Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Jeep / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

HOW MUCH LIFT FOR ME?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tracie - 23 Mar 2007 14:32 GMT
Hello.  I have a 2006 Wrangler X that I would like to lift.  I am
totally clueless and I don't know whether or not I need a  body lift,
suspension lift, or both.  I do know I do not want more than 2 or 3
inches for a lift.  Here is what I am looking to achieve:

I would like to put 31 inch tires (maybe 32's) on the jeep without
having to re-calibrate the speedometer.  I also do not want to change
the T-case fixings or the steering components.  And I do not want to
have to worry about tire rub.  I am not sure if I would need new
shocks either to accommodate the lift.

I would like to also put wider tires on my ride to give her that
"beefy stance", but I am not sure how wide I can go without causing
any damage or problems (275/285 maybe) with tires rubbing on sharp
turns.  Basically, what I want to do is get the lift and slap new
tires on my ride and just drive with no other modifications.  Any
suggestions on how much lift, what size tires (I am thinking maybe 275
or 285/75/15), and what brand of lift I would need would be greatly
appreciated.
Mike Romain - 23 Mar 2007 15:18 GMT
You don't need a lift to fit 31x10.5 tires.

You can go with a simple and cheap coil spacer lift to get another 1.5"
or so easily which makes the stance look a little nicer.  You would need
longer shocks for this or any lift.

Steering has a simple adjustment to prevent the tires from rubbing on
full turn.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)

> Hello.  I have a 2006 Wrangler X that I would like to lift.  I am
> totally clueless and I don't know whether or not I need a  body lift,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> or 285/75/15), and what brand of lift I would need would be greatly
> appreciated.
Carl S - 23 Mar 2007 15:31 GMT
You can get coil spring spacers, you'll spend about $100. You will not need
new shocks for less than 2" of lift.

Carl

> Hello.  I have a 2006 Wrangler X that I would like to lift.  I am
> totally clueless and I don't know whether or not I need a  body lift,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> or 285/75/15), and what brand of lift I would need would be greatly
> appreciated.
Tracie - 23 Mar 2007 15:49 GMT
> You can get coil spring spacers, you'll spend about $100. You will not need
> new shocks for less than 2" of lift.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Thanks for the advice, but can you give any suggestions on how wide of
a tire I can get without worrying about tire issues?  My rims are 15
inch rims.  Also, the coil spacers are those spacers (usually 1 inch)
that fit underneath the coil springs correct?
Tracie - 23 Mar 2007 15:57 GMT
> > You can get coil spring spacers, you'll spend about $100. You will not need
> > new shocks for less than 2" of lift.
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Oh, I forgot to ask....would I want to go with a body lift or a
suspension lift?
jbjeep - 23 Mar 2007 16:35 GMT
Suspension.

IMO you should not put in more than a 1" body lift.  And if you do that, you should
do the 1" motor mounts also.
-jenn

>>On Mar 23, 10:49 am, "Tracie" <brain...@upstate.edu> wrote:
>>> On Mar 23, 10:31 am, "Carl S" <carlsai...@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>>Oh, I forgot to ask....would I want to go with a body lift or a
>>suspension lift?
Jeff Strickland - 23 Mar 2007 16:35 GMT
Recalibrating the speedo is 1.) very easy, and 2.) not related to lift. It
is related to tires, and tires require lift. But lifting the Jeep in and of
itself will not result in recalibrating the speedo. Your tire selection will
though, so don't limit the lift on that basis.

As a practical matter, I think that 2 inches of suspension and 1 inch of
body lift will make a set of 32's fit rather nicely. You can do this much
lift with out moving everything else. I run a 32x11.50 on my CJ5, and that
is plenty of rubber for pretty much anybody. Yes, there are a few that are
more hardcore than I that are not happy with any less than 35" tires, but I
suggest you just stand back and watch these guys.

> Hello.  I have a 2006 Wrangler X that I would like to lift.  I am
> totally clueless and I don't know whether or not I need a  body lift,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> or 285/75/15), and what brand of lift I would need would be greatly
> appreciated.
L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 23 Mar 2007 20:00 GMT
And those hard core Jeepers go with leaf springs:
http://billhughes.com/TJleafSprings/
       God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> Recalibrating the speedo is 1.) very easy, and 2.) not related to lift. It
> is related to tires, and tires require lift. But lifting the Jeep in and of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> more hardcore than I that are not happy with any less than 35" tires, but I
> suggest you just stand back and watch these guys.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Jeff Strickland - 24 Mar 2007 17:16 GMT
Thank you Captain BesideThePoint for weighing in.

