Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Jaguar Cars / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Pulling tanks from XJ6 Series 2

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jagdriver - 28 Jun 2003 11:59 GMT
f.ck, it's easier pulling intelligence from a blonde.
Just how the f.ck are u supposed to pull these f'n things out?
I've got the manual, I've got a start but I might as well be reading the
Koran in Sanskrit via Flemish for all the sense it makes.
Ron McGrice - 28 Jun 2003 21:44 GMT
"Jagdriver" <catzunltd@bigpondSCUM.com> wrote in news:ImeLa.2616$p8.113887
@newsfeeds.bigpond.com:

> f.ck, it's easier pulling intelligence from a blonde.
> Just how the f.ck are u supposed to pull these f'n things out?
> I've got the manual, I've got a start but I might as well be reading the
> Koran in Sanskrit via Flemish for all the sense it makes.

Bad laguage won't help!!

The bolts are between the tank and the "INSIDE" of the car.
From memory, a couple are in the boot and there are one or two that were
very hard to get at. I think one was underneath at the back near the bumper
and the other underneath up the front, close to the exhaust.

If you still can't find them, sell the car, buy a Crapadore and change you
nickname to holdendriver :-)
Lee Borgea - 29 Jun 2003 04:06 GMT
   If removing fuel tanks gets you going, I can't wait until you need to
change your timing chains.

   Okay, pay attention, here you go.

   Drain both tanks.

   Remove both rear light assemblies.

   Remove both rear quarter bumpers.

   Remove both rear wing closing panels.

   Remove both side trim panels from inside the boot ( trunk).

   If you have internal fuel pumps, remove the rear road wheels.

       Remove the fuel pump cover plate from the rear of the wheel well.

       Disconnect the fuel feed line.

   If you have external fuel pumps.

       Disconnect the fuel feed lines.

   Remove the fuel gauge sender unit locking ring, this is accessible
through the rear light aperture.

   Remove the fuel tank filler cap assembly and tank filler neck.

   Prop the fuel tank with timber.

   Remove the 2 fuel tank mounting bolts from inside the boot.

   Drop the fuel tank.

   Fill tank with cold water and soap solution for storage.

   Remember, patience is a virtue, Jaguar's were built to test your
virtuosity.

Cheers, Lee.

> f.ck, it's easier pulling intelligence from a blonde.
> Just how the f.ck are u supposed to pull these f'n things out?
> I've got the manual, I've got a start but I might as well be reading the
> Koran in Sanskrit via Flemish for all the sense it makes.
Jagdriver - 29 Jun 2003 09:46 GMT
>     If removing fuel tanks gets you going, I can't wait until you need to
> change your timing chains.
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Cheers, Lee.

What with the missus bugging out with the dog and losing my job on the same
day, testing my patience with a jag is second nature.
whiskers - 18 Feb 2004 02:02 GMT
How do you pull the fuel tank filler cap assembly and tank filler neck? This is what I'm really having trouble with. I've got everything else off BUT this. Any help would sure be appreciated.

Thanks,
Whiskers
Jagwire - 18 Feb 2004 02:00 GMT
> How do you pull the fuel tank filler cap assembly and tank filler
> neck? This is what I'm really having trouble with. I've got everything
> else off BUT this. Any help would sure be appreciated.
>
>  Thanks,
> Whiskers

Undo the four screws and lift it from the top.
Lee Borgea - 18 Feb 2004 02:27 GMT
   Open the cap and remove the 4 screws that retain the filler neck. The
neck extends into the tank and is sealed by a gasket and O-ring, once the
screws are removed a good heave will remove the filler neck. from the tank.

   If everything else is removed, the tank will not become totally subject
to gravity, mind your feet.....

Hope this helps.

> How do you pull the fuel tank filler cap assembly and tank filler neck? This is what I'm really having trouble with. I've got everything else off
BUT this. Any help would sure be appreciated.

>  Thanks,
> Whiskers
whiskers - 18 Feb 2004 19:52 GMT
That worked, Thanks so very much. I was getting a bit frustrated.
Lee Borgea - 19 Feb 2004 01:57 GMT
   What ? Getting frustrated with a Jaguar ? Who ever heard of that then ?

> That worked, Thanks so very much. I was getting a bit frustrated.
JP - 02 Mar 2004 08:41 GMT
Whiskers,

I need to replace my fuel pump. I have a 92 XJ6 with an in-tank pump.

Did you take out the entire fuel tank? If so, how much trouble was it?

Thanks.

>How do you pull the fuel tank filler cap assembly and tank filler neck? This is what I'm really having trouble with. I've got everything else off BUT this. Any help would sure be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>Whiskers
Oldbie - 06 Mar 2004 22:08 GMT
>I need to replace my fuel pump. I have a 92 XJ6 with an in-tank pump.

