Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Jeep / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Floor Jack Recommendation?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
aetmos - 04 Mar 2008 06:16 GMT
Hi All,

I'm looking for a new floor jack to use primarily with my wife's '04
Jeep Grand Cherokee. I had a Craftsman SUV jack until it spewed oil
and collapsed the other day. I need to carry it fairly frequently, so
I need something fairly light, but also tall enough to lift a Jeep in
the air. Any recommendations? I'm thinking of going with the Arcan
Aluminum:

http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/product_6970_200345428_200
345428


At 19.25", it's the tallest aluminum jack I can find for around $200,
but I'm also considering the Torin 2.5 Ton Aluminum (18.25") and the
Jegs Aluminum (17.75").

What do you all use? What's the minimum height that I should go for?
My old jack goes to 21", but I don't think I've ever had it all the
way up. Most of all, I want a jack that will last a long time. I
couldn't believe it when my Craftsman jack died after only a few
years. Apparently, all of their newer jacks have the same basic
problem. ;-(

Thanks,
Tom
L.W.(ßill)Hughes III - 04 Mar 2008 07:16 GMT
Hi Tom,
   I don't have a preference, as mine stays on the garage floor. Just so
the handle doesn't bend under my weight using it as a cheater.
   Remember Daimler uses an aluminum rear differential housing that
instantly bends and throws the bearings out of adjustment if lifted from the
pumpkin: http://www.billhughes.com/WJdana44.jpg
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
       mailto:BillHughes@billhughes.com

> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the air. Any recommendations? I'm thinking of going with the Arcan
> Aluminum:

http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/product_6970_200345428_200
345428


> At 19.25", it's the tallest aluminum jack I can find for around $200,
> but I'm also considering the Torin 2.5 Ton Aluminum (18.25") and the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Thanks,
> Tom

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Pink Freud - 04 Mar 2008 21:14 GMT
> I don't have a preference, as I just jack right on the garage
> floor.

And you don't clean up afterwards, either.....
PeterD - 04 Mar 2008 13:20 GMT
>Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>Thanks,
>Tom

Did you try to fix the old one? <g> Everytime that I find they spew,
the problem is either a leak (tighten whatever is leaking) or a bad
seal on the pump or valve...

That said, most of the ones you describe would be just fine. Jegs
prices are OK, but I don't like their shipping costs. (Looses them a
lot of orders from me, as when I add the price of the product to the
shipping, they then become more expensive them their competitors).
aetmos - 04 Mar 2008 16:43 GMT
Thanks for the advice, guys.

Tom
noneofyourbusiness - 05 Mar 2008 01:05 GMT
>Thanks for the advice, guys.
>
>Tom

Without looking into any previous replies, I'll bring up this thought:
Don't Craftsman tools have lifetime warranties?

...
Frank_v7.0 - 05 Mar 2008 01:13 GMT
>> Thanks for the advice, guys.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> ...
I guess the car jack isn't a "tool". Only one year warranty.

http://www.sears.com/shc/s/p_10153_12605_00950524000P?vName=Gifts&cName=Birthday
&sName=All&psid=FROOGLE01&sid=IDx20070921x00003a


Signature

FRH

Earle Horton - 05 Mar 2008 02:34 GMT
>>Thanks for the advice, guys.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> ...
Just the hand tools, wrenches, hammers, screwdrivers that sort of thing.
Most anything with moving parts, an electric motor or hydraulics is not
included.

Saludos,

Earle
XS11E - 05 Mar 2008 04:53 GMT
>> Without looking into any previous replies, I'll bring up this
>> thought: Don't Craftsman tools have lifetime warranties?
>> ...
> Just the hand tools, wrenches, hammers, screwdrivers that sort of
> thing. Most anything with moving parts, an electric motor or
> hydraulics is not included.

But it doesn't hurt to ask, who knows?  They're pretty serious about
customer relations.


Signature

XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org

aetmos - 05 Mar 2008 05:30 GMT
> But it doesn't hurt to ask, who knows?  They're pretty serious about
> customer relations.

Oh, I asked. Their floor-jacks have a 1-year warranty, and they didn't
offer me anything beyond that...Earle is correct, though, if the tool
has moving parts and isn't a socket wrench, it probably isn't covered
under the lifetime warranty.
Earle Horton - 05 Mar 2008 06:24 GMT
>> But it doesn't hurt to ask, who knows? They're pretty serious about
>> customer relations.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> has moving parts and isn't a socket wrench, it probably isn't covered
> under the lifetime warranty.

