Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Jeep / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

CB power

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nathan Otis - 09 Sep 2007 06:11 GMT
Hey fellas. I'm wiring a new CB tomorrow and I want to do it right. I
can't find the exact answer I'm looking for on the All Seeing Eye, so
here I am.

When wiring power, I understand it's best to go to the source (battery).
What I don't know is...

1. Should BOTH the red AND black wire be connected to the battery @ pos
and neg terminals respectively?

2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground, but where?

2a. Should I ground in the engine compartment or...

2b. Is it best to make the ground wire as short as possible (i.e.,
shorten the black wire to around a foot or two and ground in the cab)?

Thanks.
n.
L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 09 Sep 2007 09:19 GMT
Hi Nathan,
   Many of the rules for a radio phone installation apply to your Citizen
Band radio: http://service.gm.com/techlineinfo/radio.html Antenna:
http://www.firestik.com/Tech_Docs.htm
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> Hey fellas. I'm wiring a new CB tomorrow and I want to do it right. I
> can't find the exact answer I'm looking for on the All Seeing Eye, so
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Thanks.
> n.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

x - 09 Sep 2007 11:34 GMT
> Hey fellas. I'm wiring a new CB tomorrow and I want to do it right. I
> can't find the exact answer I'm looking for on the All Seeing Eye, so
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Thanks.
> n.

Be very cautious when dealing with any and all info and links provided by
Bill Hughes.
Old Crow - 09 Sep 2007 15:40 GMT
>> Hey fellas. I'm wiring a new CB tomorrow and I want to do it right. I
>> can't find the exact answer I'm looking for on the All Seeing Eye, so
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>Be very cautious when dealing with any and all info and links provided by
>Bill Hughes.

Having used Firestik antennas for a number of years, I'd trust
anything on their site...even if you provided the link.

Wish you guys'd give it a rest.
--
Old Crow              "Yol Bolson!"            
'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
'95 YJ Rio Grande    
BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM                  
                           

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 09 Sep 2007 22:17 GMT
This from the biggest spammer of them all! The jealous, really weak
jealous, I can't believe how jealous this little draft dodging coward
schizophrenic psychopath liar hiding in Vancouver via
S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca who's
only way to get attention is to make a fool of its self using foul language,
like it did back in elementary school yard. But, too afraid to use it's name
and address, and take on responsibility like a grown up. With an obsession
with perverts and goats, where it writes via remailers, @news.alt.net, and
cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme jealous
ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness and fine,
Southern California surfing body, beard, and loving Christian family.
Committing forgery over many of my posts, proving I'm a responsible American
man. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican Chiwawa with its
senseless barking, me too, me too. You're even more senile than I first
thought. And the poor thing, you're too girlie to take responsibility for
yourself again, by signing your statement like a man.
    That really thinks the group's members are so stupid not to know it's
the same coward, posting over and over again using a schizophrenic
psychopath forged up names?
    You're not worth any more time when a cut and paste this same
paragraphs it fits so well!
    But, now worth a forwarding to: internet.help@shaw.ca,
security@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca, internet.abuse@sjrb.ca, abuse@aioe.org,
admin@cox.net for forgery.
   Who said it also likes baby monkeys sucking their penis, like his buddy
posted on an auto picture group at:
news:0u7g43dkje4pdkqi07hl66s8kpifo564k1@4ax.com
    I thought this traitor's attacks were just over personal disagreements,
but in reality these attacks stemming from my love of God and America on
Independents Week, I realized you are actually attacking my country, and
that's what you've been doing all along is declaring your hatred for the
United States of America, with each declaration of my signature, but just
too cowardly and stupid to be a terrorist. It's America, love it, or leave
it, so keep the f*ck out!
    Or let me know when you cross my American border, so I may arrest you!
    YOU ARE A TRAITOR and lost all rights to my American border, and
someday I'll have you in jail where you belong! Any time, I'll fly and meant
with other patriots guarding our borders against vermin like you.
    Forwarded to: alt.binaries.pictures.autos,
alt.binaries.automobile.pictures groups so they may to see what an a**hole
you, aka SW really is!!!!!
    Why don't you call the San Diego Sheriffs Department at 858-974-2020
YOU NEED HELP!
   The moral majority say you are not only faggots, but cowards
   You wouldn't know about business as you have never succeeded and
anything.
   Tell me when you are about to cross my American border and I'll fly up
and arrange at meeting with the U.S. Border patrol and Minutemen for your
arrest, after you give me your name, address, date, and meeting place.
   I would appreciate the name and address of these trolls, Square Wheel:
S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca and
24bit:
12.205.158.32 AT&T WorldNet Services ATT Mediacom Communications Corp. I
will keep your name in confidence, kindly email LWHughes3rd@aol.com or
LWHughes@hughes.net
   Sincerely,
   Llewellyn W. (Bill) Hughes III

   And you think the news members won't catch on and be able to see your
user names, as fake as you.
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> Be very cautious when dealing with any and all info and links provided by
> Bill Hughes.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

x - 09 Sep 2007 22:38 GMT
>      This from the biggest spammer of them all! The jealous, really weak
> jealous, I can't believe how jealous this little draft dodging coward
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>> Be very cautious when dealing with any and all info and links provided by
>> Bill Hughes.

Sep 15   Speed and Chrome Open Show   Bellingham, Wash.

85% certain.

The rest is up to you, Great Moby with the continually spouting blow-hole.

Take it or leave it.

Be there or be square. <heh>

Don't ask for more, you're not going to get a reply.

Now shut thy festering gob, gasbag.

And when I feel it necessary, I will continue to warn people to be very
cautious when dealing with any and all info and links provided by one Bill
Hughes, of dubious sanity and dark motives.

    :^D
L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 09 Sep 2007 22:56 GMT
This from the biggest spammer of them all! The jealous, really weak
jealous, I can't believe how jealous this little draft dodging coward
schizophrenic psychopath liar hiding in Vancouver via
S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca who's
only way to get attention is to make a fool of its self using foul language,
like it did back in elementary school yard. But, too afraid to use it's name
and address, and take on responsibility like a grown up. With an obsession
with perverts and goats, where it writes via remailers, @news.alt.net, and
cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme jealous
ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness and fine,
Southern California surfing body, beard, and loving Christian family.
Committing forgery over many of my posts, proving I'm a responsible American
man. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican Chiwawa with its
senseless barking, me too, me too. You're even more senile than I first
thought. And the poor thing, you're too girlie to take responsibility for
yourself again, by signing your statement like a man.
    That really thinks the group's members are so stupid not to know it's
the same coward, posting over and over again using a schizophrenic
psychopath forged up names?
    You're not worth any more time when a cut and paste this same
paragraphs it fits so well!
    But, now worth a forwarding to: internet.help@shaw.ca,
security@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca, internet.abuse@sjrb.ca, abuse@aioe.org,
admin@cox.net for forgery.
   Who said it also likes baby monkeys sucking their penis, like his buddy
posted on an auto picture group at:
news:0u7g43dkje4pdkqi07hl66s8kpifo564k1@4ax.com
    I thought this traitor's attacks were just over personal disagreements,
but in reality these attacks stemming from my love of God and America on
Independents Week, I realized you are actually attacking my country, and
that's what you've been doing all along is declaring your hatred for the
United States of America, with each declaration of my signature, but just
too cowardly and stupid to be a terrorist. It's America, love it, or leave
it, so keep the f*ck out!
    Or let me know when you cross my American border, so I may arrest you!
    YOU ARE A TRAITOR and lost all rights to my American border, and
someday I'll have you in jail where you belong! Any time, I'll fly and meant
with other patriots guarding our borders against vermin like you.
    Forwarded to: alt.binaries.pictures.autos,
alt.binaries.automobile.pictures groups so they may to see what an a**hole
you, aka SW really is!!!!!
    Why don't you call the San Diego Sheriffs Department at 858-974-2020
YOU NEED HELP!
   The moral majority say you are not only faggots, but cowards
   You wouldn't know about business as you have never succeeded and
anything.
   Tell me when you are about to cross my American border and I'll fly up
and arrange at meeting with the U.S. Border patrol and Minutemen for your
arrest, after you give me your name, address, date, and meeting place.
   I would appreciate the name and address of these trolls, Square Wheel:
S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca and
24bit:
12.205.158.32 AT&T WorldNet Services ATT Mediacom Communications Corp. I
will keep your name in confidence, kindly email LWHughes3rd@aol.com or
LWHughes@hughes.net
   Sincerely,
   Llewellyn W. (Bill) Hughes III

