Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Kia Cars / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Kia reliability questions

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
snow - 18 Jul 2005 12:34 GMT
I am leaning towards purchasing a
Kia Sedona thanks to the current rebate
and sale plus the excellant warranty. My
major concern is long term reliabilty.
I usually keep a new vehicle for at least 10 years. Even with the 100,000
powertrain warantry, I still wonder about the long term life of the Sedona.
Most of today's vehicles easily last 150,000 or more miles if maintained
properly. Is the Kia capable of this? Any opinions appreciated since thre is
not much information on the internet on Kia long term reliability issues.
Tim Lapin - 18 Jul 2005 15:52 GMT
> I am leaning towards purchasing a
> Kia Sedona thanks to the current rebate
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> properly. Is the Kia capable of this? Any opinions appreciated since thre is
> not much information on the internet on Kia long term reliability issues.

Hi Snow,

As I pointed out in my last response to your queries, there are several
reviews out there dating back to 2002, the van's first year.  That being
said, 3 years is NOT what most people would call "long term" data so for any
further info you will have to venture off the shores of North America.  Kia
has several cars which are not seen here and might be duplicates of the
North American vehicles.  Perhaps their "foreign" van has been around longer.

As far as rebates go, I would simply contact a couple of dealers as well as
the national office.  By your email address, I take it you are American so
why not give Kia America (or whatever it is called) a phone call?

Hope this helps!

Signature

Tim Lapin
timl@sympatico.ca

Rev. Tom Wenndt - 18 Jul 2005 21:55 GMT
Having been a two-time Sedona owner, the answer, to me, is an unquestioned
'yes.'  There are some things to consider.

**I have NEVER used manufacturers oil change intervals, except possibly for
the "severe service" interval recommendations.  I have usually let the oil
tell me when it needs changed.  On both Sedonas, that has been at around
4000 miles.  And with the recent report in Consumer Reports on a lot of
(especially foreign) engines sludging, I would stick to that closely.  As an
additional suggestion, you should probably choose (as I have) synthetic oil
for your oil changes, especially if you can do them yourself.

**Like most import engines, the Sedona runs on a timing belt, a tedious
maintenance item that MUST be replaced by the recommended 60,000 mile
interval to keep the 100,000 mile warranty intact.  With the wear on this,
apparently it is VERY unwise to go more than the 60,000 miles.  So if you go
200,000 miles on this van, you will be replacing it three times.  At my
dealer, it is a flat $450 just to replace the belt, or $800 as a part of the
regular 60,000 mile maintenance service.

**In the day of much longer life fluid level maintenance intervals, the
Sedona's are still rather short - 30,000 on the transmission (an extremely
EASY job), and about the same on the coolant.

But realistically, you can look at these same items hanging over just about
all vehicles.  If you take care of them, they should take care of you.  In
the case of the Sedona, it will.

The last item to consider is the fact that the '06 will be a complete
re-design coming in the Fall.  The new van will be larger, more powerful,
with more convenience features.  But to begin with, incentives will not even
come close to what you can get on an '05, especially if you plan to keep it
a long time.  The decision between an older but established new van(meaning
the bugs have been worked out of it) and with incentives beyond excellent,
and a newly redesigned one that has better stuff but costs more and may not
have the kinks worked out of it is a decision you will have to make.

Hope this helps.

Thomas Wenndt
a.k.a. Green Valley Giant

>> I am leaning towards purchasing a
>> Kia Sedona thanks to the current rebate
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Hope this helps!
Reckerfox - 19 Jul 2005 05:37 GMT
"" wrote:
> Having been a two-time Sedona owner, the answer, to me, is an
> unquestioned
[quoted text clipped - 106 lines]
> >
> > Hope this helps!

I own a ’02 Kia Optima and will keep it a long time even thought I
plan on purchasing an Amanti in another year or so.  With Kia/Hyundai
engines improving greatly over the years, reliability has become less
of an issue when the vehicles are maintained according to Kia routine
schedules for oil changes, timing belt, etc.  I owned several Hyundai
vehicles since 1986 including the infamous Excels.  My last one was a
’89 Sonata.  I sold it with 89,000 miles on it and no problems.  My
’86 Excel was sold with 155,000 miles on.  Keep in mind those engines
weren’t very good to begin with back then.  The newer engines are very
good and Kia is seeing better reviews now because reliability is going
up.  I don’t worry about my Optima going 200,000.  It should
considering how I maintain it.  I be very surprised if it doesn’t! 8O
plitwack - 19 Jul 2005 17:35 GMT
Hi 'Snow"

Pray you never need anything but routine service!