Too bad L. L. Bean doesn't sell floor jacks.  I checked the Sears Parts site
for my floor jack after reading this thread, and they don't even sell parts
for it.

Saludos,

Earle

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

PeterD - 05 Mar 2008 13:50 GMT
>>Thanks for the advice, guys.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>...

Craftsman *HAND* tools do, but other tools do not... Wish they did,
I'd buy more of their power tools then.

And to respond to someone else thinking that a floor jack should last
20 years... Not in my experience! Professional mechanics that I know
all seem to see them lasting about 4 to 5 years max.
aetmos - 05 Mar 2008 15:13 GMT
> And to respond to someone else thinking that a floor jack should last
> 20 years... Not in my experience! Professional mechanics that I know
> all seem to see them lasting about 4 to 5 years max.

Really? I guess that's about how long my jack lasted, but is that
really everybody's experience here? My dad has a Craftsman jack he
bought something like 25 years ago. I was hoping to get something with
that sort of longevity...

Tom
L.W.(ßill)Hughes III - 05 Mar 2008 16:31 GMT
They were pre- Chinese. The old shops we see still have their original
1920s vintage. All that ever wears out is an O ring. Of course, the size
must be perfect, none of this un-American centimeter crapola:
http://www.billhughes.com/temp/Orings.jpg
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
       mailto:BillHughes@billhughes.com

> > And to respond to someone else thinking that a floor jack should last
> > 20 years... Not in my experience! Professional mechanics that I know
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Tom

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

aetmos - 05 Mar 2008 17:04 GMT
On Mar 5, 10:31 am, "L.W.\(ßill\)Hughes III"
<BillHug...@billhughes.com> wrote:
>     They were pre- Chinese. The old shops we see still have their original
> 1920s vintage.

Yeah, the Chinese Craftsman jacks seem to be crap. I almost chalked my
experience up to bad luck and bought another one because they were on
sale a week ago, but then I read the reviews online. Seems just about
everyone has the exact same problem. The seals blow out, sometimes
within a few months...I guess I had pretty good luck with it lasting 4
years. Then again, I'm no professional. I only use it maybe 10 times a
year. Are there still any "Made in the USA" or at least "Made
Somewhere with Good Quality Control Standards" floor jacks?

> With a proper floor jack, I only have to raise my axle 2" or so to
> change a tire, not jack the bumper 3' or more in the air to get the
> spring loaded wheel up off the ground.

I've always wondered if it's okay to lift it by the axle. I always
lift from the jack points on the frame. Good to know I can use the
axle. Though, not on the pumpkin, I guess.

Thanks,
Tom
Mike Romain - 05 Mar 2008 17:42 GMT
> On Mar 5, 10:31 am, "L.W.\(ßill\)Hughes III"
> <BillHug...@billhughes.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Thanks,
> Tom

Correct, the pumpkin appears to be dangerous on some of the new units,
they can't hold the vehicle's weight.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
'New' frame in the works for '08.  Some Canadian Bush Trip and Build
Photos: http://mikeromainjeeptrips.shutterfly.com
L.W.(ßill)Hughes III - 05 Mar 2008 17:43 GMT
Can't go wrong there: http://www.billhughes.com/temp/WJjackPoints.pdf
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
       mailto:BillHughes@billhughes.com

Yeah, the Chinese Craftsman jacks seem to be crap. I almost chalked my
experience up to bad luck and bought another one because they were on
sale a week ago, but then I read the reviews online. Seems just about
everyone has the exact same problem. The seals blow out, sometimes
within a few months...I guess I had pretty good luck with it lasting 4
years. Then again, I'm no professional. I only use it maybe 10 times a
year. Are there still any "Made in the USA" or at least "Made
Somewhere with Good Quality Control Standards" floor jacks?

I've always wondered if it's okay to lift it by the axle. I always
lift from the jack points on the frame. Good to know I can use the
axle. Though, not on the pumpkin, I guess.