John/JP?

Do you know for sure that the fuel pump in your car is in the tank, or
might this be something the Jaguar repair shop has told you to scare
you off doing it yourself?

I saw your posts about fuel pump problems over the last 2 weeks, and I
was having nightmares about doing my brother's car because it had
similar no-start symptoms.  I really didn't want to take the tank out
- I'm doing this in the small car park in front of my mother's flat.

I was having a hard time looking up technical info on that Jag-lovers
web site because every time I looked up XJ6 it gave older model info,
and didn't specify the years very well, and those doepy "brochures"
pages had so much bullshit to d/l on my dialup connection that I could
never really figure it out.

But now I think I've got it.  For some strange reason the writers of
technical assistance seem to think that an XJ6 is not an XJ6 if it's a
1987-1994 - instead they refer to it as an XJ-40.

Now to my logical mind, this means either the authors are f.cked in
the head, or Jaguar is!

But Jaguar makes the things, so I'd guess they'd get the model
designations correct, so I can only assume that guys like this below
are wrong when they write:

"This book contains things that a Jaguar XJ6 owner should know, but
doesn't know who to ask. This book is directed at the TRUE XJ6 and not
at the XJ40 which was made after 1986 but had an "XJ6" badge on the
back.

Author: Jim Isbell"

Having said that, we must allow that to find anything useful written
by guys who I think may be using incorrect or at least confusing model
designations, we have to nevertheless use their method of
identification ourselves.

So does this mean you and I have an XJ-40?  At least for purposes of
reference to technical matters on Jag-lovers we do.

Now, where am I going with this?

I just been outside and pulled the fuel pump off my brother's 1990
"XJ6/XJ-40".

It was mounted on top of a transaxle member just where Jon-H said I'd
find it.

It was NOT inside the tank, however it was very difficult to get out,
especially when the wind blew up the cardboard sheeting I was laying
on and my tapered drift that I was about to use to plug the hose from
the tank rolled about 4 feet out of reach.  My work clothes are in a
heap outside the house.

The wires from the pump led up through the floor under the seat of the
rear passenger, so I took out the seat cushion (2 screws and heave up)
and disconnect the wires at the junction block.  I stuck my voltmeter
in the holes feeding the electricity to the pump and turned the car
on.  0 volts, as expected.  I cranked the starter and got about 9-10
volts, as expected.  Just for fun, I put the auto trans in R & D and
turned the key to on, but it still measured 0 volts.  So whoever
suggested that this might work was no help.

I verified that the ground wire from the pump was a good ground, then
I ran a wire from +ve battery to the plus side of the pump connection
- nothing!  No pumping sound and no fuel spewing out of the
disconnected input to the fuel rail.  So I know the pump is not
working.

I also had a hell of a lot of trouble trying to get the pump itself
disconnected from everything and dropped out of the vehicle because
there doesn't seem to be a big enough space around teh rear
suspension/drive components/muffler without first taking the pump out
of its mounting bracket and then dropping it down.

This sounds like I was trying to remove a major component, not a 2
inch diameter by 6 inch long little fuel pump, but that's "fine
British engineering" for you.

It would have been easier to drive it to a garage where I could put it
on a hoist, but I did not have that option.

The filter and hoses all look okay, and the brackets are a bit rusty,
and f.cked up from removal bullying, but the prices and availability
when the shops are open on monday will dictate what besides the pump I
will replace.

I will also have to check with alternate sources.  Didn't someone say
that the pump is a generic Bosch pump, and much cheaper when purchased
from Bosch than from Jaguar?

The filter itself has a Bosch part number on it, but the pump has no
markings.  

I suppose the brackets and hoses will be Jaguar only items.

So, why don't you crawl under there and have a look for your pump
mounted on the transaxle too.  If it's there, it'll be on the left
side, and there'll be 2 little nuts sticking down on a flat surface
where the bracket is sitting mounted just above.

- Tom
JP - 15 Mar 2004 03:04 GMT
The XJ40 and XJ6 are the same thing. The car goes by XJ40 (as in 4.0
liters) in Europe and outside the US.

Here in the US, it is marketed as the XJ6. There is also the XJ6
Sovereign and XJ6 Vanden Plas. But those models are just for trim
options.

The fuel pump is outside the tank on certain models and inside the
tank on others. Jaguar kept moving parts around from year to year.

The most difficult pump replacement is the in-tank since the tank has
to be taken out through the trunk.

Hope this helps.