We were raving fans of our 2003 Sedona until last September when the
battery blew up. Yes a Hydrogen Bomb under the hood. Check my posts
here from last month for the details. Here's the summary:

The car was in Kia garages for over 100 of 292 days (34%) and still is
not fixed - or safe to drive. And each time we received the car back,
within a day or two, the ORIGINAL problems continue: the car still
stalls frequently, sometimes many times an hour and the tachometer
still races without notice, lurching the car forward - once within
inches of a pertoleum truck!

We are still paying the lease but not driving the car for fear of
safety.

Kia has consistently demonstrtaed to us the model of how NOT to treat a
customer ... ever - right up to the CEO's office.

Example: the Kia representative from the CEO's office even called us
liars because their Kia diagnostics didn't register or confirm any of
our unsafe near-accidents. Until we delivered 47 witnessed incidents
over less than a month period. Months later they would reluctantly
admit their diagnostics COULD NOT pick up on corrossion related issues.

Excuse me ... Corrossion? That started when the battery blew up many
months earlier. Why did they only figure that out now?

Latest update:

The Kia Motors (Korean HQ) website invites you to write to them if not
receiving statisfaction from your dealer or country. Their response was
immediate, professional and helpful. Do write me at
kiafiasco@the-coach.com for the contact info for many Kia Motors HQ
senior people in Korea.

Except it got the locals angry we 'went over their heads' - even though
it was after 10 months of not receiving back a fixed car here. So now
they say they will only speak to us if we go to court or arbitration.

That's our sorry experience with Kia. We wish you and all motorists a
much safer, more customer-sensitive driving experience.

... Paul Litwack
June 2005: Selected one of the 'Top 100 Corporate Coaches in the World'
Rev. Tom Wenndt - 19 Jul 2005 19:29 GMT
Yes, things like that are worse than concerning - they are disgusting.

Sadly, my GM experience is much like that.

It seems the ability to try to get things fixed still starts with both the
competence and the willingness to do what it takes AT THE DEALERSHIP.

In my area, I have two Kia dealers (actually four, though I only have
experience with the two closest ones).  The one has provided every nightmare
you describe and more - in fact, I haven't met a satisfied Kia customer from
them yet.  The other has one of the best records anywhere in the country for
Kia sales, service and satisfaction.  The two are less than 50 miles apart.

What gives?  It seems to all start when you walk in.  The two are as
different as night and day when you walk into them, be it their sales
department, service, parts or restroom.

I don't know if you have the luxury of being betwixt and between Kia dealers
like I am, and maybe your case has gotten a little too infamous in the Kia
system.  I also have no guarantees that your next farther away Kia dealer
would be any better.  But that is where I would start.

And if you lived in a proximity where you could get to this one that has
been SO good to its customers (in central Illinois), I am even in a position
to pre-call them, tell them about you and make SURE you get treated right.

I'm sorry about your problem, though I did note that there was something
about the batteries and the electrical systems in those '02's that were bad.
My battery didn't blow up, but it was hopelessly dead in 16 months.  NO
problem in the '04.

If Kia can't help, maybe the people on this forum can.

Tom Wenndt

> Hi 'Snow"
>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> ... Paul Litwack
> June 2005: Selected one of the 'Top 100 Corporate Coaches in the World'
mdcg - 26 Jul 2005 22:03 GMT
snow:

Run, do not walk, from your Kia dealer. We bought a Sedona ('03 model)
a couple years back and it's been nothing but a headache ever since.
We're trading it in this week on a Honda CR-V (decided to go the cute
ute route). We likely won't get what we owe on it, but we're so
disgusted with the van that we just want it out of our hair.

Within 6K miles of buying it, we lost the A/C compressor, the
serpentine belt and a pulley of some sort, and it sat in the shop for
nearly two weeks while parts were ordered, repairs made. A few months
later, an inner tie rod end wore so badly it chewed up the front tires.
It was replaced and (supposedly) aligned. But a few thousand miles into
the new tires, the car had worked itself so badly out of alignment it
chewed up another set (no, we didn't hit any curbs, potholes, etc.--my
wife drives it gently and mostly on highways).