Thanks,
Tom

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

aetmos - 05 Mar 2008 18:38 GMT
On Mar 5, 11:43 am, "L.W.\(ßill\)Hughes III"
<BillHug...@billhughes.com> wrote:
>       Can't go wrong there:http://www.billhughes.com/temp/WJjackPoints.pdf

Wait, this seems to be saying no to jack up a Jeep on the axle. So the
frame is the only safe lift point?

Thanks,
Tom
Earle Horton - 05 Mar 2008 19:52 GMT
> On Mar 5, 11:43 am, "L.W.\(ßill\)Hughes III"
> <BillHug...@billhughes.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Thanks,
> Tom

That's what it says.  I gotta be skeptical that the axle tubes can't handle
it, but that's what it says.  The danger is probably that people will put
them too far inboard, and the cheap aluminum pumpkin will stress out.  Or
maybe, you know how clumsy some people are, that the axle tube would slip
off the jack pad.  I put a jack under the U-bolts or shock hangers on my
Wrangler, but you don't have a Wrangler.  Hell I put it under the pumpkin
sometimes, but I have a steel pumpkin.

My Chinese Craftsman jack lasted at least thirteen years, and I picked up
lots of things with it that I guess shouldn't have.  It still works, but it
leaks.

Cheers,

Earle

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Mike Romain - 05 Mar 2008 20:33 GMT
>> On Mar 5, 11:43 am, "L.W.\(ßill\)Hughes III"
>> <BillHug...@billhughes.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Earle

Ya but that is not what it 'shows' in the diagram 'and' it's thee
aluminum WJ one they are referring to.  The diagram shows the rear axle
tubes or the spring mounts being used in the rear.

Does the person asking have a WJ?  If not....

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
'New' frame in the works for '08.  Some Canadian Bush Trip and Build
Photos: http://mikeromainjeeptrips.shutterfly.com
Earle Horton - 06 Mar 2008 01:50 GMT
>>> On Mar 5, 11:43 am, "L.W.\(ßill\)Hughes III"
>>> <BillHug...@billhughes.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Does the person asking have a WJ?  If not....

His wife's got some kind of GC.  These threads do get long sometimes.

Earle
L.W.(ßill)Hughes III - 06 Mar 2008 02:48 GMT
Hi Earle,
   It's an 04:
news:dd47008b-5dca-4b9f-92a4-45a7f286f9b3@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
       mailto:BillHughes@billhughes.com
 http://www.billhughes.com/jeep_bookmark.htm

"Earle Horton" <earleh_nospam@live.com> wrote in message news:fqnio5$4m7

> His wife's got some kind of GC.  These threads do get long sometimes.
>
> Earle

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

aetmos - 06 Mar 2008 04:47 GMT
Yes, it's an '04 Grand Cherokee, so yes, a WJ. From the picture, I
guess it's okay to jack it up from the outer edge of the rear axle,
but not the front. I suppose that makes sense, since the front is
likely heavier...

Thanks,
Tom

On Mar 5, 8:48 pm, "L.W.\(ßill\)Hughes III"
<BillHug...@billhughes.com> wrote:
> Hi Earle,
>     It's an 04:news:dd47008b-5dca-4b9f-92a4-45a7f286f9b3@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
Dave Milne - 07 Mar 2008 08:56 GMT
A vehicle that you can't ground on the pumpkin, presumably a scenario they
never considered.

"Trail Rated" bwahaahaa. Its not like Jeep don't know how to do it - they
built the Wagoneer after all !

Dave Milne, Scotland

> > On Mar 5, 11:43 am, "L.W.\(ßill\)Hughes III"
> > <BillHug...@billhughes.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Earle
aetmos - 07 Mar 2008 15:28 GMT
> "Trail Rated" bwahaahaa. Its not like Jeep don't know how to do it - they
> built the Wagoneer after all !

Well, they never say what the rating is, or who rated it...I imagine
they assume that most people, myself included, use the 4WD mainly to
cope with bad winters, rather than ever actually going off road in a
Grand Cherokee...

Tom
Lon - 07 Mar 2008 17:28 GMT
>> "Trail Rated" bwahaahaa. Its not like Jeep don't know how to do it - they
>> built the Wagoneer after all !
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> cope with bad winters, rather than ever actually going off road in a
> Grand Cherokee...