   And you think the news members won't catch on and be able to see your
user names, as fake as you.
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> Sep 15   Speed and Chrome Open Show   Bellingham, Wash.
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>      :^D

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

x - 09 Sep 2007 23:18 GMT
> Be there or be square. <heh>

That should read: Be there or be /squared/.
L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 09 Sep 2007 23:24 GMT
This from the biggest spammer of them all! The jealous, really weak
jealous, I can't believe how jealous this little draft dodging coward
schizophrenic psychopath liar hiding in Vancouver via
S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca who's
only way to get attention is to make a fool of its self using foul language,
like it did back in elementary school yard. But, too afraid to use it's name
and address, and take on responsibility like a grown up. With an obsession
with perverts and goats, where it writes via remailers, @news.alt.net, and
cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme jealous
ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness and fine,
Southern California surfing body, beard, and loving Christian family.
Committing forgery over many of my posts, proving I'm a responsible American
man. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican Chiwawa with its
senseless barking, me too, me too. You're even more senile than I first
thought. And the poor thing, you're too girlie to take responsibility for
yourself again, by signing your statement like a man.
    That really thinks the group's members are so stupid not to know it's
the same coward, posting over and over again using a schizophrenic
psychopath forged up names?
    You're not worth any more time when a cut and paste this same
paragraphs it fits so well!
    But, now worth a forwarding to: internet.help@shaw.ca,
security@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca, internet.abuse@sjrb.ca, abuse@aioe.org,
admin@cox.net for forgery.
   Who said it also likes baby monkeys sucking their penis, like his buddy
posted on an auto picture group at:
news:0u7g43dkje4pdkqi07hl66s8kpifo564k1@4ax.com
    I thought this traitor's attacks were just over personal disagreements,
but in reality these attacks stemming from my love of God and America on
Independents Week, I realized you are actually attacking my country, and
that's what you've been doing all along is declaring your hatred for the
United States of America, with each declaration of my signature, but just
too cowardly and stupid to be a terrorist. It's America, love it, or leave
it, so keep the f*ck out!
    Or let me know when you cross my American border, so I may arrest you!
    YOU ARE A TRAITOR and lost all rights to my American border, and
someday I'll have you in jail where you belong! Any time, I'll fly and meant
with other patriots guarding our borders against vermin like you.
    Forwarded to: alt.binaries.pictures.autos,
alt.binaries.automobile.pictures groups so they may to see what an a**hole
you, aka SW really is!!!!!
    Why don't you call the San Diego Sheriffs Department at 858-974-2020
YOU NEED HELP!
   The moral majority say you are not only faggots, but cowards
   You wouldn't know about business as you have never succeeded and
anything.
   Tell me when you are about to cross my American border and I'll fly up
and arrange at meeting with the U.S. Border patrol and Minutemen for your
arrest, after you give me your name, address, date, and meeting place.
   I would appreciate the name and address of these trolls, Square Wheel:
S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca and
24bit:
12.205.158.32 AT&T WorldNet Services ATT Mediacom Communications Corp. I
will keep your name in confidence, kindly email LWHughes3rd@aol.com or
LWHughes@hughes.net
   Sincerely,
   Llewellyn W. (Bill) Hughes III

   And you think the news members won't catch on and be able to see your
user names, as fake as you.
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> That should read: Be there or be /squared/.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

twaldron - 09 Sep 2007 15:30 GMT
You will get all kinds of 'short cut' answers. Run both directly to the
battery. Make sure your pos(+) is fused.

tw

> Hey fellas. I'm wiring a new CB tomorrow and I want to do it right. I
> can't find the exact answer I'm looking for on the All Seeing Eye, so
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Thanks.
> n.
Nathan Otis - 09 Sep 2007 16:50 GMT
> You will get all kinds of 'short cut' answers. Run both directly to the
> battery. Make sure your pos(+) is fused.
>
> tw

Thanks so much, T-Dub. I haven't been around here for quite some time...
It's comforting that nothing has changed.
twaldron - 09 Sep 2007 20:01 GMT
>> You will get all kinds of 'short cut' answers. Run both directly to
>> the battery. Make sure your pos(+) is fused.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Thanks so much, T-Dub. I haven't been around here for quite some time...
> It's comforting that nothing has changed.

Welcome back Nathan. Just use your email filters and you'd be surprised
how quiet it is!

tw
DougW - 09 Sep 2007 17:32 GMT
> You will get all kinds of 'short cut' answers. Run both directly to
> the battery. Make sure your pos(+) is fused.

Yup, and fused as close to the battery as convenient.  You can either
install a circuit breaker or a new fuse block.  I don't much care for
the inline fuses as the cheaper ones tend to melt under load.

I like these if your going to run the CB for extended periods without
the engine running.  http://www.prioritystart.com/ps_pro.html

>> Hey fellas. I'm wiring a new CB tomorrow and I want to do it right. I
>> can't find the exact answer I'm looking for on the All Seeing Eye, so
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> 1. Should BOTH the red AND black wire be connected to the battery @
>> pos and neg terminals respectively?

Running from the battery is best.

>> 2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground, but
>> where?

Use the frame bolt where the battery - attaches.  There is usually
enough thread on that to put on another bolt.

>> 2a. Should I ground in the engine compartment or...
>>
>> 2b. Is it best to make the ground wire as short as possible (i.e.,
>> shorten the black wire to around a foot or two and ground in the
>> cab)?

Grounding in the cab can cause problems for the other electrical systems
and noise on your CB.  It's better to go to the battery.

Signature

-- DougW --   93 ZJ 4.0                     http://revbeergoggles.com
HESCO Supercharger   -   300W IASCA Stereo   -   Edelbrock IAS Shocks
Gibson Exhaust - rear DCpower - custom gauge install - Stillen Rotors
Banks Header - and BEER, in the fridge!

twaldron - 09 Sep 2007 20:08 GMT
>>>2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground, but
>>>where?
>
> Use the frame bolt where the battery - attaches.  There is usually
> enough thread on that to put on another bolt.

