I am just thinking about the force of the roller bearing onto the race face.
To me this 175 foot pounds that the book calls for is a lot more then that
used on the Timken bearing on the spindle of an old Chevy drum break
assembly. As a matter of a fact they only had a 25 inch pound torque
requirement, so for me I see 175 foot pounds as a lot of pre load on two
roller bearing. I can only suspect that inside this assembly must be a
precision ground spacer that is actually sharing the load. Does anyone know?
> Hows this so unbelievable??
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> >
> > Thanks
L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III - 19 Apr 2004 04:37 GMT
The axle nut has nothing to with the ball bears setup they are
pressed on to the pipe thingie you call a hub and all you're doing is
securing the axle to it, just like these little front wheel drive rice
burners: http://www.billhughes.com/Dana30hub.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:LWHughes3rd@aol.com
> I am just thinking about the force of the roller bearing onto the race face.
> To me this 175 foot pounds that the book calls for is a lot more then that
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> > >
> > > Thanks
nvrpc - 19 Apr 2004 12:40 GMT
Thanks Bill Now that makes me feel much better. It is exactly how I was
hoping. Thanks
> The axle nut has nothing to with the ball bears setup they are
> pressed on to the pipe thingie you call a hub and all you're doing is
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
Mike Romain - 19 Apr 2004 20:23 GMT
The center spindle bolts solid to the axle. This does not load the
bearing in any way.
When I do u-joints, I don't even bother undoing that nut.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> I am just thinking about the force of the roller bearing onto the race face.
> To me this 175 foot pounds that the book calls for is a lot more then that
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> > >
> > > Thanks