Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Jeep / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

87 XJ rear leaf springs

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
merrill - 11 Dec 2006 00:39 GMT
My DD is a 87 XJ 4.0 auto.

I have broken rear leaf springs on both sides. I have an 89 XJ for
parts. Should I change the springs or the springs with the axle? The
axles should have the same (or close) ratio so that is not an issue.

Merrill
Matt Macchiarolo - 11 Dec 2006 01:13 GMT
Changing just the springs should be OK. Use new U-bolts.

> My DD is a 87 XJ 4.0 auto.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Merrill
merrill - 11 Dec 2006 01:49 GMT
Thank you Matt

This might be the easy way. I had planned to swap axles and replace the
bolts and bushings.

Merrill

> Changing just the springs should be OK. Use new U-bolts.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> >
> > Merrill
Mike Romain - 11 Dec 2006 14:59 GMT
Which one is in better shape?  That means mileage on gears, leaks or
seeps of oil at the pinion and at the axle ends, brakes and brake
hardware, etc....

I am thinking on doing the same thing with my 88 and 87.  The 88 has new
springs and brakes, but more miles and no leaks.

You need to be sure the gears are the same too or you will not be able
to use 4x4.  You can check the gears by jacking up one rear wheel and
marking the tire and driveshaft with chalk.  You then turn the wheel two
turns while counting the driveshaft revolutions.  You can just do one
turn of the wheel and double the driveshaft revolutions to get the
ratio.  If you jack up both wheels, then it's a one to one count, but
with just one wheel turning it's a two to one.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)

> My DD is a 87 XJ 4.0 auto.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Merrill
merrill - 11 Dec 2006 23:37 GMT
The 87 has about 300,000km and works well with no leaks. The 89 has
about 200,000km and doesn't leak so I had thought I would probably use
it. I'm not sure about the brake shoes or drums, but the 87 has good
parts if I need them. Both are auto so I assumed the ratios would be
similar. I had planned to check anyway for the few minutes it takes. I
only use 4wd to get out of bad situations and not for highway cruising.
Would that still be a problem if the ratios are not identical?

When I disconnect the driveshaft, can I expect any surprises with the
universal joint? Most are easy and some are pigs. I have never
disconnected an XJ driveshaft.

Merrill

> Which one is in better shape?  That means mileage on gears, leaks or
> seeps of oil at the pinion and at the axle ends, brakes and brake
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> >
> > Merrill
Mike Romain - 12 Dec 2006 00:09 GMT
The U-joints are easy, watch your head though, they can pop out fast.

Mike

> The 87 has about 300,000km and works well with no leaks. The 89 has
> about 200,000km and doesn't leak so I had thought I would probably use
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> > >
> > > Merrill
billy ray - 12 Dec 2006 02:40 GMT
You can get a build sheet at no charge from your local dealer or Customer
Assistance on the Jeep web site.

It will list all kind of information you will need.

http://www-5.jeep.com/wccsapp/universal/J/index.jsp?appStr=wccs&titleStr=Contact
+Jeep&familyStr=brand&franchise=J&actionURL=%2Fwccs%2Fbrand_forms%2Fus%2Fwebform
.jsp&promotion=null&category=U


> The 87 has about 300,000km and works well with no leaks. The 89 has
> about 200,000km and doesn't leak so I had thought I would probably use
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>> >
>> > Merrill
merrill - 31 Dec 2006 17:16 GMT
Thanks for the info Billy Ray

I live in Canada so I can't complete the form, it requires a state and
zip code so it will not accept my province and postal code.

I want to get a build sheet for all 5 of my Cherokees including my old
DD, 2 fixer-uppers and 2 parts donors.

If I can't do it online, what should I ask the dealer for? My parts
dealer Town and Coutry Chrysler (highly reccomended) in Smiths Falls is
open late on Wednesdays so I could go there after work this week.

Merrill

> You can get a build sheet at no charge from your local dealer or Customer
> Assistance on the Jeep web site.
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> >> >
> >> > Merrill
billy ray - 01 Jan 2007 06:32 GMT
I was directed to the parts department for mine.

> Thanks for the info Billy Ray
>
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
>> >> >
>> >> > Merrill
noneofyourbusiness - 01 Jan 2007 10:12 GMT
>Thanks for the info Billy Ray
>
>I live in Canada so I can't complete the form, it requires a state and
>zip code so it will not accept my province and postal code.

You could always, um, LIE!
"Oops, I thought "CA" (California) *meant* Canada, and the 90028
postal code MUST have been a typo!
;-)

[snip]

...
noneofyourbusiness - 08 Jan 2007 07:17 GMT
>Thanks for the info Billy Ray
>
>I live in Canada so I can't complete the form, it requires a state and
>zip code so it will not accept my province and postal code.

You could, um, ...LIE!
Just say you thought CA (California) was for Canada, and 90028 must
have been a typo!

;-)

[snip]

...
Lee Ayrton - 08 Jan 2007 15:29 GMT
>> Thanks for the info Billy Ray
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Just say you thought CA (California) was for Canada, and 90028 must
> have been a typo!

Wait.  His `87 was built by AMC, not Chrysler.  Are build sheets even
_available_ going that far back?

--
"I defer to your plainly more vivid memories of topless women with
whips....r"
                   R. H. Draney recalls AFU in the Good Old Days.
merrill - 08 Jan 2007 23:07 GMT
Yes Lee

I had thought of this, but my next thought was nothing ventured nothing
gained.

Because of a medical emergency in the family I haven't got around to it
yet.

My 84, 87 and 89 could be a problem but my 91's are Chrysler products.

I thought I would try it online and, um, ...LIE! as recommended because
I'm not sure I can get to the dealer this week. I will advise the group
with the outcome.

Merrill

> >> Thanks for the info Billy Ray
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> whips....r"
>                     R. H. Draney recalls AFU in the Good Old Days.
Will Honea - 12 Dec 2006 04:52 GMT
Go to the stealer and get all new straps for the U-joints.  They use flat
metal straps and re-using them is not a good idea.

> The 87 has about 300,000km and works well with no leaks. The 89 has about
> 200,000km and doesn't leak so I had thought I would probably use it. I'm
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>> >
>> > Merrill
L.W.(Bill) Hughes III - 12 Dec 2006 06:20 GMT
Next time I would go ahead and convert:
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/axle/aub.html That way you may slap a
rock and keep on going.
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> Go to the stealer and get all new straps for the U-joints.  They use flat
> metal straps and re-using them is not a good idea.
L.W.(Bill) Hughes III - 12 Dec 2006 06:30 GMT
I know of a couple that got a surprise then they unbolted the
Universal Joint depending on the park to hold the car from rolling, and
one that will never make that mistake again.
    Buy a saber saw for your spring hangers and U-Bolts.
    Wire bush the ratio tags bolted to their covers, Trailer packages
and SMOG requirements make for many ratios.
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> The 87 has about 300,000km and works well with no leaks. The 89 has
> about 200,000km and doesn't leak so I had thought I would probably use
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Merrill
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.