You can go offroad in a Grand.  More importantly, you can even get back
ON road.   But then unless you are talking about serious no-trail
terrain, so can a lot more vehicles than is commonly claimed.
L.W.(ßill)Hughes III - 08 Mar 2008 18:26 GMT
The Libby can't even traverse a dirt road:
http://www.billhughes.com/temp/LibertyAndTraction.mpeg
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
       mailto:BillHughes@billhughes.com

> You can go offroad in a Grand.  More importantly, you can even get back
> ON road.   But then unless you are talking about serious no-trail
> terrain, so can a lot more vehicles than is commonly claimed.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Socks - 08 Mar 2008 20:46 GMT
How many you tube video's did you have to watch before you found one
that fit your criteria?
In that particular clip it's more
like the vehicle operator doesn't know how to operate the vehicle!
There are plenty more movie clips where Liberty's show that they
can tackle much more demanding terrain.
L.W.(ßill)Hughes III - 08 Mar 2008 22:31 GMT
Real Jeepers volunteer that info. And that's where I got it, from this
group.
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
       mailto:BillHughes@billhughes.com
 http://www.billhughes.com/jeep_bookmark.htm

> How many you tube video's did you have to watch before you found one
> that fit your criteria?
> In that particular clip it's more
> like the vehicle operator doesn't know how to operate the vehicle!
> There are plenty more movie clips where Liberty's show that they
> can tackle much more demanding terrain.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Earle Horton - 07 Mar 2008 16:02 GMT
I understand that "Trail Rated" means they can take it up the Rubicon in
California under its own power.  I have taken my stock Wrangler down
Poughkeepsie Gulch in Colorado, supposedly rated "expert" terrain.  I didn't
find it necessary to ground on the pumpkin, but I am on my third exhaust
system now.  Most Wagoneer's never saw dirt either.

Cheers,

Earle

> A vehicle that you can't ground on the pumpkin, presumably a scenario they
> never considered.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>>
>> Earle

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Earle Horton - 07 Mar 2008 16:26 GMT
"Most Wagoneers".  This common American spelling error is getting to me too.
Are they doing that in England too?

Earle

> I understand that "Trail Rated" means they can take it up the Rubicon in
> California under its own power.  I have taken my stock Wrangler down
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>>>
>>> Earle
Dave Milne - 07 Mar 2008 18:23 GMT
Assuredly, we are the most illiterate nation on earth. Having refused to
learn any other language, we are now refusing to learn our own.
Grammar isn't taught in schools any more, but what's the betting you will be
able to get a "qualification" in "txting" in a few years time ?

Out of interest, "Wagon" is spelled "Waggon" over here. Or you say
"spelled", but I say "spelt" (cf US "learned" v British "learnt").

Dave

> "Most Wagoneers".  This common American spelling error is getting to me too.
> Are they doing that in England too?
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> >>
> >>> "aetmos" <googlegroups@gersic.com> wrote in message

news:d5d7fe10-ba21-48a3-ab2f-3e8ceb14a8e5@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> >>> > On Mar 5, 11:43 am, "L.W.\(ßill\)Hughes III"
> >>> > <BillHug...@billhughes.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> >>>
> >>> Earle
Earle Horton - 07 Mar 2008 19:13 GMT
Funny I say "burnt" even though I know it sounds British.  I say "learnt" or
even "larnt" too, because over here it sounds "country".  I know people who
say "knowed".

Cheers,

Earle

> Assuredly, we are the most illiterate nation on earth. Having refused to
> learn any other language, we are now refusing to learn our own.
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>> >>>
>> >>> Earle

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

aetmos - 07 Mar 2008 19:21 GMT
> "Most Wagoneers".  This common American spelling error is getting to me too.
> Are they doing that in England too?

I'm sorry, maybe I'm showing my Americanity but what's the error? Do
you want it to be spelled "Wagonneer", with a double 'n'?  Wikipedia
and Google seem to think a single 'n' is correct:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeep_Wagoneer

I guess the original posting incorrectly put an apostrophe between the
'r' and the 's', but that's hardly an American-only mistake.

Tom
Earle Horton - 07 Mar 2008 19:25 GMT
>> "Most Wagoneers".  This common American spelling error is getting to me
>> too.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I guess the original posting incorrectly put an apostrophe between the
> 'r' and the 's', but that's hardly an American-only mistake.