>>I need to replace my fuel pump. I have a 92 XJ6 with an in-tank pump.
>
[quoted text clipped - 103 lines]
>
> - Tom
Webserve - 15 Mar 2004 12:13 GMT
Tom,
Actually, As I understand it, the first XJ6 in 1968 was the Series I,
followed by the XJ6 Series II and then the XJ6 Series III until 1987 in the
US.  In 1986, with the first marketing of the squared off body saloon and
the 3.6/2.9 litre motor, the car was initially referred to as the as the XJ6
Series IV.   Because of ALL the technical as well as interior and exterior
changes, the factory reference was changed to XJ40. It had nothing to do
with the 4.0 liter engine because the 3.6, 2.9 and 3.2 liter cars are also
XJ40s. The series of saloons from 1986 in the UK to 1994 are referred to as
the XJ40 series. It is simply as different means of identifying a particular
XJ6 series.  In addition to this, the V-12 versions (double six series) is
also badged as an XJ6, but is referred to as an XJ81 to differentiate it
from the standard versions.

In 1995, the style changed again.  Although still badged as an XJ6, these
cars are referred to as an X300 or an X308.  In 2004, the style change yet
again.  These XJ6 badged cars are referred to as X350.

There is a demarcation line in the XJ40 models between the 1990+ model years
and the 1986-1989 MY. Your 1990 has a different engine, different
transmission, different dash, different brakes system, different
differential, different electrical system and well different locations for
components and in the late 1990 versions, just before 1991, the fuel pump
was moved into the petrol tank instead of on the cross member.

In terms of the difficulty on working on Jaguar engineering, there are
indeed some miserable items.  The 7" hose from the water pump tot he fuel
rail being another item that is more miserable than the fuel pump.  On the
other hand, in order to replace the oil pump in my 1997 Dodge full size van,
the mechanics had to virtually remove the engine from the vehicle in order
to get the oil pan off.  Then, when we needed to change thermostat, it took
the removal on nearly most of the top end of the engine to get to it since
the hose now goes from the radiator to the top center of the engine which is
located directly under the windscreen.  I won't even start on how miserable
everything on my friend's 1992 Toyota Camary is to work on.

Cheers
Webserve

> >I need to replace my fuel pump. I have a 92 XJ6 with an in-tank pump.
>
[quoted text clipped - 103 lines]
>
>  - Tom
Jerry McG - 15 Mar 2004 16:03 GMT
> In 1995, the style changed again.  Although still badged as an XJ6, these
cars are referred to as an X300 or an X308.  In 2004, the style change yet
again.  These XJ6 badged cars are referred to as X350.>

Ford ruled in the early '90s that Jaguar would refer to all new models as
"Xxxx", rather than "XJxx" in order to blend Jaguar into the Ford model code
scheme. X300 was the 1995 major update of XJ40, X100 = XK8, X200 = S-Type,
X400 = X-Type and, as you pointed out, X350 = the new XJ6 sedans.

X308 refers to the '98 m.y. facelift, which included the AJ8 V8 engine
replacing the AJ16 I6 in most models.
Oldbie - 16 Mar 2004 02:03 GMT
>Actually, As I understand it, the first XJ6 in 1968 was the Series I,
>followed by the XJ6 Series II and then the XJ6 Series III until 1987 in the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>also badged as an XJ6, but is referred to as an XJ81 to differentiate it
>from the standard versions.

>There is a demarcation line in the XJ40 models between the 1990+ model years
>and the 1986-1989 MY. Your 1990 has a different engine, different
>transmission, different dash, different brakes system, different
>differential, different electrical system and well different locations for
>components and in the late 1990 versions, just before 1991, the fuel pump
>was moved into the petrol tank instead of on the cross member.

So, if I want to get a workshop manual and/or exploded parts book for
this car, how do I identify what I need?  Do the better manuals cover
all "options"/changes/differences etc.  for 1990 vehicles?
Webserve - 16 Mar 2004 10:46 GMT
The two best routes to go for a manual is the Haynes repair manual at most
auto parts stores.   It covers the XJ40 from 1988-1994.  They got the manual
out in the earlier years so it covers the 1988-1990 models much better than
the later models.  The other direction is to get the actual Jaguar service
manuals which are on CD and available from Jaguar or the Heritage trust for
$23.  Directions on how to order are at
http://www.jag-lovers.org/jagcds.php3?ql
I actually find that having them both makes life much easier on the repairs.
Webserve

> >Actually, As I understand it, the first XJ6 in 1968 was the Series I,
> >followed by the XJ6 Series II and then the XJ6 Series III until 1987 in the
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> this car, how do I identify what I need?  Do the better manuals cover
> all "options"/changes/differences etc.  for 1990 vehicles?
JP - 17 Mar 2004 07:46 GMT
Is the CD illustrated? Does it contain clear instructions for most
repairs?