Why bother? Attaching at the NEG(-) battery terminal performs the same
function as running more lead to the block where the battery grounds.
The battery cable is much more than enough to carry the necessary radio
ground and saves the further wire run. Just attach both at the battery
terminals.

tw
XS11E - 09 Sep 2007 22:40 GMT
>>>>2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground, but
>>>>where?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> same function as running more lead to the block where the battery
> grounds.

Because Jeeps have had problems in the past with ground loops causing
CB noise.  It might be worthwhile to consult with a local CB shop it
there's one available.

Signature

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

twaldron - 09 Sep 2007 23:17 GMT
>>>>>2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground, but
>>>>>where?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> CB noise.  It might be worthwhile to consult with a local CB shop it
> there's one available.

If you are attaching at the battery, how do you get a ground loop?

tw
XS11E - 10 Sep 2007 01:16 GMT
>>>>>>2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground,
>>>>>>but where?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> If you are attaching at the battery, how do you get a ground loop?

Between the CB and the antenna.
twaldron - 10 Sep 2007 02:53 GMT
>>>>>>>2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground,
>>>>>>>but where?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Between the CB and the antenna.

Then your radio or antenna or both are improperly installed. Run both
leads directly to the battery.

tw
XS11E - 10 Sep 2007 06:59 GMT
>>>>>>>>2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground,
>>>>>>>>but where?
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Then your radio or antenna or both are improperly installed. Run
> both leads directly to the battery.

Not normally possible, read Bill Spiliotopoulos' post in this thread.

BTW, running both leads directly to the battery is also incorrect,
proper installation is to isolate the CB from anything metal, isolate
the antenna from anything metal, run the antenna ground to the CB and
both power and ground from the CB to the battery.  This eliminates
ground loops but requires some engineering as most antennas will ground
through the mount most CB mounts will ground to the body in a typical
installation.  In almost all cars and trucks this works fine, in Jeeps
(at least the older Wagoneers and Cherokees) it seems to create noise,
don't know why?

I've never had any problems in any vehicle because I use a portable CB
with a magnetic antenna.  The antenna grounds only to the CB and the CB
is powered by and grounded to the ligher socket.  It's worked well so
far....

Signature

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

Frank_v7.0 - 10 Sep 2007 14:57 GMT
> I've never had any problems in any vehicle because I use a portable CB
> with a magnetic antenna.  The antenna grounds only to the CB and the CB
> is powered by and grounded to the ligher socket.  It's worked well so
> far....

I ran a Radio Shack in my younger days and I have to agree with this. I
always used a fused lighter socket plug so I could pull the unit at
night. Sold a bunch to customers and never had a problem or complaint.
For antennas I used both a center loaded magnet mount and a 108"
stainless steel whip. Of course the whip gave better results, but again
the magnet mount could be pulled at night. One caution with magnet
mounts, make sure they're clean and dust free when you put them on. If
the bottom of the magnet mount or vehicle surface is dirty it could mark
the finish of the vehicle.

Signature

FRH

twaldron - 10 Sep 2007 15:17 GMT
>>>>>>>>>2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground,
>>>>>>>>>but where?
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> is powered by and grounded to the ligher socket.  It's worked well so
> far....

I have no idea WHAT you are talking about, and I don't agree with Bill
S's post as far has how to mount a two-way radio. How is running both
leads directly to the battery "not normally possible"???  It is the ONLY
correct way to wire in a two way radio. You guys are posting
misinformation. Please read the proper way to install a two-way radio
before posting so Nathan can have a trouble free installation. BTW,
powering a two-way radio through the cigaretter lighter port is the
worst possible installation method available.

tw
Frank_v7.0 - 10 Sep 2007 15:36 GMT
>>>>>>>>>> 2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground,
>>>>>>>>>> but where?
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> tw
For a Ham rig or a commercial two way I agree, but a CB draws a lot less
power than those applications and the high end audio equipment that you
"hear" out on the street today. A lighter plug power source for those
high draw applications would be ridiculous.

Signature

FRH

twaldron - 10 Sep 2007 16:06 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground,
>>>>>>>>>>> but where?
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> "hear" out on the street today. A lighter plug power source for those
> high draw applications would be ridiculous.

Yes, they don't need as high a gauge of wire, but they certainly don't
need the interference a cigarette lighter port will introduce.

tw
twaldron - 10 Sep 2007 16:08 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but where?
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>
> tw

That should be " 'heavy' a gauge of wire"

tw
Frank_v7.0 - 10 Sep 2007 17:11 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but where?
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>
> tw
No problem, high = heavy:-) Most "modern" quality CB's have excellent
internal filter circuits. In the "early" days, ie; 70's, engine "noise"
was the source of most interference. Resistor plugs and, as I mentioned,
decent built in noise filtering make the "additional" amount of
interference picked up through use of the lighter plug or auxiliary
power plug hard to quantify. Having said all that, it is certainly not
wrong to use a direct battery to CB connection as long as it is properly
fused with sufficient wire gauge. And one other point in favor of using
the lighter plug as a CB power source, if you forget to turn the CB off
it won't drain your battery overnight.

Signature

FRH

twaldron - 10 Sep 2007 21:26 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but where?
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
> the lighter plug as a CB power source, if you forget to turn the CB off
> it won't drain your battery overnight.

I didn't want anyone to confuse the "high" with a higher wire gauge
number. While I can see the temptation to cut corners and just plug it
in to the lighter socket, you're not _benefiting_ your setup's
performance in any way, just being lazy. CBs are low quality
transceivers and need all the help they can get. While most CB
manufacturers do use simple noise filtration circuitry, it is still best
to run directly to the clean power source and the was the OP's question.
Why not do it right?

Not all cig. sockets turn off with the key, but even using the ones that
do, in order to use the radio, you have to turn the key to accessory.
It's just as simple to train yourself to turn off the radio at it's own
power switch.

tw
Frank_v7.0 - 10 Sep 2007 21:38 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but where?
[quoted text clipped - 83 lines]
>
> tw
Ya got me! "just being lazy"  "It's just as simple to train yourself to
turn off the radio at it's own power switch." LOL! For you and me and
perhaps most Jeep drivers, but human nature dictates a lot of dead
batteries. I learned my lesson the hard way. Sitting in a Navajo
County cruiser with a dead battery. Had to call for a jump on my
portable. I got out for lunch and left the "hard wired" radio on. :P
Signature

FRH

Old Crow - 11 Sep 2007 00:43 GMT
<snip>

>> tw
>Ya got me! "just being lazy"  "It's just as simple to train yourself to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>County cruiser with a dead battery. Had to call for a jump on my
>portable. I got out for lunch and left the "hard wired" radio on. :P

You must be pushing a lot of power, or your battery was sh.t.  I have
left my CB on for like 3 days(with the truck parked the whole time)
and not had it run the battery down.  They draw almost no juice on
receive.  As a matter of fact most of the newer fuel injected cars
draw more than a CB.
--
Old Crow              "Yol Bolson!"            
'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
'95 YJ Rio Grande    
BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM                  
                           

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Frank_v7.0 - 11 Sep 2007 01:35 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM                  
>                              

It wasn't a CB. It was a combo police radio, scanner and control for the
light bar. And yes the battery was sh.t :-) We replaced it last week at
the county garage. I'd like to replace the entire vehicle. ;-)

Signature

FRH

twaldron - 11 Sep 2007 04:28 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. If not, then the black wire should be attached to ground,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but where?
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
> County cruiser with a dead battery. Had to call for a jump on my
> portable. I got out for lunch and left the "hard wired" radio on. :P

Well, if you know you're cutting corners and you're OK with it, that's
fine. The original question was how best to make the lead runs. I think
it was DougW who posted the Priority Start gizmos. Might be a good
option for you. ;)  Having mobile radios as large as a 100w HF radio, I
got in the habit of turning them off so they didn't attract attention.

tw
XS11E - 10 Sep 2007 16:46 GMT
> I have no idea WHAT you are talking about, and I don't agree with
> Bill S's post as far has how to mount a two-way radio.

