Hello,
I am planning on building a Jag based kit car (Autotune's Aristocat
XK120 look-alike), and I would very much appreciate some advice with
respect to the questions below with respect to sourcing the donor. I
specifically need a XJ6 S1, 11, or 111 pre-1986 model, as I understand
that from '86 it really became the XJ40 and was quite a different
animal:
1) Would the panel recommmend the carburettor version or PI? When was
the change-over made please? What are the maintenance issues with the
PI? Was the PI much more powerful?
2) I'm obviously not that bothered about body condition (although I do
want to drive it around for a bit to satisfy myself as to its
reliability) - what should I be looking for on these models that is
expensive to fix? Which year is the best of the bunch?
3) What is spare parts availability like please - I am assuming I
would pay through the nose, but I'd like to feel comfortable that
parts are available.
4) Apparently, some models have recessed instruments - can you please
tell me which models had this feature?
5) I would like a vehicle with manual + o/d box, but naturally these
are rarer - which other manual boxes would fit with no problems - 420G
for example? Maybe a Mk11 box, but I suspect the ratios will be too
low??
6) What is the hot oil pressure please?
7) Will these run on unleaded without conversion?
8) Finally (thanks for bearing with me if you get this far), is the
Haynes book any good, or do you have any recommendations please?
Any other information that I might find useful would very much be
appreciated, and if anyone in England has such a vehicle that they
think I may be interested in, please let me know.
Thanks very much for listening,
Paul.
Aalaan - 05 Apr 2007 22:38 GMT
I have found the Haynes book disappointing with regard to the XJ40. Some of
it is good. Much is missing. But it's better than nothing.
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Paul.
Paul - 07 Apr 2007 17:56 GMT
> I have found the Haynes book disappointing with regard to the XJ40. Some of
> it is good. Much is missing. But it's better than nothing.
Thanks Aalaan - anyone else any comments on any of my post please?
Thanks,
Paul
Blake Dodson - 11 Apr 2007 04:55 GMT
> > I have found the Haynes book disappointing with regard to the XJ40. Some of
> > it is good. Much is missing. But it's better than nothing.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Paul
Paul,
Since you are going for the kit car it would be sensible to get the
proper powerplant as well. I personally like the 3.8L with dual
venturi's. It was the engine in the 120 and it would not look out of
place.
http://www.5speeds.com/racing/790.jpg
The LUCAS built, BOSCH designed early fuel injection systems were not
bad but certainly not as good as the BOSCH versions in German and
French cars.
The AJ6 and AJ16 engines really have gotten a bad rap, and it is of my
personal opinion that it is a high calibre engine. Everytime I open
one up I marvel the high quality workmanship. I have been tempted to
take this engine, turbo-charge it, and drop it in a nice kit car. The
only reason why this engine never really stood out is because this
engine was not designed from the ground up, it was designed around the
V12's H.E. cylinderhead. Sadly in doing this, the ideal valve/port
angles were not possible because the bolt holes were in the way.
However, what this did was make it possible to use the AJ6
cylinderheads on the V12 with some modifications.
Older Jag gear boxes were not known to be great performers, but did
the job. Modifications to XK transmissions made them much better. I
would think that a nice modern 5-6 speed would show of the performance
of the old 3.5L and add to the driving enjoyment. 5speeds.com can
help for older gearbox kits.
Cheers