>    And those hard core Jeepers go with leaf springs:
> http://billhughes.com/TJleafSprings/
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> I
>> suggest you just stand back and watch these guys.
L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 24 Mar 2007 21:33 GMT
Anytime Jeff, just trying to enlighten you about the correct type of
lifts out there.
       God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> Thank you Captain BesideThePoint for weighing in.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Matt Macchiarolo - 24 Mar 2007 23:49 GMT
"Those?" Bill, I think you meen "Two hard core jeepers go with leaf
springs...."

> Thank you Captain BesideThePoint for weighing in.
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>> I
>>> suggest you just stand back and watch these guys.
L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 25 Mar 2007 08:26 GMT
Whatever, I watch and recorded the last ESPN rock crawling championships
and something with leaf springs won it. There seemed to be no way to edit it
to make that connection in a short mpg, so it deleted for now. When you want
strength and articulation you go with leaf springs, like your F350. If you
want a good road hugging car you go with rear wheel drive, coil independent
suspension front and rear, like my '89 T-Bird.
       God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> "Those?" Bill, I think you meen "Two hard core jeepers go with leaf
> springs...."

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Matt Macchiarolo - 25 Mar 2007 17:34 GMT
My no-longer-in-the-stable F250 articulated like a Bobcat. Same with the
Excursion.

>    Whatever, I watch and recorded the last ESPN rock crawling
> championships
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> "Those?" Bill, I think you meen "Two hard core jeepers go with leaf
>> springs...."
L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 26 Mar 2007 00:19 GMT
Get longer shocks and remove the stabilizer bar, like this leaf spring:
http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/9/web/465000-465999/465730_3_full.jpg
       God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> My no-longer-in-the-stable F250 articulated like a Bobcat. Same with the
> Excursion.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Matt Macchiarolo - 26 Mar 2007 00:50 GMT
While I'm at it I may as well install Rockwell axles and 47" Swampers for a
daily driver.

>    Get longer shocks and remove the stabilizer bar, like this leaf spring:
> http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/9/web/465000-465999/465730_3_full.jpg
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> My no-longer-in-the-stable F250 articulated like a Bobcat. Same with the
>> Excursion.
L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 26 Mar 2007 02:15 GMT
Maybe, but tires and axle have nothing to do with the leaf spring's
articulation:
http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/9/web/465000-465999/465730_3_full.jpg
       God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> While I'm at it I may as well install Rockwell axles and 47" Swampers for a
> daily driver.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Tracie - 26 Mar 2007 14:53 GMT
On Mar 25, 10:08 pm, "L.W. \(Bill\) Hughes III" <billhug...@cox.net>
wrote:
>     Maybe, but tires and axle have nothing to do with the leaf spring's
> articulation:http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/9/web/465000-465999/46573...
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

I think I am going to go with a 4" Trailblazer series lift from Old
Man Emu.  Anyone have any opinions about the quality of this lift?
Also, with a 4" lift, do I need a slip yoke eliminator or a new
driveshaft?  THANKS AGAIN.
L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 26 Mar 2007 22:36 GMT
Yes, you could tilt the engine and drop the transfer, but it would like
you had a load of sh*t in your pants.
       God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> I think I am going to go with a 4" Trailblazer series lift from Old
> Man Emu.  Anyone have any opinions about the quality of this lift?
> Also, with a 4" lift, do I need a slip yoke eliminator or a new
> driveshaft?  THANKS AGAIN.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

SBlackfoot - 25 Mar 2007 06:24 GMT
>     And those hard core Jeepers go with leaf springs:
> http://billhughes.com/TJleafSprings/

Imagine how much more flex he would've had if he had went with coils.  ;)

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Mike Romain - 25 Mar 2007 15:49 GMT
>>     And those hard core Jeepers go with leaf springs:
>> http://billhughes.com/TJleafSprings/
>
> Imagine how much more flex he would've had if he had went with coils.  ;)

Screw flex, I want lift!

Ever notice how CJ's don't need that heavy rocker protection and extra
under carriage protection the new Jeep need?

There is a reason for this....

When a CJ lifts it wheel to go over a rock or series of them, it lifts
the whole side of the body and the undercarriage up out of the way.

When a TJ does this, it just lifts the wheel out of the way because it
has great 'flex' allowing the rockers and undercarriage to scrape along
the rocks...  Hence the need for 'rock rails', etc...