No need for you to agree, he's right with or without your agreement!
;-)

> How is running both leads directly to the battery "not normally
> possible"???

Because the normal CB mount grounds to the metal of the body through
the attachment screws as does tne normal antenna mount.  To avoid
ground loops it's necessary to isolate the antenna and radio mount from
the car body and with some antenna types that's not possible.

> You guys are posting misinformation. Please read the proper
> way to install a two-way radio before posting so Nathan can have a
> trouble free installation. BTW, powering a two-way radio through
> the cigaretter lighter port is the worst possible installation
> method available.

At least you're consistently wrong.
twaldron - 10 Sep 2007 21:09 GMT
>>I have no idea WHAT you are talking about, and I don't agree with
>>Bill S's post as far has how to mount a two-way radio.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> At least you're consistently wrong.

There's drool on your chin, idiot.

tw
XS11E - 10 Sep 2007 23:11 GMT
>> At least you're consistently wrong.

> There's drool on your chin, idiot.

You'd be wise to learn what you're talking about before posting.

So far you've demonstrated complete ignorance of electonics, CB radio,
Jeeps and common courtesy.

Please do reply and show us your ignorance in other subjects.

Signature

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

twaldron - 11 Sep 2007 03:38 GMT
>>>At least you're consistently wrong.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Please do reply and show us your ignorance in other subjects.

Oh, please advise me. Here's some advice for you...read what was written
before you comment on it. Anyone who says running power and ground leads
from the radio directly to the battery is incorrect is a F-ing moron.

tw
XS11E - 11 Sep 2007 05:10 GMT
>> You'd be wise to learn what you're talking about before posting.
>>
>> So far you've demonstrated complete ignorance of electonics, CB
>> radio, Jeeps and common courtesy.
>>
>> Please do reply and show us your ignorance in other subjects.

> Oh, please advise me. Here's some advice for you...read what was
> written before you comment on it. Anyone who says running power
> and ground leads from the radio directly to the battery is
> incorrect is a F-ing moron.

Nor did I say it was incorrect, sorry about your reading disability.

Thanks for posting and showing us an additional area of your ignorance,
will you do some more please?  You're pretty entertaining....

Signature

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

twaldron - 11 Sep 2007 05:16 GMT
>>>You'd be wise to learn what you're talking about before posting.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Thanks for posting and showing us an additional area of your ignorance,
> will you do some more please?  You're pretty entertaining....

Just because I understand you are retarded, I'll post one more time. The
only thing I've talked about in this whole thread is that you run the
leads directly to the battery. You, on the other hand, cannot comprehend
that small detail. Shame, because you really are boring me.

tw
jeff - 11 Sep 2007 00:46 GMT
>> I have no idea WHAT you are talking about, and I don't agree with
>> Bill S's post as far has how to mount a two-way radio.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> At least you're consistently wrong.

In this day and age of multi GHz computers the 27 MHz that CB's operate
that is basically considered DC. An inline RF choke will adequately
block 27MHz radiating back through the power lead. Of greater concern is
blocking chassis noise from the radio. A fused lead to the battery or
the power block are equivalent.  Any chassis ground is as effective as a
separate ground lead. Metal to metal anywhere on a jeep should be less
than an ohm. As far as metal mounting the chassis, that is the safest
bet. If the unit needs isolation from the chassis it will be done
internally. Grounding at the antenna is determined by the antenna. If it
requires then a fat pigtail as short as possible is recommended.
Non-grounded antenna are less effective since they do not use the body
of the vehicle as a ground plane. In the final analysis, most of this
does not matter if you tune the antenna for a low SWR.

Signature

jeff
(bsee)

XS11E - 11 Sep 2007 01:29 GMT
> Any chassis ground is as effective as a separate ground lead.
> Metal to metal anywhere on a jeep should be less than an ohm.

And that's EXACTLY why one isolates the antenna and CB in a Jeep to
avoid ground loops.  Jeeps are notorious for not having good grounds,
particularly back in the days when CBs were more common.  It was very
difficult to get a good noise free signal in Wagoneers and Cherokees
leading to the development of isolated mountings to avoid ground loops.

Grounding the antenna to the body (as most installations do) is
surprisingly unsuccessful when the body grounds are rusted away.

Signature

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

FrankW - 11 Sep 2007 13:09 GMT
Sorry but you got it wrong...
Unless the antenna is one of those "no-ground plane" types
The antenna base MUST be grounded. The vehicle body
(otherwise known as the ground plane) is part of the antenna.
Please show me an example of a "isolated mounting".
Where do you buy them?

>>Any chassis ground is as effective as a separate ground lead.
>>Metal to metal anywhere on a jeep should be less than an ohm.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Grounding the antenna to the body (as most installations do) is
> surprisingly unsuccessful when the body grounds are rusted away.
twaldron - 11 Sep 2007 13:16 GMT
This guy has no clue what the difference between a ground plane and an
electrical ground is. You're beating your head. "No ground plane" type
antennas are the absolute last resort on a vehicle and should never be
used on a Jeep with a metal body...Fiberglass tubs, a corvette, or a
fiberglass boat.

tw

> Sorry but you got it wrong...
> Unless the antenna is one of those "no-ground plane" types
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> Grounding the antenna to the body (as most installations do) is
>> surprisingly unsuccessful when the body grounds are rusted away.
Mike Romain - 11 Sep 2007 15:24 GMT
> Sorry but you got it wrong...
> Unless the antenna is one of those "no-ground plane" types
> The antenna base MUST be grounded. The vehicle body
> (otherwise known as the ground plane) is part of the antenna.
> Please show me an example of a "isolated mounting".
> Where do you buy them?

Everywhere Frank.

The mag mounts are totally isolated 'electrically' but require a 3'
circle of metal under them for the best 'reflective' ground plane.

The vertical clamp on ones have a nylon insert where the stick meets the
metal bracket if you look close.  These also need a 'reflective' ground
plane.

A 'reflective' ground plane is an area for the signal to bounce off of
increasing the range of the antenna.  This is 'not' an 'electrical' ground.

I use a trucker's mirror mount on my 'glass bodied CJ7 designed for no
or little 'ground plane' and get excellent reception with an old Cobra
23.  I have had 2 way conversations from Toronto Canada to Marthas
Vineyard on the US east coast and pick up the Mississippi river truckers
all the time.

