038677
Graham L - 31 Jan 2005 21:36 GMT
> (Re-ordered for ease of comprehension. Please don't top post)
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> The Classic Car Gallery:
> http://www.ofoto.com/I.jsp?m=17830847103&n=398038677
Buying an E-type is a pretty big step.
Personally, I love the old Moss box for it's character. Sure makes you pay
attention to your gear changing technique. To me it's part of the 1960's
experience. I've got a modern car for transport. The Jag is for DRIVING!
GrahamL
Blake Dodson - 01 Feb 2005 00:00 GMT
Amen!
Ron - 01 Feb 2005 09:19 GMT
> Amen!
Too right!
I learnt to drive in a 1942 Ford BlitZ (Canadian CMP)
Australia imported Canadian vehicles from the early part of the century
until the late 60's.
It was a prick of a thing to drive when you are 13 years old :-)
Ron
Graham L - 01 Feb 2005 21:31 GMT
> I learnt to drive in a 1942 Ford BlitZ (Canadian CMP)
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Ron
I learnt to drive in a 1957 Renault Dauphine, my first car, with all 32
thundering horses (yes, the big engine, 848cc!) through a 3 speed gearbox.
No synchro on first and very little anywhere else. On steep hills, first
gear was often necessary. It's bazaar, but I'd like to restore one of them
now.
Graham L
Blake Dodson - 06 Feb 2005 21:47 GMT
Hmmm. You know cars that have to be learnt always seem to find a soft
spot in us. I drove my friends new M3 and I didn't like it. Why? It did
everything so well it felt sterile; no spirit.
I learned to drive in an old 504D Peugeot. All the shifter linkage
bushings were shot; you had to make an educated guess where the next
gear was and prayed you did'nt miss or you'd stop and start all over
again! Man, I miss that POS. ;-)
Blake
Ron - 07 Feb 2005 01:01 GMT
> Hmmm. You know cars that have to be learnt always seem to find a soft
> spot in us. I drove my friends new M3 and I didn't like it. Why? It did
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Blake
Well waddayouknow!!
I owned a 504 auto sedan back in 1975 and then a 504 manual wagon. Loved
the sedan but the wagon was a POS!
Ron