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 26 Mar 2007 00:25 GMT
Bingo! And we use our leaf springs to slide over rocks, where that wheel
can't reach the ground.
       God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> Screw flex, I want lift!
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

nrs - 26 Mar 2007 18:30 GMT
> >>     And those hard core Jeepers go with leaf springs:
> >>http://billhughes.com/TJleafSprings/
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Jan/06http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)

I agree that flex is over-rated.  How much traction can a a tire have
hanging way down with little weight on it?
SBlackfoot - 26 Mar 2007 23:42 GMT
> I agree that flex is over-rated.  How much traction can a a tire have
> hanging way down with little weight on it?

How much traction does a tire have when it's hanging in the air?  ;)

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Mike Romain - 27 Mar 2007 15:02 GMT
>> I agree that flex is over-rated.  How much traction can a a tire have
>> hanging way down with little weight on it?
>
> How much traction does a tire have when it's hanging in the air?  ;)

About the same, which was his point I believe.

When you are high centered on that rock because you have so much flex,
the tires have no traction.  That's why so many TJ folks have to carry
those 'widow makers', commonly called high lift jacks...

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
SBlackfoot - 27 Mar 2007 21:46 GMT
> About the same, which was his point I believe.

A tire on the ground, even with very little weight on it, has more traction
than one spinning in the air. Not much mind you, but a little is better than
none at all. That was my point, obviously.  ;)

> When you are high centered on that rock because you have so much flex,
> the tires have no traction.  That's why so many TJ folks have to carry
> those 'widow makers', commonly called high lift jacks...

As opposed to being high centred on a rock and having one (or more) tire in
the air? I'd prefer to keep my feet on the ground, even without much weight
on 'em.  ;)

On the plus side, no flex makes tire changes a LOT easier.  lol

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 27 Mar 2007 23:32 GMT
That's why real Jeepers use spools.
       God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> How much traction does a tire have when it's hanging in the air?  ;)

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Tracie - 23 Mar 2007 20:38 GMT
> Recalibrating the speedo is 1.) very easy, and 2.) not related to lift. It
> is related to tires, and tires require lift. But lifting the Jeep in and of
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Thanks.  I think I am liking the 3 inch total lift (2 inch suspension
and 1 inch body) quite well.  I also think I will put the 32 X 11.50
tires on my ride as well.  Just three more questions for everyone.
What would the difference be if I did a 3 inch suspension lift instead
of the 2 inch suspension lift and 1 inch body lift?  Would 3 inches of
total lift and 32 X 11.50 tires compromise my ride quality much?  And
last, would I need to get new shocks as well?  THANK YOU everyone for
your responses.  You've been a big help.
Tracie - 23 Mar 2007 20:46 GMT
> > Recalibrating the speedo is 1.) very easy, and 2.) not related to lift. It
> > is related to tires, and tires require lift. But lifting the Jeep in and of
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Oops.  I forgot to ask this question.  If I decide to buy the spacer
kits myself, is it best to go with a set made of polyurethane or
aluminum?  THANKS YET AGAIN!
Jeff Strickland - 24 Mar 2007 17:15 GMT
>> > Recalibrating the speedo is 1.) very easy, and 2.) not related to lift.
>> > It
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> kits myself, is it best to go with a set made of polyurethane or
> aluminum?  THANKS YET AGAIN!

I like the polyurethane body pucks. I think you should use longer springs,
not spring spacers.
Mike Romain - 23 Mar 2007 21:02 GMT
>> Recalibrating the speedo is 1.) very easy, and 2.) not related to lift. It
>> is related to tires, and tires require lift. But lifting the Jeep in and of
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> last, would I need to get new shocks as well?  THANK YOU everyone for
> your responses.  You've been a big help.

If you plan on off roading, 'any' suspension lift requires new shocks.
Even the 1.5" spacers!

If you do not put extended shocks on, the shocks will become the axle
stops.  This is bad news and 'will' break things.  I have seen frames
snapped in half and shocks snapped off.  Another friend punched his
shocks through the back seat on a city speed bump.

Once you start talking more than 2" of spring lift, you are getting into
new springs and new suspension hardware.

If you stay with the 2 plus 1 lift, you costs still stay low.

Also just FYI, if you drive in snow, those 11.5's will not have good
traction.  They are wide and will spin up really easily.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
ULB - 23 Mar 2007 17:40 GMT
> Hello.  I have a 2006 Wrangler X that I would like to lift.  I am
> totally clueless and I don't know whether or not I need a  body lift,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> or 285/75/15), and what brand of lift I would need would be greatly
> appreciated.

If money isn't an issue go buy the Old man emu 2.5" lift.  You can run
32's with it.  What is your backspacing on your wheels?  If it is 4"
or less, run 32x12.5 meat.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.