I wheel up on the Canadian Shield south of James Bay and can 'receive
only' a gent on British Columbia's Sunshine Coast on the Pacific Ocean
regularly from one area.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
FrankW - 11 Sep 2007 16:52 GMT
No really Mike
They are capacitivly coupled to the metal body of the vehicle
The negative node of the signal is carried in the vehicle.
It can fry the electronics just as easily.
In the DC world yes it's isolated
But RF = AC.

> Everywhere Frank.
>
> The mag mounts are totally isolated 'electrically' but require a 3'
> circle of metal under them for the best 'reflective' ground plane.
Mike Romain - 11 Sep 2007 17:51 GMT
In the Ericsson systems I was using, if you mixed the two, all hell
broke loose.  We were transmitting data packets and the retries went
through the roof if the coax got frayed and touched metal or the edge of
the mag mount touched a roof ridge or a beam.  (yes some fools insisted
on running the antenna stuck to the 'inside' of the van roof or wall
despite me showing them page one of the manual that warned, in one inch
high bold letters, of burns if you were within 3' of the antenna when it
transmitted.  These were 6 Watt units)

Mike

> No really Mike
> They are capacitivly coupled to the metal body of the vehicle
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>> The mag mounts are totally isolated 'electrically' but require a 3'
>> circle of metal under them for the best 'reflective' ground plane.
Mike Romain - 11 Sep 2007 15:11 GMT
>> Any chassis ground is as effective as a separate ground lead.
>> Metal to metal anywhere on a jeep should be less than an ohm.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Grounding the antenna to the body (as most installations do) is
> surprisingly unsuccessful when the body grounds are rusted away.

If you use the vehicle chassis as a ground in a new GM vehicle, you will
void the warranty for 'all' on board electronics of the vehicle.  This
includes things like the ABS controller, ignition, etc...

You need to isolate transmitters these days.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
Old Crow - 12 Sep 2007 11:17 GMT
>>> Any chassis ground is as effective as a separate ground lead.
>>> Metal to metal anywhere on a jeep should be less than an ohm.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>You need to isolate transmitters these days.

Ain't that hard in a GM truck these days...nothing but plastic to
mount to anyway.
--
Old Crow              "Yol Bolson!"            
'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
'95 YJ Rio Grande    
BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM                  
                           

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Bill Spiliotopoulos - 10 Sep 2007 00:08 GMT
The short answer is that it must be connected directly on the battery.

But this is not as easy as it seems.
CBs - besides the the Power Supply GND wire,
may have alternative paths to the Ground, the Antenna Ground and the Chasis
of the unit.
The shield of the antenna cable is grounded, and this usually connects to
the mount of the antenna. Also if the mounting screws of the CB unit are in
contact with the chasis of the unit, these too will make a grounding path,
if bolted on the car's chasis.
You don't want alternative ground paths, as this may greate RF noise in the
car's electrical system, which could damage or create interference to the
PCM.

A good installation would be to connect the 2 power supply cables (+12V and
GND) directry on the battery terminals, with a fuse as close to the battery,
and mount the CB unit in a way that there is no connection between it's
chasis and the car's chasis.  Also the antenna must be mounted on a
non-metalic mount, to avoid grounding at the antenna mounting point.

Bill Spiliotopoulos,
'96 XJ,
'06 TJ.

> Hey fellas. I'm wiring a new CB tomorrow and I want to do it right. I
> can't find the exact answer I'm looking for on the All Seeing Eye, so here
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Thanks.
> n.
FrankW - 10 Sep 2007 13:26 GMT
  Also the antenna must be mounted on a
> non-metalic mount, to avoid grounding at the antenna mounting point.
>
> Bill Spiliotopoulos,
> '96 XJ,
> '06 TJ.

This is very bad advice unless the antenna is a "no-ground plane" type
Not mounting the base of the antenna to ground will give a very bad
SWR. The antenna needs the metal base of the vehicle for the
"ground plane"

What'd I'd do is to mount the radio on the metal of the Jeep
connect the gnd wire close to the radio, Run a power wire
directly to the battery with a inline fuse right at the battery.

Here's a few links

http://www.neons.org/neontsb/TSB/08/081698.htm

http://www.signalengineering.com/ultimate/mobile_antennas.html

http://www.wilsonantenna.com/jeep.htm

http://jeephorizons.com/tech/cb_ant_basic.html
Bill Spiliotopoulos - 10 Sep 2007 14:07 GMT
I agree.  I posted this late at night and wasn't clearly thinking.

After some more thought, I have to say that the antenna mount must be
grounded to the car body, so the RF circuit closes through the antenna cable
ground. Otherwise the antenna cable becomes an antenna itself, changing the
RF output impedance and increased SWR.

I would also ground the CB unit with the GND power supply wire on the
battery terminal.
I wouldn't ground the CB chassis though, as this would create an alternative
RF path bypassing the antenna cable ground and increasing SWR again. An RF
filter may be required on both power supply wires, if not already included
inside the CB unit, to prevent an RF loop through the power supply wires.

Sorry for the confusion.

Bill Spiliotopoulos,
'96 XJ,
'06 TJ.

>   Also the antenna must be mounted on a
>> non-metalic mount, to avoid grounding at the antenna mounting point.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> http://jeephorizons.com/tech/cb_ant_basic.html
FrankW - 10 Sep 2007 13:15 GMT
Here's a good link to read

http://www.neons.org/neontsb/TSB/08/081698.htm

> Hey fellas. I'm wiring a new CB tomorrow and I want to do it right. I
> can't find the exact answer I'm looking for on the All Seeing Eye, so
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Thanks.
> n.
Mike Romain - 10 Sep 2007 23:06 GMT
> Hey fellas. I'm wiring a new CB tomorrow and I want to do it right. I
> can't find the exact answer I'm looking for on the All Seeing Eye, so
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Thanks.
> n.

I am a bit late likely, was out Jeeping and camping for ten days.

There are DC booklets out there if you ask at the dealer.  GM has
had this booklet out for years:

http://service.gm.com/techlineinfo/radio.html

I did one contract for 9 years installing and servicing transmitter
systems in a fleet of 200 delivery vehicles.

You 'really' need to stay away from the electrical system of the vehicle
and run two fused lines directly to the battery for the transmitter like
the GM booklet states.  (some GM's have a nice power tap
there, Jeeps don't)

If you use any of the vehicle's electrics, the vehicle warranty is void
for GM's.

For a GM system you 'must' use 10 ga. wiring minimum for these power
leads in order to not void the vehicle's warranty so I use twisted 10
ga. with the built in silk string cardboard condenser on all of them.
(Type SJOW or SOW was recommended to me by Ericsson who made the
transmitters I was installing, so I used it and never had RF issues.)

Fusing the negative line is very important because if the vehicle loses
a ground for whatever reason. it can/will pull one through the
transmitter and let the magic smoke out of the transmitter big time.

The routing of the wiring needs to be on the opposite side of the
vehicle from the vehicle's harness and computer and should only cross it
at right angles if you 'have' to cross over other wires.  It is better
to route the wire out to the front and cross the front top of the rad's
brace then come back to the battery rather than run across the firewall
where the rest of the wires run if you have to cross from side to side.
(GM makes special note of this)

If you get the wiring too close to any vehicle systems, strange things
happen like the ABS module fails, digital dashes go insane and in a TJ
auto, as was reported on this group a while back, the tranny can jump to
neutral every time you key up.