Thanks

>The two best routes to go for a manual is the Haynes repair manual at most
>auto parts stores.   It covers the XJ40 from 1988-1994.  They got the manual
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>> this car, how do I identify what I need?  Do the better manuals cover
>> all "options"/changes/differences etc.  for 1990 vehicles?
Webserve - 17 Mar 2004 13:34 GMT
Yes,
  Like all Jag  manuals, it has photos and drawings/schematics.  It does
not , however contain a parts manual.

Webserve

> Is the CD illustrated? Does it contain clear instructions for most
> repairs?
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> >> this car, how do I identify what I need?  Do the better manuals cover
> >> all "options"/changes/differences etc.  for 1990 vehicles?
JP - 17 Mar 2004 07:38 GMT
LOL

Just what the guy needs, more confusion. I was just trying to help
him.

I guess you have your book, but acording to mine:

"By 1986 the XJ saloon had been in production for eighteen years and
yet, as sales figures proved, was still popular. Jaguar had been
working on a replacement since the seventies which included plans for
a 4.0 liter engine, codenamed XJ40, or Series IV. However, as
introduction of the new vehicle was delayed the codename became widely
known as rumors spread concerning the car's specifications and the
announcement date was continually postponed."

"For this reason Jaguar management decided the new model must be
evolutionary rather than revolutionary. In no way was this better
illustrated than in their decision to retain the name, XJ6. The new
car was not to be a Series IV though as this implied a mere face lift.
How anyone will distinguish between the old and new models one can but
wonder."

Bottom line is that the XJ40 appealed to some since it implied a new
series and Jaguar did little to discourage it. In reality, it was no
major change.

>Tom,
>Actually, As I understand it, the first XJ6 in 1968 was the Series I,
[quoted text clipped - 142 lines]
>>
>>  - Tom
DieInterim - 07 Mar 2004 18:52 GMT
> Whiskers,
>
> I need to replace my fuel pump. I have a 92 XJ6 with an in-tank pump.
>
> Did you take out the entire fuel tank? If so, how much trouble was it?

Yes, the tank must come out. The hardest part is removing all of the
hoses. I also recommend that you purchase a pump kit; it contains the
tank flange, rf filter module, filter sock, pump "can", and the pump.
I have seen many people replace their pumps to have the "can" leak
(suck air) when the tank reaches 1/3 empty. That means that they had
to do the job all over again.

Cheers,

Blake
Oldbie - 07 Mar 2004 19:52 GMT
>Yes, the tank must come out. The hardest part is removing all of the
>hoses. I also recommend that you purchase a pump kit; it contains the
>tank flange, rf filter module, filter sock, pump "can", and the pump.
>I have seen many people replace their pumps to have the "can" leak
>(suck air) when the tank reaches 1/3 empty. That means that they had
>to do the job all over again.

Hey Blake,

By what stroke of ingenuity did Jaguar decide to replace the external
pump which I have with an inside-the-tank one?  Was there a problem to
be solved by this modification?

Is there a particular year, or model, or world location in which this
was done for some reason?

- Tom
DieInterim - 08 Mar 2004 00:20 GMT
> Hey Blake,
>
> By what stroke of ingenuity did Jaguar decide to replace the external
> pump which I have with an inside-the-tank one?

Well it was most likely done because it cost less to do so. Imagine on
the assembly line fuel tanks (with pumps) being stuffed inside the
cars; just hook up the hoses and the wires ..BAM!

> Was there a problem to be solved by this modification?

Sort of, but there are some real benefits to having the pump
submerged:

1.)COST Your pump does not need to meet the same specifications as an
external pump would. Plastics can be used because being submerged, the
pump stays cool.

2.) Start up fuel pressurization happens quicker. (Less cavatation)
Imagine if your check valve on your external pump failed, your fuel
could siphon out of your pump slowly everytime you park. This means
there will be a delay in the engine starting up because you have to
wait for the pump to prime, *then* build pressure. So in short, having
the pump in the tank helped to reduce first start issues due to pump
cavatation or system pressurization delay if the check valve had
failed.

3.) They are quieter than external pumps.

> Is there a particular year, or model, or world location in which this
> was done for some reason?

Well I believe in the xj40 the external pump was used from 88 to 90,
after that they went internal pumps.

So there you have a winded response from me! Every wrench pisses and
moans about replacing intank pumps (Which is common in most cars), but
its better because the tank can be cleaned, the filters replaced, and
hoses replaced in one service. External pumps just get changed and the
rest of the system typically gets ignored.

Best Regards,

Blake
JP - 17 Mar 2004 07:45 GMT
There is an upgrade kit listed but runs around $600. Is this the kit
you're talking about?

Thanks.

>> Whiskers,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Blake
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.