Im considering a 2002 or so X-type. Are there any common problems with the
Jaguar? Is it durable to keep?
> Im considering a 2002 or so X-type. Are there any common problems with the
> Jaguar? Is it durable to keep?
Have a look here for a start:
http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/index.php?url=/carbycar/index.htm
AND HERE
http://www.topgear.com/jsp/roadtestSearch.jsp?carType=new&mDesc=Jaguar&rDesc=X-T
YPE&mCode=B8&rCode=B4
The ultimate reviews for cars is at
http://www.parkers.co.uk/choosing/?frommenu=true]
Not only the usual reports from "car experts" but also from real people who
own the cars.
Of course the biggest problem with the X type is that it just doesn't have
enough cylinders to be a real Jag...
Stu
> Im considering a 2002 or so X-type. Are there any common problems with the
> Jaguar? Is it durable to keep?
Blake Dodson - 14 Jun 2005 18:38 GMT
But Stuart, the X-type with more cylinders would equal twice the
failure rate. ;-)
C.R. Krieger - 15 Jun 2005 22:10 GMT
> Of course the biggest problem with the X type is that it just doesn't have
> enough cylinders to be a real Jag...
Last time I checked, all Jaguars built from 1948 to 1968 were sixes ...
--
C.R. Krieger
X-Owner
stuart adair - 17 Jun 2005 10:58 GMT
exactly - thats 6 less than it should be
> > Of course the biggest problem with the X type is that it just doesn't have
> > enough cylinders to be a real Jag...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> C.R. Krieger
> X-Owner
The x-type should be a good, average car. The Tarus is.
Blake
atec - 15 Jun 2005 03:44 GMT
> The x-type should be a good, average car. The Tarus is.
>
> Blake
But the Tarius is REALLY ugly , sorta like a 'roach on wheels .
Losiho - 15 Jun 2005 05:18 GMT
>> The x-type should be a good, average car. The Tarus is.
>>
>> Blake
>>
> But the Tarius is REALLY ugly , sorta like a 'roach on wheels .
And the X-Type is based on the Ford Mondeo, not the Taurus :)