Hope this helps,

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
twaldron - 11 Sep 2007 04:49 GMT
Thanks for the GM docs, Mike...here's Ford's:

http://www.fordemc.com/docs/download/Mobile_Radio_Guide.pdf

Ford Motor Company vehicles are designed and tested for safe operation
with properly installed and properly used land mobile/amateur radio
communication equipment with up to 100 Watt transmitter power.

Special design considerations are incorporated into all Ford vehicle
electronic systems to provide immunity to radio frequency signals. To
maintain compatibility with vehicle electronic systems, mobile
two-way radio and telephone equipment must be installed properly by
trained personnel, observing these general guidelines:

Power connections should be made directly to the battery and fused as
close to the battery as possible. Avoid using cigar lighter or “Power
Point” receptacles as power sources for radio communication equipment.

Antennas for two-way radios should be mounted on the roof or the rear
area of the vehicle. Care should be used in mounting antennas with
magnet bases, since magnets may affect the accuracy or operation of the
compass on vehicles, if so equipped.

The antenna cable should be high quality, fully shielded coaxial cable,
and kept as short as practical. Avoid routing the antenna cable in
parallel with vehicle wiring over long distances.

Carefully match the antenna and cable to the radio to achieve a low
Standing Wave Ratio (SWR) and to avoid RF currents on the antenna cable
shield.

tw
FrankW - 11 Sep 2007 13:13 GMT
Here's one from Chrysler

http://www.neons.org/neontsb/TSB/08/081698.htm

> Thanks for the GM docs, Mike...here's Ford's:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> tw
twaldron - 13 Sep 2007 16:05 GMT
> Fusing the negative line is very important because if the vehicle loses
> a ground for whatever reason. it can/will pull one through the
> transmitter and let the magic smoke out of the transmitter big time.

I would NEVER fuse the electrical ground line because if that fuse
happens to go...and fuses do go...your radio circuit WILL find an
alternate ground path and you will not likely appreciate it's choice.
The likelihood of a body ground strap going bad is far less likely than
a simple inline fuse. If you're paranoid about body straps going bad,
replace it during your radio installation.

tw
Mike Romain - 13 Sep 2007 16:40 GMT
>> Fusing the negative line is very important because if the vehicle loses
>> a ground for whatever reason. it can/will pull one through the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> tw

'I' had to 'go by the book' or be liable for lost vehicle warranties.

http://service.gm.com/techlineinfo/radio.html

Most vans/vehicles have plastic to mount to these days, a chassis case
ground must be made if wanted.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
twaldron - 13 Sep 2007 16:52 GMT
>>> Fusing the negative line is very important because if the vehicle loses
>>> a ground for whatever reason. it can/will pull one through the
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)

Yep, I understand why you're doing it, but I don't understand why
they're requiring it. Warranty aside, no one has been able to show me
why the NEG lead fuse is necessary/warranted...or even safe.

tw
Mike Romain - 13 Sep 2007 17:53 GMT
>>>> Fusing the negative line is very important because if the vehicle loses
>>>> a ground for whatever reason. it can/will pull one through the
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> tw

The definition of DC is a build up of negative electrons wanting to go
to a positive source so technically if a short happens the power has to
travel through the CB first, spiking it with power to get to the fuse to
blow.  When both are fused and something happens, the negative fuse
normally blows first for some reason. (from 9 years of observations and
repairs)

Mike
twaldron - 13 Sep 2007 18:02 GMT
>>>>> Fusing the negative line is very important because if the vehicle
>>>>> loses
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Mike

Once that NEG fuse blows, where does the energy then travel?  That's my
concern. It will backtrack and find the nearest pathway.

tw
Mike Romain - 13 Sep 2007 18:35 GMT
>>>>>> Fusing the negative line is very important because if the vehicle
>>>>>> loses
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> tw

Um, the energy comes 'from' the negative side and goes 'to' the positive....

If it has to go all the way through the transmitter to get to the fuse
on the positive side, that means the high spike hits lots of components
that really don't like high power before it gets 'to the positive fuse.

Mike
L.W. (Bill) Hughes III - 13 Sep 2007 22:56 GMT
Nowhere, it's safe, again. We use to see this problem all the time,
where GM accessories were cooked when the type of battery cables (four
connections) they used in the fifties would disconnect the their smaller
leads.
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com http://www.billhughes.com/

> Once that NEG fuse blows, where does the energy then travel?  That's my
> concern. It will backtrack and find the nearest pathway.
>
> tw

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

twaldron - 13 Sep 2007 19:31 GMT
>>>>> Fusing the negative line is very important because if the vehicle
>>>>> loses
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Mike

I guess it depends on which direction the problem comes from.
Sidenote...About 7 years ago, I had a neighbor's tree fall on the power
lines, effectively creating a 440v short. This energy came barreling
down my power line and entered the back of my big screen HDTV, somehow
skipped past the quick blow fuse and fried a main circuit board. I lost
a bunch of equipment that day. The fuse eventually went, but not before
the damage was done.

tw
Mike Romain - 13 Sep 2007 20:55 GMT
>>>>>> Fusing the negative line is very important because if the vehicle
>>>>>> loses
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
> tw

In my mind it is simple, I just fuse both of the suckers and be done
with it.  That 2A fuse isn't going to let the starter or headlights draw
through the CB, that's for sure...

Mike
twaldron - 13 Sep 2007 20:56 GMT
>>>>>>> Fusing the negative line is very important because if the vehicle
>>>>>>> loses
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> Mike

Yeah, I'll have to rethink that.  Thanks for hashing it out.

tw
bllsht - 15 Sep 2007 05:35 GMT
>>>>>>>> Fusing the negative line is very important because if the vehicle
>>>>>>>> loses
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
>
>Yeah, I'll have to rethink that.  Thanks for hashing it out.

The Chrysler TSB dealing with installing radio communication equipment
specifically states NOT to fuse the ground lead.  Apparently the
manufacturers can't agree on this either.

>tw
Mike Romain - 15 Sep 2007 22:31 GMT
> The Chrysler TSB dealing with installing radio communication equipment
> specifically states NOT to fuse the ground lead.  Apparently the
> manufacturers can't agree on this either.

That is a serious pain in the butt isn't it?

I think of all the body ground straps I have seen go bad on Jeeps so
things like the headlights 'could' pull a chassis ground to the CB then
to the negative lead to the battery.  Even the starter could pull the
other way through the body ground strap and back through the
transmitters negative, if the big ground goes bad at the block which I
have 'also' seen happen on Jeeps more than once.

I figure fusing both with the light 2A fuse has it covered...

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
L. Ron Waddle - 11 Sep 2007 02:37 GMT
> Hey fellas. I'm wiring a new CB tomorrow and I want to do it right. I
> can't find the exact answer I'm looking for on the All Seeing Eye, so
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> 2b. Is it best to make the ground wire as short as possible (i.e.,
> shorten the black wire to around a foot or two and ground in the cab)?