So they're all doing it?  It is no doubt a harbinger of the end of
civilization as we know it.  Gonna miss it.  On the bright side
reincarnation is just a crazy Hindu idea and I won't live to see it.

Cheer's,

Earle

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Mike Romain - 07 Mar 2008 19:28 GMT
>> "Most Wagoneers".  This common American spelling error is getting to me too.
>> Are they doing that in England too?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Tom

I used to own a waggon.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
'New' frame in the works for '08.  Some Canadian Bush Trip and Build
Photos: http://mikeromainjeeptrips.shutterfly.com
aetmos - 07 Mar 2008 19:37 GMT
> I used to own a waggon.

Well, that's just an American / British spelling thing. My son's Radio
Flyer wagon says "wagon" on it...I mean, you guys can't spell "color"
correctly, either ;-)

Tom
Dave Milne - 08 Mar 2008 12:51 GMT
Yes, color one you take straight from the Latin. I drive my mum nuts by
saying schedule "skedule" the way you do, as opposed to the British
"shedule", as it comes from the Greek work skede meaning a parchment.

Dave

"aetmos" <googlegroups@gersic.com> wrote in message
news:1817deb2-4a77-4c67-824b-
> Well, that's just an American / British spelling thing. My son's Radio
> Flyer wagon says "wagon" on it...I mean, you guys can't spell "color"
> correctly, either ;-)
>
> Tom
PeterD - 08 Mar 2008 23:02 GMT
>Yes, color one you take straight from the Latin. I drive my mum nuts by
>saying schedule "skedule" the way you do, as opposed to the British
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>> Tom

There is no 'Q' in coupon, either!
Earle Horton - 09 Mar 2008 04:14 GMT
>>Yes, color one you take straight from the Latin. I drive my mum nuts by
>>saying schedule "skedule" the way you do, as opposed to the British
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> There is no 'Q' in coupon, either!

My dictionary says "coopon" and "cyoopon" are both allowable.  I blame the
under-fifty crowd.  "Jewlery" is OK too, as is "noocyooler".

Cheer's

Earle
PeterD - 09 Mar 2008 14:08 GMT
>>>Yes, color one you take straight from the Latin. I drive my mum nuts by
>>>saying schedule "skedule" the way you do, as opposed to the British
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>Earle

EverytimeI hear "Qupon" I want to scream: "There is no Q in coupon!"
<g>
Dave Milne - 09 Mar 2008 15:21 GMT
I can honestly say I've never heard the qupon bit.

Dave

> >>>Yes, color one you take straight from the Latin. I drive my mum nuts by
> >>>saying schedule "skedule" the way you do, as opposed to the British
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> EverytimeI hear "Qupon" I want to scream: "There is no Q in coupon!"
> <g>
L.W.(ßill)Hughes III - 09 Mar 2008 19:54 GMT
And we thought you were Scottish. ;-)
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
       mailto:BillHughes@billhughes.com
 http://www.billhughes.com/jeep_bookmark.htm

> I can honestly say I've never heard the qupon bit.
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> > EverytimeI hear "Qupon" I want to scream: "There is no Q in coupon!"
> > <g>

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Earle Horton - 10 Mar 2008 00:24 GMT
http://www.bartleby.com/61/58/C0695800.html

The second pronunciation is fast becoming the more accepted one in the
colonies.  It is the sad consequence of too much BBC viewing, I think.

http://www.bartleby.com/61/48/N0084800.html

Earle

> I can honestly say I've never heard the qupon bit.
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>> EverytimeI hear "Qupon" I want to scream: "There is no Q in coupon!"
>> <g>
Socks - 10 Mar 2008 02:48 GMT
What about people who say Chewsday instead of Tuesday!
Where do they get Chew out of Tues as in 2's
Lazy people.
Dave Milne - 07 Mar 2008 18:25 GMT
That's my point Earle - Wagonneers didn't see much dirt, but they still came
with F & R iron D44s that you could jack up under the pumpkin, and if you
were gormless enough to ground one on the pumpkin it wasn't likely break
your tubes.

