Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Kia Cars / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

60k timing built, when did you change yours?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
bob - 07 Jan 2007 23:49 GMT
Hi folks, Just want to get a feel from the group when everyone changed or
even did there timing built, we all know it is recommended to do at 60k,
just want to see the results, also if you did do it how much $$$ ?
Charlie Morgan - 08 Jan 2007 03:44 GMT
>Hi folks, Just want to get a feel from the group when everyone changed or
>even did there timing built, we all know it is recommended to do at 60k,
>just want to see the results, also if you did do it how much $$$ ?

Service departments would LOVE for everybody to think that 60k is the magic
number for changing the timing belt. It's a very profitable job. If you read
further in the literature, you'll find that the 60K figure refers to cars that
have been used as taxi cabs in stop and go traffic in India. If your miles are
more of the low stress highway variety, then the 60k  figure is meaningless.
They don't offer a mileage number for cars that are used for mixed city/highway
driving, but I would guess that you could go 80k or 90k easily. No science to
that, but there is truly no science to the 60k figure either.

The problem is that the timing belt does not give ANY symptoms before failing.
When it fails, it takes out the whole engine.

Changing the timing belt is about a $200. job. The parts are about $35. If it
fails the engine repairs will top 3K. Your choice

CWM
Steve - 08 Jan 2007 12:48 GMT
The recommended mileage to change a timing belt in Kia vehicles, used
for normal daily use is 96,000 km.  Some models have what are called
interferance engines (belt breaks, engine breaks).  The 2001 - 2005
Rio's are one of these..

FYI

Steve

> >Hi folks, Just want to get a feel from the group when everyone changed or
> >even did there timing built, we all know it is recommended to do at 60k,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> CWM
Don - 08 Jan 2007 19:29 GMT
I wish I could find someone here to change a timing belt for $200.
It's more like $600 to $800 here, including the replacement of the
water pump.

I'm seriously thinking about tackling the job myself.  I just completed
replacing the head gaskets, water pump, fuel injector 0-rings,
serpentine belt, and a myriad number of other things on my wife's Dodge
Caravan 3.3L V6, so if I can do that successfully, I should be able to
replace a timing belt on an Inline 4!

> >Hi folks, Just want to get a feel from the group when everyone changed or
> >even did there timing built, we all know it is recommended to do at 60k,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> CWM
Rev. Tom Wenndt - 08 Jan 2007 21:37 GMT
The cost of replacing a timing belt is not fixed, nor is the "truly
recommendable" interval.

Some cars are hard on timing belts and often don't make it to 50,000 miles
(80,000 km).  Others can go well over 100,000 (160,000 km).

$600 to $800 can be a pretty reasonable price on some V-6 engines.  The
Sedona is one where there is just no space to work on anything.  You have to
take off several parts you ordinarily wouldn't just for access to the
engine.

But an in-line 4 should not cost $600-$800.  That should be a relatively
basic job.  And if you have changed a head gasket, you may want to try it.

But be careful, especially with getting everything associated with that belt
lined up perfectly.  I have heard of people having numerous problems when
the job wasn't done exactly right. Only thing you could do if it was done
wrong is to do the job over again.

BTW, what is the vehicle you are wanting to do the work on?  Knowing that
would help.

Tom Wenndt

>I wish I could find someone here to change a timing belt for $200.
> It's more like $600 to $800 here, including the replacement of the
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>>
>> CWM
Don - 08 Jan 2007 22:34 GMT
Eventually - a 2006 Elantra with the Beta 2.0L Inline 4.  I won't be in
the mileage range for replacement for some time, but was just
wondering.

My son just had his timing belt replaced on his Mitsubishi Galant with
the 2.4L Inline 4, and it came to a total of a tad over $900.  I
thought this was absurd, as the only parts replaced were the belt and
related water pump, gaskets, etc.  But, mechanics here get in the range
of $80 to $90 hour at most shops.

There's got to be a cheaper way, but I'm not going to mess with
something that could destroy an interference engine like the one on the
Elantra.

> The cost of replacing a timing belt is not fixed, nor is the "truly
> recommendable" interval.
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
> >>
> >> CWM
Steve - 09 Jan 2007 12:17 GMT
Just for your information, the Beta 2.0l four used in the Elantra and
Spectra has a belt change interval of 96,000km.  The pricing here in
Ontario is $449.95 + taxes (parts & labour).  We have never replaced
the waterpump on a Kia, and have never had a return for waterpump
replacement afterwards.  Actually our parts department dosen't even
keep the pumps in stock.  Shop your dealers for the price, and don't
expect to pay more than 4 hrs. labour.

FYI

Steve

> Eventually - a 2006 Elantra with the Beta 2.0L Inline 4.  I won't be in
> the mileage range for replacement for some time, but was just
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
> > >>
> > >> CWM
MJD - 08 Jan 2007 05:52 GMT
100K....looked like new.

> Hi folks, Just want to get a feel from the group when everyone changed or
> even did there timing built, we all know it is recommended to do at 60k,
> just want to see the results, also if you did do it how much $$$ ?
StLouisMike - 12 Jan 2007 03:34 GMT
> Hi folks, Just want to get a feel from the group when everyone changed or
> even did there timing built, we all know it is recommended to do at 60k,
> just want to see the results, also if you did do it how much $$$ ?

This timing belt thing seems to be quite the topic lately; for the
record -

1998 Kia Sportage - broke at 127K
2001 Kia Rio - still going at 145K when I traded it
1987 Toyota Supra - broke at 215K

60K for the timing belt is good to help the dealers get out of the
costly repairs that might otherwise HAVE to be covered by their
superficial 100K warranties. Toyota still covers, what? 3 yrs, 36K and
they can't built their cars fast enough. Go figger . . .
Speedy Pete - 10 Feb 2007 17:32 GMT
Yes you can get them to last more than 60k BUT I have the evidence of
what happens when you dont. I bought a car with 138k on it. Timing belt
was loose and had skipped and taken off ALL the heads on the exhaust
valves! Yes the motor is trash.

Replacement USED motor with 50k also has a VERY LOOSE timing belt.

I recommend checking your belt tension often based on these two.

-SP
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.