Since you are getting contradictory information, here is what I have
gathered on the subject:

1. Power: Go straight to the battery.
2. Ground:
   The following are grounded on the typical radio:
     a) power ground
     b) antenna wire at radio (ground sheath)
     c) antenna wire at antenna (ground sheath)

   You want to prevent ground loops as much as possible. Thus the
correct answer is that whatever you're attaching your ground to on the
antenna end (usually a metal antenna mount bolted to your bumper or
fender) should be what you attach the ground to on the CB end. Since the
antenna is generally bolted to the body (or has a low-ohm AC path to
ground through the magnetic mount attached to the body), that, then, is
what you should attach your CB ground to.

In short, the best ground is to attach your CB ground to one of the
sheet metal screws that you use to attach your CB to the body of the
Jeep. If you are not attaching the CB to the body of the Jeep, the
ground should instead be attached to the body as close to the CB as
possible. The goal is to provide a good ground path between the CB
ground and the antenna ground for use as a ground plane without worrying
about whether there is enough corrosion on the cable that grounds the
body to the battery to affect its impedence and thus cause it to serve
as an extension of the antenna (a.k.a. "ground loop").

Note that there are antenna setups which do not require a ground plane.
These use a fixed-length cable with a specified impedence and an
insulated ungrounded antenna. These generally, however, provide a poorer
reception on any metal vehicle that has sufficient steel for a proper
ground plane. Short of attaching a radial-element base station antenna
to your Jeep (which uses the radial elements as the ground plane, but
it'd make your Jeep kinda tall!), you cannot get a good ground plane
with a "groundplane-free" mobile setup. My handi-talkie CB with the
mini-whip does not get anywhere near as good of reception as my properly
grounded Firestick antenna, even if I attach the auxiliary antenna and
place it on top of my Jeep so it's as high as the Firestick on the back
of my Jeep. And this is despite the fact that the actual guts of this
handi-talkie are absolutely identical to the guts of my
permanently-mounted CB (both are Cobra designs and utilize the exact
same circuit board internally, all that differs is the surrounding
packaging, one is an all-in-mike design with a power/antenna box under
the dash and the other is a handi-talky with the power and antenna as
part of the package). The ground plane of the Jeep thus empirically has
proven to be quite a bit more effective at receiving signals than the
ground-plane-less approach, and you shouldn't even think about a
ground-plane-less approach for your antenna setup.

-Elron
Mike Romain - 11 Sep 2007 16:17 GMT
A 'ground plane' is a reflective area for amplifying the signal.

An 'electrical' ground is a power path.

The 'only' thing they have in common is the word 'ground', nothing else.

If you use an electrical ground for the transmitter's ground plane, you
will void the vehicle's warranty for all things electronic according to
all the manufacturers I have dealt with while installing and servicing
transmitters for 9 years.

Here is a link to the GM book and others posted links to the Ford and
Chrysler books.

http://service.gm.com/techlineinfo/radio.html
http://www.fordemc.com/docs/download/Mobile_Radio_Guide.pdf
http://www.neons.org/neontsb/TSB/08/081698.htm

When in doubt, RTFM eh.

OK, so I just did and WOW, the person who wrote the Neon one also has
the electrical and reflective grounds mixed up in his head but at least
he refers to the TSB which is correct.

3rd party websites are only as good as the person typing the garbage
in...  GIGO eh.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)

>> Hey fellas. I'm wiring a new CB tomorrow and I want to do it right. I
>> can't find the exact answer I'm looking for on the All Seeing Eye, so
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
> -Elron
FrankW - 11 Sep 2007 16:30 GMT
Hi Mike
To nit pick, it does not amplify the signal

This site is really good.
No garbage

http://www.signalengineering.com/ultimate/index.html

> A 'ground plane' is a reflective area for amplifying the signal.
>
[quoted text clipped - 99 lines]
>>
>> -Elron
Mike Romain - 11 Sep 2007 17:51 GMT
Ok, better said, without the proper 'reflective' ground plane, the
signal will be weaker than it's potential.

Better?
;-)

Mike

> Hi Mike
> To nit pick, it does not amplify the signal
[quoted text clipped - 107 lines]
>>>
>>> -Elron
FrankW - 11 Sep 2007 18:15 GMT
LOL...... No
How about
"Without the proper counterpoise, the antenna feedpoint will not be 50
ohms, resulting in increased reflections in the feedline otherwise known
as, load mismatch or poor SWR"
:-)

> Ok, better said, without the proper 'reflective' ground plane, the
> signal will be weaker than it's potential.
[quoted text clipped - 117 lines]
>>>>
>>>> -Elron
Mike Romain - 11 Sep 2007 19:10 GMT
In English?

Just kidding ;-)

My mirror mount antenna on my fiberglass CJ7 works great, the SWR meter
says it matches exact when we went to tune it.  I use the full length
COAX in a loose coil stuffed in the side of the body shell wall.

Mike

> LOL...... No
> How about
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>>>> The 'only' thing they have in common is the word 'ground', nothing
>>>> else.
<snip>
L. Ron Waddle - 12 Sep 2007 01:06 GMT
> A 'ground plane' is a reflective area for amplifying the signal.
>
> An 'electrical' ground is a power path.
>
> The 'only' thing they have in common is the word 'ground', nothing else.

Well, except for the fact that all mobile antennas other than the "no
ground plane" designs use the body as the ground plane and the body also
serves as electrical ground. The car body is rather common between the two.

> If you use an electrical ground for the transmitter's ground plane, you
> will void the vehicle's warranty for all things electronic according to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Here is a link to the GM book and others posted links to the Ford and
> Chrysler books.

I'm sorry, but when I want to know about radio electronics I read my
ARRL handbook and the handbooks of the antenna and radio manufacturers.
When I want to know about cars, I read GM and Ford handbooks. What GM
and Ford know about CB (11 meter) radios could fit in the palm of my hand.

> 3rd party websites are only as good as the person typing the garbage
> in...  GIGO eh.

Correct, which is why I always check these things out with more
theoretical handbooks such as the ARRL handbook and with my own
measurements. When the ARRL handbook, my own measurements, the antenna
manufacturer's websites, the CB radio manufacturer's websites, and the
3rd party web sites all agree, it's probably accurate information.

I have thus far installed my CB in my Jeep three different ways over the
years. The first installation was into the cigarette lighter, this was
when I didn't have time to do it right because I had just purchased the
Jeep and was going on a trip. This worked fine. The next trip, I still
hadn't had time to install the radio properly, so I hooked the power
wire into a fuse in the fuse box and the ground wire to a screw into the
body. This worked, but with significant noise from the electronics
hooked to the fuse box. I finally got around to installing the radio
properly, and ran a 12 gauge wire directly to the battery and placed an
auxilliary fuse block under the driver's dash for my various radios with
a very short wire from the radio to the fuse block (the 12 gauge wire
has its own 20 amp fuse where it attaches to the battery). A 12 gauge
wire with a 5 watt draw basically has no capacitance or resistance in
case you're wondering and thus does not serve as an antenna nor pick up
RF noise, thus it's okay to run it across the firewall to get to the
driver's side. I hooked the ground to the body with the same screw used
to attach the antenna junction box to the body (this is the
all-in-handset radio). The result is significantly reduced RF noise, I
can hear a very little hum in the background that goes up and down with
engine RPM but it is inaudible when someone is talking. My SWR settings
and tests with a second person holding the handy talky show that my
antenna setup (a Firestick) is quite good too and that my radio has no
significant distortion on transmit. Indeed, the only significant RF
noise that I pick up is from high voltage power lines, which create
induced RF noise in pretty much everything in the Jeep, but that's
something that a simple filter will not do anything about because most
of that noise is getting picked up by the antenna, not by the wiring
under my dash.

