>> >> My S-type goes in to the d**ler next week to have the following fixed
>> >> under warranty:
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>bet you haven't been lent a 3.0 Sport AWD model and, even if so,
>you've never driven it in snow ...
Have driven one, it cornered like it was in a groove. Wonderful
handling, great acceleration, but not as comfortable as my S-type. The
2.0 X-type was a nasty experience. Didn't like it at all.
I've not driven an X-type in the snow, but I'm sure the AWD drive is
good, but it's not really an issue where I live. There's only been one
day with any snow on roads, and that was only a covering. I can
imagine S-types being a bit tricky on standard tyres in snow.
As with everything else, it's a matter of individual preference.
Alex
Hey Now! - 16 Mar 2004 00:40 GMT
I got caught in a quick snow storm in our S-Type R. It was not a
pleasant situation. More than a bit tricky, I would say. We live in
the hills of SW Pennsylvania and even the slightest snow covered grade
was a serious problem for the S-Type R, with its wide summer-only
tires. Dont know how it would be with some grippy Blizzaks, but dont
intend to find out. I'll pay more attention to the forecast in the
future.
T
>>> >> My S-type goes in to the d**ler next week to have the following fixed
>>> >> under warranty:
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
>Alex
C.R. Krieger - 16 Mar 2004 16:20 GMT
> I got caught in a quick snow storm in our S-Type R. It was not a
> pleasant situation. More than a bit tricky, I would say. We live in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> intend to find out. I'll pay more attention to the forecast in the
> future.
Ah! My old neighborhood, only 75-100 miles east! Yeah; those tires
would suck out loud in the hills. A nice set of V-rated Dunlop M3s as
I mentioned elsewhere in this thread would transform the beast into a
Snow Monster.
--
C.R. Krieger
(Been there; drove that)
C.R. Krieger - 16 Mar 2004 16:17 GMT
> >If you think your blanket statement is true, then I'd be willing to
> >bet you haven't been lent a 3.0 Sport AWD model and, even if so,
> >you've never driven it in snow ...
>
> Have driven one, it cornered like it was in a groove. Wonderful
> handling, great acceleration, but not as comfortable as my S-type.
It's small. No question about it. My wife and I are each 5'6" tall,
so the car fits like a glove. I've also driven the S-Type and
wouldn't mind having one after I finally convince the wife I ought to
spend that much. Until then, it's the old 535is for fun and the Grand
Cherokee as the Family Truckster.
> The 2.0 X-type was a nasty experience. Didn't like it at all.
Don't blame you. The smallest engine here in the US is the 2.5 and
*it* isn't all that exhilarating.
> I've not driven an X-type in the snow, but I'm sure the AWD drive is
> good, but it's not really an issue where I live.
It's better than good. On the set of Dunlop M3 snow tires we have,
it's *stunning* (and this from a guy who has *always* lived where
there's plenty of snow). The traction control can do things off a
snowy intersection that I wouldn't even attempt (and I'm known as a
lunatic in snow).
> There's only been one
> day with any snow on roads, and that was only a covering. I can
> imagine S-types being a bit tricky on standard tyres in snow.
>
> As with everything else, it's a matter of individual preference.
As well as where you happen to live. Enjoy the S. I'm jealous, even
if I hide it well.
--
C.R. Krieger
(Been there; drove that)
X-type -v- S-type. I live in Sydney and we don't get much snow here.
However, the x-type really doesn't drive or rdie like a jaguar. Before you
say anything about the handling, I do have an SE with a sports pack fitted
as I regularly take my cars on track days. If I wanted a rough riding AWD
I might have bought an x-type 2.5 AWD (and yes I have driven one) I dread
going to get the S-type serviced as I know I will end up driving an x-type.