Dave

> I understand that "Trail Rated" means they can take it up the Rubicon in
> California under its own power.  I have taken my stock Wrangler down
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> >
> >> "aetmos" <googlegroups@gersic.com> wrote in message

news:d5d7fe10-ba21-48a3-ab2f-3e8ceb14a8e5@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> >> > On Mar 5, 11:43 am, "L.W.\(ßill\)Hughes III"
> >> > <BillHug...@billhughes.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> >>
> >> Earle
L.W.(ßill)Hughes III - 08 Mar 2008 18:12 GMT
Hi Dave,
   But it fits my belief that the Germans via Daimler won't rest until they
have destroyed the Real Jeep that won the War!
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
       mailto:BillHughes@billhughes.com
 http://www.billhughes.com/jeep_bookmark.htm

> A vehicle that you can't ground on the pumpkin, presumably a scenario they
> never considered.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Lon - 07 Mar 2008 17:05 GMT
>> And to respond to someone else thinking that a floor jack should last
>> 20 years... Not in my experience! Professional mechanics that I know
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> bought something like 25 years ago. I was hoping to get something with
> that sort of longevity...

I have a 40 year old Sears jack that still works like a charm and has
only needed a few drops of fluid in that 40 years.

I also have a 10 year old floor jack that lasted about 2 years before it
quit jacking and the internal seals are of such shoddy construction it
isn't worth the cost of an o-ring to rebuild.

I have that Sears SUV extra lift jack, hope it lasts at least a couple
years, but I must say it is of nowhere near the simplicity and
construction quality of that 40 year old unit that I suspect could
survive a nuke.  The SUV jack is nice in that it allows a quick change
of winter to summer tires since I am too poor to be able to install a
professional chassis jack in the garage.
L.W.(ßill)Hughes III - 08 Mar 2008 18:38 GMT
Order a box of assorted O-rings and hope they weren't made in China,
too:  http://www1.mscdirect.com/CGI/N2DRVSH?PMSECT=2008295
http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/04-html/4-9.html
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
       mailto:BillHughes@billhughes.com
 http://www.billhughes.com/jeep_bookmark.htm

> >> And to respond to someone else thinking that a floor jack should last
> >> 20 years... Not in my experience! Professional mechanics that I know
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> of winter to summer tires since I am too poor to be able to install a
> professional chassis jack in the garage.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Earle Horton - 05 Mar 2008 15:25 GMT
>>>Thanks for the advice, guys.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> 20 years... Not in my experience! Professional mechanics that I know
> all seem to see them lasting about 4 to 5 years max.

Mine still works but leaks from the pump, and apparently there is no way to
buy a seal for it.  We are talking occasional home use here.  Yeah, a
professional would expect to get less time out of one, if he is picking up
cars every day with it.

Earle

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Old Crow - 06 Mar 2008 10:47 GMT
>>>>Thanks for the advice, guys.
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>Earle

I've got a 2 1/2 ton that I bought from Harbour Freight about 15 years
ago.  I've added oil one time.  It's gotten left out in the rain,
snowed on, and dropped off the tailgate of a truck.  Still works just
fine.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Earle Horton - 04 Mar 2008 19:20 GMT
"Lasts a long time" and "fairly light" at the same time, does not compute.
Aluminum is lighter than iron, but it is not as good.  Titanium is lighter
than iron, but it is expensive.  You can get parts for just about anything
ever made or sold by Sears at http://www.searspartsdirect.com.  As Bill
seems to say a floor jack doesn't have to be light as long as it rolls easy.

If you are going to transport this jack from place to place perhaps a
hydraulic post jack would be better suited.  Or maybe a Hi-Lift jack with a
bumper mount.

Cheers,

Earle

> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Thanks,
> Tom
aetmos - 04 Mar 2008 21:18 GMT
> You can get parts for just about anything
> ever made or sold by Sears athttp://www.searspartsdirect.com.

Thank you for the link. Unless I'm doing something incorrectly, I
can't find any floor jacks in the database, though.

> "Lasts a long time" and "fairly light" at the same time, does not compute.
> Aluminum is lighter than iron, but it is not as good.

That's not necessarily true. I have a steel floor jack, but the fact
that it's made from steel didn't keep poor hydraulic engineering from
causing it to fail. I don't see any particular reason a good aluminum
jack couldn't last the 20-30 years that I hope for it to last.

Thanks,
Tom
Earle Horton - 04 Mar 2008 22:23 GMT
>> You can get parts for just about anything
>> ever made or sold by Sears athttp://www.searspartsdirect.com.
>
> Thank you for the link. Unless I'm doing something incorrectly, I
> can't find any floor jacks in the database, though.