So, why did I not run the ground wire to the battery? Simple. Adding an
additional ground path to the battery risks fire if the body ground
comes loose, because the antenna end of the coax is grounded to the
body. So that ground path then becomes the ground path that every
power-using accessory in the cab of the Jeep will use to send its stuff
back to the battery. This is Bad News. With my setup, because the coax
ground (both ends - radio and antenna) and the radio ground all go to
the same ground (the body) grounding the radio to the body creates no
risk of fire. My measurements with the VOM show that the body ground on
my Jeep is excellent at all points measured. If your Jeep on the other
hand is a rust bucket you may need to do extra work to get a good ground
for everything that needs a good ground -- both ends of the coax, the
frame of the radio, and the radio itself.

Now, has this affected the electronics of my Jeep in any way? Nope. 5
watts of power simply does not have the juice to do anything to the
electronics in a Jeep. You get more induced current just by passing
under a high tension power line.

In short, I am both puzzled and baffled by your objections to what every
major radio and antenna manufacturer recommends. Perhaps you simply
misunderstood what I was posting the first time? Hopefully this
clarifies things then.

-Elron
XS11E - 12 Sep 2007 01:10 GMT
> I'm sorry, but when I want to know about radio electronics I read
> my ARRL handbook and the handbooks of the antenna and radio
> manufacturers. When I want to know about cars, I read GM and Ford
> handbooks. What GM and Ford know about CB (11 meter) radios could
> fit in the palm of my hand.

But what GM and Ford know about their warranties is not only correct,
it's oftem final and non-negotiable as many have found out.  I'd pay
attention to them if I were you...

Signature

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

twaldron - 12 Sep 2007 02:52 GMT
 > I'm sorry, but when I want to know about radio electronics I read my
> ARRL handbook and the handbooks of the antenna and radio manufacturers.
> When I want to know about cars, I read GM and Ford handbooks. What GM
> and Ford know about CB (11 meter) radios could fit in the palm of my hand.

Yes, you should read and know the ARRL handbook and I believe that you
do. It covers the physics of two-way radio installations. Once you
understand how the system should work, you _MUST_ address the
manufacturer's concerns regarding the vehicle specific installation and
make your own decision as to whether their concerns are valid in your
case, or you are willing to take a risk. It would be a shame to void a
7/70 warranty for a simple 3' further/shorter ground wire run (for
example), even if your rig loses a little here or there in performance.

tw
Mike Romain - 12 Sep 2007 16:22 GMT
>> A 'ground plane' is a reflective area for amplifying the signal.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> ground plane" designs use the body as the ground plane and the body also
> serves as electrical ground. The car body is rather common between the two.

But 'totally' separate!

No ground plane simply means the antenna doesn't need a reflecting
surface to set it's SWR, 'not' it doesn't need an electrical hookup....

> I'm sorry, but when I want to know about radio electronics I read my
> ARRL handbook and the handbooks of the antenna and radio manufacturers.
> When I want to know about cars, I read GM and Ford handbooks. What GM
> and Ford know about CB (11 meter) radios could fit in the palm of my hand.

I have personally seen many ABS systems crap out from a bad install as
well as the digital dash and gauges and ignition in one case every time
the gent transmitted.  This is in the fleet of about 200 delivery
vehicles I serviced.

I have personally seen GM void the warranty on 'very' new GM vans and
voided on one Ford van that kept 'blowing' trannies.

These arrogant folks that 'knew better than GM' very quickly took the
time after that from their 'too busy' of a schedule to have me properly
wire the transmitters in rather than use the cigarette lighter socket
they were 'insisting' on using.

Their lawsuit against the parent company I worked for, for vehicle
damages got dropped before it started because they were shown to be at
fault for being lazy and warned in writing of the potential consequences
of using the lighter plug.

A bad install in a TJ was reported here on this group as making the
tranny go into neutral every time the gent keyed up.
<snip where you got lucky with bad installs>

> So, why did I not run the ground wire to the battery? Simple. Adding an
> additional ground path to the battery risks fire if the body ground
> comes loose, because the antenna end of the coax is grounded to the
> body.

No, you are mistaken.  The coax cable is 'physically' isolated from the
body at the antenna, it does 'not' act as an electrical route for DC power.

Please go look close at your antenna base.  You will see a nylon insert
isolating the antenna base from the bracket.  If you unscrew the coax at
the antenna and use a multimeter on continuity and put one probe on the
coax plug's male antenna end threads and on the vehicle body, you will
show an open circuit.

That is why the negative wire must be fused so the ground can't run
through the CB's 'chassis' ground and back feed into it's power line.

I was transmitting data packets with error correction.  It was extremely
obvious when anyone's coax got frayed and 'electrically' grounded to the
vehicle body by the number of retries in the packets.  I would get a
service call from the mainframe techs.

> In short, I am both puzzled and baffled by your objections to what every
> major radio and antenna manufacturer recommends. Perhaps you simply
> misunderstood what I was posting the first time? Hopefully this
> clarifies things then.

No, I 'have' to go by the 'Vehicle' manufacturers booklets to avoid 'me'
personally voiding someone's warranty and being liable for the damages
or the deaths that can and 'does' occur when the ABS module or tranny
module fails.  (think van loaded to the roof with newspapers in a panic
stop and the 'expected' ABS fails)

I also 'had' to use Ericsson Canada's transmitter wiring specs which are
the same as GM's which is two 10 ga. wires both fused at the battery or
right at the power tap and main ground cable bolt.

I also worked with RIM (Research In Motion transmitters, think
blackberry guts) and their isolated antenna specs and power line specs
were the same as Ericsson's.

The long and short of it is whatever works for 'you' is fine, but if you
want to be above board and to avoid expensive 'no warranty' fixes on
your vehicle, you gotta do it 'their' way.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos:  Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pictures.html?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
L. Ron Waddle - 12 Sep 2007 23:11 GMT
>>> A 'ground plane' is a reflective area for amplifying the signal.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> No ground plane simply means the antenna doesn't need a reflecting
> surface to set it's SWR, 'not' it doesn't need an electrical hookup....

I'm not understanding what you're talking about. You seem to be
confused. SWR is a rating of how much power is reflected from the end of
the antenna back to the transmitter as harmonics instead of radiating to
the airwaves. Reflected power ("standing waves") a) causes the
transmission to sound garbled (since additional wavelengths are
introduced into the amplitude-modulated output), and b) can damage the
input capacitor or output amplifier on the transmitter.  The secret to
avoid standing waves is to carefully tune the length of your
transmission chain in order that your power be radiated rather than
reflected back. A poor ground plane (reflecting surface) can certainly
cause SWR's to be high, since this causes power to be reflected back to
the antenna rather than out to the intended destination, but is not by
any means the only cause of high SWR's.

The biggest cause of high SWR's is the fact that typically other parts
of the transmission chain are radiating or are of a length that is
chopping up your waves as they hea