Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Jaguar Cars / April 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

A few questions about a new 3.0 X Type

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Slav Inger - 12 Apr 2004 05:23 GMT
Hi there,

Had my 3.0 X-Type automatic for a month and, for the most part, I'm
very satisfied.  Love the looks inside and out, first and foremost.
The performance isn't too bad either.  A few questions though:

* I'm noticing a squeaky sound coming from underneath when driving on
uneven pavement (live in the Motor City, a.k.a. Pothole City, of all
places - plenty of "uneven" pavement here).  Sounds to me like the
springs are squeaking - is this common with X-Types?

* Transmission seems to shift a bit harshly, especially on a downshift
when coasting to a stop.  Sometimes when it shifts from 3-rd to 2-nd,
a sudden jerk accompanies the shift.  This has me sort of worried,
although not enough to complain to the dealer.  When I'm slowing down
with brakes applied, this doesn't happen.

* The manual mentions in no uncertain terms that only premium gas will
do.  I'm wondering - doesn't this car have an octane sensor like most
(all?) cars out there?  I tried 93 and 89 so far - runs fine on 89 but
with a noticeable difference in performance.  I'm wondering if it's
healthy to run this car on 89 long term?

Thanks in advance.
Kryptoknight - 13 Apr 2004 00:25 GMT
i don't know lots about x-type as i'm about to buy a 2004 x-type 3.0 sport.
from all my readings of reviews, etc, the automatic trans has never been
"right". i'm after a 3.0 sport with manual trans., but due to lack of Jag
insight they don't make many "sport" models with manual transmission. it's
really a no-brainer that you don't market a "sport" sedan with just 2 pedals
under the dash..!!

the downshift harshness may be normal, perhaps that automatic was designed
to have quick clutch movements with the hydraulics, good for moving thhrough
the gears while accelerating, sometimes bad for downshifts. faster clutch
movements also means less slipage and better gas mileage.

most modern cars today deploy some sort of knock sensors and adjust timing
accordingly. if the manual does not say specifically to use a octane rating,
then any pump gas works... odd that "you" notice a diff when running 89 vs.
93. usually not noticeable under the foot, but if that's the case i would
inquire with your Jag dealer or Ford directly...

k

> Hi there,
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.