There should be an identification plate on the jack, with a "Model Number".
Mine looks like "214.50114".  Go to "Find a Part ->", click on "Model
Number" and enter your model number in the search box.  If all else fails
try the "Contact us" link.  They do answer their E-Mail.

>> "Lasts a long time" and "fairly light" at the same time, does not
>> compute.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> causing it to fail. I don't see any particular reason a good aluminum
> jack couldn't last the 20-30 years that I hope for it to last.

I had to junk a floor jack with perfectly good hydraulics once, because the
cantilever bars (something like that) stretched under use.  Aluminum is even
more vulnerable to this type of damage than steel is.  And don't even talk
about threaded holes in aluminum.   If they made them out of titanium that
would be great.

Earle
Herb Leong - 05 Mar 2008 01:31 GMT
#Hi All,
#
#I'm looking for a new floor jack to use primarily with my wife's '04
#Jeep Grand Cherokee. I had a Craftsman SUV jack until it spewed oil
#and collapsed the other day. I need to carry it fairly frequently, so
#I need something fairly light, but also tall enough to lift a Jeep in
#the air. Any recommendations? I'm thinking of going with the Arcan
#Aluminum:
#
#http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/product_6970_200345428_200
345428

#
#At 19.25", it's the tallest aluminum jack I can find for around $200,
#but I'm also considering the Torin 2.5 Ton Aluminum (18.25") and the
#Jegs Aluminum (17.75").
#
#What do you all use? What's the minimum height that I should go for?
#My old jack goes to 21", but I don't think I've ever had it all the
#way up. Most of all, I want a jack that will last a long time. I
#couldn't believe it when my Craftsman jack died after only a few
#years. Apparently, all of their newer jacks have the same basic
#problem. ;-(

I use a hi-lift.  If you don't have a good place on your body or bumper
to lift on, hi-lift makes a adapter to use the rim.  Then you would slide
a jack stand under the axle (or jack point) and lower it on to the stand.

http://www.hi-lift.com/products/liftmate.htm

/herb
Mike Romain - 05 Mar 2008 14:52 GMT
> #Hi All,
> #
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> /herb

I personally do not believe those farm tools better known as 'Widow
Makers' have any business near a Jeep.

Some poor farm boy who couldn't afford a real jack or a winch got
inventive and came up with all kinds of way to kill yourself with them.

The last one I used was brand freaking new and some sucker was convinced
it was a 'proper' thing to use so we did.  I preferred to be on the
handle end rather than being the idiot reaching under to hook up the
chain on this derelict car we were dragging out of the bush on a clean
up day.   Well when I 'carefully' let go of the handle and thankfully
started to turn away when this damn thing went almost ballistic with the
handle just skimming my ear.

Another poor sole in the Nova Scotia Jeep club as was reported here a
bit ago, also a very experienced person from the report, recently lost
an eye the same way.

I showed up to help another Jeeper with blown front wheel bearings and
he was working under the damn Jeep with it 'wayyyy' up in the air on a
Jack All.  I just about sh.t.  He was 100% convinced it was the 'proper'
tool to be using....

Think of it this way, those 'old fashioned' 'bumper jacks' that had to
also lift a vehicle 3'-4' in the air like a Jack All to get clearance to
remove a tire are no longer sold or come with vehicles!  They are just
plain too dangerous.

With a proper floor jack, I only have to raise my axle 2" or so to
change a tire, not jack the bumper 3' or more in the air to get the
spring loaded wheel up off the ground.

The original Jack-All or it's imitation, the High Lift are 'great' farm
tools, they pull fence posts, lift buildings so new foundations can go
under and even work for the railroad workers lifting boxcars up for
repairs or new wheels, but under a Jeep, nope.

I carry a 2 ton floor jack tucked behind the passenger seat.  It is
locked in place and works well.

Just my $0.02

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
'New' frame in the works for '08.  Some Canadian Bush Trip and Build
Photos: http://mikeromainjeeptrips.shutterfly.com
noneofyourbusiness - 06 Mar 2008 01:12 GMT
[snip]

>I personally do not believe those farm tools better known as 'Widow
>Makers' have any business near a Jeep.

I've never heard anyone else decry the value of a Hi-lift jack.
(You WERE referring to those common jacks many off-roaders have on
their bumpers, right?...if not, "nevermind"!)

