I was looking around at some car repo and salvage lots and saw a
2003 Kia Optima for $2000. It had a fair amount of body damage
from a side impact, but it was 100% sheetmetal. I figure $6K
in total damage - but mostly, it's both doors and a front fender
to replace outright plus some tweaking the car into shape.
Pretty easy DIYer job to fix, actually. Not as in - gosh - it
looks like new, but funcitonal and runs down the road. Repainting
won't even happen - no point.
5K miles on it. As you can imagine, a salvage title. Still,
a car with 5K on it that drives okay for $2K...
So - the question is, it seems like a good car to beat up and
drive into the ground, being nearly new, but I know it's no
Toyota or even GM.
So...
About the warranty. I know if the original buyer sells it
that all coverages drop to half. Q: is the drivetrain warranty
still in effect? It is only 6 months old, afterall.
My hope is that it would have couple of years left on it and that
I can keep the engine running with it for cheap. The rest of the
car - it's a beater a far as I'm concerned, so as long as the
rear axle doesn't shear off or something silly, it's okay.
schucha@rcn.com - 10 Sep 2003 13:21 GMT
"salvage title" = no warranty
>I was looking around at some car repo and salvage lots and saw a
>2003 Kia Optima for $2000. It had a fair amount of body damage
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>car - it's a beater a far as I'm concerned, so as long as the
>rear axle doesn't shear off or something silly, it's okay.
Joseph Oberlander - 10 Sep 2003 21:43 GMT
> "salvage title" = no warranty
Thanks. Have to pass, then, as KIAs are nice mostly
because of that warranty.
I did look at the Sephia a while back and drove one
and it reminded me eerrily of my old 1984 Buick Regal.
Same construction, same suspension designs, same sort
of okay acceleration. About the same price, too.
Unfortunately, the same reliability. That is, good,
but you will require that warranty every so often.
My Buick wasn't a bad car, actually. But compared to
today's Toyotas and such, yeah - it would lag behind
a bit.
OTOH, a ten year warranty is useful and mitigates most
of the ills of the design. They are what they are - cheap,
affordable, basic transportation that is guaranteed for
a large number of miles.
Bill Pitz - 11 Sep 2003 05:59 GMT
> OTOH, a ten year warranty is useful and mitigates most
> of the ills of the design. They are what they are - cheap,
> affordable, basic transportation that is guaranteed for
> a large number of miles.
Well, that's somewhat misleading. The 10/100 warranty a.)
only applies to the first owner (5/50 for second owner) and
b.) only covers the powertrain. This does not include a lot
of things that frequently go wrong, and is something that
should be considered.
Still, if you need a cheap car, it's a good buy..
Joseph Oberlander - 11 Sep 2003 08:36 GMT
>>OTOH, a ten year warranty is useful and mitigates most
>>of the ills of the design. They are what they are - cheap,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Still, if you need a cheap car, it's a good buy..
I know this. Also, if you want the warranty when you buy the
car, you have to waive all rights to sue them or apply for
lemon law coverage.
Technically, you can refuse to sign the warranty coverage
waiver and they can't do anything about it, but it's a
miserable catch-22 since the car will eventually break down.
(learned this today - go figure)
Im Right - 11 Sep 2003 14:49 GMT
It is DOUTFUL that any major issues will arise with the drivetrain that is
maintained.
Buy it, fix it, drive it with pride , but service it and you will be far
ahead $$ wise.
: I was looking around at some car repo and salvage lots and saw a
: 2003 Kia Optima for $2000. It had a fair amount of body damage
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
: car - it's a beater a far as I'm concerned, so as long as the
: rear axle doesn't shear off or something silly, it's okay.