Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Jaguar Cars / June 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The 2003 SL500 can not be imported from the US to Canada

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John - 16 Jun 2006 14:30 GMT
The 2003 SL500 and all Mercedes from 2004 to
2006 can not be imported from the US to Canada
It's not on the Canadian  list of the cars that can be  imported into
Canada.
The 2002 is on the list and the 2003 500SLR is also on the same list.
Any body knows the reason why the 2003SL and all Mercedes from 2004 to
2006 are excluded?
Tia
John
C.R. Krieger - 16 Jun 2006 18:37 GMT
> Any body knows the reason why the 2003SL and all Mercedes from 2004 to
> 2006 are excluded?

Ummm ... because Canadians are smarter than we thought they were?

Any body knows the reason why idiot John asks this question in a Jaguar
newsgroup only?
--
C.R. Krieger
(Been there; done that)
John - 18 Jun 2006 17:05 GMT
>> Any body knows the reason why the 2003SL and all Mercedes from 2004 to
>> 2006 are excluded?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Any body knows the reason why idiot John asks this question in a Jaguar
>newsgroup only?

Mon Cher (sarcasm for idiot) C.R. Krieger

I could entertain a discussion with you by simply say that, if one is
looking for criticism of a certain product, the best place to go is to
the competition, and Jaguar has been Mercedes competition for many
years.    I am sure that Mercedes would not agree with this.
Your reply ". because Canadians are smarter than we thought they
were?" confirms just that.

Or, tell you that it was done on purpose so that self appointed
Internet police like you, can exercise the little power they have.

But no, I just made a mistake. Once I realized my error, I placed the
same message on the Mercedes Group.
I did get useful information from both groups (yours not included) and
I would like to thank the others for the help they gave me

Probably the main reason why I first selected the Jag group is because
I had an E3 ( the most beautiful car ever made and disgrace for
reliability)  Lucas has done a lot of damage to Jag.
I still have a XJS that, as my mechanic used to say, are very good the
first 2 years. It has been on my driveway since the day it burned a
head gasket.

John
C.R. Krieger - 20 Jun 2006 22:37 GMT
> >> Any body knows the reason why the 2003SL and all Mercedes from 2004 to
> >> 2006 are excluded?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Your reply ". because Canadians are smarter than we thought they
> were?" confirms just that.

So you're humor-impaired, too?  OF COURSE Mercedes wouldn't agree!
What the hell do I care?  I think they're Overengineered Swabian Pigs©
and I don't pass up many chances to say so.

> But no, I just made a mistake. Once I realized my error, I placed the
> same message on the Mercedes Group.

These things happen.  BT, DT.  At least I checked first to see if you'd
crossposted, but you hadn't.  I'll apologize for the 'idiot' part.  Can
I call you 'fumblefingers'?

> Probably the main reason why I first selected the Jag group is because
> I had an E3

You had a Bavaria?  A 3.0S?  A 3.3Li?

OK; since you'll be offended yet again, let me explain.  'E3' is the
BMW 'Entwicklungsnummer' for the first big BMW 4-door series after Die
Neue Klasse (1500-2000).  These were the 2500, 2800, 3.0, 3.3, and a
few variations thereof (including the US-only Bavaria) produced from
~1968-1974.
--
C.R. Krieger
(Been there; done that)
John - 21 Jun 2006 18:58 GMT
>> >> Any body knows the reason why the 2003SL and all Mercedes from 2004 to
>> >> 2006 are excluded?
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>crossposted, but you hadn't.  I'll apologize for the 'idiot' part.  Can
>I call you 'fumblefingers'?

No, you may not.

Definition of fumbler:
Someone who makes mistakes because of incompetence.

I am not incompetent.
I am old and when you are 77 years old like me you will understand.

The E3 is a Jaguar that was built until 1974 and sold new for less
than 10k
I purchased mine for 10K used it for about 15 years and sold it for
more than 30K

>> Probably the main reason why I first selected the Jag group is because
>> I had an E3
>
>You had a Bavaria?  A 3.0S?  A 3.3Li?

May I call your attention that this is a Jaguar group.
A car that today devaluates more rapidly then a virgin prostitute

>OK; since you'll be offended yet again, let me explain.  'E3' is the
>BMW 'Entwicklungsnummer' for the first big BMW 4-door series after Die
>Neue Klasse (1500-2000).  These were the 2500, 2800, 3.0, 3.3, and a
>few variations thereof (including the US-only Bavaria) produced from
>~1968-1974.

Regards
John
C.R. Krieger - 22 Jun 2006 17:43 GMT
> >These things happen.  Can I call you 'fumblefingers'?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I am not incompetent.
> I am old and when you are 77 years old like me you will understand.

I'm an AARP member myself and I already do understand.  I was just
givin' you a hard time.  I've done way more incompetent things than
that.  =;^)

> The E3 is a Jaguar that was built until 1974 and sold new for less
> than 10k

I'd already assumed that.  I'm just a guy who can't let a cheap shot go
by.  Don't take it personally.

> May I call your attention that this is a Jaguar group.
> A car that today devaluates more rapidly then a virgin prostitute

ROTFL!  Now, THAT is funny!
--
C.R. Krieger
(Been there; done that)
webserve - 16 Jun 2006 19:07 GMT
Since this is a Jag list  -- I know very little about Mercedes.

The Mercedes SL500R for 2003 -2006  is listed as a car that IS admissible
from the US to Canada.
See http://www.riv.ca/english/US_vehicle_admissibility.pdf

Unless there is a difference between the SL500 and the SL500R  then you are
mistaken.  According to NADA, however -- there is no difference.

Webserve

> The 2003 SL500 and all Mercedes from 2004 to
> 2006 can not be imported from the US to Canada
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Tia
> John
John - 20 Jun 2006 00:09 GMT
>Since this is a Jag list  -- I know very little about Mercedes.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>> Tia
>> John

Response from the Federal Gvn.:

The listing of the cars as importable, is the manufactures
responsibility.
Consequently, if the car isn't listed, a letter from the manufacturer
is required, stating that the car meets Canadian standards.

Also, importing a defective car, like with water damage (Katrina) may
or may not be approved by the province. Suggested call the Government
of that province for more information.
There is probably al loophole in the law. Import it into one province
and then transfer it to another. One has to pay taxes twice.

John
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.