I got a flat tire this weekend (out by the Salton Sea), and for some
reason thought it was a bad idea to put the stock Jeep floor jack
under the axle. After maxing the jacks travel (while under the frame),
it came up half an inch short of getting the spare tire on :(

Used my friends Hi-lift jack (placed in a notched area along the edge
of the body) to get the Jeep lifted the last inch or so.

Other than some minor denting in the door (fender?) panel, it worked
just fine.

[snip]

>Just my $0.02
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>'New' frame in the works for '08.  Some Canadian Bush Trip and Build
>Photos: http://mikeromainjeeptrips.shutterfly.com

...
L.W.(ßill)Hughes III - 06 Mar 2008 02:45 GMT
It requires a lot of respect:
http://billhughes.com/mirror/HiLift/index.htm
       God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
       mailto:BillHughes@billhughes.com
 http://www.billhughes.com/jeep_bookmark.htm

> I've never heard anyone else decry the value of a Hi-lift jack.
> (You WERE referring to those common jacks many off-roaders have on
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Other than some minor denting in the door (fender?) panel, it worked
> just fine.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

L.W.(ßill)Hughes III - 09 Mar 2008 20:01 GMT
http://www.billhughes.com/temp/JackExplodes.mpg

>     It requires a lot of respect:
> http://billhughes.com/mirror/HiLift/index.htm
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> > Other than some minor denting in the door (fender?) panel, it worked
> > just fine.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Old Crow - 06 Mar 2008 10:52 GMT
>[snip]
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>(You WERE referring to those common jacks many off-roaders have on
>their bumpers, right?...if not, "nevermind"!)

I'm with Mike on this one.  My boss uses one under the front of his
car trailer to lower the back end of the trailer when loading low
clearance vehicles.  The damn thing has about killed me twice.  He's
also convinced that there is no better tool for the job.
Oh well, at least when I *do* get hurt it'll be on workman's comp.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

PeterD - 06 Mar 2008 13:32 GMT
>  He's
>also convinced that there is no better tool for the job.
>Oh well, at least when I *do* get hurt it'll be on workman's comp.

1. I'm convinced there is no worse tool for the job.

2. If you survive intact... Generally lost body parts cannot be
replaced!
PeterD - 06 Mar 2008 13:31 GMT
>[snip]
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>(You WERE referring to those common jacks many off-roaders have on
>their bumpers, right?...if not, "nevermind"!)

I've watched Hi-Lift jacks bend double at well under their rated load.
There is no way that a Hi-Lift (or similar) is a safe jacking tool,
and they need to be treated with *extreme* caution if used.

I also carry a floor jack. I've had wheelers laugh at me ("Hey, get a
Hi-Lift..."). That is until I manage to rescue one of them when either
the highlift would not work properly, or broke...

However nothing can beat a Hi-Lift jack for stretching fence wire, or
pulling fence posts...
nrs - 06 Mar 2008 17:06 GMT
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:12:21 -0800, noneofyourbusiness
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> However nothing can beat a Hi-Lift jack for stretching fence wire, or
> pulling fence posts...

I've decided not to use a Hi-Lift based on comments from this group.
Got the 2 ton floor jack, almost never use it anyway.
ufatbastehd - 06 Mar 2008 17:42 GMT
> > On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:12:21 -0800, noneofyourbusiness
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> I've decided not to use a Hi-Lift based on comments from this group.
> Got the 2 ton floor jack, almost never use it anyway.

I have both a 2 ton and a hi lift.  I've only used the hi lift to lift
my body of the frame when installing my body lift.
Socks - 05 Mar 2008 23:26 GMT
Good day,
Back in 1985 my whole family pooled together and bought me a
wretchedly expensive SnapOn Long chassis service jack(Floor jack).
10 ton lifting capacity and a 27 inch maximum lift capacity.
I have treated this piece of equipment like it's an investment and    
have religiously serviced and maintained it over the last 20 years.
Granted, they spent well over $1000.00 to $1500.00 back then.
The old saying "You get what you pay for!" Holds true.

Ry'
nrs - 06 Mar 2008 17:04 GMT
> Good day,
> Back in 1985 my whole family pooled together and bought me a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Ry'

Hey I need one of those to test my Jeep's flex!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.