Overall the car is excellent. The two negatives are slightly lower
gas milage then I would like, and the 4 is slightly underpowered for
the car. We have had the car for 2 months now, so far so good.
Quality is greatly improved from the 2001 model year, and the sticker
has not changed drastically. Lots of features which are extras on
Camrys and Accords, are standard on the Optima
Quality greatly improved from 2001 model? in what way? I have no complaints
on my 2001 expect brake squeal.The biggest downside,as you will find ,Doug
is the cars sure don't hold their value.A 2003 figures to drop at least
$5,000in blue book value in the first 2 years,depending on mileage,options
and the overall shape of vehicle. I got a letter from KIA last year telling
me that the original size of my engine was slightly smaller than what they
stated.For this,they offered to extend my 100,000 warranty on powertrain to
120,000 miles.I thought that was nice of them.So I'm still covered for
another 72,000 miles yet.As far as gas mileage,I foundit odd that most are
saying the 2003 4cyl. gets sub-par mileage.I get 25 in the city and 32-33 on
the highway and I havent even need a tuneup yet (48,000 miles)
> Overall the car is excellent. The two negatives are slightly lower
> gas milage then I would like, and the 4 is slightly underpowered for
> the car. We have had the car for 2 months now, so far so good.
> Quality is greatly improved from the 2001 model year, and the sticker
> has not changed drastically. Lots of features which are extras on
> Camrys and Accords, are standard on the Optima
termin8or - 28 Oct 2004 05:35 GMT
Value? Compare the KIA to a Buick . About the same. They all depreciate too
much but I think you will be suprised at how the KIA compares with others.
About the same.