My wife's also experienced a few episodes of sudden acceleration with
the car in reverse. After the first time, she was careful to make a
mental note of where her foot was the next time it happened. When it
did, she's certain her foot was on the brake as the car bolted
rearward. Luckily, she didn't hit anything. The Kia dealer, of course,
won't believe anything we say unless their mechanic experiences the
problem first-hand. Good luck on that.

Now, something under the hood's squeaking again with the A/C running.
Probably on the verge of losing another compressor or pulley. This
time, it's going to be gone before it strands us on the side of the
road again.

Bottom line: You really do get what you pay for. Yeah, we were
impressed with all the standard features and long warranty you get for
less than 20K. But now we're regretting going the cheap route. The
Sedona's convinced us to make reliability the number one consideration
in our next purchase, which is why we're going with Honda. Between
Honda and Toyota, you can't get a more reliable car, by all accounts
we've heard.

Do yourself a favor and stay away from the Sedona.

mdcg

> I am leaning towards purchasing a
> Kia Sedona thanks to the current rebate
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> properly. Is the Kia capable of this? Any opinions appreciated since thre is
> not much information on the internet on Kia long term reliability issues.
BudE - 05 Oct 2005 18:14 GMT
 You've got that right!  You get what you pay for.  The KIAs need constant
repair and their service dept is abominable.

Bud

> snow:
>
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>> is
>> not much information on the internet on Kia long term reliability issues.
plitwack - 12 Oct 2005 04:47 GMT
Hi all - recall my earlier posts about the hydrogen bomb under the hood
last September.

Here is the update:

Kia Canada forced us to go to arbitration using CAMVAP (no lemon laws
here). At the hearing, Kia admitted negligence in not cleaning the
battery acid properly and even then only 27 hours after the explosion.
And they couldn't answer the question "If your Kia diagnostic equipment
cannot find the source of these electical issues, does that mean they
cannot be happening?" Recall we have lots of Affidavits (sworn legal
testemonies by dozens of passengers in the car when they DID occur).

The Arbitrator ordered an inspection by an independant, very
professional mechanic - when he returned the car after a two day check,
he admitted he had found 4 serious 'ghosts' and he himself felt unsafe
driving the car. He also noted the air bag light was on, making the air
bag system inoperable - a serious safety risk. My wife jokes: KIA =
Killed In Action.

Now here's the rub. That same air bag light has been reset multiple
times in this car since day 1, and most recently the arbitrator noticed
it himself when he test drove the car after the hearing.

He questioned the Kia mechanic (yes the same one who 'discovered' the
battery acid 8 months after the explosion) and was told he didn't have
the authority to fix it. Excuse me! the other 3 Kia people at the
hearing did have the authority. Except back in June when we had the
battery shelf repainted these same people PREVENTED the Kia dealer from
fixing the air bag problem while it was in their Kia garage.

Next time you think about Kia servicing your car and their interest in
passenger safety, remember us ;-)

We are now waiting for the arbitration ruling, hopefully in our favour.

> You've got that right!  You get what you pay for.  The KIAs need constant
> repair and their service dept is abominable.
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> >> is
> >> not much information on the internet on Kia long term reliability issues.
Elmer Fudd - 26 Feb 2006 04:26 GMT
Greetings,
    I have many things to say about my '02 sedona.  I may have dumped it if
the warranty was not intact.  A lot of peoples "issues" are caused by
inadequate auto technicians who are in their position to fill an empty
spot and have no knowledge.  I originally purchased our van in Maryland
and can say, those folks didn't know a screw from a bolt.  We had to
take our van in continuously for the same problem until they had
replaced every piece related to the problem.  When we moved to Georgia
we got a good dealer.  Now, when we take our van to the shop it is fixed
right every time.  Here is a list of the items we have had go wrong with
our van.  Subsequently, these items were replaced.

Cruise control (module, switch and the main control buttons on the
steering wheel)
Alternator
Multitude of sensors (Oxygen flow, TP sensor... Among about 5 others)
Wiper motor and chain
Inside door wire (that opens the door from the inside)
One headlight (expensive light mind you.)

I must point out that no major mechanical problems have occurred with
the van, most of these items fail on any vehicle around the same time
(with the exception of the alternator.)  If I had a choice, and the
price were equal, I would probably purchase a Toyota or Honda though.

> I am leaning towards purchasing a
> Kia Sedona thanks to the current rebate
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> properly. Is the Kia capable of this? Any opinions appreciated since thre is
> not much information on the internet on Kia long term reliability issues.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.